Fully support gay rights. . I Might Lose Followers For This, But I Fully Support Gay Flights i! ! lailii r' wcar' t lose furl Uwere. this is TLJ". Does anyone else not really have any problem with your average gay. Like people who wanna live together and have kids and what is fine, I mean who cares right?
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

Fully support gay rights

I Might Lose Followers For This,
But I Fully Support Gay Flights
i! ! lailii
r' wcar' t lose furl Uwere. this is TLJ"
...
+1222
Views: 54504
Favorited: 79
Submitted: 09/30/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to franklinclinton Subscribe to fucking-tumblr E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(281):

[ 281 comments ]
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #210 - xxmibsxx (10/01/2013) [-]
Ha GAY!!!
User avatar #208 - kinginyellow (10/01/2013) [-]
I can't stand all the special attention that LGTB groups get. GO ahead, make gay marriage legal in courts and the religions that allow it, but you can't get mad if the church peacefully disagrees. Granted extremists take it way too far, but there are extremists in LGTB attacking people for just being catholic, and both sides look childish. Both groups just leave each other alone, and agree to disagree. You both have freedom of speech without hating each other, so just live peacefully away from each other.
User avatar #229 to #208 - jakefenris (10/01/2013) [-]
The LGBT community does not care about religious marriages, they want their relationships and marriages legally recognized by law and considered equal to opposite-sex marriages. Also, religion does not own or have any claim to marriage.
User avatar #244 to #229 - kinginyellow (10/01/2013) [-]
They were at one point demanding the church change their ways or be stopped, and the church was on the verge of just not giving any marriages. And actually, they do have a claim to marriage. Legal partners are recognized by law, but holy matrimony is only the church's, which is stupid but still, they started it and it sucks
User avatar #282 to #244 - jakefenris (10/02/2013) [-]
The community as a whole does not hold any interest in religious marriages, the goal of the community is to obtain legal recognition. There are cases of rather silly couples who attempt get churchs to marry them. However, by change their ways or be stopped we can infer they mean the hateful attacks on the rights of same-sex couples and the attempts by religious people to prevent legal marriages.

Marriage is the lawful union of two persons, historically it was a social contract between two individuals or two families to benefit those involved. Whether to secure lands or business opportunities. Within christianity marriages have only been performed in the last 700-800 years or so. Many other religions and institutions have performed these contracts and ceremonies prior to that.
User avatar #283 to #282 - kinginyellow (10/03/2013) [-]
I'm talking about those people who take it too far and demand the church change for them. The church in my was almost ready to shut down all marriages in general and it was just so stupid. Nobody even bothers to look into it farther and see that the church is against marrying those who won't play a part in the life giving process, or to people that go against them
User avatar #284 to #283 - jakefenris (10/03/2013) [-]
There are people who take it too far in every group, churches should change but they don't have The only thing they need to is let people live their own lives and stop trying to prevent others from being happy. In this day and age same-sex couples can and do have biological children. Soon they wont even need a surrogate egg or donated sperm. The church has never been with the times, and it will be many years until they catch up with the rest of civilized society.
User avatar #285 to #284 - kinginyellow (10/03/2013) [-]
The thing is they are against surrogates or test tube babies, which I can sorta see why. It's not them being uncivil, it's the fact that people who don't support homosexuality are demonized too, and it's hypocrisy. Both groups need to stop, not just the church.
User avatar #287 to #285 - jakefenris (10/03/2013) [-]
"Because my faith" is not a legitimate reason to attempt to attack another person's rights and freedoms. Also, there is a difference between being indifferent and being a bigot, you have every right to not care about something without harassment. However, you do not have the right to actively voice the view that another group does not have a right you take for granted. That is bigotry. The LGBT community goes after the second half, anyone who goes against people of the first half only cause problems.
User avatar #288 to #287 - kinginyellow (10/03/2013) [-]
The church hasn't sought to stop legal marriage for years -__- their issue was HOLY marriages. The LGTB cannot stop their right to say no because it doesn't deny them human rights, because they can legally get married. The church doesn't marry Muslim, Islam, Buddhist, or Atheist couples, but they don't demand that the church reforms because it infringes THEIR RIGHTS

