unpopular virgin opinion. >Yes, it matters how many people someone sleeps with. someone should be able to practice a little self control, whether you're a bo
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

unpopular virgin opinion

>Yes, it matters how many people someone sleeps with. someone should be able to practice a little self control, whether you're a boy or a girl.
>No it isn't a weird thing to care about, you can get diseases from having sex with people.
>I feel that sex is suppose to be special and should only be shared with a special person but I guess I'm just the last/only person in the world that thinks that.
>I'm pretty sure you can't compare sex to cereal
>48 people is a lot of people to have sex with. (I think)
>"go un-eat them" maybe you should have thought of that before time

MII IBM, J antrim Mill TINE
Talim 'IRE t
ael; iia_
Why r: en" t more maple think like Jenn Green'?
this is probally my rename Mm green quotation ever.
I LOVE JOHN GREEN
...
+348
Views: 16681
Favorited: 48
Submitted: 04/09/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to cheastnut Subscribe to fucking-tumblr E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(114):

[ 114 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#6 - Maroon (04/09/2014) [+] (5 replies)
t's a matter of personal taste. I would not put anyone down for sleeping around but I personally find it distasteful and would not date a girl that has "been around". It's literally the same argument as fat people who think they are still beautiful. Like, ok, you're still beautiful to yourself and maybe a few fetishists but not to me and no amount of you bitching and moaning on the internet will change that I don't find you attractive.

I'm not saying I want a virgin (well, I do but that's unrealistic) but I don't want a girl whose vagina was one long Macy's day parade of cocks.

Working as a manager at a diner taught me a few things about how girls think because I was constantly asked for advice, or gossiped to, or treated as a personal therapist. First of all, girls are evil manipulators. I've had two girls spend hours bitching to me about each other and then I see them talking and laughing like they are best friends. That's not really relevant but now I know: never trust a girl who is nice to you when she has no particular reason to be.

#12 - anonymous (04/09/2014) [-]
Women are held to a different standard BY THEIR OWN FRIGGEN STANDARDS! They are the one's calling each other sluts and whores. Men don't friggen care. BTW you are a FAGGOT
#19 - saxong (04/09/2014) [+] (1 reply)
The exception, of course, being the Mongols.
The exception, of course, being the Mongols.
#33 - MrDeadiron (04/09/2014) [+] (7 replies)
God, it's like no one has any self restraint or self respect anymore. Normally I like and agree with John Green, but not this time. Not only does banging every person you can get your hands devalue how amazing sex is it devalues each partner too. Also not everyone in "society" holds women to a different standard on this issue.
#69 - anonymous (04/10/2014) [-]
That's a completely invalid comparison. Many people think of sex as the ultimate act of intimacy between two people rather than just something that they do for fun. In which case, it absolutely does matter. Whereas eating breakfast has no special significance. And if you honestly think only women are held to any standard in that regard, you're delusional.
#85 - lolollo (04/10/2014) [+] (8 replies)
It's because some people see sex as a more serious matter than what they have for breakfast. You don't eat cereal to tell someone you want to have a meaningful, physical connection in addition to the emotional connection you already have with them. You also don't run the risk of severely, negatively impacting your quality of life for the rest of your life every time you have a bowl of cereal.

I mean...did you really compare sex to eating cereal?
#38 - scant (04/09/2014) [+] (1 reply)
For ***** sake, people need to stop using ****** metaphors like this to rationalize arguments. Tumblr does it all the time and it's ******* moronic.
Having sex with lots of people is NOTHING like eating cheerios you ******* retard.

"Dude, I don't know why people hate Hitler."
"It's cause he ordered the extermination of 6 million people, bro."
"Yeah but like, what about all those people who kill bugs and stuff bro? I bet they kill like 6 million bugs all the time"

As for his ****** argument, it's not about a person not being able to undo all the sex they've had, it's having the foresight/restraint not to do it in the first place you mong.

Having said that, I completely agree with him. I just wish he didn't have such an utterly stupid way of arguing it.
#64 - verycoolcat ONLINE (04/09/2014) [+] (1 reply)
This university did a survey of older married people.

A person who has slept with 10 or more partners in their life are unlikely of having a lasting relationship/marriage.

