Pikachu
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
72 comments displayed.
#3
-
funpunk (01/01/2016) [-] 
According to one of the history books in Diamond and Pearl, it's canon that humans and Pokemon used to **** . Most people who still play the games know this, but I want to find somebody who hasn't played the newer games and tell them this.
According to one of the history books in Diamond and Pearl, it's canon that humans and Pokemon used to **** . Most people who still play the games know this, but I want to find somebody who hasn't played the newer games and tell them this.
#26 to #3
-
infinitereaper (01/01/2016) [-] I remember doing a lore video talking about that before they did, but the idea isn't new, nice to know it's canon tho
#8 to #5
-
boomerpyro (01/01/2016) [-] >implying the history books in diamond and pearl are written by game theory
#10 to #5
-
thesecretbear (01/01/2016) [-] Actually in the japanese version it is mentioned that pokemon and humans married in a lore book in diamond and pearl.
It's canon, at least in the japanese version.
It's canon, at least in the japanese version.
#40 to #10
-
innocentbabies (01/02/2016) [-]
While I'm not saying it's not true, in fact, I'd say it's more reasonable to believe that it is true it's still possible that the book was more myth than fact in-universe. Like I said though, given how many pokemon exist, and how many can interbreed, I'd say it's definitely plausible, if not likely.
#41 to #40
-
thesecretbear (01/02/2016) [-] Yeah. I believe the books also mentioned something along the lines of people and pokemon being the same at that point as well. So you could take it to mean having a common ancestor. Then again with that vague wording many interpretations are possible.
#30 to #5
-
neostar (01/01/2016) [-] Just because he referenced a gametheory video doesn't mean its a theory. How about you watch the ******* video and see that he references in game text, you dumb **** ?
Hate on GameTheory all you want, but don't go around claiming everything he says in his videos is ******** . Call his theories ******** all you want, but the evidence he uses to make said theories are legit.
Hate on GameTheory all you want, but don't go around claiming everything he says in his videos is ******** . Call his theories ******** all you want, but the evidence he uses to make said theories are legit.
#34 to #30
-
rollfourexplain (01/01/2016) [-]
What really got me upset at mattpatt was how he sometimes presents shaky evidence and then either doesn't present any evidence to the contrary or give reasons for why he might be wrong. The biggest example I can think of right now is his "certain colours have advantages" video. I genuinely could make a compelling argument about why him and his shaky evidence are flawed to the core.
#62 to #38
-
wrpen (01/02/2016) [-] It's called a refutation. In a real argument, you aren't proving your position right, you're proving every other position wrong by presenting each position and explaining why they're wrong. If you are spending more than one statement on your position, you aren't arguing anything, you're just repeating it.
#27 to #5
-
infinitereaper (01/01/2016) [-] they basically rip off other people's ideas and take all the credit
#50 to #29
-
tenaciouslee ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-] I tried to forget about Anthony "Just cuck me up fam" Burch, but you brought back all of the weird **** .
#63 to #60
-
wrpen (01/02/2016) [-]
You need to login to view this link
here ya go, you goddamn disgrace.
#15
-
jaylenthepaintstic (01/01/2016) [-]
Books in Generation 4 (Diamon,Pearl, and Platinum) said that there was a time what pokemon and humans used to be couples. Why they got out of it, we'll never understand.
#21 to #15
-
feelythefeel (01/01/2016) [-] If I remember right, humans are descended from Mew, and are therefore distantly related to Pokemon.
#48 to #47
-
darthdingo (01/02/2016) [-] Not the worst way to die, but I'd just be mindful of it. Or hold her from behind.
#6
-
anon (01/01/2016) [-]
... Please, I just left that dark dark time of my life behind years ago. Do not make me take up that fetish again...
#32
-
billyblooper (01/01/2016) [-] **billyblooper used "*roll 6, pokemon*"**
**billyblooper rolls Cascoon**
**billyblooper rolls Murkrow**
**billyblooper rolls Tangela**
**billyblooper rolls Maractus**
**billyblooper rolls Bisharp**
**billyblooper rolls Raichu**
I''d take them all in
**billyblooper rolls Cascoon**
**billyblooper rolls Murkrow**
**billyblooper rolls Tangela**
**billyblooper rolls Maractus**
**billyblooper rolls Bisharp**
**billyblooper rolls Raichu**
I''d take them all in
#64 to #32
-
binomancha (01/02/2016) [-] **binomancha used "*roll 1, pokemon*"**
**binomancha rolls Weedle**
just need one to rule them all
**binomancha rolls Weedle**
just need one to rule them all
