after all he did we never got to see his death scene, this is a show when someone gets their head crushed you go for the close up, but we cant see the death when brienne chops his head off... almost makes me think that somehow he was spared

i have no idea, but for a show known for its violence its kinda wierd that we dont see his fukken death

>But killing Starks for literally no reason was perfectly ok.
>>Not mentioning that Stark not only deserved the kingdom but it was was willed it.
Whatever bud.

If ****** that up but you can still read it

I can read it, but it makes no ******* sense.
"Not mentioning that Stark not only deserved the kingdom but it was was willed it. "
"It was was willed it"
By ******* who? No one ever wanted the Starks to rule.
They also never laid claim on the whole kingdom, just the North
And Stannis never killed Starks
What the **** are you banging on about

What he said.
Robert wanted Stark to rule because he knew Stark was a better ruler. But his wife burned his will so no one would ever know and beheaded Stark for trying to stake his claim.
But I bet that wasent in the show was it.

robert didnt want the starks to RULE. he wanted eddard as hand of the king and to be the proxy king until joffrey came of age, he didnt forsake joffery as heir, he never found out the truth of his kids and so he never forsook them.

eddard did know of the kids lineage and he attempted to usurp joffrey and give power to stannis baratheon who is rightful king by blood.

cersei blocked this with the help of petyr baelish and the spider. and eddard was to be sent to the wall after he confessed that he attempted to usurp the throne from joffrey

joffrey went against the plan and had eddard beheaded, resulting in open rebellion in the north.

Don't you start with me mate, I read the damn books too.
If I remember right, Robert wanted Ned to rule until Joffrey was of a proper age. Not permanently. Or at least, continue as Hand. But Ned knew Roberts "sons" were not his own, and tried to put Stannis on the throne, as by right of succession, the throne was his.

The Starks have no claim to the whole kingdom and only a loose claim to the North. And on top of that, neither Ned nor Robb want the throne. Ned wanted to ******* go home, Robb wanted independence for the North.

It is still a loose claim, because it was surrendered 300 years ago. The King in the North, Torrhen Stark, surrendered to Aegon, and as such, surrendered his right to rule and his claim to the North. By right of conquest, by Aegon the ******* Conqueror, the Starks gave up the right to be Kings in the North, same as people gave up their claims of kingship when the Starks made themselves the Kings in the North so long ago.

Robb had to cling to the title. There was no power in it outside the North and Riverlands. There would only be power in it if he had won, when the rest of the kingdom would have to recognise it.