Faith is not a reason for bigotry, but it is the right to say they can practice their faith and its restrictions. Oh and harassment? Like LGTB groups throwing bricks through a catholic school? Are they allowed to attack innocent people even though they have a legal right? NO. It's hypocrisy
User avatar #289 to #288 - jakefenris (10/03/2013) [-]
I agree entirely that a church is not and should not be required to marry people whom they choose not However, there has been a crusade in the United States, Great Britian and France, to name a few, by religious people against the rights of same-sex couples to marry. They crusaded to get the people to block the rights of same-sex couples to get married by a judge, and be recognized by law.

I have heard of many many attacks on gays, I have never heard of an attack on a catholic school, and responsibility claimed by an LGBT group. No person, persons or group, has the right to physically, emotionally or mentally assault, harm or threaten another person, persons or group.
User avatar #290 to #289 - kinginyellow (10/03/2013) [-]
Ya, but they aren't recognized as true catholic people if they attack others. I know it sounds like a dumb excuse, but the church is against the physical violence committed against any person unless it's self defense
User avatar #291 to #290 - jakefenris (10/03/2013) [-]
Then a great many preachers, priests, bishops and cardinals, the very face of the church are not true Christians then. They are the ones who drive their congregation against others with their words and are responsible for the violence committed.
User avatar #292 to #291 - kinginyellow (10/03/2013) [-]
Yes, no argument there. They are going directly against what the church says with their actions, and if what they believe is true, those people will go to hell then. Just because they're high up doesn't mean they're free of bigotry
User avatar #286 to #285 - jakefenris (10/03/2013) [-]
The LGBT community is requesting respect just as the African-American community did in the 1960s. They fought segregation laws and the LGBT community has also been fighting discrimination. A person has a right to religion and freedom of speech, to a point, they do not have the right to discriminate or prevent others from seeking or having equal rights.
User avatar #216 to #208 - nerdrugger (10/01/2013) [-]
of course can have disagreements.

but when religion preaches against homosexuality. it enables the extremist hate groups that do more then just act childish
and when those hateful people attack. they actually phyiscally attack and more then just a few times. they kill
User avatar #223 to #216 - kinginyellow (10/01/2013) [-]
Well yes, but it happens on both sides. People have been attacked online and in public for just disagreeing with gay marriage, and it's sad. Makes a bad image for LGTB
User avatar #228 to #223 - nerdrugger (10/01/2013) [-]
really?
i guess i missed that people being attacked for disagreeing with gay marriage.
i guess i missed that because seeing actual reports of people getting beaten for being gay
being ******** for being gay
in other countries people getting arrested for being gay, or speaking for gay rights. there are countries with laws that if someone is gay they are executed

you want to talk about people getting verbal attacks for having a position on something
how about the amount bullying a gay kid in school will get? that some get bullied so much they commit suicide

you want to be against same sex marriage? thats fine
but dont think that those against same sex marriage have it so rough
User avatar #243 to #228 - kinginyellow (10/01/2013) [-]
Did I ever say it was worse for them? No, so shut up and don't put words in my mouth. And second, they're no better with their actions, along with death threats and people being physically attacked over disagreeing with gay marriage, and slandered across the internet and cut off from society.
User avatar #246 to #243 - nerdrugger (10/01/2013) [-]
you are making it sound like that

and really death threats and being physically attack? how often does this happen, cause i have not seen any report of that. where i can easily find many documented reports of people being attacked, torture and killed for being gay or supporting lgbt rights

preachers, or other members of the church that get threaten with violence, are usually preachers are gay or that support LGBT rights
like bishop Gene Robinson an openly gay bishop that got so many death threats that he had to wear a bullet proof vest for his consecration.

and do you want to talk about slander and being cut off from society?
that for many years being homosexual in america was basically a crime. If you were found out as gay, family and parents would reject you, you would get fired from your job. and actually be an outcast to the community.

