Tumblr on Harry Potter pt. 1. sauce: www.buzzfeed.com/lukebailey/lol-wizards?bffb. techiewizard Z Source: angel: I think that if really wanted to kill harry pot
x
Click to expand

Tumblr on Harry Potter pt. 1

techiewizard Z Source:
angel:
I think that if really wanted to kill harry potter the night the
spell didn' t weft: on he ' just picked him up and thrawn
him out e given the feet that he was a ens year we intent
this is why wizards are ******* useless,
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1130
Views: 38665
Favorited: 66
Submitted: 06/17/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to insaniacfedde Subscribe to harrypotter submit to reddit

Comments(157):

[ 157 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #14 - bakinboy (06/17/2014) [-]
with all their magic, the muggle "gun" is still a superior killing tool in almost every way
User avatar #48 to #14 - basicargentinian (06/18/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure they could protect themselves against gunfire, and can disarm you with one flick of a wand. The only way a muggle could kill a magician is shooting them at point blank without the magician realizing.
#51 to #48 - asmodean (06/18/2014) [-]
There are these wonderful things called snipers that can accurately hit targets upwards of a mile away.
User avatar #108 to #51 - pokemonstheshiz (06/18/2014) [-]
harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Protego_Maxima

If guns ever came into play, I'm pretty sure wizards could easily cast bullet proof sheilds.
User avatar #112 to #108 - lereturnedtroll (06/18/2014) [-]
They'd have to know the bullet was coming, if they had already pulled the trigger they'd have absolutely no chance to use a shield charm in time
User avatar #113 to #112 - pokemonstheshiz (06/18/2014) [-]
>implying they couldn't cast it beforehand
User avatar #114 to #113 - lereturnedtroll (06/18/2014) [-]
>implying one wizard casting it once would persist for very long
User avatar #124 to #114 - broswagonist (06/18/2014) [-]
Shield Charm can be both cast on reflex and enchanted into clothing.
User avatar #116 to #114 - pokemonstheshiz (06/18/2014) [-]
it could last a fairly long time, depending on the witch/wizard casting it.
For instance, the protective spells Hermione used on their "extended camping trip" in the 7th book. I believe she recasted them every 24 hours or so.

They could also turn invisible, disguise themselves as someone else, or a multitude of other things. This is a stupid argument, guns don't have a place in the wizarding world. Wands are basically more effective and versatile guns in a sense.
#147 to #116 - asmodean (06/18/2014) [-]
I will concede the point. However, what spell would the wizards have that could defend against a thermonuclear strike (serious question)
User avatar #151 to #147 - pokemonstheshiz (06/18/2014) [-]
they could stop the bomb from exploding with a freeze charm. I'm sure enough of them could make a strong enough ward to protect against the initial explosion, but it'd take a lot of work to keep it up for the fallout.
#70 to #48 - Jeff C (06/18/2014) [-]
The smallest nuclear bomb ever tested amounted to about 10-20 thousand TONS of TNT, to stop that would require literal Godly powers and I don't think the worlds governments would mind blowing up some stuff if it meant killing wizards
User avatar #137 to #70 - basicargentinian (06/18/2014) [-]
you can't really use an atom bomb without ******* yourself in the process, wizards live within muggle cities, they can also interrupt the nuclear device from exploding with magic and **** and easily redirect it to you.

Also, you throw an a-bomb, you better be ready for the dragons son.
User avatar #65 to #14 - tehbomb ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
protego fgt
#53 to #14 - anonmynous (06/18/2014) [-]
By the seventh book the death eaters were attacking muggle cities and the muggle governments had been a long time aware of the existence of magic. So I don't see why they didn't ask the muggles to just call a drone strike or something on Voldemort and his army when they were gathered outside Hogwarts
0
#62 to #53 - urapooper has deleted their comment [-]
#3 - youngbek (06/17/2014) [-]
Voldemort was disgusted by everything that wasn't magical. By killing or trying to kill Harry with a spell he was proving that he was a strong wizard . Not a strong man.
#16 to #3 - aaffan (06/17/2014) [-]
How does killing a one year old make you a strong wizard or man?
#20 to #16 - artistultimatum (06/17/2014) [-]
There was a prophecy saying that a child born would defeat him blah blah blah...

