x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #100 - gibroner (05/09/2013) [-]
good because breathing is ******* exhausting
#576 to #100 - jaquezable (05/10/2013) [-]
two hearts you say,
two hearts you say,
User avatar #103 to #100 - zakaizer (05/09/2013) [-]
If we don't need to breathe, then that means we have no use for lungs, so they could be severely reduced in size ( Just to complete the 'circuit'), or removed entirely, thus creating more space in the chest for organs... We could have two livers, two hearts, a longer digestive tract so we can digest poisonous stuff. Theoretically, it's a fantastic idea.
#229 to #103 - Absolute Madman (05/09/2013) [-]
but what would happen to the bodies natural response to breathe using lungs, saying it happened
User avatar #106 to #103 - gibroner (05/09/2013) [-]
I didn't say it wasn't awesome
#108 to #106 - zakaizer (05/09/2013) [-]
...Fair point, didn't take that into consideration.
User avatar #101 to #100 - llamasandwhich (05/09/2013) [-]
*roll hue* Huehuehuehuehuehue
 Friends (0)