Morbid for Zombie Apocalypse lovers. I ran the math and I was sad.. The population of the world is 6, 894, 594, 844. Assuming that a zombie virus was airborne,  Zombie apocalypse morbid dissapoint
Upload
Login or register

Morbid for Zombie Apocalypse lovers

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
 
Morbid for Zombie Apocalypse lovers. I ran the math and I was sad.. The population of the world is 6, 894, 594, 844. Assuming that a zombie virus was airborne,

I ran the math and I was sad.

The population of the world is 6, 894, 594, 844.
Assuming that a zombie virus was airborne, waterborne, and spread through bites and
scratches then only the few who were immune would survive.
A reasonable percentage of humans who are immune to an apocalyptic virus would be 3. 1%.
This means that 6, 894, 595 people would be immune to the virus.
This means to eliminate Every zombie each person would have to kill 999 zombies.
If each person killed one zombie per day it would take less than three years to eliminate Every
last zombie.
After this event was over it would take 17 generations of repopulating to bring the worlds
population back up to 6, 894, 594, 844.
...
+3193
Views: 64780 Submitted: 07/08/2012
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (617)
[ 617 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#3 - ainsley
Reply +219 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
I could totally kill 999 zombies
even more if I pack-a-punch my ray gun
User avatar #208 to #3 - MasterManiac
Reply +49 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
I'm gonna get thumbed down hard for this (cos everybody knows the FunnyJunk community hates COD), but playing Black Ops zombies with 3 friends is awesome.
User avatar #211 to #208 - ainsley
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
Multiplayer sucks cock mostly because of the community,
Zombies, however, is awesome.
User avatar #332 to #211 - captainrattrap
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
Zombies is great, until they **** it up and make it too stale/********** like they did with moon (I can still enjoy moon, it's just very full of ********).

Black ops two is gonna have 8 player zombies... So you can understand my skepticism
User avatar #404 to #332 - spacefield
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
I'm afraid to get over excited for 8 player zombies. If they don't **** it up too much, it should be awesome.
User avatar #409 to #404 - captainrattrap
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
I heard a faint whisper about vehicles. But I know such a thing couldn't be possible... I hope not. It seems like it would be fun, but I highly doubt it would work.

I WOULD like to play multiplayer on zombies maps, because I have no gaming pc.
#417 to #409 - potatoezx
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
I heard they were keeping the old zombies style for Black Ops 2, but also adding in 8 player, so if you don't like 8 player, you can still do old fashioned, "regular" zombies on the newer maps.
User avatar #415 to #409 - spacefield
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
Multiplayer on zombies maps would be legit. I haven't heard crap about black ops 2, but if they can make 8 players and vehicles work in zombies that wouldn't **** it up, I will happily protect my virginity gaming for the majority of my days.
User avatar #422 to #415 - captainrattrap
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
Treyarch would **** it up. I'd rather them just not even try to do that... More zombies maps would be nice, though.
User avatar #425 to #422 - spacefield
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
Dammit Treyarch... I probably won't care... I'm addicted to the game. Unless they royally **** up. I agree, many more maps.
User avatar #427 to #425 - captainrattrap
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
Do you have xbox? I want someone good to play with.
User avatar #431 to #427 - spacefield
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
I wouldn't consider myself good. Yes I have an xbox, but I actually just got it. I don't own black ops. I am with my friends A LOT playing. I don't have xbox live yet.
User avatar #434 to #431 - captainrattrap
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
Oh... Well then... Never mind.
User avatar #440 to #434 - spacefield
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
OptimusCrime33 is my gamertag if you wish. I just won't see it for a while.
User avatar #512 to #440 - captainrattrap
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
If you don't have xbox live you can't get friend requests.
#613 to #208 - stlassassinfhc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
Am I the only one who thinks zombies was so much better on cod waw
#85 - boobboobs
Reply +93 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
so i have 3 years of zombie killing and and have a **** ton of time to have sex
#340 to #85 - laxdevil
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #98 to #85 - kanatana
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
That being said... 0.1%? I like those odds.
#102 to #98 - boobboobs
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
there comes a time in every mans life when he has to ask "do i feel lucky" and i do
User avatar #103 to #102 - kanatana
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
Bringing those "last man on earth" questions into a while new light.
User avatar #120 to #98 - commontroll
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
One in a thousand really isn't that bad... don't know if you were being sarcastic.
#73 - pinta **User deleted account**
+90 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#577 to #73 - meganinja
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
Hey Diseases,
My name is Madagascar, and I hate every single one of you. All of you are weak, highly detectable viruses who spend every second of your day looking for ways to spread. You are everything bad in the world. Honestly, have any of you ever infected a water supply? I mean, I guess it's fun trying to make everyone vomit, hemorrhage and become depressed, but you all take to a whole new level. This is even worse than wasting evolution points on increasing your heat, moisture and cold resistance to level 4.

