13 Rules of Gunfighting. CJ Grisham. These Are The 13 Rules Of Gunfighting Everyone Should Know 1) Guns have only two enemies: rust and phoneticians. In It' s a 13 Rules of Gunfighting CJ Grisham These Are The Of Everyone Should Know 1) Guns have only two enemies: rust and phoneticians In It' s a
Upload
Login or register

13 Rules of Gunfighting

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
These Are The 13 Rules Of Gunfighting Everyone
Should Know
1) Guns have only two enemies: rust and phoneticians.
In It' s always better be judged by 12 than carried by tr.
S) Chops carry guns pretend themselves: net you.
4) Never let someone er something that threatens yen get inside arm' s
length.
5) Never say "I' get a gonf" If yen need use deadly f arce: the first
seend they hear sheild be the safety clicking eff.
6) The average Dispense time of a 911 call is 23 minutes; the response
time efa is 1400 feet per second.
7) The most important rule in a gunfight is: Always win - cheat if
necessary- r - ' I
8) Make yew attacker advance threeoh a wall of bullets _ _ _Teu may get killed with your own gun, but
he' ll have beat yen death with it, cause it' ll be empty.
9) If in a gun fight;
If net sheeting: yen sheild be leading.
If net leading: yen sheild be miving.
If net sheeting: miving er leading: probably dead.
IO) In a life and death situation, samething_ _ _It may be wrong, but samething!
l 1) If yen carry a gun, peeple call yen paranoid. New ewe! If yen have a gun, what yen have ta be
paranoid ab out?
12) You can say ‘step’ er 'alto' er any other werd: but a large here muzzle painted at ' s head is
pretty much a universal language.
13) Ten cannot save the planet, but yen may be able save yews elf and yew family.
Peace is that brief glorious moment in histery when everybady stands around railroading," - Themes
J eff as en
...
+379
Views: 24695 Submitted: 08/01/2013
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (199)
[ 199 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#1 - lafuriaroja
Reply +62 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
This might be the trashiest thing I've ever read.
This might be the trashiest thing I've ever read.
User avatar #3 to #1 - aSARendarsFJWINWIN
Reply -16 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
You must like it in the ass. Are you always on bottom?
#12 to #3 - lafuriaroja
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#4 to #1 - noideawhatimdoing
Reply -15 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
**noideawhatimdoing rolled a random image posted in comment #3288456 at Friendly ** you're probably a vegan too

