(untitled). . I Bytes " Life tst' tting Hun! Meatie,. wondertrade that
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#9 - grimidim (07/20/2014) [-]
wondertrade that 			******
wondertrade that ******
User avatar #42 to #9 - fakefalsofake (07/20/2014) [-]
Source from gif : youtu.be/hE4jzRmncRA?t=1m18s
Yes, it's from Brazil hue
User avatar #15 to #9 - greenwithenvy (07/20/2014) [-]
I'm imagining some fed-ex facility that specializes in baby wonder trades...
#1 - necroshredder ONLINE (07/19/2014) [-]
I'll show you whose gentle around here
#7 - Snuffulupicus (07/20/2014) [-]
I feel I should leave this here
User avatar #10 to #7 - dsendz (07/20/2014) [-]
#11 to #10 - speakingfrankly (07/20/2014) [-]
It's from an amazing movie called gattaca, the main character is considered to be less of a perfect human compared to those who have been genetically modified
11/10 going to go re watch that movie
It's probably not that good of a movie I just remember it being good
User avatar #13 to #11 - ninjaroo (07/20/2014) [-]
I also remember it being good.
#14 to #13 - speakingfrankly (07/20/2014) [-]
Good to know i'm not alone then
#41 to #14 - ripgeckosncherios (07/20/2014) [-]
I watched it just 2 months ago for the first time and I have to say it was amazing
User avatar #38 to #7 - goobyman ONLINE (07/20/2014) [-]
we watched that in ethics class, we had a cool discussion if it should be ethical. nice movie.
User avatar #34 - sqman (07/20/2014) [-]
I always thought gentle was good for babies. They have shallow movepool with poor coverage so they can't really utilize their attacking stats. Sice they are already physically frail and have decent special defense I always use them as special wall with substitute and toxic. They can stall most of heavy hitting special attackers in NU and do well in RU. I don't understand why anyone would want to use a baby for anything else.
#37 to #34 - comradewinter ONLINE (07/20/2014) [-]
Yeah, but it sucks when they decide to grow up.
#40 - badjokepony (07/20/2014) [-]
I miss my umbilical cord.
I grew attached to it.
User avatar #44 to #40 - notnewaccount (07/20/2014) [-]
I've spent more time with my ex-gf and I don't miss her.
#46 to #40 - hashtronaut (07/20/2014) [-]
Look, i'm going to address all these recent "bad joke" things, then go back to just scrolling past you all without even reading them like usual.   
I'm not going to give them any thumbs one way or another...but, look -   
there's already going to be plenty of bad jokes in the comments, it's FJ - you don't need to TRY to put a bad joke.   
Not that this psa is going to change anything...			***********		 enjoy being 			***********		. but, yeah, you're kind of throwing water in the ocean here.
Look, i'm going to address all these recent "bad joke" things, then go back to just scrolling past you all without even reading them like usual.

I'm not going to give them any thumbs one way or another...but, look -

there's already going to be plenty of bad jokes in the comments, it's FJ - you don't need to TRY to put a bad joke.

