Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - galacticboner
Reply +121
(06/16/2013) [-]
I have no idea how far it is from the empire state building to central park.
#63 to #3 - sirfisticuffs
Reply 0
(06/16/2013) [-]
It's the same distance of the blast radius of North Korea's strongest nuclear bomb, silly.
#12 to #3 - yunoknow
Reply +2
(06/16/2013) [-]
It would still easily kill a million people and diminish all human activity in most of the city. And that's if radioactive elements don't scatter into the water or atmosphere.
#5 to #3 - mudkipfucker [OP] ONLINE
Reply +22
(06/16/2013) [-]
This image has expired
about 2.5 miles
< pic related, its the blast radius of a nuke on the Empire state building
#80 to #5 - lolmonade
Reply 0
(06/19/2013) [-]
But it will still clear the **** out of new york and people wont be able to live there for long.
#54 to #5 - kanpai
Reply +1
(06/16/2013) [-]
how ironic is it that the epicentre of the blast is koreatown?
#6 to #5 - galacticboner
Reply +16
(06/16/2013) [-]
North Korea's nuclear bombs are less efficient than those used 70 years ago in Japan?...
#72 to #6 - gemleonn
Reply 0
(06/16/2013) [-]
Actually, yes. America and Russia are the only are the only countries with extremely powerful nuclear bombs
#7 to #6 - mudkipfucker [OP] ONLINE
Reply +11
(06/16/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Apparently so, Its also why i don't consider North Korea a threat in any way
#73 to #7 - fabbyp ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2013) [-]
Although the blast radius is small the nuclear waste and fragments that would be spread through out the united states by wind and such would bring more deaths and economic disaster than the bomb itself (even though the bomb would kill hundreds of thousands), although if that happened we would most likely respond with a nuclear counters strike which would cause a whole *********.
#71 to #7 - thascomrad
Reply 0
(06/16/2013) [-]
Nor do I, that's the closest town. and I live in the bottom of the leake (Hornborgasjön)
Nor do I, that's the closest town. and I live in the bottom of the leake (Hornborgasjön)
#15 to #7 - nustix ONLINE
Reply +1
(06/16/2013) [-]
I'm just saying but that still makes them a threat because that would still kill thousands of people.
#9 to #7 - galacticboner
Reply +1
(06/16/2013) [-]
Thanks for the informations.
Just out of curiosity, which site is that?
#8 to #7 - plankepetter
Reply +2
(06/16/2013) [-]
what the name of that website?
#51 to #10 - Penn
Reply +1
(06/16/2013) [-]
So wait, the largest bomb ever designed wouldn't even blow up Massachusetts? Not that blowing up Massachusetts is a small radius or anything, but I've always though this nuclear scare was like one bomb could blow up California or some ****.
#58 to #51 - imaginator
Reply 0
(06/16/2013) [-]
We can make bigger bombs than the Tsar Bomba. If we go to work on bombs like we did in WW2 we'd be able to blow up small countries.
#14 to #10 - martycamp
Reply +2
(06/16/2013) [-]
Now THAT is one helluva bang