Asians. OC. will CURE STIGMA l' Llil china fall CURE STUMP Asians OC will CURE STIGMA l' Llil china fall STUMP
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (123)
[ 123 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#91 - anon id: 4efd6433
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [+] (12 replies)
stickied by lulzdealer
America has been getting it's ass kicked by filthy under-equipped guerilla insurgents.

Them fighting a powerful opponent with a similar level of tech and curb-stomping them?

Also plz explain how America "curbstomps" China without this going Nuclear? Pretty sure China could just starve you economically anyway.
#97 to #91 - itsbendingtime
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
China and the US are in a symbiotic relationship.
China cannot kill the US economy without killing their own, similarly, the US economy would tank overnight if they lost access to cheap chinese labour and chinese started seizing all US assets on their soil.
The reason for the US paying more attention to the Pacific now is that China is slowly restructuring so that they can survive without the US if they have to.
The US wants so have a firm foothold in the Asia Pacific region before this happens, because if they don't then there would be nothing to stop Chinese aggression and expansionism in the area.
#109 to #97 - mendelevium
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Bitch just because you see "Made in china" on a toy in Toys are us does not mean we rely on them economically, most of it is Taiwanese now anyways, Its estimated only 5% of our daily bought items are from china now.

Everything else I agree with though.
#103 to #91 - anon id: 4ef342ad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
A war between America and China could never happen. Both of them depend on each other hugely in an economic sense; if one of them suddenly turned into a smoking crater (which is the only way a war between them would end) the remaining nation would be ******.
#104 to #91 - anon id: 9cbe59ce
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Clearly you haven't done any training with the Chinese army. It's more laughable than watching kids karate.
#112 to #91 - anon id: 9cbe59ce
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
35,000 Taliban deaths v.s 5,000 Coalition ...

Yeah I'm sure they're kicking our asses.
#99 to #91 - kmichel
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
It would be a much different outcome if the US were actually trying as hard as it could to defeat their enemy (still without using nukes though).
#108 to #91 - mendelevium
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
>Pretty sure China could just starve you economically anyway.

Are you ******* kidding me?
You clearly have no idea how much we produce over here, let alone how much china NEEDS our money from buying there ****** toys, economics would shoot through the roof like a ******* 12 year olds erection while watching sailor moon. We only buy from them because they are cheaper, but a 95% of everything is produced in every other place then china in america.

China also produces just BARELY enough food for everyone, and not everyone gets all of it. America would not just economically starve them, but literately.

Why do you think they haven't dropped the hammer on us because we haven't paid back our 15 trillion dollar debt?
They know who calls the shots.
User avatar #93 to #91 - lulzdealer [OP]
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
>America has been getting it's ass kicked by filthy under-equipped guerilla insurgents.

False. The insurgents have gotten their **** wrecked in every straight up firefight thus far. Literally the only thing they can do to delay (not stop, delay) US forces is plant IEDs and take occasional potshots.

>Them fighting a powerful opponent with a similar level of tech and curb-stomping them?

As has been said, China's army may be ********, but it lacks just about any ability to move that force anywhere. Whereas the US forces are practically built around force projection.

Nevermind the fact that our Navy is bigger than the navys of every other nation combined. Nevermind the fact that our Naval Air-Force is bigger than their air force.

>Also plz explain how America "curbstomps" China without this going Nuclear? Pretty sure China could just starve you economically anyway.

It's all hypothetical. China has been bitching again about Japan's injustices, and the US sent a friendly reminder that Japan is under our protection (sort of).

#96 to #93 - anon id: 4efd6433
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
What does it matter if China isn't built for "force projection"? Under this scenario America is the aggressor anyway. All China has to do is defend.
User avatar #119 to #93 - edgecutter
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/28/2014) [-]
Correct me if I'm wrong.

But didn't the Americans get their ass handed to them on a bamboo plate in Vietnam?

I'm pretty sure the Vietnamese had nowhere near the level of tech the Americans had available to them back then. Then again, this is becoming more and more history and apparently outdated facts to use in arguments such as the one you are referring to.
User avatar #120 to #119 - lulzdealer [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/28/2014) [-]
No, the VC also got their **** wrecked in every straight up fight. We could've stormed North Vietnam, adopted a scorched earth policy, and mopped the floor those commie sons of bitches. But politics, and bleeding heart liberals back home basically forced the US military to into a stalemate.

tldr; we were winning, but then hippies happened.
User avatar #121 to #120 - edgecutter
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/28/2014) [-]
I am by no means an expert BUT....

