Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - felixjarl ONLINE (02/23/2013) [-]
Mine is better.
#16 to #3 - ganjalf ONLINE (02/23/2013) [-]
User avatar #15 to #3 - thamuz ONLINE (02/23/2013) [-]
Probably a BT-7. The BT-2 was armed with the 37mm
User avatar #27 to #15 - herrytheheadcrab (02/23/2013) [-]
Not the bt series it is a T-46
User avatar #29 to #27 - thamuz ONLINE (02/23/2013) [-]
T-46 looks way different...
User avatar #30 to #29 - herrytheheadcrab (02/23/2013) [-]
It is either t 46 or 26 the bt series never had the radio rings around the tower.
#34 to #30 - thamuz ONLINE (02/23/2013) [-]
T-46 never left the prototype stage for one.

it IS a BT-7 command tank. Command tanks had the radio antennas on them.

BT-7 with radio. Horseshoe radios were used on some tanks,the BT series did get them.
User avatar #40 to #34 - flybager (02/23/2013) [-]
T-46 was started being producted but it turned out to be too expensive.

(that's what WoT says anyways, no solid proof)
User avatar #41 to #40 - thamuz ONLINE (02/24/2013) [-]
its world of tanks. they've said all sorts of things and Id ont believe them. Im just waiting to see their "evidence" of mounting the BL-10 to the T-50-2.

All the information Ive found said it was overly complex and not much better than the T-26.
User avatar #42 to #41 - flybager (02/24/2013) [-]
It's BS how world of tanks puts the tiger in tier VII against the IS even though th IS was made way later to COUNTER the tigers, because they're kv was sort-off obsolete against it
and how the tier VI M36_ slugger_ (not ****** 'jackson') is a tier lower than the tiger even tohugh it was ALSO designed to destroy tigers,
even the WoT description says it FFS!
User avatar #44 to #42 - thamuz ONLINE (02/24/2013) [-]
Not really. the IS wasnt built for anti tank fighting. The Soviets left that up to artillery,rocket artillery,and tank destroyers.
Sure the IS-122 could penetrate the panther and the tiger,but it made a wonderful breakthrough tank

The SU=152 was more than capable of blowing the superstructure off of the Ferdinand. Given they could hit it.

And the Tiger is fine where it is,all the tanks in its tiers were whati t fought. Hellcat,Slugger,Shermans,T-34-76//85 JS-2/KB-2

It just perceived sucks because the devs have artificially nerfed the **** out of the 88mm guns. The Short 88 L/56 was known to punch a nice clean hole front to back of a Sherman or T-34.

if the devs were smart,and not drunk/high(Because SerB usually is) they would use nation specific penetration tables. German for German,American for American,USSR for USSR etc. The Germans didn't count if the shell didn't fully penetrate(in the case of APBCHE shells,penetrating and exploding behind the plate). Soviets passed if at least 75% of the shell made it through I think.

Also,the Soviets get way too many advantages in Tanks. While the IS-7 would be godly if it were allowed to be historically accurate,many tanks perform much better then they could in RL. *shrugs* its a russian game,they have to have them be a badass for once.
User avatar #45 to #44 - flybager (02/24/2013) [-]
Thing is, When they had the tigers, the american's M10 wolverine turned out obsolete, so they designed the M36 slugger (OR they gave it the 90mm M3) that's what the WoT discription says, M36 is tier VI Tiger's tier VII.
Chinese tanks are also completly out of the time boat in the game (Type-T34 same tier as T-34, M5A1 same tier as M5 (can still live with this),IS-2 same tier as IS(also acceptable)
But they shoudl've put those tanks in their origional makers, not in the ****** chinese ones!
User avatar #46 to #45 - thamuz ONLINE (02/24/2013) [-]
M10 could penetrate the panther and the tiger with HVAP shells. TD companies got first serve on HVAP shells.
TDs are also weighted 2 tiers higher then they are.

The Chinese had their own tanks,but they were so crappy(look at the Chi-Ha) that it was easier to import and modernize them. They have their own advances,the Type -34 is slightly better due to wider tracks but those tanks area ll modernized/modified to suit the Chinese need.

M5A1 is the modernized variant that used the 45mm with HV shells.

IS-2 is the modernized final variant of the IS. the Soviets get an IS1/2 hybrid(IS 2 turret IS hull)

Type -34 is a hybrid using many parts from later tanks to upgrade it,it has the T-54/55 suspension and I think the engine as well.or a much newer version of the engine as the Soviets had a hard time with engine reliability in the T-34
User avatar #43 to #42 - flybager (02/24/2013) [-]
*their
User avatar #33 to #30 - flybager (02/23/2013) [-]
The rings are for camo nets, aren't they?

radio-rings makes no sense
User avatar #35 to #33 - thamuz ONLINE (02/23/2013) [-]
No. Horse shoe radio masts. Thats what they are. Old radios needed long antennae to work right. So the would bend it around the turret and mount it that way.
User avatar #38 to #35 - flybager (02/23/2013) [-]
oooh okay
User avatar #32 to #30 - flybager (02/23/2013) [-]
...It's definetely one of the bt-#'s.
A t-26 nor T-46 looks more.. square-ey
just look at how the front looks angled like it's a racecar.
User avatar #5 to #3 - flybager (02/23/2013) [-]
My world of tanks knowlage is telling me that's a bt-7 or bt-2.
 Friends (0)