| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
-
Fist motherfucker ,- -
Why women cant driv- -
The quietest room i- -
Bright side Ben -
WE DON'T HAVE BATTL- -
tilas tacos -
Youtube's at it aga- -
Typographic Transgr- -
Best Fusion Yet -
Preparing for ww3 -
Stephen King -
so that's how they -
Dat Personality -
Chair -
Wrastling -
Giraffe -
Aint nothing but a -
Nostalgic perving -
Bring it on bitch -
The worst type - li-
Evolution
| |
Links are not allowed.
You are allowed to post every 1 minute on the same page.
You are allowed to post every 1 minute on the same page.
Remaining character count: 1000
#366 to #354
-
tweetyftw **User deleted account** (05/31/2012) [-]
False, a fish does not neccesary evolve into a human, the progress of evolution is completely random.
Also in a very narrow and simple nuttshel. It went from first living beings, to chordates, then to tetrapods, to mammals, to primates, to hominidae and finally to homo. Not fish, dinosaurs, rats, monkeys, humans.
Also in a very narrow and simple nuttshel. It went from first living beings, to chordates, then to tetrapods, to mammals, to primates, to hominidae and finally to homo. Not fish, dinosaurs, rats, monkeys, humans.
I still think it's funny how evolutionists gets so butthurt when they get questionized, then they come up with a shitty answer and call it science. Even due they haven't even got an answer yet, they say that every other beliefe is wrong.
"HAHA HURR DURR CHRISTFAG, I BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION BECAUSE IT IS SCIENCE HURR DURR, YOU ARE STUPID FOR NOT BELIEVING IN OUR RELIGION IDIOT"
"HAHA HURR DURR CHRISTFAG, I BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION BECAUSE IT IS SCIENCE HURR DURR, YOU ARE STUPID FOR NOT BELIEVING IN OUR RELIGION IDIOT"
Oh man where do i begin.
1. Unlike religion, science doesn’t work with beliefs – you take the facts supporting the theory and compare those with facts not supporting the theory. Then you decide if the theory is correct – or perhaps you should improve the theory, choose an alternate theory or scrap the whole thing altogether. You don't believe in evolution.
2. Religion is different from creationism, it is possible to believe in a god and accept evolution.
3. Evolutionist say that creationism is wrong because evolution is backed up with evidence while creationism is a falsified hypothesis.
4. You didn't question anything. You tried to insult it by completely taking it out of context and making false claims about it.
1. Unlike religion, science doesn’t work with beliefs – you take the facts supporting the theory and compare those with facts not supporting the theory. Then you decide if the theory is correct – or perhaps you should improve the theory, choose an alternate theory or scrap the whole thing altogether. You don't believe in evolution.
2. Religion is different from creationism, it is possible to believe in a god and accept evolution.
3. Evolutionist say that creationism is wrong because evolution is backed up with evidence while creationism is a falsified hypothesis.
4. You didn't question anything. You tried to insult it by completely taking it out of context and making false claims about it.
Thats why I'm getting huge shitstorm for question your religion?
And when you are questioning someone doesnt mean you have to use a "?"
it can be like , if you think that something will happen if you do a curtain thing. Then I can questionize your thought by saying it is not true what you are saying , or something like that.
And when you are questioning someone doesnt mean you have to use a "?"
it can be like , if you think that something will happen if you do a curtain thing. Then I can questionize your thought by saying it is not true what you are saying , or something like that.
#396 to #380
-
N. Korean citizen (05/31/2012) [-]
Ok firstly this gif is completely wrong but whatever it was cool to watch and secondly evolution is an undisputed fact, its what humans evolved from which is disputed, where we came from and why this happened and so on. Scientists have ideas and there is pretty strong evidence for it but it's completely fine to deny it and say you believe in creation and so on. But evolution does exist and can be seen as quickly as one generation to the next. Take a look at bacteria and the effects of antibiotics on them before you start denying that evolution is real
#371
-
poontanglife (05/31/2012) [+]
(17 replies)
Its so funny reading comments using the word believe in context of evolution.
Its not something you can ''believe'' in, its just something thats there.. Like gravity.
Its not something you can ''believe'' in, its just something thats there.. Like gravity.
#460 to #371
-
thepenname (05/31/2012) [-]
Especially critical philosophers would argue everything requires belief, considering there is no flawless method to observing the world. Even what we glean from sight is relative and can be tempered by the brain's misinterpretations. There are many philosophers who have posed all of reality exists only for the individual. For all I know, you guys are just computer simulations and I'm the only individual with any true cognitive processes.
I'm going to go curl up in a ball now.
I'm going to go curl up in a ball now.
Everything is a theory until it is proven.
It is a theory that we evolved from apes.
It is a fact that you have hemoglobin in your blood.
It is a theory that Arthur Leigh Allen was the Zodiac Killer.
It is a fact that Paul Bernardo was the Scarborough rapist.
It is a theory that we evolved from apes.
It is a fact that you have hemoglobin in your blood.
It is a theory that Arthur Leigh Allen was the Zodiac Killer.
It is a fact that Paul Bernardo was the Scarborough rapist.