User avatar #58 to #4 - josephwolfe
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
username: noideawhatimdoing
User avatar #61 to #58 - noideawhatimdoing
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
yes?
#95 to #61 - adamks
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
It's very descriptive.
#11 to #4 - lafuriaroja
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Riiiiight. You go take a long while to think about your comment and get back to me when you can explain it.
Riiiiight. You go take a long while to think about your comment and get back to me when you can explain it.
#33 to #11 - anon id: ed35997f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
he's calling you a weak pussy if you don't understand
User avatar #114 to #33 - lafuriaroja
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
Right. That makes absolutely no sense at all whatsoever.
#14 to #11 - noideawhatimdoing
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#18 to #14 - lafuriaroja
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#74 to #1 - dwarfman
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
I have to agree. Also your comment is luring all the angry white trash on the site.
User avatar #113 to #74 - lafuriaroja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
Oh well. What are they gonna do? Shoot me?
#2 to #1 - lifeofliam [OP]
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
#5 - draxdiesel
Reply +34 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #6 - imofcnotharveydent
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
To bad you don't live in a glorious country like mine where guns aren't necessary to keep safe
User avatar #8 to #6 - eating
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
europian master race
#130 to #8 - mooghens
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
Considering all the *********** coming here every day, i am wishing for a gun more than ever.
User avatar #9 to #8 - mattseven
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Canada is pretty cool too
User avatar #35 to #9 - enkmaster
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Canada has relatively lenient gun laws too, considering im sitting within 20 feet of more than 15 firearms.
User avatar #23 to #9 - imofcnotharveydent
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
yeah I kind of love Canada, I saw a documentary and you seems to have just as many guns and bullets availability compared to your neighbor, but you focus on good healthcare and the like of it
User avatar #16 to #8 - sketchE
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
doesnt a large portion of europe allow guns though?
User avatar #17 to #16 - europe
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Not a large part, no
#22 to #6 - anon id: f5f59c02
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Which ou try is this since there no country with total ban what you just said is nonsense
User avatar #108 to #22 - eating
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
yeah and its me who's talking nonsense ahahahah
User avatar #29 to #22 - blargchikahonkhonk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
U just accidentally a sentence
User avatar #40 - bokkos
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Owning a weapon is fine. Owning a weapon with this kind of attitude is insane.
#42 to #40 - anon id: a99da4c1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
A gun is like a seatbelt that you always wear and hope you never need. It doesn't mean you're paranoid, just cautious.
User avatar #44 to #42 - bokkos
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
A seat belt is a device designed to keep you from flying out of a moving vehicle. A gun is a device made to kill. Both have their purposes, but saying a seat belt and a gun are in the same league is the insane kind of attitude I'm talking about.
User avatar #59 to #44 - thenewgizmobox
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
technically a gun in just a device made to shoot bullets, where it shoots these bullets is usually determined by the user.
#73 to #59 - draxdiesel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
i agree, when smith and wesson designed their revolver they envisaged people using it to turn out lights
User avatar #181 to #44 - Onemanretardpack
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
It's actually pretty accurate. IF used in the way he's describing, guns are something that you keep but hope to never have to use. If you can't compare them, how can you say they're different?
User avatar #187 to #181 - bokkos
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
Seat belts save lives from arguably arbitrary events. A gun works my ending, maiming, or impairing life. The two are dissimilar and do not make sense when compared.
User avatar #191 to #187 - Onemanretardpack
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
You're taking only one side of what a gun does and distorting it to your own needs. That's like saying all a seatbelt does is restrict your movement. How many families have been saved from an intruder? How many people have defended theirselves from someone who would do them harm? A gun is not an offensive item. It is only an item. Guns don't kill innocents, people do. If you use it to harm innocents, you can only hope someone else has one to stop him. Because what you're arguing is that people shouldn't be allowed to carry guns for defense of someone with a weapon, BECAUSE there are people with weapons that would hurt someone.
#45 to #44 - anon id: a99da4c1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
You're obviously afraid of guns and that's okay. Guns aren't for everyone. It's your choice to be a victim and take whatever happens and hope you live through it or take the necessary steps to protect yourself and your loved ones. Just don't project your irrational fear of guns onto the rest of society and try to take away our right to self defense. Not all of us aspire to be hapless victims.
#46 to #45 - bokkos
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
I own 3 .22s, 3 shotguns (one of which is a 12 gauge), a 7mm magnum rifle, a .308 and a vintage 1896 winchester, of which I can't remember the specs. There is a difference between fear and respect, and those who have no respect for human life or firearms have no right to own or use guns.
Oh Canada, bitch.
User avatar #180 to #46 - Onemanretardpack
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
I completely agree. If you want a toy to dick around with, get an airsoft gun. Too bad your gun laws are stupid as hell. Although having a shortbarrelled shotgun shipped directly to my door sounds nice
#47 to #46 - anon id: a99da4c1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Right on!
#53 to #45 - kuci
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
So when are you going to buy a tank or a nuke?

Since someone else can threaten you with it, why should you not have one aswell!?

**** your guns you nutcase.
User avatar #142 to #53 - lifeofliam [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
as soon as i can afford one i want to buy a tank they are pretty cool although i might have to get it from someone in the UK there its legal to drive them on the road
User avatar #99 to #53 - Onemanretardpack
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
Piers Morgan plz go. Tanks are legal, but when's the last time you heard of someone going on a killing rampage with a tank? Your whole argument is based on a non-issue. There's no one trying to kill people with tanks, and nobody wants to deal with the moral weight of a nuke. You literally have no argument. All you can say is people who want to defend themselves are nutcases and want to use nukes and tanks on each other. Meanwhile, you say only law enforcement and government should have guns? Yeah, because I totally trust the government that sold firearms to mexican drug cartels and spies on its citizens.

People like you are why this country is going to ****. "Wah wah, I don't agree with something, it should be banned!"
#57 to #53 - anon id: a99da4c1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
You really need to see a shrink...
#60 to #57 - kuci
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
How so?

"Guns aren't for everyone" & neither are tanks or nukes. Guns are for law enforcements and military personnel, not civilians.

If you think you need a gun as a necessary item to protect yourself against others, what are you going to do when X-Country, wants to nuke your living location?

Going with your gun logic, everyone should have access to nukes.
#62 to #60 - anon id: a99da4c1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
You really need to read up on US history and our Constitution. You obviously don't know much about either.
User avatar #188 to #62 - bokkos
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
The consitution states firearms are to be used if the state becomes corrupt or becomes self serving, and the people are to tear it down and erect a new one. Since it's obvious most Americans have not, do not, and will not perform this civic duty, the need for guns appears greatly diminished.
#63 to #62 - kuci
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
I'm sorry, something that was written in 1790ish is completely immune to being removed or improved in todays society?

