Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#128 to #6 - cookingwithflowers
Reply +2
(04/06/2013) [-]
I find this pic related
I find this pic related
#57 to #6 - krizzah
Reply 0
(04/06/2013) [-]
Funny thing, OP was the only one who favourited that content.
#38 to #6 - ghipling
Reply 0
(04/06/2013) [-]
Dafuq is that mouthless lion.
#10 to #6 - doctorhax [OP]
Reply +43
(04/06/2013) [-]
Ah, ****, sorry man
I found it on 4chan, didn't know
You want me to delete it?
#141 to #10 - kyoutu
Reply 0
(04/06/2013) [-]
"doctorhax
Rank #596 on Content"

Rank #596 on other peoples content.
Lol, cunt.
#12 to #10 - steckenrider
Reply +68
(04/06/2013) [-]
nah
#13 to #12 - tittylovin
+56
has deleted their comment [-]
#22 to #13 - asimplepotato
Reply -8
(04/06/2013) [-]
Naa, if he didn't give ****, he wouldn't have made the comment about it beeing his OC.
#67 to #22 - rellort
Reply +1
(04/06/2013) [-]
'asimplepotato'. The name suits perfectly.
#23 to #22 - tittylovin
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#19 to #13 - anon
Reply 0
(04/06/2013) [-]
Gave two ***** to make the comment.
#20 to #19 - tittylovin
+16
has deleted their comment [-]
#24 to #20 - asimplepotato
Reply -10
(04/06/2013) [-]
but he did comment twice here ;D
#111 to #24 - guymandude
Reply +2
(04/06/2013) [-]
Mathematical analysis:

Ratio of ***** given to ***** not given (by comment): 1:1
In fraction form: 1/2 ********* (units of ***** per comment)
Average in percentage: 50% of comments giving a ****

Net *****, given that a comment not giving a **** holds a value of -1 while a comment giving a **** is valued at 1: 0

Net *****, given that a comment not giving a **** this time holds a value of 0 while a comment giving a **** remains valued at 1: 1

By looking at the date, we can be certain that the user steckenrider did not in fact give two ***** over this issue. One could consider him to have given 1 ****, which the data has accounted for, but this is only a theory and will require more study.
#25 to #24 - tittylovin
+6
has deleted their comment [-]