They surmised that it was due to the previous habit of finding someone else when bored with their current rather than working things out... its easier.
#84 - haeckal (04/10/2014) [-]
The more non-marital sex partners someone has, the higher their risk of getting divorced. Generally speaking, people who have large numbers of sex partners are less likely to have a stable marriage, more likely to get divorced, more likely to report being unhappy, more likely to suffer from emotional and mental disorders, more likely to contract a sexually transmitted disease, more likely to be involved with an unplanned pregnancy, etc. The risks apply to men and women, but are higher for women. There are sound, purely secular and scientific reasons to prefer a non-promiscuous partner - and that's before we bring in any romantic, moral, or religious considerations.

For anyone out there considering a serious relationship, definitely don't pick a partner who's had 10 or more sex partners before you. (And try not be be a slut yourself, either.) It may sound kinda gay, but try to save yourself for someone special.
#61 - anonymous (04/09/2014) [+] (2 replies)
I don't see this guy's appeal. I mean granted I really know nothing about him but his face makes me wanna hold him down and **** in his mouth in a non-sexual way.
#16 - inept (04/09/2014) [+] (7 replies)
I get the feeling he's just saying that so that women will **** him...
#93 - thegrayfox (04/10/2014) [+] (6 replies)
Let me start this comment by saying that I'm a big John Green fan, and while his ideas are usually well thought-out, this one however, is not...   
   
1. STDs, if someone 						*****					 enough people (regardless of gender) they're bound to run into some kind of infection. Yes, condoms fail. Yes you can still get diseases from giving/receiving oral.   
   
2. If you're a woman, it literally takes NO skill  or effort to have sex. All you have to do is put on some cheats (read: makeup), bypass your natural ugliness and ask any dude to 						****					 you in any hole you want, and 99% of the times, he'll gladly do it.   
   
If you're a dude, it takes TONS of effort to get laid.   
- You have to be good looking. Guys can't cake makeup on and just paint the ugliness away.   
- You have to have money to buy good clothes.   
- Have confidence   
- Be funny   
- Take initiative   
- Be charming   
- Lots more stuff   
   
3. Comparing breakfast, that has no health, social or emotional ramifications on ANYTHING to an intimate, physical experience, and connection with another human being is just next-level retarded.
Let me start this comment by saying that I'm a big John Green fan, and while his ideas are usually well thought-out, this one however, is not...

1. STDs, if someone ***** enough people (regardless of gender) they're bound to run into some kind of infection. Yes, condoms fail. Yes you can still get diseases from giving/receiving oral.

2. If you're a woman, it literally takes NO skill or effort to have sex. All you have to do is put on some cheats (read: makeup), bypass your natural ugliness and ask any dude to **** you in any hole you want, and 99% of the times, he'll gladly do it.

If you're a dude, it takes TONS of effort to get laid.
- You have to be good looking. Guys can't cake makeup on and just paint the ugliness away.
- You have to have money to buy good clothes.
- Have confidence
- Be funny
- Take initiative
- Be charming
- Lots more stuff

3. Comparing breakfast, that has no health, social or emotional ramifications on ANYTHING to an intimate, physical experience, and connection with another human being is just next-level retarded.
#89 - anonymous (04/10/2014) [-]
Theres a difference in morality between the two concepts, what about murdering someone? Sleeping with people recklessly shows your faithfulness in a relationship, which is highly valued to those seeking a genuine match. Tumblr is filled with a bunch of stupid brainless feminists who think they are scot free of responsibility and whatnot
Theres a difference in morality between the two concepts, what about murdering someone? Sleeping with people recklessly shows your faithfulness in a relationship, which is highly valued to those seeking a genuine match. Tumblr is filled with a bunch of stupid brainless feminists who think they are scot free of responsibility and whatnot
User avatar #58 - christmouth (04/09/2014) [-]
It obviously depends on the person. I would rather have a partner, who has had sexual relations with lets say 27(or something) because she was confident in what she was doing and wanted it, rather than having a partner, who has only had like 17, but did it because of other reasons than just to have sex(be it insecurities, trying to make someone else jealous, or something else entirely).