And how does tanks/nukes differ from guns? The governemnt can still kill you while you are unable to do ******** back at them.
User avatar #179 to #63 - Onemanretardpack
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
THEN WHY DO YOU CARE? Holy ****, all you do is contradict yourself. Are guns killing machines? Or are they small and ineffective. Also, apparently somebody hasn't watched the news lately, because both the US and Russian army were ****** up by sand ******* in mud huts with nothing but small arms. I swear you have the most selective memory of anyone I ever met. The first amendment was written at the same time as the rest of them, do you think your right to free speech is still relevant? Yes? Then the constitution and bill of rights are all relevant. Just shut up and please stop spreading your disinfo. Tanks and nukes aren't the issue, quit bringing them up in a pathetic attempt to cover up the fact that you literally have no argument besides "LOL UR NUTZ, Y U NEED GUN?"
#67 to #63 - anon id: a99da4c1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees.
Your mileage obviously varies...
#68 to #67 - kuci
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
I'm sorry, but you'll still be on your knees if someone has a tank and you have your ****** little peashooter.
#120 to #68 - anon id: a99da4c1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
A brave man dies but once. A coward dies a thousand times.
Make sure to carry your own lube because you'll need it.
#121 to #120 - kuci
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
How does not wanting to arm an entire society or myself, make me a coward?
User avatar #170 to #121 - useroftheLOLZ
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
Okay, you seriously know nothing about gun policy, or militant deterrence, you seem to think that guns are on the same level as tanks and nuclear armaments, when they are not, with a gun, you have to make the conscious decision to cause destruction, and your capacity to destroy is severely limited by a vast number of factors. With a nuke, all you have do, is press a button, and boom, you cause permanent and uncontrolled destruction, your decision to cause destruction is not conscious, there is a case of see no evil.

Any my little pea shooter won't stop a tank? Maybe it won't kill the tank, but tanks are not ******* invincible, a mag dump from a .308 will take out the treads of most tanks used in the military, and it takes five minutes of google searching, and twenty minutes of collecting materials, to create a powerful enough explosive that would disable a M1 Abrams tank.

And to just stir up the pot, yeah, I see no problem with countries owning nukes, peace through deterrence and all that good ****. It is human nature to take when we see something we want, if it is in possession of someone else, either we deal with it, find a copy of it, or take it with any means necessary, but we won't peruse that route if we find that we are incapable to taking our desired item.

And there is something seriously wrong with you if you are willing to live your life, by giving your natural freedoms to someone else. I would rather die, than let someone dictate how I should properly live my life. "A man who is willing to sacrifice freedom, in the name of safety and protection, deserves neither." Benjamin Franklin
#65 to #63 - anon id: a99da4c1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
People haven't changed one bit. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter how evolved, enlightened or even self-actualized you think you are. I promise you, the person illegally carrying a gun with the intent to hurt and take from you isn't.

You can't have nukes because you'll shoot your eye out.
#66 to #65 - kuci
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
What? How does that make any sense:

"You can't have nukes because you'll shoot your eye out"?
User avatar #97 to #40 - Onemanretardpack
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
Are you stupid? If you ever have to use a gun to defend yourself, you damn well better use it like he says. If you flash at someone to scare them, you're going to get yourself arrested. If you hesitate pulling the trigger on someone who is armed, you're dead. Yeah, I guess defending yourself is insane, right?
User avatar #186 to #97 - bokkos
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
A gun is only ever an offensive weapon. Can it be used for defense? Strictly speaking, no, because actual defense products advertised for defense are non-lethal, such as a tazer or pepper spray.
#21 - blakhawk
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
The CDC has determined that owning a gun makes you more likely to die a gun-related death.
#25 to #21 - boothead
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Not owning a gun makes you more likely to die in any death.
#32 to #25 - funnydutcha
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Not here in Europe.
User avatar #171 to #32 - useroftheLOLZ
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
Nope, that just means instead of dying a quick and clean death by gun, you get to bleed out in the alleyway, as some sand ******* walks away with your wallet, after having raped your girlfriend. And since you can't own guns, you have no way of protecting your self, or anyone who placed their safety in your care.
#31 to #25 - anon id: 9751cf5a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
ARE YOU TELLING ME I AM MORE LIKELY TO DIE IN A CAR CRASH?
#36 to #31 - funnydutcha
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Or robot ninja unicorns. Did you know fifteenhundred people are killed by robot ninja unicorns every minute because they don't have firearms? Let 'em try that **** in Texas.
#83 to #21 - anon id: 956a24ef
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
its the same with a car

and hotdogs

and propane

and ******* EVERYTHING
#106 to #21 - anon id: d01dc864
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
What the **** can the Center for Desiese Control say about guns? are they an illness??
User avatar #70 - willindor
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Could someone please explain me what's so great about guns?
User avatar #72 to #70 - dieselthedragon
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Nobody on here is qualified to answer that. I however will try.

