Upload
Login or register
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #37 - nanapopo
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(01/25/2013) [-]
too bad it's impossible for something to combust without releasing CO2. Description is misleading.
User avatar #42 to #37 - Einsty
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/25/2013) [-]
Sulfur can.
User avatar #43 to #42 - nanapopo
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(01/25/2013) [-]
ok but it still combusts into something SO4 or something. the point is combustion will always make air pollution
User avatar #49 to #43 - TheMather
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/25/2013) [-]
Hydrogen.
Unless of course you count water vapor as pollution.
User avatar #51 to #49 - nanapopo
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/25/2013) [-]
damn it. oh well.
#46 to #43 - anon id: b071fe77
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/25/2013) [-]
After a bit of research, fire glass works like gas logs inside a gas fireplace. Thus the source of the flame is really propane, or any other gas fuel source.

So it still produces CO2. The glass however produces nothing, The gas still does.
#48 to #46 - lostindark
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #45 to #43 - Einsty
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/25/2013) [-]
Well, SO3, SO4 is not possible but you got the point. And CO2 does not much to polute the air and is easily absorbed by plantlife and algae.

But yes, a vast majority of flamable substances can cause polution, for example due to incomplete combustion (lack of oxygen)
User avatar #50 to #45 - nanapopo
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/25/2013) [-]
I'm not trying to claim its terrible for the environment, just saying that the description was misleading. i dont even know why i care. i need a life.