TL;DR Version: Harry was the chosen one who would defeat him, he wasn't gonna have that **** .
#28 to #3 - anon (06/18/2014) [-]
Yeah that a little, but also because he wanted to turn Harry into a Horcrux
User avatar #32 to #28 - zdawg (06/18/2014) [-]
He didn't want to, he did it accidentally
#63 to #3 - urapooper (06/18/2014) [-]
ah but you see by killing harry the muggle way he shows that he doesn't even need his magic to kill someone that was prophesied to kill him
User avatar #66 to #3 - mrbuu (06/18/2014) [-]
trying to kill a 1 year old with the strongest spell in the wizard universe doesn't scream " oh wow that super amazing wizard killed a defenceless 1 year old baby with an incredibly strong spell. its not like anybody could kill a 1 year old baby"
User avatar #9 to #3 - mytomanenbre (06/17/2014) [-]
That... was like a ******* poem.
#24 to #9 - tehfalconguy (06/18/2014) [-]
On a scale from 1-10 how high are you?
User avatar #144 to #24 - hellomynameisbill ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
blueberries/18
#99 to #24 - airforceman (06/18/2014) [-]
You're saying that wrong, it's "Hi, how are you?"
#84 to #24 - yisumad (06/18/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#126 to #3 - MasterManiac (06/18/2014) [-]
It's a freakin one year old kid. He's hardly gonna get street cred for taking him out.
It's a freakin one year old kid. He's hardly gonna get street cred for taking him out.
User avatar #143 to #126 - hellomynameisbill ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
"the prophecy" cliche said that harry would be able to slay voldemort
#22 to #3 - anon (06/18/2014) [-]
More like a stupid wizard. They do exist in the physical plane its not like their bodies don't exist they can do stuff with them jeez.
#46 to #3 - hjklasdf (06/18/2014) [-]
Wands are magical therefore stabbing him with the wand would be within his standards.
#94 to #46 - bann (06/18/2014) [-]
He's magical...therefore simply killing him would have been magic enough. Just need to accept it's a story and if logic applied through out it would be a short and boring story.
User avatar #7 to #3 - rockmanfan (06/17/2014) [-]
and man did he **** that up.
User avatar #100 to #7 - mion ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
Didn't he basically vanish directly after the spell malfunctioned?
User avatar #111 to #100 - lereturnedtroll (06/18/2014) [-]
It rebounded onto him, and would have killed him if not for the
Spoiler if you haven't seen the later movies or read the books
horcruxes
User avatar #4 - ricielazrael (06/17/2014) [-]
Throwing him out of the window might not have hurt Harry. Neville Longbottom was thrown out of the window by accident as a child, and bounced like a bouncy ball, not taking any damage.
User avatar #11 to #4 - willshire ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
"not taking any damage" the harry potter universe is not a video game
User avatar #12 to #11 - ricielazrael (06/17/2014) [-]
Well, English is not my native language. I wasn't aware 'taking damage' is a term exclusively used in computer games. In German, it's not.
User avatar #15 to #12 - wedgehead (06/17/2014) [-]
In English neither. This dude just done goofed.
User avatar #49 to #15 - basicargentinian (06/18/2014) [-]
It still would be better to say "without getting hurt"
User avatar #50 to #49 - basicargentinian (06/18/2014) [-]
And "taking damedge" is pretty gamer when applied to a living being
User avatar #123 to #50 - wedgehead (06/18/2014) [-]
No. Its a phrase that has already been used pretty often in the middke of the 20th century.
User avatar #132 to #123 - basicargentinian (06/18/2014) [-]
where in the year 2014 though
User avatar #133 to #132 - basicargentinian (06/18/2014) [-]
we're*
User avatar #135 to #133 - wedgehead (06/18/2014) [-]
And whats the problem?
User avatar #136 to #135 - basicargentinian (06/18/2014) [-]
that in the year 2014 saying "taking damedge" is used for gaming, also, the book says something along the lines of "without getting hurt".
User avatar #138 to #136 - wedgehead (06/18/2014) [-]
The phrases meaning hasnt changed. It just expanded and is now also used when it comes down to videogames.
But if you think that it is only used for videogames, then you sould really turn your xbox off.
User avatar #140 to #138 - basicargentinian (06/18/2014) [-]
or maybe you should stop going to the ren fair.
User avatar #58 to #4 - thebaseballexpert (06/18/2014) [-]
Knife? i'm sure there is a knife-like object SOMEWHERE in the house
#104 to #74 - amuzen (06/18/2014) [-]
but a dragon isn't a wizard's strongest weapon, I mean **** Dementors are even worse than dragons and they at least have control over those.
User avatar #146 to #104 - hellomynameisbill ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
A dementor takes roughly 20 seconds to exorcise a man's soul.

