Typical advocate of gun control. After destroying this, which I barely consider an argument, the reply was "no its stupid and the second amendment is stupi
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

Typical advocate of gun control

After destroying this, which I barely consider an argument, the reply was "no its stupid and the second amendment is stupid."
Never argue with anyone this ignorant and stupid. It isn't worth your time or the rage it will cause

Spencer #will you missed the point of this. It' s called common sense you ass. When they
signed the legislature or wrote the ******** , guns were not that big of a deal or dangerous. Your chances of
melee and musket were not that different. NOW A DAYS, you have 100000000 better chance with melee vs
guns. Why? An assault rifle can shoot 30 rounds in like 20 seconds! Kill like 20 people with one clip, AND with no
Laws people do not need to even reploid.. why reploid and waste 1. 5 seconds of time, when you can just grab
another gun, since it is legal to buy like 800 guns, grandaddy, or whatever. Why the **** do we need an arsenal
except to ****** with ? It' s beyond chronical common sense is not applied to laws or religion. THAT
is the point.
9 minutes ago . Like
...
+26
Views: 4510
Favorited: 5
Submitted: 12/17/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to smokerocks Subscribe to fucking-guns E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#36 - ogloko (12/19/2012) [-]
"is not applied to laws..."

MFW the constitution is the supreme law of the United States
#35 - anonymous (12/18/2012) [-]
We have more people in america and knives are less common here than in other countries you cant look at a country which has a quarter of our population and say look they only had say 1000 people killed by guns and we had 5000 you have to look at it by capita crime then factor in the difference in knife crimes.
#28 - yellowjack (12/18/2012) [-]
>musket   
>main weapon of the Revolutionary War   
>shot a .50 cal projectile   
>MFW "not that big of a deal"
>musket
>main weapon of the Revolutionary War
>shot a .50 cal projectile
>MFW "not that big of a deal"
#42 to #28 - gassnake (12/22/2012) [-]
I still hunt with a .50 cal Flintlock they can knock a deer off it's feet and kill it within seconds.
User avatar #46 to #42 - bitchitroll (05/21/2013) [-]
i have a .54 black powder. only problem with it is walmart doesnt carry .54
#44 to #42 - stonecore ONLINE (12/23/2012) [-]
Once i went hunting with my dad's replica kuntucky rifle, it was amazing

#45 to #44 - gassnake (12/23/2012) [-]
I think a muzzleloader is more dangerous because of the huge ******* bullet it shoots. I shoot 325 grain power belts as compared to the 50-90grain .223 and 5.56 bullets
#31 to #28 - anonymous (12/18/2012) [-]
yeah and its rate of fire was amazing. 3 rounds per minute, and an effective range of about 50m (considering accuracy).
User avatar #41 to #31 - foelkera ONLINE (12/22/2012) [-]
"effective range"

You had to hope that your bullet might graze someone
User avatar #33 to #31 - onezeroeight ONLINE (12/18/2012) [-]
A good soldier could fire it 3 rounds a minute. It wasnt 3 rounds a minute for everone
#29 to #28 - autoxx ONLINE (12/18/2012) [-]
Wasn't it supposed to be able to "pass through 3 and a half mules"? That's some serious power...
I read that somewhere.
#27 - thehornedking (12/18/2012) [-]
Ever wonder the purpose of the 2nd Ammendment? It is to protect the other ones in case the government ever got uppity! Realize that at the time of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and all that 						********					, we had just won our independence from a tyrant. How do we ensure that the government cannot become tyrannicval and oppressive? We arm ourselves so that we may stand against them should they ever attempt to trample our rights. In the days of the revolution wars were fought with muskets. Now they are fought with assault weapons. I wont BS anybody by saying that I should have a full auto weapon for self defence, I have a 12 Gauge for that. What we need the full autos for is to remind the government that we have the same toys. The people shouldn't live in fear of the government, the government should fear the people.
Ever wonder the purpose of the 2nd Ammendment? It is to protect the other ones in case the government ever got uppity! Realize that at the time of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and all that ******** , we had just won our independence from a tyrant. How do we ensure that the government cannot become tyrannicval and oppressive? We arm ourselves so that we may stand against them should they ever attempt to trample our rights. In the days of the revolution wars were fought with muskets. Now they are fought with assault weapons. I wont BS anybody by saying that I should have a full auto weapon for self defence, I have a 12 Gauge for that. What we need the full autos for is to remind the government that we have the same toys. The people shouldn't live in fear of the government, the government should fear the people.
User avatar #30 to #27 - smokerocks (12/18/2012) [-]
You're posting the exact argument the idiot in this screencap was replying to. As you can see, he did a terrible job of making a counterpoint.
#16 - malifauxdeux (12/17/2012) [-]
Typical advocate of gun rights, " OMG WE HAVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT! GUNS DONT KURLL PPL PPL KILL PPL!!! HUR DUR."

