Evolution. .. CHECK MATE ATHEISTS: then why aren't monkeys turning into humans today? lizard dinosaur evolution science
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (229)
[ 229 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#11 - entername
Reply +177 123456789123345869
(07/10/2014) [-]
CHECK MATE ATHEISTS: then why aren't monkeys turning into humans today?
CHECK MATE ATHEISTS: then why aren't monkeys turning into humans today?
#110 to #11 - rytul
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
There`s actually a theory that monkeys degraded from humans.
There`s actually a theory that monkeys degraded from humans.
User avatar #113 to #110 - entername
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
thats a stupid theory
crazy theories like that make it easier for religious kooks to dismiss theories with tons of evidence
#154 to #11 - tsds
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
#107 to #11 - ketiw
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
It's easy because we are not from monkeys but we have common ancestor. Imagine evolution like a tree, we and monkeys share same main branch, some of branches already die and so on.. btw. I want to punch in the face everyone who say this ********, i've heard it like thousand times.
User avatar #112 to #11 - danyrambo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Is that a midget psycho monkey?
#119 to #11 - anon id: 79827f97
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
they are, they put posts like yours on internet because they like to throw **** around.
#180 to #11 - anon id: d939ef3f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Why do we still have wolves if we have dogs'

Checkmate, you dumbass
User avatar #201 to #180 - sspacecore
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
What is a joke?
User avatar #182 to #11 - imadeanaccountforu
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
They still love throwing **** at people and not getting blamed.
#181 to #11 - seeking
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
I have this saved, figured i would share
User avatar #52 to #11 - bongoboon
Reply +34 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Humans doesn't come from Monkeys, they come from common ancestor

By the way i'm am sorry for my poor english if i made any mistakes
User avatar #62 to #52 - gentlemanotaku
Reply +45 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
is okay ivan, you science is only matter, english is for dumb
User avatar #108 to #62 - bongoboon
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
hahaha, was it that bad?
#92 to #52 - anon id: 7ff03175
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
*Humans don't come from monkeys, they come from a common ancestor

(You're English is fine, I understood you, just thought I'd help you out)
User avatar #109 to #92 - bongoboon
Reply +27 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Thanks, also, your*

Sorry
#152 to #109 - ansjovis
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
#200 to #109 - anon id: cd0bf3fd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Don't be sorry, that's ******* terrific.
User avatar #150 to #52 - metalmind
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Who also was an ape/moneky.
User avatar #14 to #11 - wellimnotsure
Reply +43 123456789123345869
(07/10/2014) [-]
at this point i think monkeys may be more civilized than us, maybe we should be turning into them
#24 to #14 - anon id: 88eabfc8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
civilized
civilized
User avatar #140 to #24 - ieatpaste
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
looks like the compton riots
#121 to #24 - xxmemosxx
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Have you never been downtown in any city? Definitely more civilised
User avatar #198 to #121 - sspacecore
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Downtown Charleston isn't so bad
#160 to #24 - cannibalvegan
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Reminded me of this.
Reminded me of this.
#4 - applescryatnight
Reply +102 123456789123345869
(07/10/2014) [-]
its evolution, baby
its evolution, baby
User avatar #17 to #4 - frankjeager
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/10/2014) [-]
****, I forgot all about that video. Where is it from again?
#18 to #17 - applescryatnight
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(07/10/2014) [-]
Pearl Jam - Do the Evolution

pearl jam: do the evolution
User avatar #56 to #18 - richhobo
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Oh, I thought it was from Batman: The animated adventures or something.

The art style looks REALLY similar
User avatar #63 to #56 - chiefwahoo
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
The same animators that did Batman did this music video.
User avatar #174 to #63 - allahrules
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
that explains a lot
#191 to #63 - anon id: 7295928a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
it was from spawn, not batman. todd mcfarlane directed the music video
User avatar #19 to #18 - frankjeager
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/10/2014) [-]
thanks man
#23 - underthetable
Reply -77 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
I'm sick of hearing about evolution. I've looked at the theory for 10 years and it's a bunch of horse crap.
#142 to #23 - anon id: 9a626326
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
If you spent 10 years studying it and came up with the same answer as a religious zealot you're probably retarded.
#137 to #23 - helgheimftw
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #61 to #23 - aizeinstein
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
You're not even a biologist, so shut the **** up.
#71 to #23 - bobbysnobby
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
As a student of anthropology I find this comment silly.
Ill lay it out nice and simple.
Animals reproduce.
Animals offspring are not perfect copies of the parents.
Not all animals survive to adulthood.