For one, they are fun to shoot. Another, they are fantastic self defence. They are not toys, nor are they to show off and be like 'come at me I have a gun' They are things made to kill, and they do it very well. Some people use them for hunting and sport (Rifles/shotguns) and some for just defence. (Handguns/shotguns.) Some have them, because they collect them.

Never should you have a gun because you 'want one.' That is the wrong reason to have one.
#92 - chancevance
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
I'm a Texan so my opinion may be heavily biased, but here goes.   
   
1. Guns can't kill someone by themselves, people kill people.   
2. Guns are meant FOR killing, or to STOP killing, it's your decision.   
3. Children must be taught to respect guns if they're brought up around any.   
4. Yes they're fun but as a wise old man once said with great power comes great responsibility.   
5.Having a gun more often than not will not influence you getting into a situation, but can ALWAYS influence you getting out of one.   
Extra. ALCOHOL AND GUNS ARE NOT FRIENDS!(I needed a reason to post this .gif)
I'm a Texan so my opinion may be heavily biased, but here goes.

1. Guns can't kill someone by themselves, people kill people.
2. Guns are meant FOR killing, or to STOP killing, it's your decision.
3. Children must be taught to respect guns if they're brought up around any.
4. Yes they're fun but as a wise old man once said with great power comes great responsibility.
5.Having a gun more often than not will not influence you getting into a situation, but can ALWAYS influence you getting out of one.
Extra. ALCOHOL AND GUNS ARE NOT FRIENDS!(I needed a reason to post this .gif)
User avatar #157 - Milvath
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
Liberal ideology

>hur dur, if you don't support gay marriage don't get married with your same sex

>hur dur, I don't like weapons, nobody should have them either
User avatar #163 to #157 - Crusader
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
Well no.
It's more Everyone should have the option to do what they wish
No one should have the ability to have such overbearing power over another person
User avatar #10 - mattseven
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
I don't like guns. Things that were invented to take lives away aren't exactly my thing.
#28 to #10 - anon id: 36db01c1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
don't think of guns as something that takes lives away. The person holding the gun is either trying to take a life away or if he's a good guy, trying to save a life.
#56 to #28 - tittylovin
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#64 to #56 - ihavecontentthumbs
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
these rednecks just watched one too many cowboy movies
#172 to #64 - anon id: 0b4f9c9a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
Or they want to be able to defend themselves.
User avatar #81 to #10 - SgtObvious
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
So I then guess you have a moral objection to me throwing shot in high school
User avatar #15 to #10 - sketchE
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
yo dont liek yoyos?
#20 to #15 - blakhawk
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
You tell me which is a more effective weapon.
#26 to #20 - boothead
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/01/2013) [-]
Obvioulsy a ******* yoyo ever hit yourself in the head *******? No you havent because of that comment.
User avatar #118 - cowinspace
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
1) Poor trigger discipline, Poor education (both overall and specifically weapons based)
2) That depends on your principles
3) Police are unarmed where I live (Batons and CS spray are the most they will carry)
4) That depends on your situation
5) Warning is the difference between murder and self-defense (Not issuing a warning can be used to show premeditation)
6) That's a retarded argument
7) How about not getting into one in the first place?
8) RL isn't hollywood, one well aimed shot is worth far more than spray and pray
9) Not much to say here
10) A calm, measured action will do more for you than flailing like an idiot
11) Well done, you pretty much proved you;re paranoid (saying you have nothing to be paranoid about impies that, without the gun, there is something that you are paranoid about)
#122 to #118 - nylak
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
Yeah, exactly this.