Hm, what do ya know. I can post stupid arguments and say that they're "typical" too.
User avatar #40 to #16 - reapertwotwothree (12/20/2012) [-]
i love guns, and think these laws soon to pass are stupid, i have never once quoted the second, i realize it was a different time, however, if guns are made illegal a lot of people can be hurt or killed seeing as criminals don't follow the law!!!! and you would only be taking it out of the hands of people who actually listened to the law
User avatar #25 to #16 - smokerocks (12/18/2012) [-]
You didn't post an argument. You posted a poor attempt at satire that was done to death years ago. If you would like to have a discussion on this, please be civil about it.
User avatar #19 to #16 - techketzer (12/17/2012) [-]
Can you?
User avatar #14 - jonnyp (12/17/2012) [-]
we need idiot control.
User avatar #20 to #14 - techketzer (12/17/2012) [-]
That, my friend, would save lives.
#11 - PuMan (12/17/2012) [-]
So why are you posting the ramblings of an idiot? Moreover why are you proud of "destroying" an idiot over the internet?
User avatar #12 to #11 - smokerocks (12/17/2012) [-]
I assumed the channel " ******* guns" has some semblance of /k/ and enjoyed seeing the ramblings of anti gun ignoramouses
#15 to #12 - PuMan (12/17/2012) [-]
meh, to each his own. never really understood the point of basking in ignorance. then again i frequent internet communities....
User avatar #24 to #15 - smokerocks (12/18/2012) [-]
it's a /k/ thing, kind of like how real gamers laugh at the people who say "I'M A ******** GAMER" and then play nothing but call of duty.
#7 - lewersss (12/17/2012) [-]
I don't get it. Here in Britain we don't have the right to bear arms and we don't have psychopaths shooting up schools.
And yes, if you take away guns then you're only leaving innocent people unarmed, because the bad guys don't abide by the law. But by having a free-for-all with no ammo or weapon limits you're just allowing a crazy ******* bastard legal access to an incredible armory.
User avatar #21 to #7 - techketzer (12/17/2012) [-]
Who the hell needs guns for a massacre?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
User avatar #8 to #7 - smokerocks (12/17/2012) [-]
Our laws do not allow you to just walk in a store and get a gun the same way you would buy something at the corner store.

The availability of guns has no correlation to crimes committed with guns. The problem, lies with our society, and why we have young men thinking violence is the only way. But everyone is too hellbent on blaming inanimate objects. If you outlaw guns, only outlaws have guns. Did Norway's gun laws stop Anders Breivik?
#32 to #8 - lewersss (12/18/2012) [-]
Nothing will stop a person who is hellbent on ******* **** up.
Here in Northern Ireland there are riots up and down the country because the Union flag was taken off the city hall to make the place more "neutral".
[small]It's because there are lots of Irish living in N.I, which is British.[small
Anyway, the police are managing it fairly well, as the only "weapons" these rioters have are bricks and stones, the occasional petrol bomb.
2 officers have been injured in the last 2 weeks, could you imagine how high that number would be if guns were commonplace?
Pic related, it's Belfast.
#17 to #8 - malifauxdeux (12/17/2012) [-]
"The availability of guns has no correlation to crimes committed with guns."

Where is your statistical evidence? Britain and the U.S are very similar. Britain has less people with guns. Britain has much less gun violence. Oh look, there's correlation. The same can be said of Japan or Australia.

Oh and before you say Sweden, please take in to account that they have mandatory military service in which EVERY guy is given and trained in the use of a gun, so yeah, people are probably more hesitant to try to commit violent crimes there. Furthermore, they have a much more socially minded society than ours and our individualistic society is probably not going to change any time soon.