With these 3 rules that you cannot argue against because they are unarguably true, evolution must occur. If you change anything regularly over time you end up with a different something down the road, its ridiculous to think you wont.

If you think any of those 3 are untrue then explain how they are untrue, if you cannot then you must accept the conclusion which is animals and more generally organisms evolve.

Finally in a later comment you talk about God. Evolution and science in general are agnostic that is to say they operate under the impression that the question "Is there a god?" is one which has no answer, by which they mean its impossible for people to answer that question. Science cannot disprove a god, and does not try to. God could have created the world Via evolution there is no way to know.
User avatar #26 to #23 - thephoenix
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
lel
#82 to #23 - precision
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #57 to #23 - hydraetis
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Y u gotta ********, man?
#58 to #57 - underthetable
Reply -10 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
i'm sorry i don't speak gentleman of color
User avatar #59 to #58 - hydraetis
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Why do you have to *********?
#32 to #23 - dhumbassckids
Reply +82 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
obvious troll is obvious:
1. doesn't explain why he doesn't believe theory
3. thinking because he took at best an elementary look at a theory he has the evidence to disprove numerous factual scientific studies and theories.
User avatar #43 to #32 - amusingusername
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Are you gonna give us that 2. or do I have to I call the cops?
#44 to #43 - dhumbassckids
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
#45 to #44 - amusingusername
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
#189 to #32 - anon id: d8bc572d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #164 to #32 - twofreegerbils
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
>replying to obvious trolls
You are the retard.
User avatar #96 to #32 - reefteef
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Wait? Are you implying that real christians (or any religious people) actually try to explain why they don't believe in evolution?
#37 to #32 - underthetable
Reply -28 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
i'm 27 years old and i've studied evolution for 10 years. I've compared the non existent evidence to the evidence proving it wrong. so you should probably search "why evolution is false" and tell me what you come up with.
#42 to #37 - dhumbassckids
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
how about you provide some of this evidence as to why it doesn't exist.
Here's some evidence as to why it does:
note the common bone structures in our anatomy to that of a cat, whale and bat. All mammals. the length and density of these bone structures all relates to the function of the limb that they are in, especially the case of the whale and the bat whose "arms" have the least common purpose to ours. The bone structure of the bat specifically the "fingers" of the wing which are longer and thinner to provide support for the membrane of the wing while being light enough for flight. The whale has a shorter radial bone and longer "fingers" to extend the length of it's fin while maintaining flexibility in the upper region of the fin. The cat's fingers form a pad with the upper region angled to provide added tension for more powerful leaps so that they are better adapted to catch prey while our fingers are adapted for gripping, specifically the tree branches that our ancestors would grip after evolving from primates. This occurrence known as "adaptive radiation" shows that all of these structures were adapted from a common ancestor that all mammals must share. You've gotta be ******* with me if you expect me to believe you've honestly spent any more than 30 minutes looking for actual evidence that evolution exists and you couldn't find a single thing that adequately explains that it does. I'm all for skepticism and not blindly believing every single thing told to you but ignoring glaring evidence (which is out there) is just plain ignorant. next you're gonna tell me that because you can't ******* see gravity that it doesn't exist or that because you were born on Earth and thus must look outward at the universe you believe that Earth CLEARLY has to be the center of the universe despite scientific and mathematical data done by people clearly smarter than either of us proves wrong. 9/10 made me respond twice and pissed em off you're a successful troll.
#55 to #42 - underthetable
Reply -19 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
please tell me one instance of visible evolution. please tell me one thing on earth the wasn't created. technology was created, it wasn't evolved. it advanced, didn't evolve. a created by volkswagon has an engine similar to that of a honda, they must have evolved from a common ancester. Also, look at DNA, rip it apart and know that inside each of those little strands of dna are 100s more parts and if 1 part is slightly off, mutation will occur. DNA is one of the reasons why i can't and won't believe in evolution.
www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread163678/pg1
www.ucg.org/science/prove-evolution-false-even-without-bible/
www.aboundingjoy.com/scientists.htm

Also, if evolution were true...why would you disprove the fact that evolution could cause a being aka God, and give him the power to create himself?
User avatar #97 to #55 - voltkills
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
the mutations in DNA are literally the reason for evolution you dumb ****.
User avatar #73 to #55 - iviagic
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
You can believe in a God while contemporaneously believe in evolution. Want to know my personal belief?

I believe God, not a fairy or a man, but a supernatural being, created the universe via processes. These processes are therefore described by science and mathematics.

