Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#62 - ChromedDragon
Reply +10
(02/10/2013) [-]
now just zoom out a little bit so we can see more than a very small amount of time that is 130 years
#65 to #62 - popadoo
Reply 0
(02/10/2013) [-]
^

This guy, this guy gets it. The Earth's temperature jumps up and down all the time, over the course of thousands of years. Showing us 130 years proves nothing.
#70 to #65 - thegorn
Reply +1
(02/10/2013) [-]
The graph isn't trying to prove climate change, it's showing how similar climate models are across the world.
#90 to #70 - winglit
Reply -1
(02/10/2013) [-]
but the global climate tends to change over time, the planet has gone from being covered in ice, to being a giant desert with only a few forests towards the southern equator, to being a forest filled with giant insects, would you blame those on human actions as well? the whole argument seems a bit like us trying to make ourselves seem more important, and whos to say the world didnt let us evolve so we could make more CO2 for it? maybe the world was a bit chilly so it left us to do as we wanted? its also as stated a tiny graph which shows nothing of the past millions of years of climate change.
#102 to #90 - thegorn
Reply +1
(02/10/2013) [-]
Read my comment again.
#157 to #102 - anon
Reply 0
(02/10/2013) [-]
True, the graphs are the same, but some people understand that the graphs don't mean **** while others think it's a sign of the end.
#170 to #157 - thegorn
Reply 0
(02/10/2013) [-]
Exactly, everyone who looks at that and say's "Boy, we sure are ******!" is an idiot, just like anyone who looks at it and says "It's only 130 years durr, that's proof that global warming is a myth, and everyone who thinks otherwise is arrogant!". The reason it only shows the last 130 years is that it's a graph over recorded weather. Before 1880 humans didn't take periodic meteorological measurements.