Typical advocate of gun control. After destroying this, which I barely consider an argument, the reply was "no its stupid and the second amendment is stupi
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Typical advocate of gun control

After destroying this, which I barely consider an argument, the reply was "no its stupid and the second amendment is stupid."
Never argue with anyone this ignorant and stupid. It isn't worth your time or the rage it will cause

Spencer #will you missed the point of this. It' s called common sense you ass. When they
signed the legislature or wrote the ******** , guns were not that big of a deal or dangerous. Your chances of
melee and musket were not that different. NOW A DAYS, you have 100000000 better chance with melee vs
guns. Why? An assault rifle can shoot 30 rounds in like 20 seconds! Kill like 20 people with one clip, AND with no
Laws people do not need to even reploid.. why reploid and waste 1. 5 seconds of time, when you can just grab
another gun, since it is legal to buy like 800 guns, grandaddy, or whatever. Why the **** do we need an arsenal
except to murder with ? It' s beyond chronical common sense is not applied to laws or religion. THAT
is the point.
9 minutes ago . Like
...
+26
Views: 4571
Favorited: 5
Submitted: 12/17/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to smokerocks Subscribe to fucking-guns E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - madkip (12/17/2012) [+] (6 replies)
We don't need gun control we need self control
#27 - thehornedking (12/18/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Ever wonder the purpose of the 2nd Ammendment? It is to protect the other ones in case the government ever got uppity! Realize that at the time of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and all that 						********					, we had just won our independence from a tyrant. How do we ensure that the government cannot become tyrannicval and oppressive? We arm ourselves so that we may stand against them should they ever attempt to trample our rights. In the days of the revolution wars were fought with muskets. Now they are fought with assault weapons. I wont BS anybody by saying that I should have a full auto weapon for self defence, I have a 12 Gauge for that. What we need the full autos for is to remind the government that we have the same toys. The people shouldn't live in fear of the government, the government should fear the people.
Ever wonder the purpose of the 2nd Ammendment? It is to protect the other ones in case the government ever got uppity! Realize that at the time of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and all that ******** , we had just won our independence from a tyrant. How do we ensure that the government cannot become tyrannicval and oppressive? We arm ourselves so that we may stand against them should they ever attempt to trample our rights. In the days of the revolution wars were fought with muskets. Now they are fought with assault weapons. I wont BS anybody by saying that I should have a full auto weapon for self defence, I have a 12 Gauge for that. What we need the full autos for is to remind the government that we have the same toys. The people shouldn't live in fear of the government, the government should fear the people.
#28 - yellowjack (12/18/2012) [+] (8 replies)
>musket   
>main weapon of the Revolutionary War   
>shot a .50 cal projectile   
>MFW "not that big of a deal"
>musket
>main weapon of the Revolutionary War
>shot a .50 cal projectile
>MFW "not that big of a deal"
User avatar #14 - jonnyp (12/17/2012) [+] (1 reply)
we need idiot control.
#7 - lewersss (12/17/2012) [+] (5 replies)
I don't get it. Here in Britain we don't have the right to bear arms and we don't have psychopaths shooting up schools.
And yes, if you take away guns then you're only leaving innocent people unarmed, because the bad guys don't abide by the law. But by having a free-for-all with no ammo or weapon limits you're just allowing a crazy ******* bastard legal access to an incredible armory.
User avatar #21 to #7 - techketzer (12/17/2012) [-]
Who the hell needs guns for a massacre?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
#36 - ogloko (12/19/2012) [-]
"is not applied to laws..."

MFW the constitution is the supreme law of the United States
#16 - malifauxdeux (12/17/2012) [+] (3 replies)
Typical advocate of gun rights, " OMG WE HAVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT! GUNS DONT KURLL PPL PPL KILL PPL!!! HUR DUR."

Hm, what do ya know. I can post stupid arguments and say that they're "typical" too.
User avatar #25 to #16 - smokerocks (12/18/2012) [-]
You didn't post an argument. You posted a poor attempt at satire that was done to death years ago. If you would like to have a discussion on this, please be civil about it.
#35 - anonymous (12/18/2012) [-]
We have more people in america and knives are less common here than in other countries you cant look at a country which has a quarter of our population and say look they only had say 1000 people killed by guns and we had 5000 you have to look at it by capita crime then factor in the difference in knife crimes.
#6 - veryspecialagent (12/17/2012) [+] (5 replies)
Why is someone a retard or idiot for having a different point of view? The guy's not far off. Back then it was seen that people should be allowed to protect themselves against a corrupt gov't. 200 years later our gov't is pretty solid, and not gonna change any time soon.

Even if somehow some crazy man was elected president and persuaded the army to help him create a dictatorship, and civilians had to fight for their freedom, what are our semi automatic guns going to do about their jets, missiles, nukes, and better, larger amount of guns?
#18 to #13 - veryspecialagent (12/17/2012) [-]
that's kinda my point, it's so unlikely that it's ridiculous to use as an argument as to why people should be allowed to own automatic guns in the first place. Their argument is always "I want to be able to defend myself against my own gov't if the situation ever arises. That's an impractical argument and your comment illustrates that nicely, better than I could.
User avatar #4 - fgtometer (12/17/2012) [+] (2 replies)
...Maybe everyone in America is totally cool and safe with guns, but I would not trust myself, any of my family or friends with a gun. Never mind scumbags I don't know. But you guys can keep yours, since you're at least 500 miles away
User avatar #23 to #4 - techketzer (12/17/2012) [-]
You've got that one backwards.
It's not your decision if I can own a gun or not.
#11 - PuMan (12/17/2012) [+] (3 replies)
So why are you posting the ramblings of an idiot? Moreover why are you proud of "destroying" an idiot over the internet?
 Friends (0)