We've had two mass shootings in the past six months, Norway has had one in the past two years (afaik).
How many have happened in Britain or Japan or Australia recently? I can't think of any.
User avatar #26 to #17 - smokerocks (12/18/2012) [-]
It's not exactly a huffington post article, but if you have the time to read it, by all means, please do. Was eye opening for me as well.

Crime and firearms accessibility have no correlation

Bureau of Justice - Criminal Victimization: www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv11.pdf

Bureau of Justice - Violent Victimization Committed
by Strangers: www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vvcs9310.pdf

Bureau of Justice - Firearms Stolen during Household Burglaries and Other Property Crimes: www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fshbopc0510.pdf

US Census Bureau - Homicide Trends: www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0312.pdf

US Census Bureau - Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted: www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0330.pdf

US Census Bureau - Crimes and Crime Rates by Type of Offense: www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0306.pdf
#6 - veryspecialagent (12/17/2012) [-]
Why is someone a retard or idiot for having a different point of view? The guy's not far off. Back then it was seen that people should be allowed to protect themselves against a corrupt gov't. 200 years later our gov't is pretty solid, and not gonna change any time soon.

Even if somehow some crazy man was elected president and persuaded the army to help him create a dictatorship, and civilians had to fight for their freedom, what are our semi automatic guns going to do about their jets, missiles, nukes, and better, larger amount of guns?
User avatar #13 to #6 - natedizzie (12/17/2012) [-]
Do you really think that is how its going to happen?
If only 20% americans fought you would still have 60000000 people fighting each one armed with a semi automatic rifle is a pretty deadly force.
Then you say jets tanks and bombs!
Well yes they have them but they wont use them
1) If the government started bombing and using missiles against the resistance the rest of America would grow tired and join the resistance America economy would crumble no one would work out of fear.
2) Nukes? whats the point Im a dictator so im going to destroy all the people and land i control. They wouldn't do it.
Eventually with no one producing goods their armies would starve and abandon the dictator leaving him defenseless.
#18 to #13 - veryspecialagent (12/17/2012) [-]
that's kinda my point, it's so unlikely that it's ridiculous to use as an argument as to why people should be allowed to own automatic guns in the first place. Their argument is always "I want to be able to defend myself against my own gov't if the situation ever arises. That's an impractical argument and your comment illustrates that nicely, better than I could.
User avatar #22 to #18 - techketzer (12/17/2012) [-]
The reason why people should be allowed automatic firearms is that you do not want a government powerful enough to issue and enforce a ban.
#9 to #6 - anonymous (12/17/2012) [-]
******* retarded piece of **** *****
#10 to #9 - veryspecialagent (12/17/2012) [-]
log in and say that like a man
User avatar #4 - fgtometer (12/17/2012) [-]
...Maybe everyone in America is totally cool and safe with guns, but I would not trust myself, any of my family or friends with a gun. Never mind scumbags I don't know. But you guys can keep yours, since you're at least 500 miles away
User avatar #23 to #4 - techketzer (12/17/2012) [-]
You've got that one backwards.
It's not your decision if I can own a gun or not.
User avatar #39 to #23 - fgtometer (12/19/2012) [-]
O...kay... well see I didn't say I wanted to. You don't get to decide whether we allow people to get guns or not, but that's just as irrelevant to your point as yours is to mine
User avatar #1 - madkip (12/17/2012) [-]
We don't need gun control we need self control
#34 to #1 - valetparking (12/18/2012) [-]
couldn't've said it any better myself
User avatar #5 to #1 - smokerocks (12/17/2012) [-]
That was actually the argument I made to which this idiot was replying to. I said that we need to teach ourselves as a society that violence is no answer, and that we need to look at what causes the depressed and mentally disturbed to think it's the only way.
User avatar #3 to #1 - superunclesam (12/17/2012) [-]
We need to look at the declining mental health in this country rather than just blame firearms. Jesus I hate Liberals. **** it I just hate stupid people.
#37 to #3 - ogloko (12/19/2012) [-]
Conservative/ independent = i dont want that so i wont get one

"Liberal"= i dont like that, IT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar #38 to #37 - superunclesam (12/19/2012) [-]
me: Goddamn guns are amazing marvels of technology. I want dozens!! FOR SCIENCE!
User avatar #2 to #1 - teamrocketninja (12/17/2012) [-]
Well said.
 Friends (0)