so someone getting a few negative comments here or there about being actively anti gay? i think theyll be ok
User avatar #247 to #246 - kinginyellow (10/01/2013) [-]
And I never said "actively anti gay" I said someone who just doesn't agree with it. Your argument is just putting words in my mouth to make yourself sound smarter.
And check the last few years, gay people are practically worshiped for coming out. They're applauded and treated like celebrities, and people are constantly bashing the church, and half of them don't even understand the church, just spout ******** . And I guess spending every day fearing for your life with people determined to hurt you isn't "a few negative comments"
User avatar #248 to #247 - nerdrugger (10/01/2013) [-]
who is making legitimate death threats and reviving those death threats for disagreeing with gay marriage? really, i want to know.

ok ill agree with you there that now it is much better time to come out, and yes the media has gone overboard with those celeberties

but for normal people coming out is still a scary thing to do, worrying about getting rejected by friends, family and community.


and for years and years the church constantly bash gays. I applaud the pope trying to stop rhetoric. And there are still many parishes that still speak out about how wrong and evil homosexuality is.
User avatar #249 to #248 - kinginyellow (10/01/2013) [-]
www.wnd.com/2013/09/church-attacked-for-pro-marriage-message-to-itself/
www.wnd.com/2011/10/356361/
The first is the church being told they can't have an opinion on marriage or be shut down, the second is ******* BRICKS thrown through a school in protest of a church.
And this is where everyone gets it wrong:
The church says homosexuality is wrong, meaning the ACT
Many Christian people, and pretty much my school (I had to go to a catholic school) have no issue with gay people, they only think the ACT is wrong. My Christian Ethics teacher even said a gay couple go to their church, and they don't mind knowing that the church doesn't see them as married, and the church welcomes them with open arms as long as they don't try to change the church. That's how a relationship should work between both groups, just agree to disagree and leave each other alone.
User avatar #257 to #249 - nerdrugger (10/01/2013) [-]
yes they have that right to say whatever they want

but the church needs to realize what they say has consequences that influence more than a just a couple people, all around the world to do many horrible things all in the name of god?

and that guy wasn't WBC, he was evangelical.



and your welcome, this was still a messy internet none the less. and i think that while it was a more lively and less hateful i still am not a fan of it


if you would like i would like to extend an olive branch and start over from less of an intense argument. and bring it to an exchange of ideas

to start off
Hello my name is Tim
User avatar #259 to #257 - kinginyellow (10/01/2013) [-]
Mine is Kiefer
User avatar #260 to #259 - nerdrugger (10/01/2013) [-]
Thats a real german sounding name
so are you from the US ?
User avatar #261 to #260 - kinginyellow (10/01/2013) [-]
Canada actually, and thanks it's a German name
User avatar #262 to #261 - nerdrugger (10/01/2013) [-]
ok Kiefer
here are my views and hopes

1. I want it so that any two loving consenting adults can get married without being treated any different from any other marriage in the eyes of the law. (i understand some churches dont want to do same sex marriage and that is fine)

2. I want it so that being homosexual, bisexual, ********** , etc is no big deal. That lgbt dont have to "come out" just so it be a regular fact about that person, like they were left handed, or double jointed. That it doesn't matter to friends, family, employers. That parents don't disown children for coming out. Friends rejecting friends for being gay, and being discriminated when it comes to getting work.

3. I want to live in a world where I and other lgbt people don't need to be afraid to go to certain places because worried that we will get attack just for being who we are. When I came out, my mother was so worried and had a long talk how she didn't want to see me to become a victim of hatred

4. This one concerns the church (and all faiths in general) . That the church doesnt make a big deal about homosexuality, yes the act of homosexuality is a "sin". but so is a lot of stuff that many people do. And i want the church to realize that when they demonize and dehumanize homosexuals that it enables the extremist to commit atrocities because they are being good Christians (Muslims, Jews, etc.)


