Fixing Yesterday's Mistakes. All credit to . L' M TIME MACHINE Bl COMPLETE! I CAN ' i' RETURN TD Tl-[ AT FATEFUL DAV. mom To MAKE‘. A BRING GREAT TIMIE LEADER R Fixing Yesterday's Mistakes All credit to L' M TIME MACHINE Bl COMPLETE! I CAN ' i' RETURN TD Tl-[ AT FATEFUL DAV mom To MAKE‘ A BRING GREAT TIMIE LEADER R
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (326)
[ 326 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#5 - anon id: 010ab7cf
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Oh hell no. **** that. I want a ******* Charizard. Because that is one bad ass ************. I can take a Gyarados or a Victreebel instead of the other two. But not having a Charizard, isn't an option.
#6 to #5 - pineapplepeople
Reply -47 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
What if I told you Moltres is better?
#7 to #6 - kanatana
Reply +86 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
You shut your whore heathen mouth.
You shut your whore heathen mouth.
User avatar #126 to #6 - Marker
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
You can't even get Moltres before beating the 8th Gym.
#10 to #5 - qazymoto
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Well I'm a bug trainer. Beat sapphire and I'm in the 8th gym in fire red.
User avatar #23 to #10 - lucidria
Reply +272 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
All I read was "Well I'm a bug trainer. I like shorts; they're comfortable and easy to wear."
User avatar #223 to #23 - furyofthestorm
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
I don't know why I laughed so hard at that comment.
#372 to #23 - qazymoto
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Post comment, 7 thumbs, post reply 241. Ah 'tis life I guess.
#61 to #10 - BroadSword
Reply +53 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
#1 - bartichello **User deleted account**
+21 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#4 to #1 - anon id: a186f628
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
But it's not the best long-term choice due to a lot more type disadvantages than the other two.
User avatar #39 to #1 - TheBarneyStinson
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
By then he could have a decently trained Caterpie or a Pikachu from Viridian Forest.
User avatar #183 to #1 - huszti
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
well, in my opinion, grass types suck like hell.... they have weaknesses against five types - tied with rock & ground for the most weaknesses. (water has just 2 and fire 3) additionally, seven types have a resistance against grass while it's only effective against 3 types.
#240 to #183 - bartichello **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #264 to #240 - admiralen
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
or you could be multitasking and train a nidoran to get double kick
#266 to #264 - bartichello **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #267 to #266 - admiralen
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
butterfree sucks lategame, nidoran can become nidoking and **** bitches
#268 to #267 - bartichello **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#305 - smeargle
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Anyone else wonder how your rival gets to elite 4 before you..