OP sounds like he has very little real firearms experience, and just keeps em around to accentuate his junk.
User avatar #128 to #122 - lifeofliam [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
oh how little you know about me lol
User avatar #136 to #128 - quesocnkane
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
I think he was trying to refer to cowinspace as "OP"
User avatar #139 to #136 - lifeofliam [OP]
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
oh if that is the case i misunderstand sorry
User avatar #138 to #128 - lifeofliam [OP]
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
just so you know not that i think you will actually give a flying **** I was born and raised around firearms, been firing them my whole life. I've spent 8 years in the Army and am a combat veteran. but you are welcome to have your opinion about me that is your right. have a good night.
User avatar #152 to #118 - Milvath
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
go back to commiefornia liberal hippie
#125 to #118 - quesocnkane
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
1. Being retarded make you your own enemy, not the gun's.   
2. Not if you want to live.   
3. Well **** that, where you live automatically sounds ******.   
4. At what point would you want a potential problem close to you in comparison to 5m away?   
5. Safety off -> verbal warning -> decide fate.... Don't give them a chance to make the choice for you.   
6. I think you're the retarded one. I'd rather let my 9mm tell them off right now rather than an officer 23 minutes later.   
7. How about not getting caught in an Earthquake? Or how about all these sluts stop claiming rape? They just keep getting dick caught in their huge vaginas... Sometimes **** be out of your control bro.   
8. Tell me right now you can draw, pull the slide, click the safety off, and line it up in under .6 seconds. The answer is no.   
9. Because he is right, yet again. This applies in real life, and in Halo. Scrub.   
10. Have you EVER been shot at? Have you ever had so much adrenaline pumping you can feel heat behind your eyes and you can audibly hear your heartbeat? You haven't.   
11. That is circular logic... I don't even feel like explaining the flaws with what you said.   
12. This guy nailed that on the head. I don't care what you speak, if you're in my home and threaten me, my puppy dog, or anyone in my family, I won't try to speak your language. A gunshot sounds the same in ever language.   
13. He's right, YET AGAIN. You might not be able to save all the beached starfish, but you damn sure can make a difference for one of them.   
   
[  ] Not owned   
[X] Owned   
[  ] Not told   
[X] Told   
[X] ******* Told   
[X] Told like a bitch
1. Being retarded make you your own enemy, not the gun's.
2. Not if you want to live.
3. Well **** that, where you live automatically sounds ******.
4. At what point would you want a potential problem close to you in comparison to 5m away?
5. Safety off -> verbal warning -> decide fate.... Don't give them a chance to make the choice for you.
6. I think you're the retarded one. I'd rather let my 9mm tell them off right now rather than an officer 23 minutes later.
7. How about not getting caught in an Earthquake? Or how about all these sluts stop claiming rape? They just keep getting dick caught in their huge vaginas... Sometimes **** be out of your control bro.
8. Tell me right now you can draw, pull the slide, click the safety off, and line it up in under .6 seconds. The answer is no.
9. Because he is right, yet again. This applies in real life, and in Halo. Scrub.
10. Have you EVER been shot at? Have you ever had so much adrenaline pumping you can feel heat behind your eyes and you can audibly hear your heartbeat? You haven't.
11. That is circular logic... I don't even feel like explaining the flaws with what you said.
12. This guy nailed that on the head. I don't care what you speak, if you're in my home and threaten me, my puppy dog, or anyone in my family, I won't try to speak your language. A gunshot sounds the same in ever language.
13. He's right, YET AGAIN. You might not be able to save all the beached starfish, but you damn sure can make a difference for one of them.

[ ] Not owned
[X] Owned
[ ] Not told
[X] Told
[X] ******* Told
[X] Told like a bitch
User avatar #137 to #125 - cowinspace
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(08/02/2013) [-]
1) eh?
2) I would rather take a shot to pretect someone than take a life. That is my standpoint, others will differ.
3) Why? To clarify there are armed response units, but these are rare (nuclear sites and military installations are obviously guarded by armed units at all times)
4) You don't get to decide how close they are before you realise they are a threat.
5) "decide fate" yeah, try to be a little less gung ho. You might not know the full situation (That guy with the weapon might be in pursuit of an attacker, how would you know?)
6) It's a retarded argument because the safest way out of a situation where you have time to call the police is to keep your head down and stay out of everyones way.
7) You don't "accidentally" get involved in a gun fight. You make the choice to participate.
8) Ok, simpleton, try not to act like this is the imaginary wild west. If you have to draw your weapon, you've lost because they already have you in their sights. If they don't, then you have the time to act calmly.
9) You really are simple? And bringing Halo into a real life discussion about arms automatically rules out your opinion.
10) Yes, but that was just some idiot with a .22 . Guy got the **** kicked out of him later though.
11) Yes it is circular logic, that is WHY his original statement was flawed.
12) What if that guy was running from an assailant? Are you so confident in your ability to identify a "real" criminal that you would cheerfully take a life without asking questions?