Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(72):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
72 comments displayed.
#3 - funpunk (01/01/2016) [-]
Game Theory - Humans are Pokemon According to one of the history books in Diamond and Pearl, it's canon that humans and Pokemon used to **** . Most people who still play the games know this, but I want to find somebody who hasn't played the newer games and tell them this.
User avatar #26 to #3 - infinitereaper (01/01/2016) [-]
I remember doing a lore video talking about that before they did, but the idea isn't new, nice to know it's canon tho
User avatar #61 to #26 - warioteam (01/02/2016) [-]
link
User avatar #69 to #61 - infinitereaper (01/02/2016) [-]
Pokémon Lore Episode 2: Poké-Human Connection
vid upload date confirms
#5 to #3 - anon (01/01/2016) [-]
>Game theory
>taking ANYTHING he has to say seriously
This guy is 90% ******** and 10% "facts"
User avatar #9 to #5 - loopzoop (01/01/2016) [-]
"theory"
User avatar #8 to #5 - boomerpyro (01/01/2016) [-]
>implying the history books in diamond and pearl are written by game theory
User avatar #11 to #5 - akkere ONLINE (01/01/2016) [-]
This is something that's actually in the game content explicitly, and not just another one of Game Theory's exaggerated implicit ******** .
User avatar #10 to #5 - thesecretbear (01/01/2016) [-]
Actually in the japanese version it is mentioned that pokemon and humans married in a lore book in diamond and pearl.
It's canon, at least in the japanese version.
#40 to #10 - innocentbabies (01/02/2016) [-]
While I'm not saying it's not true, in fact, I'd say it's more reasonable to believe that it is true it's still possible that the book was more myth than fact in-universe. Like I said though, given how many pokemon exist, and how many can interbreed, I'd say it's definitely plausible, if not likely.
User avatar #41 to #40 - thesecretbear (01/02/2016) [-]
Yeah. I believe the books also mentioned something along the lines of people and pokemon being the same at that point as well. So you could take it to mean having a common ancestor. Then again with that vague wording many interpretations are possible.
User avatar #30 to #5 - neostar (01/01/2016) [-]
Just because he referenced a gametheory video doesn't mean its a theory. How about you watch the ******* video and see that he references in game text, you dumb **** ?

Hate on GameTheory all you want, but don't go around claiming everything he says in his videos is ******** . Call his theories ******** all you want, but the evidence he uses to make said theories are legit.
#34 to #30 - rollfourexplain (01/01/2016) [-]
What really got me upset at mattpatt was how he sometimes presents shaky evidence and then either doesn't present any evidence to the contrary or give reasons for why he might be wrong. The biggest example I can think of right now is his "certain colours have advantages" video. I genuinely could make a compelling argument about why him and his shaky evidence are flawed to the core.
User avatar #38 to #34 - neostar (01/02/2016) [-]
Well of course he wouldn't present evidence as to why he'd be wrong, the whole point of the video is him trying to convince you of his theory.