within 6 seconds, the Fatman atomic bomb can kill almost 200 000 people
User avatar #127 to #104 - noisia (06/18/2014) [-]
Still...
Dementors < Nuke
User avatar #118 to #74 - Darianvincent ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
Science prevails!
#1 - woodoo (06/17/2014) [-]
Actually, Voldemorts body was destroyed after the spell rebounded off of harry, and what little remained fled to Romania. Anyone who's read the books more than once should know that.
#35 to #1 - comradewinter ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
I haven't even read the books, but it's stated by Hagrid in the Philosopher's Stone that "something that day stopped him". And looking at what he was like until The Goblet of Fire you could tell he probably didn't have the strength or patience to kill him off.
#142 to #1 - anon (06/18/2014) [-]
but the rest have a life and are not retarded like you
User avatar #6 to #1 - angelious (06/17/2014) [-]
and that could have been avoided by picking up the baby and throwing it out of the window


or by popping a bullet on the ******* head.
#13 to #6 - anon (06/17/2014) [-]
Given the fact he had no idea SOOPER MUTHA LUV MAGICK was a thing in the wide world of magic and that no one in history had ever survived a killing curse before i think he was pretty justified in using magic to kill a baby. Then a bunch of ******** happened he was destroyed by the rebound as said above and was then in no state to throw a baby anywhere or handle a firearm.
Plus he's a magical wizard in the UK. You really think he'd dirty himself talking to muggles for guns when he has magic?
Finally it's a goddamn book and this massive stupid SOOPER MUTHA LUV MAGICK was pretty much the get out of jail free card for the whole series so shut up and enjoy this mediocre pot broiler of a series.
User avatar #91 to #6 - psykobear ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
When the curse rebounded, it almost killed Voldemort. He was in no condition to do anything.
#145 to #91 - angelious (06/18/2014) [-]
and thats why using a gun in the first place would have been smarter.unless you claim that the superdupercallifrigalistastic love magic could actually create kevlar vests out of thin air   
   
   
i rest my case
and thats why using a gun in the first place would have been smarter.unless you claim that the superdupercallifrigalistastic love magic could actually create kevlar vests out of thin air


i rest my case
User avatar #152 to #145 - psykobear ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
Voldemort hated muggles and anything they use, and relied heavily on magic. He demonstrates superiority through magic, and of course would use it for his crimes. But even ignoring that, why would he use any other method? No one had ever survived the killing curse. He had no incentive or inclination to not use the curse.
User avatar #153 to #152 - angelious (06/18/2014) [-]
the point isnt why voldemort should use guns,nor why he doesnt


the point is.he would have had a lot easier time if he had used guns.
User avatar #154 to #153 - psykobear ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
Well okay. But my main point was that he didn't know he would have an easier time. Avada Kedavra is basically a wizard's gun. Would you stop to think, "Maybe, for some reason, this toddler will survive this shot. I should use something else."? He had no reason to think that it wouldn't work.
User avatar #155 to #154 - angelious (06/18/2014) [-]
maybe.but i do believe a tactical artillery strike is a lot more efficient
User avatar #156 to #155 - psykobear ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
Yep.
#5 to #1 - anon (06/17/2014) [-]
I think they mean instead of using the curse, not after
User avatar #90 to #5 - psykobear ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
Why would he do that when he has no reason to believe that the curse would fail?
#19 to #5 - woodoo (06/17/2014) [-]
No actually, he couldn't. He was going to use harry to create his final horcrux, in order to do so he had to kill harry using magic. Yes, he could have not used harry, but he's vain as **** and wanted the soul of his only threat to be what ultimately made him immortal.
#26 to #19 - anon (06/18/2014) [-]
He had already finished his horcruxes. Harry being one was an accident.
#97 to #26 - ricielazrael (06/18/2014) [-]
he was not finished when he tried to kill harre. he wanted to use the murder of harry to create the last horcrux, he did not want do turn harry into a horcrux - that, he did accidently. voldemort used 'meaningfull' deaths to create his horcruxes, and harrys was such. the dark lord later created nagini, his snake, as his final horcrux, but he did that after his return
#17 to #1 - AnonymousDonor ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
at all_   
   
anyone who's read the book at all would know that   
   
			*******		 			****		 thats the stupidest thing ive ever read on tumblr - what, he just shoots the kid, fails with his body in infant-throwing condition, and just decides_ to go chill on the back of somebody's head for the next 12 years?   
   
