1. It has more maps than Reach, 10 in total, when Reach came out it had like 8. Not only that but if you count the forge environments you have 13 maps.
2. Game modes? They are there, not in Matchmaking yet, next week is the update for SWAT. BS Angel even said in the new bulletin yesterday that they will update Matchmaking weekly instead of Reach's monthly. The problem with Reach was there were too many gamemodes/playlists, thus separating the population making it appear less.
3. They might do that, there's a reason why they don't due to people who vote for a certain gametype, E.G. Elite Slayer, while others didn't want it. So, in order to fix it if you want to play -insert gametype here- then go into the playlist instead of hoping to get lucky in the playlist it should be in.

Oh and don't forget all the DLC's with 4 coming too.

Yeah I don't like the lack of playlists in 4 either. I'm hoping that more game types will be added with all of the DLCs.

but when reach came out they had very few game modes and they added more with each patch, they will most likely do the same with halo 4

And I guess you have played Halo 4 as much as you have played Reach?

didn't think this one through, did you faggot?

I will give halo 4 props for allowing people to join in during the middle of games

Then play Halo Reach.

The game came out THREE days ago.

I've played the multiplayer enough to give my critique to it. Roughly 10 hours

Thats like playing wow to level 20 and then complain about how boring the raids are.

And I've played it 10 hours. More than enough to give out an opinion. Some reviewers spend less than that for reviewing a whole game

And those are typically horrible reviews. A review shouldn't be done until all aspects of the game are experimented with and finished. I saw a review on Borderlands 2 that said the game was complete rubbish and they didn't even give it the time to get to the point where the game slaps you in the face with its dick with the story.

Also, another problem with critics is that many times someone goes in biased. Like I've seen with AC 3, people are dissing Connor because from what I hear he's emotionless, especially when compared to Ezio. But need I remind you that Altair was as well? Altair was rather cold ESPECIALLY when compared to Ezio, all he cared about was doing his job.

Ezio is Italian, need I say more?, and what's more he's Old Italian, and the Italians are known for being very emotional and strong with them as well. Connor is Native American, which are very stoic, and what's more is in the middle of the Revolutionary War. Of course he's not going to be happy and charming as Ezio was.

My point and rant being... people review with too much bias or they don't give enough time for decent reviews.

The reason I said it came out three days ago, is they still need to work out the bugs. Give it a few weeks, let them add the stuff you're talking about, and then critique it.

Trust me, I'm not writing it off. I'm just saying that they have a long way to go to top Reach's multiplayer in my opinion