Yet you beat the **** out of him in every prior battle?
User avatar #299 - thepedomexican
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
but Bulbasaur will easily get you through Brock AND Misty!!
User avatar #310 to #299 - taternutz
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
and surge.
#306 to #299 - iwanttousenumbers
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
I always choose Bulbasaur
I always choose Bulbasaur
#284 - lemonsixx
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
bulbasaur will get you through the first three gyms though.
User avatar #287 to #284 - thekingofengland
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
and die in the remaining 5 and the Elite Fo'
User avatar #291 to #287 - mrmcdubley
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
No.... only bug/fire/dragon elite really problemtaic :D
User avatar #289 to #287 - lemonsixx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
well by then you should have some other pokes to get you through.
User avatar #288 to #284 - mrmcdubley
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Actually, 4 because grass isnt super effective aginst grass :)
User avatar #290 to #288 - lemonsixx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
boom.
#294 to #284 - anonymousbrawler
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
but then Blaine (fire) and sabrine (psychic) and Lorelei (ice) will give you some trouble, I like venusaur a lot, but i'd have to go with squirtle if you want the easiest time,LT surge isnt a problem when you can capture dugtrios in digglet's cave, right beside vermillion
User avatar #296 to #294 - lickilicky
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
But after the first three, you can catch enough pokemon for type diversity to fit any problem you have.
#318 to #294 - anon id: db42c95d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Good sir if you go through the whole game with only one pokemon, you are doing it wrong.
#327 to #318 - anonymousbrawler
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
no, if you beat the game with only one pokemon without it ever fainting you are a winner, its takes skills (and grinding) to do that tough
#168 - daniboyi
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Or get Bulbasaur and be super effective against the two first gyms?
No? Just me doing that?
User avatar #204 to #168 - whycanticaps
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
I used him too for that reason
#207 to #204 - daniboyi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #216 to #168 - LegititmateKyle
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
I like all 3 starters, so after getting all 3 games I was okay. well for the most part, because one made me have that damn pikachu.
User avatar #276 to #216 - nogphille
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
pikachu is awesome.. especially when you teach it seismic toss
#175 to #168 - iseeyouthartwo **User deleted account**
+16 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#176 to #175 - daniboyi
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
I do!
I do!
User avatar #181 to #176 - runelh
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Don't worry bro, I use him to.
#184 to #181 - daniboyi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#201 to #181 - anon id: 2af0c494
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
almost all my starters were grass, except 2 gen, which had the definition of badassery, Feraligatr
#177 to #176 - iseeyouthartwo **User deleted account**
+2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#180 to #177 - daniboyi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#214 - ramzar
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Something in this comic makes me wonder:
He chooses charmander, he's beaten by brock, he regrets it, he makes time machine, he goes back to tell himself not to chose charmander. So, if he didn't choose charmander, he never got beaten, therefor he never had to build the time machine, so he never told himself not to pick charmander. So if he never told himself to pick char, wouldn't that mean that he will pick it again?
#225 to #214 - pulu
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
''He went back in time and told himself not to pick charmander, he doesnt pick charmander so the ''future him who chose charmanders'' stops existing i guess.



Spoiler alert!!!!!




Have you seen tv-series fringe? There is similar paradox in the end of season 3
User avatar #226 to #214 - iarethesecks
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Also known as the destroyer of the universe. Like the feedback from a guitar amp if the paradox runs long enough with anybody interrupting it, the universe explodes.
User avatar #224 to #214 - Keoul
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Or we go with the alternate reality theory of time travel and we branch off into a new universe where he doesn't pick charmander and his future self just bums around.
User avatar #229 to #224 - whyfalsewhy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Multiverse allows for this.
User avatar #230 to #229 - Keoul
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Yeah that, I just forgot the name and went with alternate reality, thanks!
User avatar #219 to #214 - VechasSa
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Welcome to the Infinity loop paradox.
User avatar #227 to #214 - whyfalsewhy
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Yeah you see if we go back we can only observe or change things by accident, if you go back with a purpose and achieve it you create the infinity loop.
#81 - zombierapist
Reply -12 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
ARE YOU KITTEN ME!

choose charmander and lvl him till you get metel claw. or get a pidgey, charazard destroys everything. Choosing anything else is folly

red thumbes, AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar #123 to #81 - Marker
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
2nd panel; 1998. There was no Metal Claw.
User avatar #83 to #81 - tmsem
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
>Metal claw