The VC weren't having straight up fights. Guerrilla warfare is all about not having straight up fights. In fact, when the Americans were dropping in these listening devices along the Saigon trail, the VC got their ass kicked at first, but after a while they managed to detect these listening devices, dismantle them and use the batteries inside said devices for their own radios. In short, it's an example of how the VC used American resources against the Americans themselves.

The scorched earth tactic was tried, and yes, politics and hippies got in the way.
Even if the hippies didn't get in the way, other countries would heavily disagree. Though, if I remember correctly, even the American Napalm strikes did more harm to them than good, in the sense that they hit more civilians than they hit the enemy. Because of this, it renders the tactic terribly inefficient and only gives the enemy propaganda ammo, which they fully used.

I'm not trying to make you angry, or start a flamewar (excuse the terribly distasteful pun), not by a long shot. But there is more to war than military tactics and fighting. The fighting is a small part of it. To paraphrase Sun Tzu, war is the gravest form of politics. Meaning that propaganda plays a huge role too.
#1 - newdevyx
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/15/2014) [-]
Since when has china wanted to attack Japan?
Since when has china wanted to attack Japan?
User avatar #24 to #1 - jimmytwoshoes
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
dat ******* E 100...
User avatar #10 to #1 - drakevil
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Hm, let me see...

It's 1:12am here, take the time zone, day 16, month of may, 2014...

So let make some calculations... Hmmmm...

Yeah, since ever...
#21 to #1 - unknovne
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
nanjing massacre, you know when japanese officers had the "who can chop a 100 civilian heads of the fastest race" or the "how long can does it take for 10 scholars in a hole to sufficate experiment" and not to forget the rape everyone in sight sunday, force a man to rape his own daughter monday and wacky wednesday in which we storm a university and hack and slash at everyone we meet.

TlR japanese festivals are brutal.
User avatar #49 to #1 - removekimchi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Since forever
#2 to #1 - joshthepoet
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/15/2014) [-]
since they found out your mom was living there
#4 to #1 - lulzdealer [OP]
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(05/15/2014) [-]
Since ever. China and Japan have hated each other for quite a while now.
#101 to #4 - kmichel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
It doesn't help that he Chinese government spreads the lie that Japan has never apologized for its actions in China. China also stirs up feelings against Japan to manipulate its people.
#5 to #1 - letrollzor
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(05/15/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #6 to #1 - mightypoggers
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(05/15/2014) [-]
One of the main reasons they hate eachother in todays world is because of recent disputes over control of some islands.
#13 to #1 - funnyjunkelite
Reply +41 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Both countries have been attacking each other since beginning of time, Japan did some crazy ****, China gets pissed, China did some crazy ****, Japan gets pissed. Japan kept doing crazy ****, Koreans get pissed. Japan just wouldn't stop doing crazy ****, entire continent is pissed. Japan still went ******* on ****, US gets pissed. US finally ends Japan doing crazy **** with treaties and ****. China becomes commie, North Koreans become commie also. Japan and China go ******* about little islands. Both still pissed about each others crazy ******* past. Japan can't attack since they're bonded with treaty about attacking after they've been attacked. US has to come and shake its anti-commie stick. South Korea too busy with retarded commie sister to get involved.   
TL;DR since ever, along with several other countries
Both countries have been attacking each other since beginning of time, Japan did some crazy ****, China gets pissed, China did some crazy ****, Japan gets pissed. Japan kept doing crazy ****, Koreans get pissed. Japan just wouldn't stop doing crazy ****, entire continent is pissed. Japan still went ******* on ****, US gets pissed. US finally ends Japan doing crazy **** with treaties and ****. China becomes commie, North Koreans become commie also. Japan and China go ******* about little islands. Both still pissed about each others crazy ******* past. Japan can't attack since they're bonded with treaty about attacking after they've been attacked. US has to come and shake its anti-commie stick. South Korea too busy with retarded commie sister to get involved.
TL;DR since ever, along with several other countries
#20 to #13 - brassydolphin
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
>retarded commie sister
User avatar #19 to #13 - alfibrakiz
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
comment of the day. thanks for the laugh
#25 to #13 - anon id: 1f4f2aa8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
US gets pissed. US finally ends Japan doing crazy **** by dropping nukes on them.