Not that this psa is going to change anything... *********** enjoy being *********** . but, yeah, you're kind of throwing water in the ocean here.
User avatar #47 to #46 - sociocat (07/20/2014) [-]
you got it wrong
he is posting GOOD jokes not bad ones like the rest of fj
User avatar #48 to #47 - hashtronaut (07/20/2014) [-]
User avatar #49 to #48 - sociocat (07/20/2014) [-]
its not like its posting jokes that nobody gets or jokes that are offensive
its puns
he is posting puns and people love puns
User avatar #50 to #49 - hashtronaut (07/20/2014) [-]
User avatar #51 to #50 - sociocat (07/20/2014) [-]
now your just a bad troll
User avatar #52 to #51 - hashtronaut (07/20/2014) [-]
Lol. I just have no desire to argue it with you. I already put my 2 cents in my first comment.
User avatar #53 to #52 - sociocat (07/20/2014) [-]
its mainly because its not really *********** if the jokes are funny and not repetative
i havent seen the user use the same joke once
User avatar #54 to #53 - hashtronaut (07/20/2014) [-]
#29 - thesecretbear (07/20/2014) [-]
I can't grow attached to my pokemon like I used to unless they have perfect IV and nature anymore.
User avatar #31 to #29 - iamgoliath (07/20/2014) [-]
But there's nothing more satisfying than getting your favorite pokemon with competitive IVs and Nature and all that.
User avatar #32 to #31 - thesecretbear (07/20/2014) [-]
Yeah, i just hate it when i use one for so long and almost get attached and them i'm like. Oh wait! I cant use you to fight other people with or I will shame myself!
#16 - RedJoker ONLINE (07/20/2014) [-]
I feel that Iv's and newer forms on competitive battling/training is ruining/will ruin Pokemon
User avatar #17 to #16 - zerosonaku (07/20/2014) [-]
....IV breeding has been a part of the competitive pokemon scene since the beginning dude. there is literally nothing new about the training and Battling in pokemon other than the fact that it is more difficult to cheat in X&Y to get perfect IV/shiny Pokemon, with lvl/moves wanted or needed to fight competitively. It took me two weeks to put together a team in X&Y after release. whereas in gen 4 and 5 I could literally hack in a pokemon with the IV's, EV's, and Moves that I wanted for competitive play in less than a minute. it's a little easier to build a team in X&Y now because I have a box of dittos I ported forward using pokemon bank, and porting certain legendaries and event pokemon have helped immensely.

tl;dr: you have no idea what your talking about, the training and breeding system has never been more viable.
User avatar #43 to #17 - zomaru ONLINE (07/20/2014) [-]
He means it's no longer the carefree casual game, but it has been taken over and morphed into a game where all one seems to care about is shines and Stats. Back in the days of Ruby no one cared about the nature or whatnot, all they cared about was 'which one of the many legendaries do I use my masterball on?'
User avatar #55 to #43 - zerosonaku (07/20/2014) [-]
Dude. No. Ruby was still a competitive game. there were tournaments, people cared about IVs, at the very least Natures. It's still a casual game IF you want it to be a casual game. play with close friends who aren't douchenozzles, play ingame as much as you want.

I rarely care about stats, I could care even less about shinyness, all I care about is making a team with my favourite pokemon at the forefront. my Absol that I have had since Ruby has been on my team for every, single, generation. Is it shiny? yes. does it have perfect IV's? **** no. hell even it's Nature isn't that favorable. it's nature is lonely. Does it have all the best moves it COULD learn? No. Is it my current Mega? Yes, even though it is a subpar Mega, and there are much better options. I COULD breed her to get an Absol that is much better, but **** that, My Hyoshi is my favourite and I will use her forever. All I did was do research into what would be the best team to support Absol, and I have been able to hold my own even in tournaments.
User avatar #35 to #17 - enigmaticspirit (07/20/2014) [-]
I know it has been around for almost ever, but I feel like it takes a lot of the fun out of the game. I miss when I was a kid ignorant to the whole thing and just knew I was friends with my pokemon. Now all I can do is stare at the abra I just caught and know it is useless to me because it's adamant nature. It turns it too much into a game of playing calculator until you get the right combination of nature/ivs rather than going on an adventure and fighting with your friends you grew together with.
User avatar #56 to #35 - zerosonaku (07/20/2014) [-]
you could still use that Abbra to play through the game and have fun. I use random pokemon each playthrough of pokemon and still have fun, but when it comes to playing against others I use a team of pokemon I've bred to support my Absol.
User avatar #19 to #17 - RedJoker ONLINE (07/20/2014) [-]
Regardless. You cannot say that you havent seen a drop in quality in Pokemon. These days it dosent really even feel like Pokemon anymore. Back then you could be just as good as a team of random wilds that you catch in the Meta. Now there's lists of what people want and what they dont want and its just ruining the authenticity of it i guess
User avatar #20 to #19 - zerosonaku (07/20/2014) [-]
Are you ******* kidding me? go look at Smogons Tier listing. Go look at OU and TELL ME STRAIGHT that you could use a ******* Raichu in OU. Tell me you could use Beedrill, Clefairy(although now she's a ******* beast), Starryu, or any/all pokemon you could catch in the first three areas of a generation in OU tier for Gen 4 and 5, hell it was like that for even Gen 3. Most pokemon who didn't break the Base stat total of 490 were hard pressed to find a spot in OU. but they did find their spot in UU tier and lower. You COULD use a UU or even RU tier pokemon in OU but it was generally a hindrance. The main reason it seems that the Metagame is stagnant is because we can't hack in pokemon and test them as soon as we get the game. the metagame for gen 5 was pretty much set two months after black and white released. We had a limited pool of pokemon in the first 6 months of X&Y's release, so it was hard to set a metagame, hell the metagame still isn't fully set, we're still testing pokemon viability in OU tier (the tier that almost everyone uses) let alone the other tiers. If you don't like the current Meta do your god damned research into what pokemon you want to use, and use that team. A team is only as good as the person who builds it, plans its use, and knows how to read his opponent.