goddamn ive read some stupid 			****		 but.....goddamn
at all_

anyone who's read the book at all would know that

******* **** thats the stupidest thing ive ever read on tumblr - what, he just shoots the kid, fails with his body in infant-throwing condition, and just
decides_ to go chill on the back of somebody's head for the next 12 years?

goddamn ive read some stupid **** but.....goddamn
#18 to #17 - woodoo (06/17/2014) [-]
He didn't, he spent 11 years hanging out in the place where he got one of his horcruxes. Quirrell was totally fine until the year before Harrys 11th birthday, and got possessed after that point. This is okay to forget though, as it's only mentioned in passing.
#40 to #18 - AnonymousDonor ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
yeah it didnt sound quite right but my phrasing was easier so i went with that

which horcrux was that?
#125 to #40 - woodoo (06/18/2014) [-]
The diadem, Ravenclaws daughter hid out in Albania after stealing it and running off.
#76 - grimmwaters ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #69 - leonhardt (06/18/2014) [-]
I wanna see an HBO series where Muggles find out about this **** and start shooting every ****** with a beard and a long robe.
#67 - mastersaturday (06/18/2014) [-]
Except, dumbass, the spell ravaged Voldemort. Destroyed his body and protected Harry from even being touched by him. Love is the most powerful magic of all.
#75 to #67 - samoaspider (06/18/2014) [-]
+not forgetting the fact that spells had no effect on Harry
+not forgetting the fact that spells had no effect on Harry
User avatar #101 to #67 - commontroll (06/18/2014) [-]
Well apparently magic isn't all that powerful then, seeing how we can shoot people even though they're loved.
#105 to #101 - amuzen (06/18/2014) [-]
Yeah but they don't even need to be loved in order to cast a charm capable of stopping bullets.
User avatar #106 to #105 - commontroll (06/18/2014) [-]
Then that means love isn't the most powerful magic.

Either way none of it makes sense.
#110 to #106 - amuzen (06/18/2014) [-]
No that means magic is still magic complete with force fields, good luck charms, teleportation, and a million different cantrips and tricks for the everyday situation when compared to mundane **** like guns.
Basically
Magic > guns
Ancient love based super vague sacrificial magic > all the other types of magic

The whole point of the love based magic thing was that it was absolutely entirely final, voldemort could not kill Harry, if he shot a gun at him it would have ricocheted, if he tried to choke him his hands would turn to ash, if he shot a spell at him it would rebound, if he doused him in oil and tossed a match on him it would've sizzled out.
that particular brand of magic was straight up ******** plot magic that could adapt to whatever situation it needed to.
User avatar #115 to #110 - epicpoke (06/18/2014) [-]
In that situation, I would hire an assassin. Just stab Harry when he does not have his wand. Or poison. Burning. Drowning. Blunt trauma. Mortality, really. And magic does not save you from all "muggle" methods of death. Pretty sure falling from a tower or something without a broom or flying beast to catch you would be fatal.
User avatar #149 to #110 - commontroll (06/18/2014) [-]
Then why did Harry freak out and try to survive all kinds of stuff if he was apparently invincible? If you shot with a .50 caliber rifle from half a mile away, he wouldn't hear anything, he would just suddenly be hit with a half inch wide piece of steel and be raining on the rest of Hogwarts by the time the others heard the bullet.

Muggles were able to capture and kill witches and wizards in the past, remember the Salem Witch Trials? In the Harry Potter Universe, that was one of the things that made them a secret society and forbade them from using magic around muggles.
#150 to #149 - amuzen (06/18/2014) [-]
Because
A. Harry didn't understand the limits of that power, it was still risky for him.
B. He could still be killed by Voldemort's followers
C. He could still kill all of his friends, Harry wasn't freaking out about voldemort coming back because he thought he was going to kill him, he was freaking out about Voldemort coming back because he thought he was going to get rid of Hogwarts.
D. When Voldemort did come back using his Harry's blood as a catalyst it circumvented the charm placed on him by his mother and they said as much.
#119 to #67 - testaburger (06/18/2014) [-]
"Love is the most powerful magic of all."
User avatar #148 to #119 - mastersaturday (06/18/2014) [-]
That's what the book said.
User avatar #71 to #67 - charredenay (06/18/2014) [-]
Yeah, but why did Voldemort even bother with a spell when killing a baby is so God-damned easy? Like, super easy guys.
User avatar #72 to #71 - mastersaturday (06/18/2014) [-]
I guess he was on a roll with the parents and he kept going. Besides, the whole "can't touch him" thing...
User avatar #80 to #72 - charredenay (06/18/2014) [-]
He could've still collapsed the house on the little **** . This is some seriously sloppy villainy here. Hell, he could've just as easily told one of his minions to take care of it.

