x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#26 - octobadger (02/27/2013) [-]
In order to this this the frame rate would have to be faster than the speed of light. The camera would actually time travel.
In order to this this the frame rate would have to be faster than the speed of light. The camera would actually time travel.
#61 to #26 - quackyquack ONLINE (02/27/2013) [-]
**quackyquack rolls 314,791,466** You're somewhat right. A regular camera at super high speeds wouldn't work - it would be too dark. But this fancy nerd camera obviously lifts and has magic in it that gets the raw data and poops out neat-o reposts like this.
#27 to #26 - anonmynous (02/27/2013) [-]
Umm... the camera is not moving. And yes this is real. It takes light approximately 1 nanosecond to travel the distance in this video so you need a camera that can essentially take one shot ever 10 pico seconds to produce a video like this.
#34 to #27 - octobadger (02/27/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_9vd4HWlVA
Oh snap! I stand corrected.
#30 to #27 - octobadger (02/27/2013) [-]
Electricity can't travel that fast. If it could when you took the video the electrons would time travel and shock a caveman.
#29 to #27 - John Cena (02/27/2013) [-]
He's right. This innovation was unveiled at TED. Honestly, the things people display at this conference is unreal
#32 to #29 - John Cena (02/27/2013) [-]
Oops, forgot.

SAUCE:

[url deleted]
 Friends (0)