Which is which?. They are the exact same weapon except one has been modified with a different stock and attachments. They will shoot exactly the same no matter
x
Click to expand

Which is which?

(Enlarge)
Which is which?. They are the exact same weapon except one has been modified with a different stock and attachments. They will shoot exactly the same no matter

They are the exact same weapon except one has been modified with a different stock and attachments. They will shoot exactly the same no matter what they look like. I assure you that they are both real firearms that fire lethal bullets.

I have what I call a
ial experiment that
I am going to try here.
The test is simple. . all
I want you to do is
identify which of
these pictures would
be classified as an
assault weapon" in
the comments, but
before you do that I
I _ Id like you to read
I e description at the
bottom of the post. I
don' t mean for this to
be a trick or troll of
any sort I am just
curious.
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+72
Views: 5778
Favorited: 1
Submitted: 07/30/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to zradel Subscribe to fucking-guns submit to reddit

Comments(104):

[ 104 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#76 - johnstyron (08/12/2012) [+] (2 replies)
Why would anyone ever do that to a 10/22? It's horrible
-3
#107 - Pineapplekush **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (2 replies)
User avatar #116 to #107 - natteulven (12/14/2012) [-]
>Clip
Also any 10/22 can use 25rd mags. That's most likely a fake suppressor, there is absolutely no fire selector. How does one "assault a building".

1/10 for making me respond, kill yourself faggot.
User avatar #73 - Kalder ONLINE (08/04/2012) [+] (1 reply)
the only way either could be considered an "assault" weapon is of they have an option for full auto fire
User avatar #75 to #73 - zradel (08/05/2012) [-]
You're thinking assault rifle, which is a weapon that fires more then one bullet with each trigger pull. An "assault weapon" is not the same. If you would like to share an opinion please use proper terminology.
User avatar #92 - shinote (10/06/2012) [-]
Not gonna lie, I just like the look of some weapons over others.

I'm a guy who likes things to look nice, I mean it's the same reason people prefer BMW's to idk hondas?

If I were FORCED to choose between the two, I'd choose the top one, NOT because of all the goodies, but because I like the look of the quad rail & suppressor.

Plus I dislike guns that are styled like the bottom, reminds me of westerns & **** , of which I was never fond of.
#78 - qwermy (08/22/2012) [+] (3 replies)
I can see that both are 10/22s, but the top one is an "assault weapon" because of it's above 15 round magazine, collapsing stock, grip, and (possibly fake) suppressor. These features make the gun no more dangerous. In fact, the stock and grip add accuracy (making the gun less prone to hitting the wrong target), and the suppressor makes it shootable without earplugs. In the hands of a responsible person, that makes it safer. In the hands of a criminal, it is potentially more lethal. That said, it comes down to the person holding this gun, not the gun itself. The tactical appearance of the top gun adds virtually nothing to its ability to kill, and either gun would be only safe in responsible hands.
User avatar #28 - subgunner (07/30/2012) [+] (23 replies)
under the old assault rifle ban the top 10/22 would be considered an assault weapon (the stock must be fixed and magazine capacity capped at 10) even though that would be incorrect as an assault rifle is a rifle that can fire multiple shots within the same trigger pull
User avatar #105 - InglushMayjur (12/13/2012) [-]
Clearly the first one is an assault weapon, because, going by politician gun control logic, it looks more dangerous.
#101 - winterworlock (12/12/2012) [+] (2 replies)
The top one has legally been made an "Assault Weapon." It has a removable magazine, and the requisite 2 listed features, those being a pistol grip and adjustable stock. Telescopic sights would also count, but it only requires 2.
User avatar #103 to #101 - twofreegerbils (12/12/2012) [-]
You are a complete and utter faggot
The pile of dildos you have shoved up your ass can be seen from space
Obvious nogunz
First of all, there is NO SUCH THING as a ************* ASSAULT WEAPON. It's like saying sniper rifle. Really? Does the rifle snipe people? All by itself?
If we assume that "assault weapons" do exist, then we still have to assume the term doesn't apply. Because it refers to a weapons ban that lapsed many years ago.
User avatar #89 - billclintonpig (09/22/2012) [+] (3 replies)
The first one as it has has the trigger behind the magazine, pretty gay but this would not legal in some states
User avatar #91 to #89 - zradel (09/26/2012) [-]
Are you retarded...both have the trigger behind the magazine. Unless it's bullpup that's kind of how guns are made.
#64 - fango (07/31/2012) [+] (3 replies)
The only thing is that the top one does make it more effective to use against other humans, especially the extended magazine.
User avatar #65 to #64 - zradel (07/31/2012) [-]
Except that magazine would fit into the bottom rifle as well.
User avatar #43 - theplatypus (07/30/2012) [+] (11 replies)
Neither. Perform an assault or raid a building with 10/22 and find out what happens to you. 2/10 OP. Stop spreading anti gun slander if you don't own and regularly use weapons like this.
User avatar #47 to #46 - zradel (07/30/2012) [-]
That would never be my intention...the 10/22 is a great gun. Like i said before I was just trying to point out that in some states that gun on top would be illegal even though it is for all intensive purposes the same as the one on the bottom.
+1
#11 - sdevmanny **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (1 reply)
User avatar #122 - giggitygil (12/18/2012) [-]
I love my 10/22. I have the magazine with the 3 stock magazines attached to eachother, a holographic site, a red and blackish stock (without the stock) with the grip of a pistol, and a heavy barrel.
User avatar #120 - thejgwentworth (12/17/2012) [+] (1 reply)
My 10/22 is slightly tactical now but the truth about assault rifles is that they are select fire weapons meaning they can either fire semi auto or burst fire and in some cases full auto but the ones we used were burst fire full auto are for special forces anyway a civillian AR-15 isnt an assault rifle its just a semi auto rifle. Also this is a cool experiment you have.
User avatar #113 - boobiesman (12/14/2012) [-]
ruger 10/ 22 i have one and love it
#112 - anonymous (12/14/2012) [-]
All these morons in this chat is making me sad, few appear to notice they are 10/22s, and even less notice that they both have exact features, the difference is optics and mag sizes, but even then, they both have the capability to have the larger mag size and optics with no major modification.
#62 - anonymous (07/31/2012) [+] (1 reply)
u got a good point op.. if the second weapon can hold the same amount of ammunition in a single clip.
-2
#19 - Zorfsic has deleted their comment [+] (3 replies)
User avatar #21 to #19 - zradel (07/30/2012) [-]
They're the same, weapon- a Ruger 10/22 and according to the old assault weapons ban the bottom is not considered an assault weapon while the top would be.
User avatar #18 - hdierks (07/30/2012) [+] (8 replies)
actually the modified rueger might shoot not as well because of what i'm assuming is a suppresser on the end. It doesn't change it much but still a little less affective. who would suppress a 10/22 anyway? it isn't that loud to begin with
#9 - anonymous (07/30/2012) [-]
The bottom one is an assault weapon while the top is a cloe ranfge frie suport. This is true since the top has the medium power scope along with the bipod.
[ 104 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)