On the topic of evolution, the notion that we cannot 'observe' evolution is ridiculous. We observe it all the time. That's why viruses and bacteria are such a nuisance to scientists developing vaccinations and medicine; they evolve and adapt to antibiotics that we treat them with and essentially become immune to them.

On a macroscopic scale, however, we cannot directly observe evolution because it is a process that occurs over the course of millions of years and thousands of generations. We can, however, utilize evidence from fossils and their correlating environments to provide evidence for evolution. Take a look at certain fossils of ancient organisms and then take a look at their environments. It isn't a coincidence that they are suited for their habitats.

If that isn't enough for you, then you need to ask yourself simple questions: Why are there so many different species of the same animal (sharks, insects, monkeys, dogs, cats, etc) and what do you know that the scientists and researchers that have been researching the topic for years don't?
#75 to #73 - underthetable
Reply -14 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
i can't discuss this anymore, i'm tired of doing it day in and day out. I'm not going to change anyone's mind. I'm just going to stick to my beliefs and let the world do its own thing.
User avatar #76 to #75 - iviagic
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Listen, there is literally no reason to not believe in evolution other than fear of knowledge or ignorance.
#83 to #76 - underthetable
Reply -8 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
I don't deny science. I deny evolution.
User avatar #84 to #83 - iviagic
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
So you assume that you know more than the scientific community? I'm sorry, but doing a 'google search' doesn't show me anything. If you want me to believe that anything you say is relevant, then you have to show me counter-experiments/research that disproves the clear evidence made by actual scientists doing actual scientific studies.
#87 to #84 - underthetable
Reply -8 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
There are scientists who deny evolution. i'm going to bed now this is boring me.
User avatar #88 to #87 - iviagic
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
There are scientists that are going to disagree with each theory. There are also scientists that argue against gravity. But if you feel like the 1-5% of scientists that disagree w/ evolution are right, then you're clearly an idiot.
User avatar #130 to #87 - Daeiros
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
What you mean to say is that there are creationists who become scientists with the sole purpose of disproving evolution. They enter into the scientific community with their minds already made up and ignore all contradicting evidence in their quest to find any tiny glimmer of scientific doubt they can cling to and exploit.

They are merely trying to arm themselves to fight the fight against evolution using science as their weapon because they are actually smart enough to realize that you can't wave a bible at a scientist and make him admit that everything his research has proven is wrong because an old book says so.
#173 to #75 - dhumbassckids
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
I sincerely hope that you didn't think that *********** that you didn't believe in evolution wouldn't get you some type of actual response. You're not even a troll account you actually have good content. How the **** are you this stupid?
User avatar #117 to #55 - Daeiros
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Lets do the run down of your link
www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread163678/pg1
Titled "Top Ten Scientific Facts : Evolution is False and Impossible."
All ten of which are wrong, and here's why

1. Even a partial wing can prove useful in some ways. Gliding for instance, or simply helping to release excess heat. Just because a mutation isn't immediately greatly beneficial doesn't mean that it is useless or puts the creature at a disadvantage. There are plenty of "useless" parts in nature today.

2. From the text: "Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man. They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture." But then they FIND those creatures exactly when and where and what they predicted would fill that gap. They say, "hmm, from the looks of it, there is a missing link between creature A and creature B, it likely lived X number of years ago in this region, lets go dig here, about this deep and, hey would you look at that, found it." They aren't "making up" anything, they are predicting and then proving those predictions.

3. True, scientists have not created life in a lab, but evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life, it is concerned with the origin of species. This point is both invalid to the argument and just like #2, trying to claim that any missing information is reason to scrap the theory.

4. This "fact" claims that evolution is wrong because women are born with all their eggs, so things that happen to the mother can't change the offspring she produces. This is irrelevant to the process of natural selection, and also untrue because eggs can in fact mutate and environmental factors like stress during pregnancy greatly effect fetus development

5. From the text: "DNA Error Checking Proves Evolution is Wrong... The fact is that any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed." Birth defects don't care about your DNA error checking and it isnt 100%
User avatar #122 to #117 - Daeiros
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
continued

6. The second law of thermodynamics has nothing to do with evolution. Inorganic systems will naturally decay into chaos. Living things can grow more complex and ordered because they are living and can make an effort to do so. Ripples in a pond cannot try to be bigger ripples and avoid fading, this is what that law refers too.

7. Sure, a creature with more or less chromosomes than the rest of their species would not be able to breed, unless of course, they found another member of their species with the same number of chromosomes. There is more than one person on earth with down syndrome.

8. Number 8 just says that because scientists don't know the origin of matter and the universe, that it is impossible for them to say that animals evolve through mutation and natural selection. I don't think I even need to refute that, it falls apart all on it's own.