"Hey, Pettigrew, I can't touch the baby for some reason, you mind taking care of it for me?"
"Does my lord wish me to cast a killing spell?"
"No, no. Just drop him from about, say, shoulder height. No need to overcomplicate things."
User avatar #83 to #80 - mastersaturday (06/18/2014) [-]
You think he'd stoop so low? No, this is the Tom Marvolo ******* Riddle, the heir of Slytherin. He's gotta do it in style, and he's gotta do it himself.
User avatar #85 to #83 - charredenay (06/18/2014) [-]
If you want style, you go to a fashion show. You want to rule the planet, you kill the "Chosen One" quickly and with as little chance of ******* it up as possible. I repeat, "wizards are ******* useless".
User avatar #86 to #85 - mastersaturday (06/18/2014) [-]
Oh I'm not denying that. I'm just saying, that's not what Voldemort would do.
#87 to #86 - charredenay (06/18/2014) [-]
Then I suppose there is nothing left for us argue. Good day sir.
Then I suppose there is nothing left for us argue. Good day sir.
#93 to #87 - shadowvision (06/18/2014) [-]
I would like to point out that at the time of casting the death curse on Harry, Voldy had no idea that Harry was protected.
#107 to #80 - amuzen (06/18/2014) [-]
Yeah except he had no prior knowledge that he wouldn't be able to touch or harm the baby directly in anyway until he tried to harm the baby directly and once he did that he was ****** .

It's like asking a guy who stepped on a landmine in a forest why he didn't just jump from branch to branch on the trees. without subsequent knowledge of said landmine, why would he bother doing that **** ? same goes for voldemort, if you think you can kill bitches with a glance you kill them with a glance you don't go collapsing houses on them or some **** .
#96 - anon (06/18/2014) [-]
In order to gain power and eternal life [via horcruxes] Voldemort HAS to kill with magic. Murdering someone in a non-magical way would not yield the same result.
In order to gain power and eternal life [via horcruxes] Voldemort HAS to kill with magic. Murdering someone in a non-magical way would not yield the same result.
User avatar #98 to #96 - popcornqueen (06/18/2014) [-]
But he didn't WANT to make another horcrux that night. It was an accident.
#121 to #98 - anon (06/18/2014) [-]
Yes he did. He was going to use Harry to make his sixth and final one.
We can infer that he had probably made preparations to split his soul before setting out.
User avatar #89 - krobeles (06/18/2014) [-]
Well, didn't his spell kinda backfire pretty much killing him? Like, he tried to be all wizardy, killing Harry with spells, which then ended up killing him?

I haven't read the books beyond The Order of Whats-Its-Face, and I hardly remember anything from that, so...
#92 to #89 - shadowvision (06/18/2014) [-]
Yes, that is what happened.
#95 to #89 - solomonkane (06/18/2014) [-]
I like how you used the spoiler thing on the sentence that wasn't a spoiler..
User avatar #130 to #95 - krobeles (06/18/2014) [-]
None of that was a spoiler though. The "Voldemorts spell backfired and killed himself" is pretty well established by the first 10 pages of the first book, or something like that.
User avatar #103 to #95 - satansferret (06/18/2014) [-]
Snape kills dumbledor
#77 to #73 - grimmwaters ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #109 to #78 - sweetnothings (06/18/2014) [-]
what is the source of that gif?
#131 to #109 - anon (06/18/2014) [-]
Harry Potter Friday parody by the Hillywood Show... check Youtube, it's good for a giggle.
User avatar #157 to #131 - sweetnothings (06/18/2014) [-]
thanks!
#64 - thegreenbutton (06/18/2014) [-]
Didnt he get obliterated by his own spell.
#59 - anon (06/18/2014) [-]
he would not have been able to touch him anyways.
User avatar #82 to #59 - lotengo (06/18/2014) [-]
Just dropkick him, no physical contact
User avatar #23 - xplosevdiarrhea (06/18/2014) [-]
You underestimate the laziness of a man with the option. It would make more sense for wizards to carry guns as backup, but their kinda heavy.
User avatar #10 - ntobarrev (06/17/2014) [-]
This content is ******** , and I'm not even going to explain why.
#102 to #10 - anon (06/18/2014) [-]
i believe he could of done it before the fact... but i guess that is just me....
#25 to #10 - cowcubrub (06/18/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #37 to #25 - ntobarrev (06/18/2014) [-]
Because of reasons.

