The future is better than you think 2. Not sure if OC. I took it from this video www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1NJ9Vv-Y6Q&list=LLWQytNn_VXoquWiVqfkEbNg And I screenc
x
Click to expand

The future is better than you think 2

  • Recommend tagsx
+806
Views: 36893
Favorited: 111
Submitted: 04/02/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to vycanismajoris Subscribe to fucking-science submit to reddit

Comments(70):

[ 70 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - Ken M (04/02/2013) [+] (5 replies)
not sure if OC means NOT OC.
User avatar #2 to #1 - vycanismajoris (04/02/2013) [-]
ok.
User avatar #17 - ruckallthefules ONLINE (04/03/2013) [+] (5 replies)
So basically you're saying there are no world problems atm. Okay cool.
+12
#26 to #17 - sickpup **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#71 - seniorawesomesauce (04/03/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Yeah, the number of people in extreme poverty shrank by 270 million, but the number of people in regular poverty grew by 270 million. See OP, you gotta think about these things, the glass isn't always half full.
Yeah, the number of people in extreme poverty shrank by 270 million, but the number of people in regular poverty grew by 270 million. See OP, you gotta think about these things, the glass isn't always half full.
User avatar #81 to #80 - ainsley (04/03/2013) [-]
Yes but regular poverty is better than extreme

***** , quit being a pessimist
#3 - askurya (04/02/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Thank you for the hope.
#104 - capps (04/07/2013) [-]
"Not sure if OC"
User avatar #105 - listerthepessimist (11/17/2013) [-]
but... but...

what about the profits?
#82 - Ken M (04/03/2013) [-]
>The average income for Botswanians is greater than Finns.
Average income is a terrible way to measure income distribution. One needs to look at wealth disparity, as 80% of the population may be living in poverty while 2% or 1% controls a large amount of wealth. I know very little about either country so the idea being presented in this case may hold true, but as a general measure it is a terrible way to show it.
User avatar #77 - Ombra (04/03/2013) [-]
Life expectancy in Mexico didn't go up because life got better, it's because everybody who can run swim and jump is already OUT of Mexico.
User avatar #74 - KoolMasterJ (04/03/2013) [-]
when I was i kid, I used to design cites by drawing them on paper, and i thought of skyscraper farms with climate control and what not. Its cool to see that im not the only one.
#72 - Ken M (04/03/2013) [-]
tl;dr
#64 - captainreposty (04/03/2013) [-]
Hmmm, you need to reference all these facts, since some of them, without evidence, just seems like ******** . Especially the one about Mexico's life expectancy.
User avatar #47 - aerius (04/03/2013) [-]
We need more Solar Panels so bad. They should just be installed on every house as standard.
User avatar #46 - dantemp (04/03/2013) [-]
can someone give me a link to part one?
User avatar #43 - bullbrigade (04/03/2013) [-]
"Infant mortality is lower in Nepal than it was in Italy in 1951"

Uh, that's ok... I guess
User avatar #40 - WhatIsGwaning (04/03/2013) [-]
It's a shame I live in Rip-off Britain, where the water bill is £600 annually for a family of 4
#38 - Ken M (04/03/2013) [-]
Light one is misleading. Comments suggests that one second of work is the amount of money made in one second of vocational activities. Work should be in joules, not seconds.
#36 - Ken M (04/03/2013) [-]
the problem isn't the lack of energy or food

too. many. ******* . humans.
and humans. are. ******* . still.
#33 - Ken M (04/03/2013) [-]
******* boner for the indian girl.
0
#31 - tacosattack has deleted their comment [-]
#9 - Ken M (04/03/2013) [-]
think of all the weed i could grow
[ 70 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)