tl;dr: The quality of pokemon has never been higher for me, the game has never been more authentic than it is now.
#24 to #20 - RedJoker ONLINE (07/20/2014) [-]
Two kinds of people i guess
Two kinds of people i guess
User avatar #23 to #19 - bagguhsleep (07/20/2014) [-]
there's been a list of what people want on their team since gen 1, the only thing that's changed since then is your perception of it
User avatar #25 to #23 - RedJoker ONLINE (07/20/2014) [-]
Yeah but back then the lists were made up of pokemon that people thought were cool or looked powerful. Not because they had broken stats or because if you bred them 50 times youd max out on damage.
User avatar #33 to #25 - VincentKing ONLINE (07/20/2014) [-]
My team in X/Y is made up of pokemon I thought were cool though, not because they are strong. The only one I bred to be strong is my aggron, and he gets defeated easily in battle.
#26 to #25 - bagguhsleep (07/20/2014) [-]
and competitive players like the advent of breeding
it was easier to breed to max **** out than it was to walk in the grass, pray for the rng gods to give you the pokemon you want, and then pray once again and sacrifice your baby sister so that it was good
breeding made it more predictable, and the only people that didn't really mind either way were people that didn't care about competitive play or people that had gameshark/AR

>Not because they had broken stats
#27 to #26 - RedJoker ONLINE (07/20/2014) [-]
I guess i see your point. Im just tired of seeing codfags on my Pokemans
I guess i see your point. Im just tired of seeing codfags on my Pokemans
User avatar #28 to #27 - bagguhsleep (07/20/2014) [-]
they've always been there, it's just more apparent now

it's gonna be okay lil *****
User avatar #30 to #25 - pokemonstheshiz (07/20/2014) [-]
but you can still do that if you want. Competitive battling =/= in game battling.
User avatar #22 to #5 - bagguhsleep (07/20/2014) [-]
The doctor mentions IVs, which are stats that can have a value of 0 - 31. Pokemon have base stats that will give them a stat value of (2 x base stat) + 5 + IV value and then a 1.1 or .9 multiplier depending on nature, but some handsome anon took care of that at level 100. People don't like pokemon with low IVs because they will be weaker than those that have high IVs, given the same base stat and nature.
The problem is that IVs are determined when the egg is received and can't be changed once it's hatched.
#6 to #5 - John Cena (07/20/2014) [-]
In pokemon their stats can be changed by natures.

Natures decrease one stat and increase another.

Gentle, for example increases Special defense and decreases Defence.
It is also **** and unsuitable for bulky teams.

We can assume the baby was meant to be Adamant or Modest
#2 - quicksilveralicorn ONLINE (07/19/2014) [-]
Its probably because the parents didnt use a destiny knot to pass on their IVs.
User avatar #18 to #2 - zerosonaku (07/20/2014) [-]
they also didn't use an everstone either.
#45 to #2 - popnotes (07/20/2014) [-]
"Destiny knot"
#57 to #2 - John Cena (07/25/2014) [-]
Tell me thats not true a "Destiny Knot" dear god that is the dirtest thing I've read
tonight and i'm in the middle of research *pic loosely related
#36 - zerith has deleted their comment [-]
#3 - redzeopoweranger (07/20/2014) [-]
poke explain natures
User avatar #4 to #3 - Lloydles ONLINE (07/20/2014) [-]
Here, I googled it for you.

User avatar #8 to #3 - dariusnigrophallus (07/20/2014) [-]
in short, natures change how a pokemon acts in battle
 Friends (0)