Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#100 - gibroner
Reply +85
(05/09/2013) [-]
good because breathing is ******* exhausting
#576 to #100 - jaquezable
Reply 0
(05/10/2013) [-]
two hearts you say,
two hearts you say,
#103 to #100 - zakaizer
Reply +9
(05/09/2013) [-]
If we don't need to breathe, then that means we have no use for lungs, so they could be severely reduced in size ( Just to complete the 'circuit'), or removed entirely, thus creating more space in the chest for organs... We could have two livers, two hearts, a longer digestive tract so we can digest poisonous stuff. Theoretically, it's a fantastic idea.
#229 to #103 - anon
Reply 0
(05/09/2013) [-]
but what would happen to the bodies natural response to breathe using lungs, saying it happened
#106 to #103 - gibroner
Reply +10
(05/09/2013) [-]
I didn't say it wasn't awesome
#108 to #106 - zakaizer
Reply +7
(05/09/2013) [-]
...Fair point, didn't take that into consideration.
#101 to #100 - llamasandwhich
Reply 0
(05/09/2013) [-]
*roll hue* Huehuehuehuehuehue