#409 to #393
-
poontanglife (05/31/2012) [-]
Alrighty then... Believing in a god is based on believing and faith because there is zero proof, believeing in evolution is... well thats not really a thing in a real grown up conversation, its as much fact as the earth is round, the sun is warm and gravity exists.
People who dont ''believe'' in evolution could just as well sit and explain how they dont feel like believing that water is wet. Sure you can believe that... but that doesnt change the fact that evolution is nothing about believe, its there.
People who dont ''believe'' in evolution could just as well sit and explain how they dont feel like believing that water is wet. Sure you can believe that... but that doesnt change the fact that evolution is nothing about believe, its there.
#469 to #459
-
poontanglife (05/31/2012) [-]
Evolution today is seen as just as much as fact as the earth circles the sun.
That the earth circles the sun is a theory in it self and is not 100 % either, but thats how science works, if there comes a better theory that stands the test of time better then we have to change our assumptions, however these theories that we use now and is seen as fact, just like the earth is round and the existence of evolution all have so massive evidence that we consider them factual.
Well no, its not ignorant, ignorant would be not to educate yourself or not try to understand how things works.
There is massive evidence that explains how we as a species came into existence.
That the earth circles the sun is a theory in it self and is not 100 % either, but thats how science works, if there comes a better theory that stands the test of time better then we have to change our assumptions, however these theories that we use now and is seen as fact, just like the earth is round and the existence of evolution all have so massive evidence that we consider them factual.
Well no, its not ignorant, ignorant would be not to educate yourself or not try to understand how things works.
There is massive evidence that explains how we as a species came into existence.
HEY GUESS WHAT
I'M CHRISTIAN AND I THINK EVOLUTION HAPPENED
I'M CHRISTIAN AND I THINK EVOLUTION HAPPENED
Christianfag here who believes in evoloution... now that was a cool gif :D
On a more serious note. Im athiest, and i believe that everyone has the right to believe in whatever they please. However, i would think that evolution would disprove god? He apparently created the world for humans, but why would he go through the punctuated equilibrium of evolution in order to create us? That doesnt make sense to me, please explain your thoughts.
Going to be pelted in red thumbs from angry christians
Going to be pelted in red thumbs from angry christians
According to the bible, God created the universe for us, so of course he knew we were coming. What im confused about is why go through this elongated and gradual stages of evolution to do so? And on top of that create a world whos surface is 70% salt water
Yeah thats what i believe god gave us free will and if your a good person then you have as much chance as getting to haven as some very relgious person. I believe he does not dam someone on their beliefs but the action of their hearts. Hmm that is true it could disprove him. But like i said i believe god to be more of an architect figure, causing things to happen which create chain reactions, like the big bang he caused that but didn't create what happened after. So indirectly i believe he created man as i believe he gave the necessary surrondings for evoloution to succeed.
I thumbed you up
I thumbed you up
#221 to #217
-
BroadSword ONLINE (05/31/2012) [-]
I was raised as a christian, but when i was 15 i started to question the ideology that was being preached by our local church, turned to the internet for extensive investigation after my religious teacher at school couldn't satisfactorily answer them. I live my life with good morals, not because if i dont some omnipotent being in the sky who already knows whether ill 'sin' or not will throw his 'loved child' into the fiery depths of hell, i live with good morales because i respect my fellow human being and entitlement to an enjoyable life.
#691 to #451
-
BroadSword ONLINE (06/01/2012) [-]
The way in which i would like to be treated.
I dislike the way Christians say that they take their morales from the bible, but when someone says oh we dont follow that part of the bible anymore, how do you make that decision whether to follow that moral code or not? That just proves we have some moral code embedded within us or something to that extent. Its this mental gymnastics that christians have with the bible is what i find such an incredible flaw in the foundation of christianity. Most of Genesis is rejected now, but its upon this chapter that the christian faith is built upon.
How do some christians agree with gays and some disagree with gays, yet in the bible which they all claim to follow clearly states in leviticus chapter Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is an abomination. If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them'
The way in which christians disregard parts of the book in which the entirety of what they believe in is based upon is beyond me. Yet Christians say where do atheists get their morals? This is such a hypocritical statement as where do christians get the morals in order to take some of the bible but not the whole thing as a away to live their lives.
I dislike the way Christians say that they take their morales from the bible, but when someone says oh we dont follow that part of the bible anymore, how do you make that decision whether to follow that moral code or not? That just proves we have some moral code embedded within us or something to that extent. Its this mental gymnastics that christians have with the bible is what i find such an incredible flaw in the foundation of christianity. Most of Genesis is rejected now, but its upon this chapter that the christian faith is built upon.
How do some christians agree with gays and some disagree with gays, yet in the bible which they all claim to follow clearly states in leviticus chapter Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is an abomination. If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them'
The way in which christians disregard parts of the book in which the entirety of what they believe in is based upon is beyond me. Yet Christians say where do atheists get their morals? This is such a hypocritical statement as where do christians get the morals in order to take some of the bible but not the whole thing as a away to live their lives.
