Well, There Ya Go (OC). The world's first certified death from cannabis... Government agrees, alchohol is worse than cannabis proceeds to ban alchohol first cannabis death
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (487)
[ 487 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#1 - wardd
Reply +285 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
Government agrees, alchohol is worse than cannabis
proceeds to ban alchohol
#43 to #1 - xalko **User deleted account**
-5 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #140 to #43 - tomahawkit **User deleted account**
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
well its pretty hard to make money from an organization that was disbanded a few decades ago
#195 to #140 - xalko **User deleted account**
-4 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#197 to #195 - xalko **User deleted account**
-4 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#200 to #197 - xalko **User deleted account**
-4 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #209 to #200 - tomahawkit **User deleted account**
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
people on fj have diverse opinions, and they enjoy expressing them threw comedy and the power of thumbs.
#210 to #209 - xalko **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #212 to #210 - tomahawkit **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
there is no difference, everything you know can be disproven, you only choose to believe the facts you see fit.
#227 to #212 - xalko **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #240 to #227 - tomahawkit **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
well, its a republic after all, so the stupid get the same vote as Morgan freeman; its not chance that a criminal gets elected, its a government of the people and the people are stupid. im surprised we didn't nuke ourselves during the cold war.

as for the illuminati. its literaly impossible to try to argue with you because you will just say the illuminati is all powerful. and I have just been fooled by their tricks. so I will just say ok. you win. I lost.
#254 to #240 - xalko **User deleted account**
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#253 to #240 - xalko **User deleted account**
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #491 to #253 - tomahawkit **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
k
#492 to #491 - xalko **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #495 to #492 - tomahawkit **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
~don't have same opinion as you
~Nvm **** you, i hope you get ******* murdered and thrown into the sea.


yup im on the internet all right
#226 to #212 - xalko **User deleted account**
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#312 to #226 - LiamNeeson
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Why do you need to be right so badly? He didn't even really argue with you, you looked for an argument and he didn't give you the satisfaction. You called people on FJ retards because they didn't agree with your statement and them called them ignorant when he said they have diverse opinions. And he's right you know, there's no way he can argue you if you believe the Illuminati are all powerful. That's clear. If I think that God created everything, or that Zeus created the heavens you literally cannot argue with me if I'm not willing to take your opinion into account because I'm so sure of my own.
#478 to #312 - xalko **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #485 to #478 - LiamNeeson
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
I read your comments, but the problem is you see everything as a fact. If you see it as a fact no one can persuade you otherwise. And your argument of all the presidents being related holds no relevance.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhtgINeaJWg
#490 to #485 - xalko **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#489 to #485 - xalko **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#488 to #485 - xalko **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#486 to #485 - xalko **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#487 to #486 - xalko **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#477 to #312 - xalko **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #165 to #1 - doctorhue
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
If alcoholic drinks or tobacco cigarettes had been invented now, they would most likely be illegal, as both are more than 10 times more harmful than marijuana.
#370 to #165 - aceonfire
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
>implying cannabis was "invented" in modern times.
The plant has been a cash crop in the US before. Like, 1700's and 1800's it was grown on the US east coast and used as medicine, rope, clothing, recreational drugs, paper, etc.
User avatar #178 to #1 - xdeathspawnx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Tobacco is way worse then both of them, but will never be banned because of how much money the government makes off it.
#17 to #1 - ipostfunny
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
oh is that so?
User avatar #10 to #1 - thechosentroll
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
The last time they did that was during the american prohibition. The result - more drinking than ever. I'm fairly certain a lot less people'll smoke pot if it were legalized.
User avatar #34 to #10 - zeusx
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
not exactly true
You need to login to view this link
www.nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opinion/actually-prohibition-was-a-success.html
also i don't see the reasoning behind less people using pot if it becomes legal. makes more sense that when something becomes generally available and easier to obtain, use rises.
User avatar #328 to #34 - bluenebula
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
At first, it would. Think of people who turn 21 (Here in America) and are now able to buy alcohol. The first thing they do is exercise this new freedom. The same will happen for marijuana. There would be a lot of use in the first few months, but it would die down pretty fast. If pot was made legal, I can see it given the same treatment as alcohol. You don't go to work drunk unless you're looking to get fired. You don't drive drunk unless you're looking to die or get arrested. The same can apply to weed very easily. It's not impossible to make legal, it's just considered taboo right now. Do remember that at one point in America, the idea of letting women vote was ******* insane. Things change with time. Who knows what the future holds for our little cannabis friend.
User avatar #483 to #328 - zeusx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
no man, i'm all for legalization. it's your right to do whatever you want to your own body as long as you're not infringing on anyone else's rights. it's just that the argument that weed legalization would reduce use just seems preposterous on the face of it and i hear people use it all the time. there are many better arguments to be made.
User avatar #58 to #34 - thechosentroll
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
Not when a large portion of the people using it are only doing it to be "edgy".
User avatar #60 to #58 - zeusx
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
but really most people i've seen don't really partake to be edgy. maybe the first time but after that it's all about the high. that's my experience anyway. and if you compare this situation to the alcohol situation, it seems like in that instance ease of obtention has led to increased use across the board
#285 to #58 - anon id: a47e2f4b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Ahaha! You made my day, I appreciate people like you who generally think that their better than other people and that everyone but themselves and who they idolize are retarded. YOU HAVE MADE MY DAY!
#128 to #58 - anon id: 49f2a4b7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
you're wrong.