9. Number 9 just states that evolution is wrong because we haven't found life on Mars even though Mars looks like a good candidate for life. Again, it mistakes evolution as an explanation for the origin of life.

10. Number 10 says that radio silence in space means that there is no other life in the universe and that means that evolution is wrong. Again, not dealing with origins. Also, space is a pretty big place, we have not been listening for radio signals for very long. I think Neil Degrasse Tyson summed it up best in Cosmos when he said that aliens could have been bombarding us with radio signals 300 years ago and we would have never heard them, it's entirely possible that they are using something more advanced that we have yet to discover, it's also possible that they never even discovered radio at all and technology took a different route on their planet.

All ten, nonsense. I'm sure I could do the same with the rest of your links, but I feel I've wasted enough time here.
#70 to #55 - bobajoe
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
How can you compare technology (cars) to animals. You really must be either blind, stupid, or just a decent troll as stated above.
How can you compare technology (cars) to animals. You really must be either blind, stupid, or just a decent troll as stated above.
#72 to #70 - underthetable
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
To look at things being slightly identical, you would think it was created (designed) that way. I still believe evolution to be an indoctrinating tool to get rid of God in society. You have to ask yourself why do you continue to tell people they're wrong and your way is right. Who's to say my way is right and who's to say your way is right? Science hasn't proven evolution. There are more evidence of Jesus than there are in evolution. Which btw, science says jesus did exist, they don't believe he performed miracles. All i'm saying is evolution is crap. how many people have lived their life believing in science and not having faith in something else? Think back before evolution, what did people believe? It's the same crap now, different story. Eventually evolution will be proven wrong and they'll come up with some other stupid reason why we are here, and it wont be religious because they won't accept that we cannot answer the question to where we came from. We can think we know. But the possibility is not there. You'll be dead before you know it and you'd have lived your life believing in the "scientific" aspect of life, and not the spiritual one. Where's your soul gonna go?
#77 to #72 - bobajoe
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Okay I never said you were wrong. I was saying your logic is terribly flawed and I'm sorry that you are so blinded by your own faith in a book written thousands of years ago that ended up getting changed multiple times. Did you know that the church took out multiple parts of the bible because they didnt believe in it or they thought it would put a bad image on the church. Your entire argument being "Well we have no direct evidence" and "Well we cant believe in science." really makes you seem like the one denying facts. If more people thought the way you did we would have never made any scientific expansion.
#81 to #77 - bobajoe
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Here's a graph that shows exactly what religion has done to science in the past.
#85 to #81 - underthetable
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
i'm not denying science, i'm denying evolution to be the origin of life. Although I would like to see some useful science come out sometime soon. Free energy perhaps, or medicines without side effects. Everything is entertainment based and is about money. I'm tired now.
#89 to #85 - bobajoe
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Well you are thinking of things that might of happened by now if there were a lot less people like you. But at the end of the day this got nowhere. You changed no ones mind. No one changed your mind. It was all just an argument of fact over belief.
#171 to #85 - skorchy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Basically what the internet is trying to tell you right now, is that you're a dumbass and your opinion is wrong.

Sorry to disappoint you, but I agree with them. You're pretty ******* stupid.
#124 to #72 - xxmemosxx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Are you 5?

"science says jesus did exist"

No, science doesn't say **** about whether Jesus exists. A lot of Historians agree that he did (there are plenty that don't but that's besides the point here) but science doesn't. Do you even understand what science is?
User avatar #141 to #55 - Daeiros
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Alright, decided to take a look at the other ones, just to humor you.
www.ucg.org/science/prove-evolution-false-even-without-bible/
This one uses the FALSE acronym to denounce evolution

F is for fossils
This article starts by saying that there are no Precambrian complex fossils, so evolution is false. I don't know why we haven't found any complex Precambrian fossils yet, but again, evolution is the origin of species, not the origin of life.
It goes on to say "Further important evidence from the fossil record is the absence of transitional forms between species." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitional_fossil "There are no fossils of creatures whose scales were changing into feathers" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeopteryx "no fossils of fish getting legs" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mudskipper This one isn't even a fossil, you can go see live ones at many aquariums and zoos

A for Assumption
This is mostly just an uniformed attempt to attack credibility with statements like "Words such as "could," "perhaps" and "possibly" plague the entire book." and "Evolution is still called a theory"
This demonstrates a lack of understanding of what the word theory means, and acts as if any uncertainty is reason enough to scrap the whole thing. Science is constantly learning, and thus, never assumes that it is absolute fact.

