What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - galacticboner (06/16/2013) [-]
I have no idea how far it is from the empire state building to central park.
User avatar #63 to #3 - sirfisticuffs (06/16/2013) [-]
It's the same distance of the blast radius of North Korea's strongest nuclear bomb, silly.
User avatar #12 to #3 - yunoknow (06/16/2013) [-]
It would still easily kill a million people and diminish all human activity in most of the city. And that's if radioactive elements don't scatter into the water or atmosphere.
#5 to #3 - mudkipfucker ONLINE (06/16/2013) [-]
This image has expired
about 2.5 miles
< pic related, its the blast radius of a nuke on the Empire state building
User avatar #80 to #5 - lolmonade (06/19/2013) [-]
But it will still clear the **** out of new york and people wont be able to live there for long.
User avatar #54 to #5 - kanpai (06/16/2013) [-]
how ironic is it that the epicentre of the blast is koreatown?
User avatar #6 to #5 - galacticboner (06/16/2013) [-]
North Korea's nuclear bombs are less efficient than those used 70 years ago in Japan?...
User avatar #72 to #6 - gemleonn (06/16/2013) [-]
Actually, yes. America and Russia are the only are the only countries with extremely powerful nuclear bombs
#7 to #6 - mudkipfucker ONLINE (06/16/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Apparently so, Its also why i don't consider North Korea a threat in any way
User avatar #73 to #7 - fabbyp ONLINE (06/16/2013) [-]
Although the blast radius is small the nuclear waste and fragments that would be spread through out the united states by wind and such would bring more deaths and economic disaster than the bomb itself (even though the bomb would kill hundreds of thousands), although if that happened we would most likely respond with a nuclear counters strike which would cause a whole ********* .
#71 to #7 - thascomrad (06/16/2013) [-]
Nor do I, that's the closest town. and I live in the bottom of the leake (Hornborgasjön)
Nor do I, that's the closest town. and I live in the bottom of the leake (Hornborgasjön)
User avatar #15 to #7 - nustix (06/16/2013) [-]
I'm just saying but that still makes them a threat because that would still kill thousands of people.
User avatar #9 to #7 - galacticboner (06/16/2013) [-]
Thanks for the informations.
Just out of curiosity, which site is that?
#8 to #7 - plankepetter (06/16/2013) [-]
what the name of that website?
#51 to #10 - Penn (06/16/2013) [-]
So wait, the largest bomb ever designed wouldn't even blow up Massachusetts? Not that blowing up Massachusetts is a small radius or anything, but I've always though this nuclear scare was like one bomb could blow up California or some **** .
User avatar #58 to #51 - imaginator (06/16/2013) [-]
We can make bigger bombs than the Tsar Bomba. If we go to work on bombs like we did in WW2 we'd be able to blow up small countries.
User avatar #14 to #10 - martycamp (06/16/2013) [-]
Now THAT is one helluva bang
 Friends (0)