Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #28 - anonefgthree (05/29/2013) [-]
If this was in the US they would both get fired and there would be a lawsuit
#269 to #28 - kaarvaag (05/30/2013) [-]
Only in the US would people flip **** at it and only see it as an opportunity to sue them and get money.
User avatar #248 to #28 - capslockrage (05/30/2013) [-]
no, there wouldn't.
#245 to #28 - mosesisgay (05/30/2013) [-]
American freedom in a nutshell.

fuk da police
User avatar #127 to #28 - doomfish (05/30/2013) [-]
I live in a US newcastle haha
User avatar #104 to #28 - johnnygat ONLINE (05/30/2013) [-]
I work in the US and I can confirm this.
User avatar #44 to #28 - dashgamer (05/29/2013) [-]
Wait, what? How would she even have a legal precedent for suing them?
User avatar #70 to #44 - walkerjam (05/29/2013) [-]
From what I've heard, sanity works in mysterious ways over in the US of A.
#158 to #70 - vangoz has deleted their comment [-]
#234 to #158 - fefe (05/30/2013) [-]

That's actually just an urban legend.
User avatar #76 to #70 - dashgamer (05/29/2013) [-]
I'm in the US, and I'm sane...
User avatar #123 to #76 - zorororonoa (05/30/2013) [-]
Insane people always thing they are sane and normal
#78 to #76 - walkerjam (05/29/2013) [-]
Hmm... Are you... suuuuure...?
Hmm... Are you... suuuuure...?
#84 to #78 - dashgamer (05/29/2013) [-]
He's on to me. Woop woop woop woop woop!
He's on to me. Woop woop woop woop woop!
#38 to #28 - silverhellion (05/29/2013) [-]
that's the most retarded reason for a lawsuit i've ever heard. not that i've heard of retarded lawsuits to begin with, as seeing i live in NZ and we'd just have a good laugh and give them a few beers as a thank you for not stealing my phone.
#75 to #38 - majortomcomics (05/29/2013) [-]
Well, you see, America has weakened itself by trying to please minorities, like the environmentalists, humanitarians, etc... Anyways, these minorities include the people too stupid to live, who think it's unfair that they are not warned that something inevitable or obvious will happen, and take no responsibility (e.g. kid dicking around, kid falls, kid scrapes knee, kid's mom sues cement company for hurting her kid's knee.) This is also the reason I dislike liberals, since they tend to be overly-passive, and they have a mindset in which all minorities must be embraced and catered to, which is just stupid. (My hate for liberals does not make me a republican, since I hate them, too.) Anyways, there are now regulations on everything, and since no one wants to be sued, they have ridiculous safety requirements, laws, etc... Which is ******** because if someone is too stupid to live, they should probably go do something stupid and die, instead of being catered to.

Here is a prime example. In the case of Liebeck v. McDonalds, some stupid cunt, Liebeck, sued Mcdonalds for, get this, serving her hot coffee, which SHE spilled on HER lap, causing severe burns. But, get this, the cup in which the coffee was served did not have a label warning that it was hot. Common. ******* . Sense.
That stupid bitch won, and is why we, in America (not sure about other countries) have to have a label on our coffee, warning us that its contents are hot. Pretty ******* stupid, and so, those are just my thoughts on frivolous lawsuits.
#215 to #75 - fefe (05/30/2013) [-]
I had to look up the Liebeck vs Mcdonalds case for business law class. There is more to that case than spilled coffee but most people never bothered to look into it. . While at the time most establishments kept there coffee at lower temperature around 140 degrees, Mc D had theirs at 180 to 190 degrees Fahrenheit. Temperatures this high cause severe burns in 2 to 7 seconds. She had to get a skin graft and medical treatment for about two years after the spilled coffee incident. She originally wanted only enough to at-least cover half of her medical expenses. The courts gave her millions for punitive damages to punish Mcdonalds so they would lower the temperature of their coffee. So yeah, she wasn't a complete stupid cunt.
#171 to #75 - onceapiece (05/30/2013) [-]
That mcdonald's thing was actually because the coffee gave her 2nd to 3rd degree burns all over her legs. She wanted something to pay for the medical bill; she could care less about a label.
User avatar #136 to #75 - drdonothing (05/30/2013) [-]
like how kinder eggs got banned because some silly twat choked on the toy.
User avatar #137 to #136 - majortomcomics (05/30/2013) [-]
#153 to #137 - zetaroxos **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#154 to #153 - zetaroxos **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#142 to #139 - majortomcomics (05/30/2013) [-]
User avatar #258 to #142 - xzynth (05/30/2013) [-]
oh god, that scene man, that scene.
#116 to #75 - thempc (05/30/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#82 to #75 - silverhellion (05/29/2013) [-]
User avatar #93 to #82 - majortomcomics (05/29/2013) [-]
I wish America could learn how to let stupid ***** go die like they would in the wild, New Zealand should let us borrow its notes on not being ******* stupid.
User avatar #91 to #82 - majortomcomics (05/29/2013) [-]
People provide sympathy and a safe environment for idiots, keeping them alive.
User avatar #89 to #82 - heartlessrobot (05/29/2013) [-]
Too many people are enablers.
#30 to #28 - fefe (05/29/2013) [-]
She could sue them, but british people tend to have a sense of ******* humour and don't act like heartless jews.
#313 to #30 - fefe (05/30/2013) [-]
I would have a problem with two people I don't know looking through my device and seeing I was still signed onto facebook and deciding to, instead of ignoring it and not looking through someone else's computer/phone, take and post a picture. That is a major invasion of privacy
#308 to #30 - ratchkae has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #287 to #30 - jetpistol (05/30/2013) [-]
I'm offensive and I find this jew
#309 to #287 - trojandetected has deleted their comment [-]
#284 to #30 - fefe (05/30/2013) [-]
racisem, out of ******* nowhere
#311 to #284 - fefe (05/30/2013) [-]
jewdaism is an ideology not a race, why can't people ******* understand that being against certain ideologies is not racist!! it's not racist to be against fascism is it.
#267 to #30 - lolzordz (05/30/2013) [-]
im a jew and thats actually 			*******		 offensive... i probably got more heart than your family put together you racist cunt
im a jew and thats actually ******* offensive... i probably got more heart than your family put together you racist cunt
User avatar #314 to #267 - talkingmouth (05/30/2013) [-]
(terribly offensive holocaust joke)
User avatar #307 to #267 - drainbramage (05/30/2013) [-]
Oh no, somebody offended you, whatever will we do.

