Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #37 - nanapopo (01/25/2013) [-]
too bad it's impossible for something to combust without releasing CO2. Description is misleading.
User avatar #42 to #37 - Einsty (01/25/2013) [-]
Sulfur can.
User avatar #43 to #42 - nanapopo (01/25/2013) [-]
ok but it still combusts into something SO4 or something. the point is combustion will always make air pollution
User avatar #49 to #43 - TheMather ONLINE (01/25/2013) [-]
Hydrogen.
Unless of course you count water vapor as pollution.
User avatar #51 to #49 - nanapopo (01/25/2013) [-]
damn it. oh well.
#46 to #43 - Womens Study Major (01/25/2013) [-]
After a bit of research, fire glass works like gas logs inside a gas fireplace. Thus the source of the flame is really propane, or any other gas fuel source.

So it still produces CO2. The glass however produces nothing, The gas still does.
-1
#48 to #46 - lostindark has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #45 to #43 - Einsty (01/25/2013) [-]
Well, SO3, SO4 is not possible but you got the point. And CO2 does not much to polute the air and is easily absorbed by plantlife and algae.

But yes, a vast majority of flamable substances can cause polution, for example due to incomplete combustion (lack of oxygen)
User avatar #50 to #45 - nanapopo (01/25/2013) [-]
I'm not trying to claim its terrible for the environment, just saying that the description was misleading. i dont even know why i care. i need a life.
 Friends (0)