>Gen 1

****** Charmander cant cant learn that **** until leaf green/fire red
#82 to #81 - jojord
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Metal claw, in pokemon red..
#325 - CrowbarNinja
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
But what about the fact that he then wouldn't have to make a time machine, thus cancelling the paradox. The way i see time travel is that if you go back and **** with your life you also have to give them the blueprints to the time machine so they can continually renew the timeline. If you just go "There i did it" then you wouldn't get the desired effect. As Dr. Emmett Brown said "Changing key features of the past would make a parallel time line" So if we follow that rule then we come to the conclusion where there are now two timelines: One where he is a no-life scientist so he can change time, And another where he is a supah rich ladies-man. So no matter how much you try, You will always suck ass. But, If we follow 'The time machine's logic, that would mean we could instead change a linear line of time, each one with a different result than the last. But at the same time, that would show time as a creature who knows who has to die and where. So again we reach the conclusion that you will always suck. The only way you can be sure of your standing is if you go back and sneak into Nintendo, Change code in Pokemon so you dont fight squirtle right off the bat, then go and rob a few banks, pin it on someone else, give you family the cash and schematics to the time machine, tell them to invest in google and apple, then return to your timeline and see if it worked. the thought of time travel is mind boggling at least, full of what ifs and variables. Drop a pen in the wrong place and you can **** something up. not to mention what the military would do if they got their hands on it, Or theists, or atheists. Personally i would destroy the knowledge of time travel because our nature dictates some dumb **** will end all life without knowing it. But then we reach the paradox rule again, If there are no humans in the future, Where did he come from? If we break one thing it could be a devastating as pulling the bottom card of a card tower out from under it. Tl:dr; I used 2000 chars
But what about the fact that he then wouldn't have to make a time machine, thus cancelling the paradox. The way i see time travel is that if you go back and **** with your life you also have to give them the blueprints to the time machine so they can continually renew the timeline. If you just go "There i did it" then you wouldn't get the desired effect. As Dr. Emmett Brown said "Changing key features of the past would make a parallel time line" So if we follow that rule then we come to the conclusion where there are now two timelines: One where he is a no-life scientist so he can change time, And another where he is a supah rich ladies-man. So no matter how much you try, You will always suck ass. But, If we follow 'The time machine's logic, that would mean we could instead change a linear line of time, each one with a different result than the last. But at the same time, that would show time as a creature who knows who has to die and where. So again we reach the conclusion that you will always suck. The only way you can be sure of your standing is if you go back and sneak into Nintendo, Change code in Pokemon so you dont fight squirtle right off the bat, then go and rob a few banks, pin it on someone else, give you family the cash and schematics to the time machine, tell them to invest in google and apple, then return to your timeline and see if it worked. the thought of time travel is mind boggling at least, full of what ifs and variables. Drop a pen in the wrong place and you can **** something up. not to mention what the military would do if they got their hands on it, Or theists, or atheists. Personally i would destroy the knowledge of time travel because our nature dictates some dumb **** will end all life without knowing it. But then we reach the paradox rule again, If there are no humans in the future, Where did he come from? If we break one thing it could be a devastating as pulling the bottom card of a card tower out from under it. Tl:dr; I used 2000 chars
User avatar #330 to #325 - feraligatrnommi
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Congratulations on top comment!
#339 to #330 - heetler **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #376 to #325 - commontroll
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
I would give them the blue prints in the first place. Earlier and earlier in life I would be rebuilding it, making me an incredible engineer by the age 10. Then, for ten more years I would constantly train to be adventuring. I would go back to the Roman Empire and take some simple coins, then go to the future and sell the antiques. Rinse and repeat, with random artifacts, then go to the most advanced times for humanity, purchase the best armor and weaponry future money can buy, and then keep training. Then, finally, go and adventure for the rest of my life, participate in battles, help build empires, topple civilizations, etc.
User avatar #381 to #325 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
But you have to remember the multiverse theory, that by changing the past, he is not creating a new universe, but simply changing the universe that he came from into the one where he will return to, much like changing lanes on a highway,
User avatar #382 to #381 - CrowbarNinja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
No, but the time before could still possibly exist.
User avatar #383 to #382 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
But, that is what the multiverse theory would state.
That by going back in time, you are not destroying the future you came from, but simply changing which future that particular universe would go to, or simply, by going back in time, you are actually going to a new universe where you and your former self were both alive at the same time.
#340 to #325 - Lulzilla
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
User avatar #350 to #325 - blanc
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
didn't read completely but What if he builds the machine anyways because he knows that it is necesarry?
User avatar #354 to #350 - CrowbarNinja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Then there would be a separate timeline where he has a time machine, but in the event where he makes a large change to history (And when it comes to time alot is considered a large change) then it could create another timeline; and since every choice has a different outcome, and therefore; a different timeline, he would as elbrysobrony said "Look at the past". But even looking could cause problems, so if you wanted to do something like that without a chance of failure then you would have to do what Walter Bishop did in Fringe and make a window into the other side (In his case a parallel universe, in our case a different time) with that you wouldnt have any way to interact with that timeline and in the same instant yours.
#346 to #325 - payneiac
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Didn't read
Didn't read
User avatar #349 to #325 - elbrysobrony
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
That's why I think that no one'll ever be able to TRAVEL through time, per se, but they should be able to LOOK at the past.
#107 - derpmageddon
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(10/05/2012) [-]
Comment Picture