L for Life
Yet another assumption that evolution describes the origin of life, this time using the old "chicken or the egg" paradox!

S for Symbiosis
This one claims that mutually dependent relationships between two different life forms prove that they were both created at the same time, because there is no way these relationships developed over time from two previously independent creatures.

E for Engineering
The same old tired excuse that life is just too complex to happen by accident, so there must be a creator. Meaningless.
User avatar #111 to #55 - Daeiros
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dog_breeds
One instance of visible evolution.

Humans chose which dogs to breed and which dogs not to breed based on desirable traits. They bred the smallest two dogs they had together, and the puppies were even smaller. Rinse and repeat and you get the Toy Poodle and the Chihuahua. They bred the largest two dogs they had together, and the puppies were even larger, Rinse and repeat and you get the Great Dane and the the Mastiff.

Now the theory of evolution states that instead of humans picking the desirable ones and allowing them to breed, through the process of natural selection, nature chose which ones were allowed to breed by killing those that weren't able to survive. This process, along with random mutations, over many generations resulted in greater differences than we have achieved in the limited time we have been breeding dogs.

Mutations also contribute to evolution when they are beneficial, for instance:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polydactyly
If people with extra fingers were somehow more likely to survive, then they would breed with other people with extra fingers, and eventually everyone would have extra fingers.
#41 to #37 - haxslasher
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
I tried... I really tried to read those... but it hurt.
I tried... I really tried to read those... but it hurt.
#40 to #37 - presidentmoose [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#25 - popnotes
Reply +40 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Fish > Lizard > Badger

I don't think that's right.
User avatar #54 to #25 - dunkleosteus
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
It's a little right, except for the badger part

there were more species in between.
User avatar #13 - thechosentroll
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/10/2014) [-]
Evolution doesn't quite work that way. We didn't evolve from dinosaurs.
User avatar #15 to #13 - toosexyforyou
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/10/2014) [-]
It didn't specify why was evolving.
#20 to #15 - presidentmoose [OP]
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/10/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #22 to #20 - toosexyforyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
I meant to type "what" and not "why"
User avatar #28 to #22 - presidentmoose [OP]
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
I didn't even notice. I read it as "what"
User avatar #51 to #28 - toosexyforyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Thanks, bud.
User avatar #16 to #13 - chrisel
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/10/2014) [-]
That weren't dinosaurs, those were just reptiles.
#33 to #13 - hankiepankie
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
I believe that was not your average dinosaur, but a Synapsid--which mammals did indeed evolve from.
User avatar #29 to #13 - noblexfenrir
Reply +32 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Well yes, it's an artists rendition, ofcourse it's going to stray from the actual theory. Do you want a tracking of every successive species since the first microbe?

...Well I kinda do actually.
User avatar #30 to #29 - thechosentroll
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Yeah, me too. That'd be cool.
User avatar #132 - sinconn
Reply -18 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
it'd be neat if evolution even happened.
#172 to #132 - eezo
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
God, these dumbasses replying to you are hilarious
God, these dumbasses replying to you are hilarious
#162 to #132 - psychadelicace
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #185 to #132 - acemcgunner
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
yeah, I know, right, good thing we got the bible..
User avatar #168 to #132 - aldothenazi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Guys got baited. 10/10.
User avatar #133 to #132 - derpsenderp
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
You're retarded.
#186 to #132 - yisumad
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Let me guess, you think vaccinations are bad, too?
Let me guess, you think vaccinations are bad, too?
#151 to #132 - entername
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
ignorant people like you sicken me, you have no idea how science works, and people like you hold back the advancement of science
ignorant people like you sicken me, you have no idea how science works, and people like you hold back the advancement of science
#147 to #132 - trollypollyz
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #197 to #147 - anderps
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Funny thing is that Mr. Garrison (Or in that gif Mrs. Garrison) thinks that evolution is retarded.

Not saying I don't agree with you doe. I completely agree with you.
#129 - wetpantslol
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #139 - CXJokerXD
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
>Did not turn into Godzilla
>4/10
>would not evolve again
#21 - youlikeme
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
If evolution had taken a slightly different turn, who knows what we'd look like today.
User avatar #31 to #21 - leightonsolomon
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
We'll probably look like anime characters in the future anyway
www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/11/faces-of-the-future-human-facial-features-photos_n_3391747.html
User avatar #184 to #31 - nigeltheoutlaw
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
I guess Ron Paul really is going to make anime real.
#116 - exposeyourgenitals
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(07/11/2014) [-]
Evolution of Hurr
Evolution of Hurr