5. I want the hatred toward lgbt people to end. I want the resentment lgbt people have for religion to end

6. For me and other LGBT people to just be able to live our lives in peace




User avatar #250 to #249 - nerdrugger (10/01/2013) [-]
thank you for pulling up articles. ok those acts of vandalism was wrong. but when it comes to who has done more. i dont think i need to bring up anything saying who has attacked who more

and the church can say whatever they want about homosexuality. but when it comes down to it the church has no right to impose their views on people's rights. they do not have the right to discriminate, to demonize, to say what is right and wrong

in this country everyone has the right to worship or not worship whatever god he or she chooses. They dont have the right to deny people basic dignity of being in a legally recognized relationship.

and i don't have any problems with christians. i have plenty of friends who are real religious. hell i am friends and have had plenty of nice conversations with several nuns. when brother jed came and spewed hate messages in the name of god and specifically called me out in the crowd. several members of the university's different religious organizations came up and said what he was doing was wrong
User avatar #252 to #250 - kinginyellow (10/01/2013) [-]
Oh and thanks for a good debate. I'm so used to the YouTube pit of screaming and yelling or swearing with no valid points but somehow being "right"
User avatar #251 to #250 - kinginyellow (10/01/2013) [-]
The thing is, they are allowed by freedom of speech to say that they don't believe in certain things.

They do say gay people are legally married, but just not in the eyes of their god. They can only ban them from catholic marriages, because they can still go to the courts

I'm saying I'm tired of LGTB groups saying that the church has to change and they're in turn imposing their views on the church. They should realize that both have a right to say what they believe, and neither group is doing anything to purposely hurt the other

The WBC is a different story though
User avatar #198 - konradkurze (10/01/2013) [-]
Funnyjunk loves gays too

everyone knows OPs are gay, reposters are gay, and anons are fags
User avatar #199 to #198 - franklinclinton (10/01/2013) [-]
I'm only half fag..
User avatar #200 to #199 - konradkurze (10/01/2013) [-]
half gay aka bisexual
#205 to #202 - konradkurze (10/01/2013) [-]
as long as youre not Phansexual
User avatar #295 to #205 - phansexual (10/06/2013) [-]
whats wrong with that?
#209 to #205 - franklinclinton (10/01/2013) [-]
mfw I saw phansexual
User avatar #294 to #209 - phansexual (10/06/2013) [-]
thats be me
User avatar #211 to #209 - konradkurze (10/01/2013) [-]
well, phansexuality is an odd one

easiest way to explain.....its like acting flaming gay yet still hooking up with hot girls
User avatar #212 to #211 - franklinclinton (10/01/2013) [-]
Oh! Silly you! You mean swagfag
User avatar #235 to #212 - konradkurze (10/01/2013) [-]
i could see phanact being like that

any time someone harasses him, he's all like "bitch please, y'all just jealous of my ORANGE AWESOMENESS"
User avatar #242 to #235 - franklinclinton (10/01/2013) [-]
Pfft.. I don't want to encounter one..
#195 - nathanthefatman (10/01/2013) [-]
**nathanthefatman rolled a random image posted in comment #28 at When people try to drive my car. ** This is gay.
User avatar #191 - nortledrones (10/01/2013) [-]
I still say that watching the game, having a drink or playing video games and then sleeping together is 10x better than going to a parade that just makes things look worse.
#188 - bleeduntildeath (10/01/2013) [-]
you left out the parts of this that made it funny.... the comments
#173 - reginleif ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
This image has expired
0
#171 - anonymous Comment deleted by franklinclinton [-]
#170 - anonymous (10/01/2013) [-]
everyone hating on this post is just a middle class suburban white kid. i lived in the ghetto nearly my whole childhood and if you said you supported gay rights they would beat the living **** out of you. i still have the scars on my back to prove it too.
#194 to #170 - imasuperhero (10/01/2013) [-]
Good, they toughened you up.
#179 to #170 - jackii (10/01/2013) [-]
...And you're proud of that?
User avatar #168 - thegamerslife (10/01/2013) [-]
Gays can go **** THEMSELVES!! It's good practice for when they have sex. lawl
User avatar #217 to #168 - raigen (10/01/2013) [-]
Woulden't that be asexuality?
User avatar #218 to #217 - thegamerslife (10/01/2013) [-]
I thought asexual was someone who has no particular interest in sex?
User avatar #219 to #218 - raigen (10/01/2013) [-]
I thought it was they don't want anyone but themself... Like.. are only attracted to themself?
User avatar #220 to #219 - thegamerslife (10/01/2013) [-]
Not even to themselves...