-Fixed it for you.
#26 to #25 - anon id: 1f4f2aa8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
The Japs are so crazy the only way to stop them doing crazy **** was to nuclurize them. HerpDerp.
User avatar #7 to #1 - ninjagaiden
Reply +125 123456789123345869
(05/15/2014) [-]
Read a history book.

Japan is the asshole of history.
#8 to #7 - jakatackka
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Hence the flag.
#15 to #8 - anon id: 25ebe41b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
goatse
#27 to #7 - ripgeckosncherios
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
I was under the impression most people would agree Germany's history is the least flattering
User avatar #29 to #27 - huszti
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
cut us some slack. we had to put up with france for centuries.
#30 to #29 - ripgeckosncherios
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
well yeah they were pretty mean bullies, especially with Napoleon. Only fair to take revenge?
User avatar #31 to #27 - ninjagaiden
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
You have to dig deeper.
User avatar #69 to #7 - reginleif
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
All Island nations are the assholes of history. :/ Low resources tend to make aggressive assholes.

Better include frozen nation, oh and desert nations.

Guise, I found the way to world peace, let's all move to brazil.
#78 to #69 - EdwardNigma
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
>Tfw Australia has high resources and minds it's own business.
We are the exception.
#80 to #78 - anon id: bd1ce733
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
OOOOR, it's because you can't fight both other people and the giant spider lizards that roam free around the place.
User avatar #82 to #80 - EdwardNigma
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
You uneducated bastard, we don't fight giant spider lizards. We tame them and use them as war machines against the terrors that rise up from the ocean every year to take us back to the briny deep.
#63 to #7 - janosaudron
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
I wouldn't say asshole of history. They've just been bred to fight since the founding of the country. Once the Sengoku Jidai ended they just needed to find someone to fight other than themselves
#12 - shadowrated
Reply +28 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
User avatar #37 - mrnaanbread
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
I think China's more powerful than America isn't it?
User avatar #50 to #37 - yunoknow
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
China can easily destroy the US economy with the amount of debt owed to them, but the world can't allow the US to crumble. So this whole situation is pretty much balancing on China's patience with US dominance.
#89 to #50 - repostsrepost
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
That's a double edged sword. Without the treasury bonds that they buy, the Yuan will appreciate greatly to the levels it should be at which will cause the price of Chinese Exports to rise and since the Chinese economy is at the economic development South Korea was at in the 60s where it relies primarily on cheap exports, the Chinese economy would not survive. And China doesn't even own a majority of US debt, although they are the biggest foreign holder.
User avatar #74 to #50 - reginleif
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Why'd you thumb him down, he's right. China could do some serious economic damage to the world, but the brilliant part is they'd damage themselves too. By calling in their debts there would stop there immense growth, and they have a large population that's built on overthrowing their government.

Ladies and gentlemen, we are in possession of a debt bomb.
User avatar #52 to #37 - nigeltheoutlaw
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
They have an insane amount of available troops that they could throw at an enemy, like the Soviets, but quantity does not mean quality. Our troops are overall better trained, better supplied, better armed, and have higher tech equipment than the Chinese soldiers. So, no.
#59 to #52 - widar
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
"Quantity has a quality all of its own" - Zhukov
#61 to #59 - janosaudron
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
That obviously didnt help russia against finland
User avatar #81 to #59 - willindor
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Didn't Stalin say that?
User avatar #62 to #59 - nigeltheoutlaw
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
True, but they can't effectively move those troops, and they do jack **** in terms of naval, air, or armor capabilities.
#60 to #37 - itsasecrettoyou
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Because most of these other people replying to you have no idea what they are talking about let me help you out

China does have the largest standing army in the world, but it is a defensive force. They have little to nothing in the way of force projection capabilities (I.E. the ability to move troops and wave your dick around in foreign nations.) This is due to most of their military actions having been dealing with domestic issues,

America's military on the other hand is practically built on force projection, as we have never had to fight a war on our own soil. Our navy is stronger then the combined forces of every other navy on the planet, and our navy's air units alone outnumber and outclass the entirety of China's air capabilities.

So in conclusion, China may have a larger army, but most of their gear is a sub-par knock off of a European or American design. Furthermore, any fight between the US and China would likely be done through proxy wars or in China's territory, as they have no way to get troops across either ocean due to our complete air and naval superiority.

