Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#8 - LovegoodJuggalo (06/25/2013) [-]
Remember a couple years back when left-wing media tried to blame Bush for a stray flock of birds flying into an aircraft. Of course you don't because Bush Bashing was acceptable. Obama Bashing isn't, which is complete garbage.  I hate FOX News, CNN, The Blaze, and especially The Huffington Post when it comes to politics. Rant over, enjoy this gif.
Remember a couple years back when left-wing media tried to blame Bush for a stray flock of birds flying into an aircraft. Of course you don't because Bush Bashing was acceptable. Obama Bashing isn't, which is complete garbage. I hate FOX News, CNN, The Blaze, and especially The Huffington Post when it comes to politics. Rant over, enjoy this gif.
#146 to #8 - hobys (06/25/2013) [-]
it's pretty difficult to understand your attempt at english, but it sounds like you're trying to say people dont bash Obama as much as Bush..? Thats complete rubbish, Obama has probably been bashed more than Bush was during his presidency, mostly for retarded reasons. Sure there have been some (or many) reasons to bash Obama, but people tend to chose the most retarded like how he's taking more vacations than Bush ever did, he's spending billions on himself or other made up ******** . Or simply "eh communist liberal ****** ".
User avatar #117 to #8 - antisocialtwilight (06/25/2013) [-]
Dude, people bash Obama and Bush, the issue here is that Dave Chappelle called Fox News' stupidity a decade early.
User avatar #103 to #8 - eatchickendaily (06/25/2013) [-]
So what news do you tend to listen to?
User avatar #59 to #8 - whistleandrun (06/25/2013) [-]
the left and right wing media both ignore the flaws of their politicians and take any chance to bash the other side, but you gotta admit Obama and Bush are in totally different leagues of "bad president"
User avatar #28 to #8 - ivoryhammer (06/25/2013) [-]
The only reasons people bashed Bush were for legit reasons, people bash on Obama for made up reasons, like he's a "fascist communist socialist Muslim atheist Kenyan terrorist"
User avatar #140 to #28 - ivoryhammer (06/25/2013) [-]
And once again we see retarded conservatives taking things wayyyyyyyyyy too seriously
#38 to #28 - DasSpiel (06/25/2013) [-]
"Made up reasons."
Right so NDAA, his support of mass surveillance, his support of gun control, drones taking out American citizens without a trial, Benghazi, and potentially the IRS scandal are all totally made up. Also judging by your choice of words, you probably think that anyone who doesn't like Obama and his DJ 4DM1Nistration are ignorant racist homophobic rednecks.
User avatar #141 to #38 - ivoryhammer (06/25/2013) [-]
And once again we see retarded conservatives taking things wayyyyyyyyyy too seriously
#119 to #38 - anonymous (06/25/2013) [-]
Aaaaand the right wing media got to you - The americans being taken out by drones on american soil is one of fox news's "what ifs" in response to unmanned planes, aka drones patrolling farmland to take pictures of farmers illegally poluting.

Why do people thumb up retarded **** like that?
#92 to #38 - voltism (06/25/2013) [-]
>benghazi
>irs scandal
pls
User avatar #60 to #38 - whistleandrun (06/25/2013) [-]
Agree on most of that there, but what's the beef with background checks and magazine limits? I'm english and don't understand why that's bad unless you're a convicted criminal/insane person and want to get a gun or want to pump a deer full of 30 rounds fast...
User avatar #80 to #60 - rieskimo (06/25/2013) [-]
I'm going to do something stupid right now and share an opinion.

I personally have no issue with universal background checks and magazine limitations, the way I see it if that gets the people who can't even spot the business end of a gun off of gun owner's asses, it's a worthy sacrifice.
Gun nuts, most people it seems actually, take issue with the fact that Universal Background Checks "do nothing"(I don't agree) and that guns are a right not a priviledge.

My issue is that guns may be a right and not a privilege but they are a dangerous tool that is at the forefront right now as well as they are part of many different violent and non-violent(accidental) deaths and injuries. If a ******* spoon was as dangerous I'd think similarly about spoons.

Like I said, this is only my personal opinion on the matter.
#95 to #80 - eliteqtip (06/25/2013) [-]
The thing is, we Already have background checks. Every time you buy a firearm from a Federal Firearms License holder you must fill out a 4473 form created by the ATF. The dealer then calls the FBI , who then tells the dealer whether you can buy a gun or not by using a background check. Magazine limits are idiotic because it's all arbitrary. Magazines are just springs in boxes. Any limit placed upon them is arbitrary. An unskilled person can reload an AR-15 within about 2- 3 seconds. I respect your right to your opinion, I just respectfully disagree.
User avatar #102 to #95 - rieskimo (06/25/2013) [-]
As far as I understand, the background checks that they use aren't that effective as they just because a person has been a part of one or multiple violent crimes doesn't mean that they'll be flagged in the FBI's system.

Furthermore, I didn't say that magazine limitation was an effective way to curb gun violence. I know I didn't say that because I know that it doesn't and won't, I'm not stupid or ignorant. I do know what a magazine is. I think that if limiting magazine size will cool the heat on guns and gun ownership it's a worthwhile sacrifice. Especially considering what you just said, it won't limit the availability of ammunition just how quickly it can go out the barrel and even then it won't limit it much.
#105 to #102 - eliteqtip (06/25/2013) [-]
No compromise. That's it. Past gun owners already ****** us enough. No backing down. Also, the current background checks work fine. The Santa Clara shooter was denied access to firearms and so was Lanza. Why do you think Lanza had to kill his mother to get her guns? Read the picture. That's how a lot of firearms owners feel. And for good reason, too.
User avatar #116 to #105 - laughdamnyou (06/25/2013) [-]
Not trying to start a ********* , but as a non-american I'm thinking that he wouldn't have shot anyone if is mother didn't have a gun.
#35 to #28 - anonymous (06/25/2013) [-]
They're both bad presidents... Obamacare is stupid, and Bush is stupid..
 Friends (0)