seriously though. .. as a gay hairdresser.... Leviticus really hates me... -.-
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

seriously though

+699
Views: 24916
Favorited: 32
Submitted: 02/10/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to thebritishguy Subscribe to gay E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #6 - actinglead (02/10/2013) [+] (4 replies)
as a gay hairdresser.... Leviticus really hates me... -.-
User avatar #1 - steedawwg **User deleted account** (02/10/2013) [+] (6 replies)
So... many... colours... why?!
#2 to #1 - mr skeltal (02/10/2013) [-]
Because he's gay and is making a point out of the Leviticus entries that we are choosing to ignore versus those we apparently heed to.
User avatar #9 - Vandeekree (02/10/2013) [+] (28 replies)
Tis old testament.
User avatar #11 to #10 - Vandeekree (02/10/2013) [-]
i will look these over to make sure i understand but from reading it once it looks like there is a lot of misunderstanding in these quoted verses. Such as when Jesus says none of the law will pass away but only after founding the "second covenant ."

"...I will establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not like the covenant I made with their fathers." (Heb 8:8-9)

The old testament is about bondage and the new testament is more focused on freedom.
The Old Testament was enacted with a curse saying, "Cursed be every one who does not abide by all things written in the book of the law, and do them." (Galatians 3:10) But the New Testament was enacted with a promise, "For if the inheritance is by the law, it is no longer by promise; but God gave it to Abraham by a promise." (Galatians 3:18)
The new testament, when looking at the bible as a whole, is in fact not only an extension but a rewriting of much of the old testament.

"I do not nullify the grace of God; for if justification were through the law, then Christ died to no purpose." (Galatians 2:21)
"He abolishes the first in order to establish the second." (Heb 10:9)

The law still stands as an example of what is right, but not what must be followed. Salvation no longer comes from actions, but from intent.
"You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace." (Galatians 5:4)

This needs a lot more explanation but there is limited room here so i invite you to study on your own and see why this is true.
#69 - xrainbowdashx (02/11/2013) [+] (6 replies)
Am I the only one here that doesn't have an opinion on gay marriage?
#40 - ettripod (02/11/2013) [+] (4 replies)
what are the versus that it says u cant get a hair cut
#44 to #43 - ettripod (02/11/2013) [-]
I was going to thank you but then you corrected me, so **** you.
User avatar #35 - corundum (02/11/2013) [-]
Can't have sex with a man as you would with a woman.

Well.... "I'd NEVER have sex with a woman."

Problem solved.
User avatar #62 - whipptron (02/11/2013) [-]
Yeah man. Why can't I sell my daughter into slavery? (Exodus 21:7)

....seriously... why not?
#60 - bazda (02/11/2013) [+] (11 replies)
The laws in Leviticus also only applied to priests from the tribe of Levi, but I guess we're skipping context.
User avatar #29 - mexicandudeinsd (02/11/2013) [-]
gggggggaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
#51 - mr skeltal (02/11/2013) [+] (4 replies)
So, since we're now throwing out the entire book of Leviticus instead of certain chapters, does that mean pro-gay Christians also endorse incest?
#57 to #55 - mr skeltal (02/11/2013) [-]
No, I'm serious. A consistent view of the Bible is essential to moral discussions.
User avatar #49 - trojanmannn (02/11/2013) [+] (3 replies)
weird how everyone (pro-gay, anti-gay) quotes leviticus even though it's not even part of Christian law.
User avatar #39 - roliga (02/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
So why is it that this is just fine how come if I hosted a straight pride parade I'd get a ton of **** from pro gay people?
User avatar #37 - badsamaritan (02/11/2013) [+] (6 replies)
but that is the old testament, and the old law.
Christians believe int the new testament and the new law
#54 - mr skeltal (02/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I just let people live how they choose and don't gripe about it. Love, understanding, and respect for thy fellow men. And women, can't forget the ladies...
0
#46 - nengcaste **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #36 - xyxoz (02/11/2013) [-]
Holy crap. There's a legitimately intelligent and peaceful discussion about religion in the comments section. Thank God/Buddha/Allah/Atom/The Great Noodley One/Bob!
User avatar #34 - Crusader (02/11/2013) [+] (2 replies)
The bible just says no gay sex, and that you can't have sex with a man as you would with a woman.
So it is more a law against anal/sodomy in general than saying no gays.
User avatar #45 to #34 - ivoryhammer (02/11/2013) [-]
It never says sex, it says that you shouldn't lie in bed as you would with a woman.
#83 - FoonyJoonk (02/11/2013) [-]
Silly, internet. We all know that the old testament doesn't matter after Jesus died for our sins. Either that or because the Jews nailed him to a cross.
Silly, internet. We all know that the old testament doesn't matter after Jesus died for our sins. Either that or because the Jews nailed him to a cross.
User avatar #81 - greatbear (02/11/2013) [-]
I don't give a **** about gays and their rights, but why did you make a gay channeL? **** funnyjunk, i'm out
 Friends (0)