Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#6 - waffies ONLINE
Reply +311
(03/06/2013) [-]
#206 to #6 - anon
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
Donate money to the university
#176 to #6 - cabbagemayhem
Reply -1
(03/07/2013) [-]
Because last I checked, we don't have a shortage of water or extreme humidity levels, and we'd rather fund more useful projects, like alternative energy and landing on Mars.
#247 to #176 - roarflmao
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
Uhm, the posts states that there was a shortage of clean water in the area, i dont know if this is the most effective way of doing it. But if it is, then its definitly something that will spread quickly
#248 to #247 - cabbagemayhem
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
That's in Peru. OP lives in the US. It's not going to be needed here anytime soon.
#249 to #248 - roarflmao
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
True, but if we can found this, it might be able to help alot of people and improve life quality for alot of humans. We still help the people we ****** over during the colonial era, this might be an efficient way to do so
#250 to #249 - cabbagemayhem
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
No.
#251 to #250 - roarflmao
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
What?
#252 to #251 - cabbagemayhem
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
Are you the one who thumbed down comment #176?
#253 to #252 - roarflmao
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
No, but i still find your lack of logic disturbing.
#254 to #253 - cabbagemayhem
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
Then, you're not just wrong, you're stupid. Go pick up a logic book before you try using it in a sentence.
#255 to #254 - roarflmao
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
You're saying we shouldnt fund research about this because? No? Yeah, that does make alot of sense, people all over the world dying cause theres no clean water but something that might help them get clean water nope, because the reason no
#257 to #255 - cabbagemayhem
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
lol ok. You didn't get any humor in my curt response, I understand. We don't need to add any funding to this because we're already in serious financial trouble and it doesn't benefit us at all. That kind of research is something that UTEC needs to do, not us. I didn't mean to call you stupid, I read that off a crackerjack box.
#258 to #257 - roarflmao
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
Well that the economy atm is seriously ****** up, no doubt. Im still pretty sure theres alot of US tax dollars going to charity, then again when it comes to economy its like quantum physics. Dont pretend you really understand it, nobody really does.

I hardly doubt it would cost much to fund this aswell though, research is always going to be needed and cutting spending on research in the long term is just bad in all scenarios
#259 to #258 - cabbagemayhem
Reply 0
(03/08/2013) [-]
I'm not talking about the economy, I'm talking about government spending. It's not a mystery, we're spending more than we're making. Simple. And, this benefits us none. Why do you want to spend money frivolously?
#241 to #176 - oodlesandoodles
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#195 to #176 - mcstorms
Reply -4
(03/07/2013) [-]
>Implying water isn't a renewable energy
#240 to #195 - sinonyx
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
water isn't a renewable energy.. resource maybe, but not energy
#198 to #195 - cabbagemayhem
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
Can't tell if joking. It's not. The Earth has a limited supply of water. And again, it doesn't matter, we have plenty of water.
#208 to #198 - mcstorms
Reply -1
(03/07/2013) [-]
what epic anon said. Using this process it becomes renewable, and only about 15% of the worlds water is drinkable.
#237 to #208 - anonymouzx
Reply 0
(03/07/2013) [-]
1%
#200 to #198 - EpicAnon
Reply -2
(03/07/2013) [-]
>Water is pulled from air
>Air = Oxygen
>Plants take in Carbon Dioxide and release said oxygen with said water molecules in it
#76 to #6 - roarflmao
Reply +12
(03/06/2013) [-]
But we probably are?