#696 to #691
-
justthisonepost (06/01/2012) [-]
Well, Jesus came and fufilled the old testament, and as soon as I find the verse that says it, I will send it to you. There is another verse that says something along the lines of we will ignore the old testament rules that aren't restated in the new testament, except for sexual immorality, drinking of the blood of animals, and human sacrifice.
Why would god make this long-ass chain reaction in order to get the end product (who are somehow special compared to all the other animals)?
It doesn't make any sense.
And evolution certainly disproves the genesis account in the bible, which forms the basis of the entire religion.
No original sin = no need for god/jesus
It doesn't make any sense.
And evolution certainly disproves the genesis account in the bible, which forms the basis of the entire religion.
No original sin = no need for god/jesus
Fair point... but a lot of the bible is mis-matched so i can't necessarily say that genesis is correct perhaps an entire chapter relating to evolution was lost. All i feel is that there is a higher entity without a shadow of a doubt.
#24 to #19
-
N. Korean citizen (05/30/2012) [-]
Dont hate me for saying this, but religion has nothing to do with evolution.
Sure, Super-christians don't like to believe in evolution because they believe god created man, but thats just an opinion.
In truth, like I said, religion has nothing to do with evolution.
On to my point: There is really no reason you had to type that youre a "christianfag".
Sure, Super-christians don't like to believe in evolution because they believe god created man, but thats just an opinion.
In truth, like I said, religion has nothing to do with evolution.
On to my point: There is really no reason you had to type that youre a "christianfag".
Errrr i believe god created man indirectly... i believe god is more of an architect and places things in the world which cause chain reactions. Like the big bang, i believe god caused it to happen but he did not control what happened after entirely... i am a christian because i believe in christ and heaven and stuff however... i think Science and religion could work together.I believe much science as i believe much religion. Science is cool for explaining things. Religion is cool for hoping things :) that is all i have to say :)
I just don't understand how you can believe in something like that. I don't get it, what exactly is the point? Are you afraid of death? Do you need to know that there is someone better to go after death than just decomposing in the ground? If you believe God created the big bang and that evolution is one of his tools, what is the need for him? What is the purpose of this god? These things do not need an almighty creator.
Probably get red thumbs but I'm genuinely confused.
Probably get red thumbs but I'm genuinely confused.
#155 to #42
-
kdeastab (05/31/2012) [-]
Doesn't the story of creation tell how original sin happened? Without the original sin, there's no fall. Without a fall, there's no need for redemption. With no need for redemption, there's no need for a redeemer. Seeing as Jesus is the redeemer, that pokes a bit of a hole in the entire basis of Christianity. This is why there are many religious people that reject evolution. About 43% of the United States population still reject evolution.
Two of every animal in the world fitting on a boat springs to mind.
Everything about that story, actually.
Earth being 5000 years old.
The creation of life itself, in fact.
And half a dozen other things that we can now say for certain aren't true due to science.
Everything about that story, actually.
Earth being 5000 years old.
The creation of life itself, in fact.
And half a dozen other things that we can now say for certain aren't true due to science.
I don't recall ever having said that god was all powerful, and if he was, he created the laws of physics, the least he can do is abide by them.
We as humanity know the Earth is older than that with a wide myriad of techniques, the most vague being common sense and the most specific being things like carbon dating.
We also know that humans weren't created as simply as the bible would have us believe, because we have fossils of animals that are, if you will, 'caught' between monkey and human, which no longer exist as animals today.
We as humanity know the Earth is older than that with a wide myriad of techniques, the most vague being common sense and the most specific being things like carbon dating.
We also know that humans weren't created as simply as the bible would have us believe, because we have fossils of animals that are, if you will, 'caught' between monkey and human, which no longer exist as animals today.
#191 to #57
-
justthisonepost (05/31/2012) [-]
Don't you love how I get thumbed down for having a discussion? I never called you a fool or said you are wrong, I simply asked questions to receive answers. Luckily thumbs aren't important. Anyway, you can answer my questions if you want, or just move on if you are bored. I can always try and find information elsewhere.
#59 to #57
-
justthisonepost (05/30/2012) [-]
How many of the fossils do we have that you described? Also you didn't say that God being all powerful was B.S., so that's why I brought it up. Additionally, does God have to follow rules that apply to things that are not of a higher power?
I believe the one thing that god gave us is freewill... no matter our choices... they are our choices and he won't condem you for not believing in him... in fact he probably would condem a religious man who did things wrong then an athiest who is a good person, because god hates hypocracy... i think...
You have to be able to put things into perspective. The bible is a philosophy book, not a history book. The oldest stories in it are more than 2000 years old, there are going to be some errors. That doesn't diminish the philosophy of it though.
If God exists, then how do Pokemon evolve?
God: 0
Atheists: 0
Pokemon: 1
God: 0
Atheists: 0
Pokemon: 1
I like to think Wicca likes to belive in evolution. That religion has been changing for thousands of years as man grew smarter. For example. It focuses mainly on the goddess, cause at first there was only the goddess. That was because people thought that life came from women and women alone. Once we figured out that man was needed to help, they figured that a God must be helping the Goddess.