But Siriusly, it's all already been said in the comments. Here's a summary:

- After the spell failed, he didn't have a body. He was "less than a ghost", as stated in the books. How could he have picked up a child and throw him?

And for those idiots who won't accept that argument ...

- Why bother doing that, when he had the power to do whatever he wanted by pointing a stick?

- He was planning on making his last horcrux by murdering Harry, which would require, you guessed it, MAGIC. gif related

- Voldemort despised pretty much anything non-magical. Why the **** would he do like the filthy muggles?

and other reasons, because **** all of you, I'm tired of typing.
#44 to #37 - ntobarrev (06/18/2014) [-]
Forgot the gif.
Forgot the gif.
User avatar #29 to #25 - zdawg (06/18/2014) [-]
Because he was literally weaker than a ghost at that point
User avatar #31 to #29 - cowcubrub (06/18/2014) [-]
That was directly after he tried killing Harry.
User avatar #34 to #31 - zdawg (06/18/2014) [-]
I assumed that the post meant "After the spell didn't work"
User avatar #36 to #34 - cowcubrub (06/18/2014) [-]
I think they mean instead of the spell.
User avatar #39 to #36 - ntobarrev (06/18/2014) [-]
Well gee, son, it's not like there's a ******** of valid points proving you wrong on this page.


oh wait
User avatar #38 to #36 - zdawg (06/18/2014) [-]
Now that I could understand, but I'd imagine old voldy would want to do it in a ceremonial way. I'd imagine one elegant incantation would hold a lot more weight in the mind of a murderer than seeing how far a newborn can fly when thrown from a window
User avatar #42 to #38 - cowcubrub (06/18/2014) [-]
I get what you're saying. Like instead of making his horcruxes random objects, he used priceless items and artifacts.
User avatar #47 to #42 - zdawg (06/18/2014) [-]
Plus they said that he likes collecting trophies, and he felt he was the owner of hogwarts, so taking something from each of the previous owners and making them horcruxes was like him conquering them.
User avatar #141 - iamnuff (06/18/2014) [-]
didn't he ******* die the moment he cast his spell? because Hurry porter deflected it off his shiny fivehead?

He didn't exactly have a chance to give it a second try.
User avatar #120 - arokky (06/18/2014) [-]
I just don't think he NOSE how to do that?
User avatar #117 - andovaredoras (06/18/2014) [-]
All the people in the comments should remember that Voldemort was on the ''magic is superior than muggles'' rampage. So of course he would use his killing curse instead of the ''normal thing to do''.
User avatar #122 to #117 - tormain (06/18/2014) [-]
Yeah because smashing an infant's head against the wall is ''the normal thing to do''.
#128 to #122 - andovaredoras (06/18/2014) [-]
Easier  to say 2 words instead of going through the bother of picking up a baby and smashing it's head against the wall.
Easier to say 2 words instead of going through the bother of picking up a baby and smashing it's head against the wall.
User avatar #129 to #122 - andovaredoras (06/18/2014) [-]
refer to comment #3
User avatar #57 - EasyEnzie (06/18/2014) [-]
question. in OOTF harry can see thestrawls because he witnessed cedrics death. why couldn't he always see them because he witnessed his mother die?
#60 to #57 - urapooper (06/18/2014) [-]
I think it's because it really traumatized him when cedric died but when his mother died he was still a stupid baby that didn't understand what was happening.
#81 - Orc (06/18/2014) [-]
**Orc rolled image** The only place lizardlicktowing could post his lizard licking cereal gifs and the le how you dare stand there maymay face wouldn't make me rage as badly.
**Orc rolled image** The only place lizardlicktowing could post his lizard licking cereal gifs and the le how you dare stand there maymay face wouldn't make me rage as badly.
[ 157 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)