| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
goddamnit
From the book Incognito,by david eagleman
The
illusion of
of "seeing"
Neuroscientists weren' t the first to discover that placing your eyes on something is no guarantee of seeing it. Magicians figured this out long
ago, and perfected ways of leveraging this knowledge? By directing your attention, magicians perform sleight of hand in full view. Their actions
should give away the they can rest assured that your brain processes only small bits of the visual scene, not everything that hits your
retinas.
This fact helps to explain the colossal number of traffic accidents in which drivers hit pedestrians in plain view, collide with cars directly in
front of them, and even intersect with trains. In many of these cases, the eyes are in the right place, but the brain isn' t seeing the stimuli.
Vision is more than looking. This also explains why you probably missed the fact that the word "of" is printed twice in the triangle above.
illusion of
of "seeing"
Neuroscientists weren' t the first to discover that placing your eyes on something is no guarantee of seeing it. Magicians figured this out long
ago, and perfected ways of leveraging this knowledge? By directing your attention, magicians perform sleight of hand in full view. Their actions
should give away the they can rest assured that your brain processes only small bits of the visual scene, not everything that hits your
retinas.
This fact helps to explain the colossal number of traffic accidents in which drivers hit pedestrians in plain view, collide with cars directly in
front of them, and even intersect with trains. In many of these cases, the eyes are in the right place, but the brain isn' t seeing the stimuli.
Vision is more than looking. This also explains why you probably missed the fact that the word "of" is printed twice in the triangle above.
...
| |
That must be why some people can't see why kids love the taste of cinnamon toast crunch
#19
-
mattkingg (03/04/2013) [+]
(2 replies)
The double of thing doesn't proof it, we ignore it subconsciously because of the way we read as we know it's redundant.
#20 to #19
-
meowthre (03/04/2013) [-]
Actually, that's exactly what proves it. We technically see the whole image, but our brain chooses to ignore details that it doesn't consider valid. This applies both in the double 'of' situation as well as in the magic tricks example; we see it, but it doesn't register because of what the brain chooses to filter out.
I didn't even look at the triangle until you mentioned it,I figured it was a logo
Thanks for making me paranoid as fuck about getting hit by cars now.
Dick.
Dick.
thepiratebay.se/torrent/8192087/David_Eagleman_Incognito_2011_Retail_EPUB_eBook-BitBook
Found the book if anyone's interested.
Found the book if anyone's interested.
#21
-
WrightVGC (03/04/2013) [-]
**WrightVGC rolled a random image posted in comment #44 at Hue hue hue ** I read the paragraph first, well fuck.
#5
-
N. Korean citizen (03/04/2013) [-]
I read the paragraph before looking at the triangle. I feel like that possibility should have been accounted for.
i thought the triangle was a logo for somethings o i ignored it.
#23
-
N. Korean citizen (03/04/2013) [-]
But...I did see the double of in the triangle. That's why I read the post because it pissed me off.
#22
-
N. Korean citizen (03/04/2013) [-]
I expected something like this and checked the triangle extra carefully.
I still didn't notice that.
I still didn't notice that.
Its not that you dont see it.... its that you ignore it, whether subconciously or not...
#15
-
igiveawayitems (03/04/2013) [+]
(1 reply)
I suppose that's why when I look at a clock to check the time I don't remember it 30 seconds later.