www.google.com/#q=define+asexual
User avatar #221 to #220 - raigen (10/01/2013) [-]
Well wheres the sexuality for only wanting yourself?
User avatar #231 to #221 - jakefenris (10/01/2013) [-]
Narcissism, though that isn't a sexuality, and it's more that you consider yourself the center of the universe and genuinely only care about yourself.
User avatar #222 to #221 - thegamerslife (10/01/2013) [-]
I don't know. my joke is that ******* themselves will make them better at ******* the same sex partner.
User avatar #224 to #222 - raigen (10/01/2013) [-]
I get it but... not really since theres noone else around... it'd let them know what THEY like but.. noone has a unrelated twin that likes everything they do down to the pleasures they enjoy and are both homosexual and like eachother.
User avatar #225 to #224 - thegamerslife (10/01/2013) [-]
Our organs aren't alien either. organs are, for the most part the same in all of us and functions similarly.
User avatar #189 to #168 - mangostormlegend (10/01/2013) [-]
HA-HAHA-HAHAHAHAget the **** out
User avatar #162 - syferxftw (10/01/2013) [-]
The best.
#160 - anonymous (10/01/2013) [-]
It saddens me that the various anonymii across the Internet have been so easily coddled away from brutality.

You hugbox politically correct ************* are TRULY the cancer killing the internet.
#163 to #160 - amuzen (10/01/2013) [-]
I always thought the cancer killing the internet were the people who can't get over the fact that they are now dealing in a multi billion person mega community and the rules have changed to adapt to the situation.
#155 - icelandicjesus ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
What's the first sign of an HIV infection?

A cock in yer fanny
User avatar #151 - durkadurka (10/01/2013) [-]
This is approximately the breakdown of people talking about gay rights:

75% : "It's dangerous and tough supporting gay rights, but I'm going to do it anyway!"
25%: Don't actually fully support gay rights, and about half of them are awfully apologetic about it.
#149 - Lepain (10/01/2013) [-]
TFW
User avatar #132 - mayormilkman (10/01/2013) [-]
This very post makes the front page roughly once every two weeks, huh?
#131 - lolzordz (09/30/2013) [-]
in every sect theres the extreme crowd. its the reason people dont like gays or religion or bronies
in every sect theres the extreme crowd. its the reason people dont like gays or religion or bronies
User avatar #159 to #131 - rhinocerous **User deleted account** (10/01/2013) [-]
People tend to focus on those sects, and take it as an example of how the rest of the group is, which is stupid,
#135 to #131 - diffusion (10/01/2013) [-]
Finally some sense. I think they only fuel more and more problems by being extremists.
Finally some sense. I think they only fuel more and more problems by being extremists.
User avatar #192 to #129 - mangostormlegend (10/01/2013) [-]
I am almost okay with this
#128 - anonymous (09/30/2013) [-]
as a gay, most of these comments are highly infuriating. but i have decided that instead of trying to argue why i disagree with most of your opinions, and why for some of you i believe your thought processes are detrimental to the cause, and how some of you are horribly debilitating to the general advancement of the human race. i will simply walk away from my computer. because lets face it, i am too sober and no one wants to be told what to think or how to feel. have a good day y'all.
User avatar #137 to #128 - diffusion (10/01/2013) [-]
Are you wanna of those gay guys that think homossexuality is the next step of evolution?
#126 - yourmomismyhostage (09/30/2013) [-]
Oh look another gay rights related post. This is exactly what i got on funnyjunk for, to see people talk about how "right" it is to support homosexuality while i sit here helplessly in a sea of red thumbs for reminding you all that it isnt normal in society and at the very least, in nature.
User avatar #197 to #126 - Ruspanic ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
Homosexuality not being normal in society is simply indicative of the norms of a given society. It implies nothing about homosexuality itself. In the West, it's becoming increasingly normal.

