Today's Physics Engines
Tags: future
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
72 comments displayed.
#33
-
nought [OP](01/19/2015) [+] (35 replies)
stickied by nought
"Too bad these will take ages to render" Real-Time Fluid Physics on GTX 580
#16
-
anon (01/19/2015) [-]
If it was being rendered in real time, I would be interested. But we've had particle and cloth physics like these for years.
#1
-
xxdarkdanxx (01/19/2015) [-] I don't give a **** even if its collaboration effort between Ubisoft, EA and Microsoft,
I'm buying the next game that uses these engines.
I'm buying the next game that uses these engines.
#27 to #1
-
citruslord (01/19/2015) [-] Animation major here. Unfortunately Houdini isn't an engine for games. It's a 3D animation toolkit, Mantra is the rendering engine. My guess is that those first few second particle demonstrations took hours or likely days to render on production level hardware.
I would guess we are still years away from running stuff like this real time.
I would guess we are still years away from running stuff like this real time.
#68
-
theguyishere (01/20/2015) [-] When I saw the pig head hitting the posts it made me think of this
#52
-
gabbin (01/19/2015) [-] What my ****** computer would look like if I try to run a game that uses this physics engine.
#129
-
maxismahname (01/20/2015) [-] I can't wait until clipping stops being a problem. These new engines are getting better and better, but I won't be fully erect until I play a game with absolutely no clipping
#32
-
SteyrAUG (01/19/2015) [-] Well, looks like it's time to upgrade to those dual quadro gpus I've always wanted to play the next generation of computer games.
#36 to #32
-
OtisMcWonderful (01/19/2015) [-] Quadro would do nothing for you. You're better off getting whatever the top "gaming" GPU is. Quadros and FirePros are optimized specifically for computing, while "gaming" cards are optimized for real time visuals.
#39 to #38
-
OtisMcWonderful (01/19/2015) [-] Yeah. Even then, I don't think it could do it in real time.
#45 to #39
-
diskky (01/19/2015) [-]
go see this www.youtube.com/watch?v=XISqvBVyASo
and you may start to like nvidia's titan
and you may start to like nvidia's titan
#46 to #45
-
OtisMcWonderful (01/19/2015) [-] Er. No. The Titan series are just rendering GPUs rebranded for gaming. This is why they're so expensive. The Titan Z barely benchmarks above the r9 295x2, at just over double the cost. And the 980 benches better than the Titan Z at a third of the cost. The Titans are garbage for gaming unless you wanna try to flaunt your money by buying inferior hardware. The only thing you're really gaining is more VRAM, but considering that I'm still getting by on 2GB, the 8GB of the 295x2 or the 6GB of the 980 should be plenty.
The Titan cards are pretty good for workstations, so I'll give it that.
The Titan cards are pretty good for workstations, so I'll give it that.