Don't be a stranger. Just hit me with your best epidemic. I'm pretty much healthy. I’m the fourth largest island in the world, and only have one port. What symptoms do you have, other than "fatigue" and "sores"? I also get no reports of infections, and have a banging hot port (She just shut down; **** was SO closed). You are all faggots who should just be vaccinated. Thanks for listening.
Pic Related: It's me and my port.
#187 to #73 - furrytoes
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
pandemic 2?
pandemic 2?
#89 to #73 - gimmeyobrain
Reply +21 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
only to find hordes of zombie lemurs
User avatar #193 - ColeTheUber
Reply +72 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
Assuming .1% are immune, you are missing one important point.
No zombie will bite a human and say "Oh damn, he's immune, let's go somewhere else, guys." There will be casualties, and a lot of them.
I'm going to go ahead and round the world's population to 7 billion, since it's all speculation.
That means that ~7 million will be immune.

It is safe to assume that 20% will die in the initial attacks. In fact, that is probably being too generous. This leaves us with 5.6 million immune survivors.

People that won't be as efficient in fighting:
Elderly: ~14% are age 65+
Children: ~24% are ages 0-17
So that means that 2128000 survivors won't be as efficient in fighting zombies, meaning that the adult survivors (3472000) will have to take that load, increasing the strain.

Some other facts to consider:
1) These are survivors all around the world. They are not united. They have no government. They have no leadership, and no contact. They will not be as efficient.
2) They are not necessarily "survival" types. Most survivors will die off due to malnutrition.
3) With hospitals closed down and medical supplies scarce, there will be an increase of other diseases.

In an ideal world, all survivors will be giant, Russian Bear Calvary type men and women, from ages 18-30, who are able to fight, and are willing to unite to defend themselves. In reality, you're going to get a **** load of hippies, businessmen, grandmothers, and idiots who will leeroy jenkins themselves to hell.
#625 to #193 - anon id: 8a48588c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
Yeah, but the most realistic zombie apocalypse to date seems to be the Max Brooks World War Z apocalypse. Nobody is immune, but it ONLY transmits through vital fluid contact. Therefore smart, capable people will survive. And although this may come as a surprise, there are more than you would think. Governments would not collapse, more likely the opposite. Humans are social creatures, we would bond together. Governments would unite their military forces and quickly train them on the weaknesses of the supposed zombies. In a few years or so, zombie levels would drop to the point where we could start to take back land, perhaps even cities.
In about 10 years, the zombies would either have rotted or we would have united to the point where we could unite trade lines again. Wouldn't take long after that.

Humans are highly underrated.
User avatar #653 to #193 - pokemonstheshiz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
Also a point that's being missed is the initial spread. Even an airborne or waterborne disease would be quickly dealt with, and the area closed off. A disease spreading massively around the entire world is quite unlikely.
User avatar #231 to #193 - thephantur
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
Not to mention survivors will be killing each other for supplies. Roving bands of raiders will do a **** ton of damage to other survivors.
#225 to #193 - simoon **User deleted account**
+4 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #235 to #225 - ColeTheUber
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
Not saying that you'll be useless, but you don't have access to materials that older people would. A plan doesn't mean much if you aren't prepared ahead of time.

Good preparation questions:
What weapons do you have stockpiled?
How much ammunition do you have stockpiled?
How proficient with those weapons are you?
Do you have easily preserved food?
What about spare medical supplies?
What about transportation?
What about a guaranteed safehouse in a safe location, away from civilization?

I'm 19, and I have already accepted that I will probably be infected early on and devour everyone I care about. Yeah, I have plans, but that doesn't mean that I will survive.
#273 to #235 - simoon **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#680 to #273 - Qweeaf
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
About the gun; if the gun was silenced it wouldn't typically draw any attention in your direction, and bullets are far more common and are smaller and thus easy to carry. Also, guns can fire multiple shots before needing to be reloaded, which isn't the case for most crossbows.
#685 to #680 - simoon **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#277 to #273 - simoon **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #301 to #277 - ColeTheUber
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
I didn't necessarily mean guns when I said weapons and ammunition, but here are a few weapons-related questions you still would need to answer.
1) Do you have a crossbow?
2) Do you have an ample supply of bolts?
3) Crossbows aren't as simple as point-and-shoot, so do you have training with one?
4) Do you have the skills with a knife to fashion new bolts?
Also, why would you stay in or near a city, and why would you want a large group of survivors? An average city has several million people living in it in close quarters, leaving a lot of room for infection. If you keep emergency supplies, even basic supplies like you would keep for a hurricane or being snowed in, you can grab those and get out, once the initial shock wears off.

