A Tank Fact. Just because.. did you know? tum hpr. e om Since its introduction in 1993 and extensive ehwhat use, the only thing that' s ever destroyed the Briti
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

A Tank Fact

Just because.

did you know?
tum hpr. e om
Since its introduction in 1993 and extensive
ehwhat use, the only thing that' s ever
destroyed the British Challenger 2 was
another Challenger 2.
...
+1365
Views: 48071
Favorited: 57
Submitted: 04/16/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to cirruss Subscribe to fucking-tanks E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(337):

[ 337 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - flemsdfer ONLINE (04/16/2014) [+] (70 replies)
stickied by cirruss
The same is said about the M1 Abrams.
#37 - PenguinsOfMars (04/17/2014) [+] (7 replies)
The only combat vehicle to ever challenge a Challenger 2 was a Challenger too?
The only combat vehicle to ever challenge a Challenger 2 was a Challenger too?
User avatar #25 - jinxter (04/17/2014) [+] (6 replies)
The only thing that ever killed Hitler was Hitler. So...
#8 - cyberconnor (04/17/2014) [+] (6 replies)
British tanks have tea making facilities
User avatar #24 - nitsuan (04/17/2014) [+] (11 replies)
It's not saying much. The Challenger 2 has never really gone toe-to-toe with any aircraft or modern tanks since it's time in service.
#22 - boxofwonderz (04/17/2014) [+] (5 replies)
Comment Picture
User avatar #43 - okamiterasu (04/17/2014) [+] (15 replies)
what 'extensive combat' have the British been in since 1998
User avatar #52 to #43 - monkee (04/17/2014) [-]
Sierra Leone, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.
User avatar #81 - theforeseen (04/17/2014) [+] (6 replies)
Can we at least agree both the Challenger MK2 and the Abrams are both good tanks and we have far better war capabilities then a lot of the world rather then have a flame war between two allies....again
#2 - letrollzor (04/17/2014) [+] (4 replies)
Comment Picture
#93 - wereking (04/17/2014) [+] (39 replies)
165 mm HE round inbound
User avatar #92 - ScottP (04/17/2014) [-]
But can it drive me closer so that I may hit them with my sword?
User avatar #147 - indulge (04/17/2014) [-]
I dunno, I have a nerf gun that actually hurts quite a bit if you shoot someone in the neck.
User avatar #21 - justinsane (04/17/2014) [+] (11 replies)
Ditto for the Abrams. Except the Abrams actually saw combat
#53 to #21 - anonymous (04/17/2014) [-]
What combat has the Abrams seen that the challengers (1&2) hasn't.
#30 - youborn (04/17/2014) [+] (8 replies)
Bitch please
#252 - Galliwho (04/17/2014) [+] (3 replies)
Say what you want, but we all know that the Scorpion tank beats EVERYTHING.
User avatar #230 - fadetometallica (04/17/2014) [-]
So the only challenger to challenge a Challenger 2 was a Challenger 2, too?
#216 - zomaru (04/17/2014) [+] (9 replies)
The Mighty Maus has never had a single combat loss.
The Mighty Maus has never had a single combat loss.
#80 - angelusprimus (04/17/2014) [-]
The destruction mentioned happened after the crew of one challenger tank stole another crew's favorite teapot.
It is the one thing no brit will stand for.
[ 337 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)