King Morello

See i was thinking about this the other day. What if they upped the max number of stack you can have from his passive to,say, 7, while keeping the damage the same on it (7 stacks is the same as 5 stacks are currently) and make his ult do physical damage UNLESS he has max stack of his passive on someone. If he does hit someone while they have 7 stacks on them, then it does true damage. In fact, I think it would be cool if his ult had bonus effects at different numbers of stacks. For example, have its base damage be quite low, but hitting someone with 3 stacks increases it, 5 stacks resets the cooldown on kill, and 7 stacks makes it do true damage.

I think they should take away the action with bleed stacks, take out the reset, the change the true damage to magic and give it a % missing health instead. Oh wait that's Garren's ult.

Id be happy if he actually had to get the last hit for it to reset. I hate how if they die within .5 seconds it still refreshes

thats even worse they might as well keep it true damage

see if he had all 10 stacks on then it would be true damage but its much harder for u to hit a enemy 10 time to get that which makes his ult only really effective to one person
and his bleed does the same damage at 7 stacks as it does at 5 now.

Basically, they're showing how much League of Legend's Gamemakers nerved or buffed their champions (characters to play with)

Nerf = they're harder to play with/ weakened/ restricted
Buff = They're easyer to play with/ Stronger, sometiemes OP (overpowered)

Does this explain it?

So the developers go back and forth with different characters to balance them? I think I understand.

Yeah, and the cobweb and longer switches explain that they've been OP for a while, or super-nerved
Etc. You get the joke...

Rengar was balanced on release. The only thing that made him weak was bugs.

I don't know why Riot fixed his bugs AND buff him.

No he was too strong, they then nerfed him, found they went too far, and buffed him back a little. His Q and the heal on the W were to strong to fight against. He was only weak after nerfing

No, he was buffed the patch after he was released, go check it.

The buff and the bug fix were what made him suddenly really strong.

The big fixes were minor, and the buffs were more late game, not early.
I played him alot when he was 'bugged', and with my ping i thought it was just graphical- it didnt effect my play. He did get a little stronger, but you only noticed if having a bad game since you had items that were more effective otherwise. Then after that patch all he got were nerfs for a fair while, until they over nerfed him and buff again recently. The biggest nerf that hit him (and riven) was changes to health regen

Curtain...

"You seriously have to be autistic to enjoy this"

How DARE other people like what you don't like! THEY MUST BE AUTISTIC OR SOMETHING!

I'm not saying it because I don't like it, I'm saying it because each match is the same thing over and over and there is hardly any variety, hence the autistic remark.

Except no two matches are the same, and you're entirely wrong

It is the same, just a different character. The map is the same, the towers are the same, the minions are the same, the objective is the same. Just because the characters are different doesn't mean that every game is unique, just slightly less repetitive.

The opponents are different, the players are different, the plays are different, there's a million different item combinations. Sure, the map and objectives are static, but that can be said of any video game.

No, no it couldn't. By your just named the same reason twice. You can't say every match is different based on items you pick, cause that's fucking dumb.

Obviously the items aren't the only difference, but they're one of them. And yes, it can be applied to almost ANY game. I can't think of a single competitive, player versus player game that DOESN'T have set, static maps and objectives.

I can name at least 10 online games off the top of my head that have more than one map and game type. In fact I don't think I can name any games that have one map and one game mode except for MOBAs.

Which is hilarious, because League has 4 maps and 2 standard game modes, not including custom games with special rules.

And even though they have this there is still only one map and one game mode that is extremely popular. It doesn't matter if it has 4 maps if you only ever play the one.

That was one of the most retarded things I've ever heard. "It doesn't matter that they exist if one is more popular than the others." On a side note, obviously it's not that bad of a game, considering it's the most played online game in the world. People play games because they're fun, so obviously it's serving its purpose.

Because we all know that popularity means that it must be good. It's like having heaps of car and only driving a beetle. You can't say that game has variety.

Something being popular means that a large number of people enjoy that particular thing, which brings me back to the second point I made in my last comment (assuming you even took the time to read it), which was saying that people play games because they're fun.

You know what was popular? The Nazi party. And as it stands most people don't have the best taste in games, what with call of duty being as popular as it is.

That was probably the weakest argument you've made so far. There's no such thing as a "good" or "bad" game. They're created for entertainment. I don't know why you have such a superiority complex going on. One way or another, you hate a game that millions of people love, and that's just your opinion.

Then why do people watch sports? It's just the same thing over and over again, with just a few variations, and with different characters.

I don't watch sports mainly because they are boring and repetitive.

Well then there must be something to it, since so many people around the world watch sports. Are they all autistic? I'm not saying that you should watch sports, or play LoL, but you should have an understanding why people would find it fun. Also you shouldn't call them autistic.

Maybe it's just me, but I don't like to do/watch the same thing over and over for hours, I like variety and fun. But have fun playing LoL.

Just an FYI, I don't play LoL :) just defending it, defensive.

Well have fun playing real games then.

So... LoL is repetitive but somthing like Call of Duty isn't?

At what point did I ever say that I played that piece of shit?

I'm not saying you did, just saying that a lot of games get repetitive, in fact almost all of them (there are examples to this however)

Yeah a lot of games might be repetitive, too a certain point, but not on the level of LoL. Other games have different maps, game modes and weapons/power-ups. LoL just has different characters and that's it.

In fact LoL has 3 different gaming modes and 3 maps, but one of them is just very popular. Also since there are over 100 different champions it's not as repetitive as it seems. There are also some "fun" modes in custom games (ARAM, ARAB, Catch the Teemo...)

4 maps

every game ever is the same thing over and over, life sucks, etc, get over it.

well tastes are different from one person to another

I understand the premise of the game, but it has no variety, barely any changes from match to match.

try HoN

Why? I've played hon and its the same thing with a different art style.

it's not the same... it's entirely different. If you knew league well you'd understand that. i prefer hon to lol because of those differences. in league you can screw up and live in a 2v1, in hon you cannot do that. it's just more strategy in hon which is good for me as i like to think.

Or you could play a game with more variety, such as any other game out ever.

mario party must be a blast for you then. lots of variety.

More variety then HoN, LoL and DOTA put together.

That looks really painful.

I think it is..

they said in like their twitter they will never nerf darius from current standing, I play darius because he is op its fun to play too one time there was this vi turret hugging. I walk up q her, walk back, do this 4 times, than e and w and ult. She was warmogs and black creaver

sad day. why would they knowingly leave a champ as OP as Darius alone? He needs a nerf bc he makes matches too one sided. Sure pros can counter him no problem and he's a non factor in 2000+ elo, but for 90% of League players he's just much too strong to deal with. I play mid, support, jungle myself so I rarely have head-up confrontations with him, but I've just seen way too many matches be won almost singlehandedly by a Darius

yeah i agree darius is just plane op, needs maybe some ratios lowered on his Q and maybe less flat damage. I'm Silver II and played darius in ranked only once, although i should play him more to utilize his OPness. I play (greatest to least in this order) Top, Support, adc, and mid. Never got the groove of jungling. Haven't been playing much ranked lately, due to some on and off internet problems and my duo partner has been gone for a while. I started playing when Darius was released.

Diana was op as hell when she came out. She CONSTANTLY triple-quadra killed solo. I hated that bitch.

I think you misunderstood me. I was mocking the plebs who said she was overnerfed. She's was OP as tits when she came out and for months after, it's just that noobs couldn't land her Q and cried and played Akali instead.

Now that she was finally nerfed to her rightful place is when the idiots learned to aim Qs so now they complain.