However, that would never come to pass as we are now in the nuclear age. If it ever came to point where troops were marching on Beijing/Washington D.C. the losing side would start tossing nukes and the whole world would die.
#83 to #60 - willindor
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Last time the US and China had a war it didn't end well.
User avatar #113 to #60 - mrnaanbread
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Ah okay, well that's the kind of reply I was hoping for; friendly and informative. I guess I pissed a few people off.
#100 to #60 - kmichel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Don't forget that China's military is also largely untested. Before they go into a major conflict, they'll want to test their weapons and strategies on countries they know they can defeat.
User avatar #38 to #37 - bendingtimeisgood
Reply +24 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
That's not what our insane military budget says.
#40 to #38 - anon id: 5bf51ba5
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
China does have the largest military in the world.
User avatar #41 to #40 - trojandetected
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
I believe you mean NORTH KOREA
Do i please you admin?
#48 to #40 - lave
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Hap tot burst it, US does not by much though. but we still do sheer numbers, around 60% of our population is either a soldier or cop.
User avatar #47 to #40 - tazzerz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Quality>Quantity

Just because there is a lot of them doesn't mean they are all as well equipped per soldier, e.g In my country (Ireland) Our basic Private soldier in the Irish Army would be classified as a form of Special Forces in America because each one is basic trained with (Weapons wise, not including other specializations like Riot Training, Art of concealment Etc.) A Rifle, a GPMG, a Handgun, Grenades, and most Emplacement Weapons, from there they can take a M203/320 training, Marksman training, Advanced First Aid, Anti-Tank/Air, Explosives, Repair and Maintenance and so on, and still be just a Private soldier, which means in a Fire team/Section of 5/9 soldiers, they could all be trained in every one of the above topics, which means any of them could take on the role if another is wounded or killed in a fight and so on. Then if the wanted they can specialize into lets say a Sniper, or a full on Medic, dedicated Driver, ARW(Special Forces), Etc. The only reason we can achieve this is because we are a small country and don't have a massive Army like the others, it would not work otherwise.
User avatar #54 to #47 - hybredmoon
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Ummm, no, sorry but your soldiers would most definitely not be classified as special forces in the U.S.. Every soldier in the US Army receives training similar to what you just described. That's the BASIC part of basic training.

The goal of training in the US Army is such that every single uniformed member is a fighting force. The training is broken down into Basic and AIT. Basic is where you learn to be a soldier. AIT is where you learn your specialization beyond that. Sounds like your private soldiers would qualify to be American soldiers, but certainly not SF.
User avatar #57 to #54 - tazzerz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Special Forces was the wrong word, yeah , but I cant remember the one that the Retired Sargent I was talking to said. (He was over to our country for US 6-7 times and was good friends with some of the Officers in the barracks I met him at) He said something like Specialist, But what I had typed up there was pretty much word for word of what he said to me, so I'm confused now. The point still stands though China may have Quantity, but there is no way in hell they could keep up the same amount of Quality per soldier that other countries have.
User avatar #58 to #57 - snakesniper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Well, both of you are forgetting, the US has different branches each differently trained, like the Marines are currently the most disciplined, and highly trained branch we have, Not including special forces the US army is just don't get me started about the pussy **** they go through, it just saddens me to hear what I went through, is actually being compared to what they do.
User avatar #67 to #58 - tazzerz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Man, don't worry about that, I know about the Marines, and there training, serious stuff, great stuff. This guy was on about the US Army, Though he didn't say which he was from.
User avatar #70 to #67 - snakesniper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
I won't, in fact my brother in law is in the army, and every time I see him he wants to fight, and every time after I say ok he worms his way out of it, I find it rather hilarious, and didn't we have a conversation similar to this?
User avatar #116 to #70 - snakesniper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
I think, I just remember us starting a giant flame war.
User avatar #95 to #70 - tazzerz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Oh yeah! We did, about the no soldiers getting killed in march thing.
User avatar #68 to #67 - tazzerz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
*Their training
#42 to #40 - galgawine
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Americas is more sophisticated with better technology I believe, even with less manpower. Have to be spending those billions on something every year, right?
Americas is more sophisticated with better technology I believe, even with less manpower. Have to be spending those billions on something every year, right?
User avatar #122 to #42 - eratonysiad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/10/2014) [-]
Yes, like increasing debt.
User avatar #43 to #42 - guiguito
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
You have to consider that all it takes to kill a person is one shot, but still from past experiences with large armies against diciplined ones we can guess how it would play out.
User avatar #45 to #43 - galgawine
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Drones, tanks, planes... pretty sure America has more quantity and quality there.
#44 to #43 - anon id: 9b23d0f0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
that only applies in a land war. On the water, technological superiority and training is everything. And there's kind of a really big wet place between China and America
User avatar #46 to #44 - guiguito
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Even brazil got one of the most powerfull dreadnaughts with a crew complement of monkeys, so chine won't be far behinde, especially with child labor to make a **** load of cheap ships to ram american ones.
User avatar #53 to #38 - herecomesjohnny
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
all china has to do is demand america to pay its debts for the budget to let go of military
#90 to #53 - repostsrepost
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
That's not how debt works. You can't just say pay everything now, it's based on structured payments that are codified in contracts over a period of years. Nobody will see a move like that as legitimate.
#55 to #53 - anon id: e56ce6ba
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
All the United States has to say is no, or call upon all the debts everyone else owes us.
User avatar #56 to #55 - herecomesjohnny
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
if the U.S violates international law by bullying, the whole world turns against them, every defense treaty they have with other countries won't get renewed out of distrust, and all their military bases start packing.
User avatar #71 to #56 - reginleif
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Eh no they won't because you forget that America doesn't get military treaties by having countries LIKE them, they get them because other nations are bigger assholes.