It'd be like a saleman telling you why you shouldn't buy their product.
User avatar #62 to #38 - wrpen (01/02/2016) [-]
It's called a refutation. In a real argument, you aren't proving your position right, you're proving every other position wrong by presenting each position and explaining why they're wrong. If you are spending more than one statement on your position, you aren't arguing anything, you're just repeating it.
User avatar #71 to #62 - neostar (01/02/2016) [-]
Except his videos aren't an argument. He's trying to convince you of his theory. Like I said before, a salesman trying to sell you on his product doesn't explain why his product is **** .
User avatar #51 to #5 - slayzo (01/02/2016) [-]
The original pokemon gold spoke of human and pokemon marriage fagget
User avatar #27 to #5 - infinitereaper (01/01/2016) [-]
they basically rip off other people's ideas and take all the credit
#4 to #3 - anon (01/01/2016) [-]
Wait what? I played those games and Black and white and didn't know this. Is this canon? That's ******* weird ninty.
#25 to #3 - thehistorylover (01/01/2016) [-]
... That's canon?
How ... in the balls ... ?
#29 to #25 - funpunk (01/01/2016) [-]
Because Japan gives 0 ***** .
User avatar #50 to #29 - tenaciouslee ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-]
I tried to forget about Anthony "Just cuck me up fam" Burch, but you brought back all of the weird **** .
#31 to #29 - thehistorylover (01/01/2016) [-]
I mean, how does one procreate with a pokemon?
#39 to #31 - anon (01/02/2016) [-]
Same way a skitty procreates with a wailord, probably.
User avatar #33 to #31 - funpunk (01/01/2016) [-]
The same way you'd **** a dog, I guess. Hell if I know, some of them are like animals while others are animate objects.
User avatar #35 to #31 - leifbunny (01/01/2016) [-]
The games also imply that humans are just a branch in pokemon's evolutionary tree. It's weird, but.... Japan.
#45 to #31 - jackdynam (01/02/2016) [-]
Egg groups maybe?
#43 to #25 - mrspyder ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-]
**mrspyder used "*roll picture*"**
**mrspyder rolled image**
there are incredibly many pokemon that are really twisted and ****** up.
why wouldnt this be canon?
#59 to #3 - johrny (01/02/2016) [-]
So it is totally legit when i breed for female pokemon and give them cute names like "Cutie" and "Waifu"? I only use cute pokemon like Espeon and Scizor for example, so this is totally not weird
#66 to #59 - funpunk (01/02/2016) [-]
GIF
Never really considered Scizor cute but ok.
#67 to #66 - johrny (01/02/2016) [-]
Well, you dont see the world with my eyes /furry/674536#674536
User avatar #14 to #3 - tyrson (01/01/2016) [-]
Wait, what?
I haven't played anything since 1st gen, so this is new to me.
#18 to #3 - yiffcario (01/01/2016) [-]
Aw **** yiss.
#60 to #18 - johrny (01/02/2016) [-]
Is there, you know, an adult version?
#63 to #60 - wrpen (01/02/2016) [-]
You need to login to view this link here ya go, you goddamn disgrace.
#65 to #63 - johrny (01/02/2016) [-]
Its not female
User avatar #72 to #65 - yiffcario (01/02/2016) [-]
Yeah, it upsets me too.
#70 to #65 - anon (01/02/2016) [-]
Could consider it a trap.
#16 to #3 - captainbalu (01/01/2016) [-]
**captainbalu used "*roll 1, pokemon*"**
**captainbalu rolls Gallade** what pokemon i'd ****
User avatar #44 to #16 - silverrhythm (01/02/2016) [-]
nice..
User avatar #28 to #16 - ZenMacros (01/01/2016) [-]
***** u gay
User avatar #13 to #3 - inuyuru ONLINE (01/01/2016) [-]
Well, at least my porn is validated by canon now.
#12 to #3 - mudkipfucker (01/01/2016) [-]
pokemon rule 34 confirmed canon
User avatar #17 to #12 - selfdestructo (01/01/2016) [-]
We cant tell sperit about this
#42 to #17 - funpunk (01/02/2016) [-]
I think he knows.
User avatar #56 to #17 - stroganoff (01/02/2016) [-]
SPERIT
I SUMMON THEE FROM THE DEPTHS OF HELL
#1 - anon (01/01/2016) [-]
when ************ ****** a mudkip....
User avatar #2 to #1 - zetsuboukamina (01/01/2016) [-]
Too classy to be ************** kid
#15 - jaylenthepaintstic (01/01/2016) [-]
GIF
Books in Generation 4 (Diamon,Pearl, and Platinum) said that there was a time what pokemon and humans used to be couples. Why they got out of it, we'll never understand.
User avatar #21 to #15 - feelythefeel (01/01/2016) [-]
If I remember right, humans are descended from Mew, and are therefore distantly related to Pokemon.
#20 to #15 - yiffcario (01/01/2016) [-]
Plebs not marrying Pokemon.
User avatar #36 to #20 - darthdingo (01/02/2016) [-]
I want to hug it and never let go.
User avatar #47 to #36 - sexyhimself ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-]
Wouldn't you get stabbed by the chest spike?
User avatar #48 to #47 - darthdingo (01/02/2016) [-]
Not the worst way to die, but I'd just be mindful of it. Or hold her from behind.
#6 - anon (01/01/2016) [-]
... Please, I just left that dark dark time of my life behind years ago. Do not make me take up that fetish again...
#22 - anon (01/01/2016) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**
User avatar #57 to #22 - theoneaboveall (01/02/2016) [-]
the image looks weird
#23 to #22 - gmanjohn (01/01/2016) [-]
**gmanjohn used "*roll picture*"**
**gmanjohn rolled image**MRW
#24 to #22 - kristovsky (01/01/2016) [-]
Yes, that is very indeed very nice.
User avatar #49 to #22 - alenkt (01/02/2016) [-]
Holy god
User avatar #32 - billyblooper (01/01/2016) [-]
**billyblooper used "*roll 6, pokemon*"**
**billyblooper rolls Cascoon**
**billyblooper rolls Murkrow**
**billyblooper rolls Tangela**
**billyblooper rolls Maractus**
**billyblooper rolls Bisharp**
**billyblooper rolls Raichu**

I''d take them all in
User avatar #37 to #32 - perishing (01/02/2016) [-]
**perishing used "*roll 6, pokemon*"**
**perishing rolls Wooper**
**perishing rolls Crawdaunt**
**perishing rolls Clefairy**
**perishing rolls Crobat**
**perishing rolls Azumarill**
**perishing rolls Totodile**
#52 to #37 - anon (01/02/2016) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll 6, pokemon*"**
**anonymous rolls Skiploom**
**anonymous rolls Bellsprout**
**anonymous rolls Victini**
**anonymous rolls Golem**
**anonymous rolls Onix**
**anonymous rolls Igglybuff**
#53 to #52 - froglordy (01/02/2016) [-]
**froglordy used "*roll picture*"**
**froglordy rolled image** You people just want to roll gardevoir, or at the very least lowball Meloetta
User avatar #54 to #53 - froglordy (01/02/2016) [-]
**froglordy used "*roll 6, pokemon*"**
**froglordy rolls Dragalge**
**froglordy rolls Volcarona**
**froglordy rolls Dustox**
**froglordy rolls Petilil**
**froglordy rolls Skiploom**
**froglordy rolls Talonflame**
#55 to #54 - froglordy (01/02/2016) [-]
**froglordy used "*roll picture*"**
**froglordy rolled image** It isn't possible to **** any of those pokemon.
User avatar #64 to #32 - binomancha (01/02/2016) [-]
**binomancha used "*roll 1, pokemon*"**
**binomancha rolls Weedle**
just need one to rule them all
#58 - johrny (01/02/2016) [-]
Common Pokemon Breeder knowledge. The female "pokemon" decides the outcome of the offspring. Example: A 10-year old boy and a female Espeon have sex the offspring would be an Eevee.
User avatar #7 - mrkanyeeast (01/01/2016) [-]
Is that Daisy Ridley?

Top Content in 24 Hours

No entries found.
 Friends (0)