It's the ******* internet, get over yourself.
User avatar #270 to #267 - kokkodellrrisch (05/30/2013) [-]
Jewish is not a race you cunt.
User avatar #279 to #270 - cyanidesandvich (05/30/2013) [-]
actualy, Technically it is,
there is judaism (relegion)
and then there are jewish people, they do not need to actualy be relegions to be jewish, it is a heritage issue.

now i agree, there is no race, as there should be no distinctions of different human subsets within the human race, be it back, white, chinese, eskimo, these people are not seperate races.

(i would define race as homo-sapian, or neanderthal.)
#310 to #279 - festinas has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #280 to #279 - kokkodellrrisch (05/30/2013) [-]
Jewish is not a race because Jewish people do not share a common ancestory or biological distinction. People from many different races over the centuries have become Jewish. People of many different nationalities have become Jewish.
#283 to #280 - cyanidesandvich (05/30/2013) [-]
i'm sorry thats not true at all, it's true that true jewish people do not have a home land, that is because throughout the past they have been moved and persecuted by people, they currently call isreal(?) there home.

when we say race towards a Jewish person we dont mean race in the same way we would referring to black people.
it is more a heritage situation, although there is a religion of the same name it would not be considered part of the "race", as you yourself would say that not all Americans are christian, despite living in a christian country, or having theist parents.
it's only been a couple hundred years since your ancestors came to that land from Europe.

(just so you know i'm hoping that this is a friendly debate and not a rant, here is a picture of a cat)
User avatar #312 to #283 - biomedic (05/30/2013) [-]
You can't change the definition of 'race' to make it frowned upon for people to oppose it. Any religion is an ideology, in the same way political ideologies are not races.
#257 to #30 - fefe (05/30/2013) [-]
What exactly do jews have to do with this?
#282 to #257 - fefe (05/30/2013) [-]
#198 to #30 - fefe (05/30/2013) [-]
anon comment win
#150 to #30 - fefe (05/30/2013) [-]
Enough with your antisemitism.
#155 to #150 - fefe (05/30/2013) [-]
Oh look, a Jewish anon trying to Jew for thumbs! How very jewish of you.
#122 to #30 - fefe (05/30/2013) [-]
Ain't nothing wrong with jews.
#119 to #30 - thempc (05/30/2013) [-]
This image has expired
84 thumbs? interesting....
#32 to #30 - thisshipdied (05/29/2013) [-]
Welcome to America; where occasionally, seemingly normal people will jump on any opportunity to take everything you own and more.
User avatar #249 to #32 - capslockrage (05/30/2013) [-]
I believe that's called welcome to a first world country, because that happens in the UK as well.
#252 to #249 - thisshipdied (05/30/2013) [-]
I don't live in the UK so I'm talking out of my ass here, but I think the difference is that in the UK the people who sue for no reason are specific people. You can just look at them and say "that person is a cunt", but in America it's a lot harder to tell who would do it.
Care to elaborate?
User avatar #253 to #252 - capslockrage (05/30/2013) [-]
also, most of the cases where somebody is suing for money, it's a person suing a big corporation, it's not all that often its one person suing another.
 Friends (0)