Some other points:
Food will be a primary target for looters. Why would you assume that there would be any left in stores? Same for medical supplies. Those are easily purchased now, so why wait for any disaster to happen. No sense waiting until after the world has gone to hell to have a stockpile of medical supplies or preservable foods.
Also, you may be a qualified mechanic, but that doesn't mean that you ejaculate gas and car parts. Again, that means preparation.

I'm not trying to argue. I'm just saying that raiding the nearest wal-mart and running isn't a sensible plan.
#547 to #301 - mdauch
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
1)yes,2
2) about 12 good ones 16 useable ones
3)about a good 5 years hunting
4) wouldn't need to they are reusable and i keep good care of them
do I pass?
#319 to #301 - simoon **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#336 to #225 - anon id: 644c9937
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
WORLD'S COOLEST STORY.
#341 to #336 - simoon **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #282 to #193 - dadukesta
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
Best place to set up.

Lowes.
Theres already a garden, theres materials to set up defense, you have enough supplies to build a windmill ontop of the lowes. There is a parking lot that can easily be made into a walled off courtyard where work can be done. The plumbing could work for a week maybe and typically Lowes is surrounded by other hardware stores and clothing outlets and occasionally restraunts and general stores. Not to mention the gas station down the road.

When the apocalypse happens immediately alert everyone you know to head to one of these lowes, take all supplies possible in your vehicles, block off the front entrances to only allow 1 person in at a time and check every person head to toe for bites. Lack of privacy is ensued but protection is garaunteed.

Plenty of melee weapons for everyone and plenty of materials to turn into important devices in normal life. And not to mention, security.







User avatar #550 to #282 - mdauch
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
or Cabelas just saying
User avatar #215 to #193 - Trrave
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
lol! I almost choked to death when I read the last bit.
#212 to #193 - pmilooo
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
This guy knows his ****
#200 to #193 - cartrman
Reply +24 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
**cartrman rolled a random image posted in comment #34 at post apocolyptica... **
This made so much sense, it scared me.
User avatar #335 to #200 - runtybeaver
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
Relevant roll is relevant.
#164 - PenguinsOfMars
Reply +44 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
The odds are 1 in 1000 that I will survive?
#261 to #164 - anon id: f65da47f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
No. OP doesn't know much about medicine. Once the virus enters ones's system, they are screwed. Naturally immunity to a virus is more like one in million, and about the same for bacteria. Bacteria can be fought with antibiotics and viruses by antivirals, but this won't save many people due to the chaos and lack of information on the disease. Immunity and treatment will play a very minimal role in who survives; rather, (considering it's multitude of routes of infection) isolationism and self sufficiency will determine survivors. People who have stockpiles of drugs, purified water through intense boiling and condensation, barricades, and air seals would survive. We will take my incredibly generous number of naturally immune people (7000) and couple it with people in the world who meet the isolation requirements before the breakout (10000 tops) to leave us with 17,000 survivors and 6,999,983,000 infected. You have to remember that this is before suicide and panic. We could fairly reasonably say that anyone not bunkered down before the outbreak would die. The human race would likely never recover, and any shred of social order will be obliterated. There would be no chance at all.
#269 to #261 - PenguinsOfMars
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
We're all gonna die Lloyd...
User avatar #656 to #164 - pokemonstheshiz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/09/2012) [-]
If the disease managed to hit everywhere in the world at the same time, yes.
User avatar #170 to #164 - wacemindu
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
That you'll be immune to the virus, not that you'll survive.
#229 - rnchampagne
Reply +33 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
What if the immunity gene is also the ginger gene
#247 to #229 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
+5 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#1 - blackcorsair
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
Manbearpig's the real problem, not zombies, i'm cereal
#61 - rickmac
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
why the hell would we want to restore the population back to 6,894,594,844
User avatar #253 to #61 - zehutit
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
because you touch yourself
User avatar #92 to #61 - ultrarobbie
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
Because I like that number
User avatar #6 - shinigamigod
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
It is not a virus it makes more sense to be a parasite.
A virus would require you to be alive and warm to survive, a parasite however does not always require this.
A parasite will live inside you feasting on the food you ate in your stomach, then once you die it will dig its way to your brain and take control of you, and reviving your basic human needs such as eating so that it may continue to survive.
The transition of the parasite can either be airborne spores, or it lays eggs which it then plants into its victims through the saliva when it bites.
So, the surviving population will start off quite high and slowly drop at first and then topple out of control once they begin to swarm all over.
#227 to #6 - anon id: d33722b9
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/08/2012) [-]
You forget about weather conditions. Certain weather in certain areas will cause the parasite to be stuck in an area. It would be like a fish out of water if it were to spread.