What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +23
#111 - thedarkestrogue (01/18/2013) [-]
Demagnetized magnets?
Demagnetized magnets?
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #112 to #111 - garymotherfinoak (01/18/2013) [-]
they were attracted to the wrong poles.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +2
User avatar #113 to #112 - thedarkestrogue (01/18/2013) [-]
Who says they were attracted? If they were demagnetized they could just be placed next to each other. They're essentially just metal at that point.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #114 to #113 - garymotherfinoak (01/18/2013) [-]
well being that i put them together and saw them pull toward each other north to north..
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #135 to #114 - thedarkestrogue (01/18/2013) [-]
Where did you find them? Chances are wherever you got them, they were already demagnetized then. Or they could just have their N and S labels wrong.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #136 to #135 - garymotherfinoak (01/18/2013) [-]
they were just standard magnets from a package that our electronics teacher bought. they were meant for educational use.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #149 to #136 - thedarkestrogue (01/18/2013) [-]
that is why. Educational use magnets are terrible. They're usually low quality. My teacher bought a 10 pack and none of them were properly magnetized. They lost their pull within two days.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #150 to #149 - garymotherfinoak (01/18/2013) [-]
they were bought for educational use, not designed for it. there was a set of magnets out as well that were from a couple years ago but from the same model, and still had good tug.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #152 to #150 - thedarkestrogue (01/18/2013) [-]
well then I give up its a mystery and I'm ******* starving.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #153 to #152 - garymotherfinoak (01/18/2013) [-]
better get some Scooby snacks.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +1
User avatar #154 to #153 - thedarkestrogue (01/18/2013) [-]
ruck res!
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +1
User avatar #155 to #154 - garymotherfinoak (01/18/2013) [-]
NO, BAD SCOOBI, WATCH UR LANGUAGE
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +1
User avatar #159 to #155 - thedarkestrogue (01/18/2013) [-]
ruck rou. Rooby Rooby Roo rays rhatever re rants. RUCK RIS RHOLE RUCKING RORLD!
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #161 to #159 - garymotherfinoak (01/18/2013) [-]
ruk ris ray rearth
0
#134 to #114 - thedarkestrogue has deleted their comment [-]
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #131 to #114 - Marker (01/18/2013) [-]
Then you divided by zero, simple as that.
Back to the content 'Morbid for Science'
<
>
 Friends (0)