Of course someone shouldn't judge someone only based on the number alone, but the person himself should be aware of that a high number of sexual partners isn't attractive and something you want your partner to have, because on some level it shows some commitment "issues". This applies to both genders.
#14 - deezknuts (04/09/2014) [+] (2 replies)
Girls judge each other and then get mad at men for not coming in and sovling their 						********					.    
   
In fact, like everything women are upset about  with the obvious exception of rape  can be solved by women but it's a lot easier to blame the patriarchy
Girls judge each other and then get mad at men for not coming in and sovling their ******** .

In fact, like everything women are upset about with the obvious exception of rape can be solved by women but it's a lot easier to blame the patriarchy
#2 - theviolabeast (04/09/2014) [+] (1 reply)
I have mixed feelings about this issue. I haven't slept with many people (I'm 22) and I don't really plan on having sex with a lot of people. For one I don't think it's a necessity to be getting laid all the time. Second, I'd rather have sex with someone I'm in a relationship with. It's just my preference. If a girl can have sex with a lot of people not feel any emotional attachment, more power to her. However, it does make it harder on girls like me when other girls are just throwing it around. It makes guys think I should just be giving it away and when I don't they call me stuck up and a bitch. So in a way I wish some girls would tone it down but I can't stop them so I'm not going to sit here and belittle them.
User avatar #80 - belt (04/10/2014) [-]
My opinion is that a person who sleeps with a larger amount of people probably hasn't been able to hold a long lasting relationship with a majority of the people not to mention the more people your partner has slept with the more likely they are to be carrying some sort of STD which makes it reasonable to want to have sex with someone who has had the fewest amount of partners as possible.
#79 - GEARBOY (04/10/2014) [+] (1 reply)
This post - that site - and that man really piss me the 						****					 off.    
   
STOP USING 						*******					 METAPHORS AS IF THEY CLARIFY YOUR 						******					 ARGUMENTS.    
   
Granted - personally I don't mind a girl who has had a few partners in the past - but if you were having a go at someone regarded as 'the town bicycle' (everyone has had a ride) you can't help but feel disgusted to the thought of how many different dicks have been in her/came in her.    
   
Or the type of men that have been rubbing/slobbering themselves against her.    
   
LET'S NOT 						*******					 FORGET THAT THE DIFFERENCE IS: A MAN'S GOD.DAMN DICK DOESN'T LOSE ITS SHAPE AND COLOR AFTER TOO MUCH SEX YOU INSOLENT MORONS!    
   
Next thing you know - the girl is complaining about you now not being big enough and before you know it she would be aiming for someone else (if you were in a said relationship).    
   
You just can't use that logic as an excuse to be a 						*******					 whore.
This post - that site - and that man really piss me the **** off.

STOP USING ******* METAPHORS AS IF THEY CLARIFY YOUR ****** ARGUMENTS.

Granted - personally I don't mind a girl who has had a few partners in the past - but if you were having a go at someone regarded as 'the town bicycle' (everyone has had a ride) you can't help but feel disgusted to the thought of how many different dicks have been in her/came in her.

Or the type of men that have been rubbing/slobbering themselves against her.

LET'S NOT ******* FORGET THAT THE DIFFERENCE IS: A MAN'S GOD.DAMN DICK DOESN'T LOSE ITS SHAPE AND COLOR AFTER TOO MUCH SEX YOU INSOLENT MORONS!

Next thing you know - the girl is complaining about you now not being big enough and before you know it she would be aiming for someone else (if you were in a said relationship).

You just can't use that logic as an excuse to be a ******* whore.
#47 - anonymous (04/09/2014) [-]
Yeah, that's a stupid argument.

Women and men are not held to different standards.
If you ask a manwhore if he's a manwhore, he'll say no.
If you ask a skank if she's a skank, she'll say no.
If you ask a crackhead if there's anything wrong with using crack, he'll say no.

If someone cares about that, YES IT DOES MATTER. It's a personality trait after all.
Just don't be hypocritical about it or a dumbass making false comparisons like John Greene.
User avatar #27 - jacklane (04/09/2014) [-]
I bet the people that like his comments are MAJOR sluts.
[ 114 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)