NSFW: two men at once
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
59 comments displayed.
#23 to #2
-
sirlorge (01/06/2016) [-] 
Typically, no*. That's why loading docks exist or forklifts, for the lack thereof or elevators on the back of the truck or ramps for the container. Removing the supporting legs would allow for very unprofessional uneven loading, but then you're stuck with a heavy ass container that *needs a crane to put the legs back under it.
#63 to #57
-
sirlorge (01/06/2016) [-]
It's the name of the content, and I was binging the "straight up caught" series by notenoughtortillas. Great coincidence though.
"Rice planting machine" " **** : two men at once" "Straight up caught comp 1" "Straight up caught comp 2" "Straight up caught comp 3" "Straight up caught comp 4" etc.
"Rice planting machine" " **** : two men at once" "Straight up caught comp 1" "Straight up caught comp 2" "Straight up caught comp 3" "Straight up caught comp 4" etc.
#19 to #12
-
thebadspellir (01/06/2016) [-] You can crank the legs on most of these type of trailers down, not all the way though
#52 to #6
-
ohemgeezus (01/06/2016) [-] HFW walking away
cause he said there's plenty of fish in the sea
cause he said there's plenty of fish in the sea
#24
-
skeletorexplains ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-] The OH&S side of my brain went off at this. "That's a 50,000$ fine."
#53 to #24
-
hueduebue (01/06/2016) [-]
Anyone with a proper forklift license that had safety lessons(thats mandatory here which goes alongside the tests and such) knows all this. Not that some things you do daily may not be 100% what rules say. Though it just has to be done as safely as possible. But definitely your taught atleast here that your responsible if your driving the forklift and its your job to do safe job. And that means denying your boss if he says something thats dangerous with it.
#54 to #53
-
skeletorexplains ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-] I was trained to drive a forklift, and no, they didn't advocate this at all. it was actually one of the many things they said "Don't let us catch you ******* doing this."
#55 to #54
-
hueduebue (01/06/2016) [-]
Im presuming your in the US? wouldn't surprise me they even care to say you hold responsibility for the failure of doing a safe job with the forklift if your driving it. In Denmark our work ethics and various safety organisations put requirements on how to safely train workers in various operation for tools that your work place can have one of which can be forklifts etc. You actually get explained weight tolerances and what kinda uses some forklifts has and what you are not allowed to do during transport with something on your forks. Example a smaller container the square ones. You cannot see ahead so basic safety says drive backwards as optimally as possible and lift for example when your the closest to the place its supposed to go at if your stacking. And other various safety rules same with ramp driving rules and the yes and no's of that. So here you get all the required basics you need to understand for doing safe work with in this case a forklift. I can tell you if any safety organisations here got a wind of bad forklift usage at a workplace and unsafe stacking or what have you now. You get fined very fast here. They really push the idea of absolutely avoiding injury of workers or death.
#56 to #55
-
skeletorexplains ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-] No, Australia... The very first few things we were told about forklifts in the theory part was how to NOT used them, What to do if your forks hit a powerline and how to safely exit the vehicle without electrocuting yourself somehow. Tires, yeah i know. But they still went on about how you're supposed to Hop out, rather than slide out of the forklift because you may ground it if you STEP out.
#60
-
brokentrucker ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-] Who do I see about the duck that OSHA just had while watching this?
#42
-
shadownigga (01/06/2016) [-] Good lord the safety manager must have a god damn aneurism working with these guys every day.
#5
-
sixinthehood (01/05/2016) [-] I'm actually very impressed the forks took the weight of that other lift. After working in a warehouse, I was always fantasizing of using a reach-lift to put another in the racking but I always thought the forks would just break.
#8 to #5
-
CaptainZero (01/05/2016) [-]
The forks on ours are solid steel it'll take a lot to break them. Also the second forklift is definitely much bigger than the first one
#7 to #5
-
hektoroftroy (01/05/2016) [-] I might be wrong, but it looks like the first lift is using its own forks to support the weight.
Pushing down against the trailer so the weight isn't all resting on the forks of the second lift
Pushing down against the trailer so the weight isn't all resting on the forks of the second lift
#38 to #13
-
hektoroftroy (01/06/2016) [-] yeah but im sure there's something preventing the forks from just flying into the air, if theres a motor powering the forks up, it would provide resistance, so while its not literally pushing itself up, it's using the trailer and resistance from the motor for support, if that makes any sense.
I might be retarded though
I might be retarded though
#9 to #5
-
lennybrown (01/05/2016) [-] Since I cant see an exhaust they both electrical am guessing the orange 1 is 2000kg cap the 1 yellow is a 4000kg cap. Also you should never do this you can lose your flt licence but from the looks of it was the only way at that location. If they used a ramp the arch wound not of fit really the should of had a lift and trolly.
#58
-
anon (01/06/2016) [-]
This is exactly what they tell you not to do when you do your Forklift licence. Also MAAAEEERSK!
#44
-
elcreepo (01/06/2016) [-] A forklift for a forklift
Don't we have ramps for this kind of problem
Don't we have ramps for this kind of problem
#43
-
keroberios ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
Actually, the way they're doing it isn't 100% stupid. Front lifter is using his prongs to keep balanced on the trailer as back lifter picks him up/brings him down. All things considered, with a pair of skilled operators it would be rather trivial.