Case in point the Phillipines, they were asses to the US, kicked the US out of the country a short while later they come running back on account of China *********** them out of Islands.

NATO is there not cause ****** ass countries like estonia likes us but because they fear the Russians and we don't want the Soviet Union. As of right now other nations are considering NATO membership and current NATO nations want MORE US presence in their country.

If China becomes an asshole we'll suffer, but we won't go down millitarywise.
User avatar #72 to #71 - herecomesjohnny
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
The US taking what it wants without answering for it is the equivalent of being the bigger asshole.
User avatar #73 to #72 - reginleif
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Because clearly that's being represented right now with China claiming an entire sea, and Russia annexing foreign countries.

Don't be ignorant. The US works by puppet governments not land grabs.
User avatar #75 to #73 - herecomesjohnny
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
the US refusing to pay its foreign debt would clearly be a violation on par with military ****. The country would face charges in face of international law all the same
User avatar #76 to #75 - reginleif
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
In a situation where the US wouldn't pay it's debt there would have to be a huge rift between China and the US where China would call it in.

Now I dunno what you think about international law, but nobody is going to give a **** if the US refuses to pay China on account of China trying to force the US to do something.

User avatar #79 to #76 - herecomesjohnny
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
>no one would give a **** if China, with its autocratic governement that can dictate economical policies on a whim, decides to stop being the US' workshop

don't be ignorant
#105 to #79 - killingoffstars
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Here's something for you, If China calls in the United States' debt to be payed the US would do the same to them because if you don't seem to know how governments work. So at that point the US would, yes, still be in debt to China however it would no longer have one of the worlds largest importers to help pay for anything anymore and the US would get its crap elsewhere, Hell it could start up its own industries again. So like you said "don't be ignorant' politics is one of the most complex things on the planet.
User avatar #106 to #105 - herecomesjohnny
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
US is consumer powerhouse and certainly not an industrial one
#84 to #72 - anon id: 66e49240
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
welcome to the world. It revolves around rich americans being the biggest cunts in the universe.
User avatar #64 to #56 - nigeltheoutlaw
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
How is calling in our debts bullying?
User avatar #65 to #64 - herecomesjohnny
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
this was about the 'saying no' part. Also, america owes more than it is owed.
User avatar #66 to #65 - nigeltheoutlaw
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
My mistake there.

Most of our debt is owed to the Federal Reserve, not China.
#3 - letrollzor
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(05/15/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#14 - navien
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
#16 to #14 - anon id: 25ebe41b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
Most of the United State's debt is to itself.
#17 to #16 - navien
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
I know but the U.S will have less debt.
#23 - minekiller
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
User avatar #22 - naitsabesh
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
China is sick of japan's kawaii desu ne ****.
User avatar #107 - nthmetal
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
"Japan if you attack China I will kick the stripes off of you."

Would have been a better line.
#111 to #107 - lulzdealer [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
That is legitimately funny.
User avatar #18 - Fjcf
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/16/2014) [-]
South Park How Chinese People view to the Japanese East asian diversity.
[ 123 comments ]
Leave a comment