Whether homosexuality is normal in nature is irrelevant. There's no reason we should look to nature to guide our behavior.
User avatar #190 to #126 - theloonyone (10/01/2013) [-]
"At the very least, in nature." I'm guessing you have never been to a dog park before. Every time I bring my male dog to one, there is always another male dog who tries to hump him.
User avatar #186 to #126 - dbrak (10/01/2013) [-]
oh please. natural? what the hell is "natural" about anything?? Girls slap a pound of makeup onto their faces to cover up "natural". Is the internet "natural"? It's just such a stupidly abstract term. You want natural? go run into the woods ***** and eat berries and squirrels for the rest of your life. This is called society, and we've evolved a bit too much to care about what is "natural" over what is ethical and supportive of human rights.

And normality in society is a stupid ass thing to say as well. Mixed race couples weren't normal in society 50 years ago... but we grow and change as a species. Get with it and grow up.
User avatar #180 to #126 - onewithpokerface (10/01/2013) [-]
I believe you're the exact type of person this post is aimed against.
#174 to #126 - fredgregory (10/01/2013) [-]
Homosexuality is population control
#185 to #164 - bilbobagginshield (10/01/2013) [-]
ssshhhhuuurrrrluck
ssshhhhuuurrrrluck
#274 to #273 - bilbobagginshield (10/02/2013) [-]
hey friend
hey friend
#275 to #274 - newbiee (10/02/2013) [-]
whats up?
whats up?
#276 to #275 - bilbobagginshield (10/02/2013) [-]
nothing much,just wanna show you something cute!
#277 to #276 - newbiee (10/02/2013) [-]
benedicts face?
benedicts face?
#278 to #277 - bilbobagginshield (10/02/2013) [-]
all of Benedict! but his eyes are just.........
all of Benedict! but his eyes are just.........
#279 to #278 - newbiee (10/02/2013) [-]
and his body?
and his body?
#280 to #279 - bilbobagginshield (10/02/2013) [-]
heh,of course
heh,of course
#157 to #126 - rhinocerous **User deleted account** (10/01/2013) [-]
#138 to #126 - diffusion (10/01/2013) [-]
Nothing against the homiessexuals. But I totally agree with you. Wait.. but theres some reports about homossexuality in nature.
Nothing against the homiessexuals. But I totally agree with you. Wait.. but theres some reports about homossexuality in nature.
#182 to #138 - mcquiston (10/01/2013) [-]
Some people thumbed him down then thumbed you up for agreeing with him.

******* FUNNYJUNK!
#201 to #182 - casedlsix (10/01/2013) [-]
isn't that how it works? you thumb posts you like/agree with and thumb down the ones you don't?   
   
is that not what we're supposed to do?
isn't that how it works? you thumb posts you like/agree with and thumb down the ones you don't?

is that not what we're supposed to do?
User avatar #203 to #201 - mcquiston (10/01/2013) [-]
Read my post again....
User avatar #204 to #203 - casedlsix (10/01/2013) [-]
i assumed that the "Wait.. but theres some reports about homossexuality in nature. " was different enough to make them separate arguments
User avatar #207 to #204 - mcquiston (10/01/2013) [-]
Nothing against the homiessexuals. But I totally agree with you
User avatar #153 to #138 - TheFixer (10/01/2013) [-]
many species have homosexual activites not just humans. although their homosexual activites are low enough and their heterosexual activites are high enough allow the continued survival of the species.
User avatar #134 to #126 - rokulda ONLINE (10/01/2013) [-]
its actually about how tumblr likes gays but k
[ 281 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)