So wrong.
User avatar #3 to #1 - minorian
Reply +27 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
They already tried that many places. Oh, the havoc.
User avatar #274 to #3 - missrainbowdash
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
it wouldn't cause any havoc, but it would strip more freedoms.
#340 to #274 - thebesttrumpeteer
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
dude. there was literally a prohibition. it failed because people with booze had better guns than police. basically it created a new wing of the mafia for the import of alcohol from canada and the carribean. source: 5 on APUSH test
User avatar #349 to #340 - missrainbowdash
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
I'm saying I don't support another prohibition, I love my whiskey too much.
User avatar #350 to #349 - thebesttrumpeteer
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
but it would cause havoc. like ******* rise of the planet of the apes kinda ****. kids roaming the streets with guns. teenagers doing heroine. adults doing nothing but shirking responsibilities to drink. basically the whole country would turn into LA
#421 to #274 - gahlskaag
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Alcohol is to ingrained in most cultures for it to be outlawed without any large scale backlash from the community
#12 - gibroner
Reply +190 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
User avatar #31 - scoggand
Reply -130 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
do you realize how dumb of a false that is? people can get crushed by anything. If it were teddy bears would teddy bears be outlawed?
#168 to #31 - funforlife
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
#208 to #31 - nonanonnon
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Yes.
User avatar #472 to #31 - kanpai
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
teddybears are legal in your country?
#35 to #31 - warwolfrider
Reply +163 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
User avatar #36 to #35 - scoggand
Reply +38 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
I look happy as ****
#38 to #36 - badasszilla
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
ignorance r da blissin'
User avatar #98 to #38 - scoggand
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
i don't know what the **** you just said funnyjunkie but you reached out and touched my heart let me give you thumb, hand me the thumb scott HAND ME THE THUMB SCOTT
#316 to #98 - iamnotacleverman
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
I'll reach out and touch your dick heart with pictures of puppies.
I'll reach out and touch your dick heart with pictures of puppies.
#342 to #35 - thebesttrumpeteer
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
User avatar #24 - whatugawkinat
Reply +55 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
Regardless of an inability to become physically addicted or overdose, being high is still being high. It doesn't matter what medicinal purposes it has, people still abuse it. You can't do anything to your full potential drunk, stoned or even buzzed. Using numbers and so called statistics to glorify getting high isn't the way to go if you want marijuana to become legal and used to its potential.
#65 to #24 - anon id: 741e129b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
why not let me make that decision, just like when i drink?
#334 to #24 - thefjgienni **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Of course no one is at their full potential when they're drunk or high. Using drugs and alcohol responsibly means doing them when you don't need to be at your ******* potential, like after a week of work. Or a day of work. its meant to blow off steam not to use all the ******* time. Of course people will abuse it, like people abuse alcohol, but that just means they're **** ups, not me for blowing off steam by smoking a joint once every month
User avatar #366 to #24 - robbyarcane
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
I enjoy getting high. Keeps me focused on things actually. As a music producer, i can say that being high helps production flow a lot smoother
User avatar #431 to #24 - aherorising
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
actually, I think you can overdose. and you can definitely get addicted, and it is bound to cause injuries if used incorrectly.

>source I'm Dutch
User avatar #116 to #24 - YourName
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
You obviously have never seen me hackey sack while blazed out of my mind.

Regardless, you can abuse any substance that has a potential effect on your body. Just because someone can abuse hamburgers, doesn't mean all fast food joints should be outlawed. Sure, there are obese people who eat more than they should, but that is their choice, it has nothing to do with the original substance.
User avatar #181 to #24 - xdeathspawnx
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
I think the point being made is that the government considers people over 21 responsible enough to drink alcohol, which is potentially deadly, then they should also be considered mature enough to smoke weed, which you can't overdose on.
#40 - mitdwit
Reply +47 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
I'll drink to that statistic.
User avatar #101 - thisisspartah
Reply -21 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
>weed supposedly 'cures cancer'
>Bob Marley died from cancer

your argument is invalid
User avatar #203 to #101 - xdeathspawnx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
weed is used as a natural painkiller for people going through chemotherapy, so that they won't get addicted to things like Vicodin or codeine. No one says that weed is a miracle drug that will cure anyone from cancer. Also, Bob Marley died because he refused medical treatment until it was too late. Doctors told him that amputating his toe would probably get rid of his cancer, but he decided not to do it because of religious reasons and ended up paying the price for it later.
User avatar #344 to #101 - IamSofaKingdom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
It does, however, help immensely with people suffering from certain types of seizures and it can be frown to have very little THC content.
#469 to #101 - youngmoneysobased
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
bob marley died from a foot infection if im not mistaken
#109 to #101 - terminalinfinity
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Weed helps TREAT cancer, by reducing the size of tumors, not cure it. Your understanding of science terminology is lacking.
User avatar #383 to #109 - anonymoose
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
It depends on what type of cancer. It's going to do **** all to help lung cancer.
#498 to #383 - terminalinfinity
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/29/2013) [-]
#452 to #383 - anon id: abad412b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
edibles. easy. next conundrum.
User avatar #333 to #109 - malacyman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
it's also to relieve pain.
#213 to #109 - vanhoutte
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #112 to #109 - thisisspartah
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
yeah, i tried it once, im probably not going to again
User avatar #119 to #112 - schneidend
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
You...tried weed, or you tried to understand science terminology?
User avatar #173 to #119 - thisisspartah
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
yes
#214 to #173 - vanhoutte
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
#121 to #119 - thisisspartah
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#171 to #121 - midothegreat
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#172 to #171 - thisisspartah
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #277 - Crusader
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
"Weed never killed anyone"
Really?
No one EVER died because of it?
No one was ever killed over it?
No one was ever killed by a driver under the influence of it?
No one was killed by a stoner making a mistake because they were high?
None of it was ever laced with something harmful?
None of it was ever grown in bad soil?
#324 to #277 - DamnWalmartBullets
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
no faggot it really has never happined
#325 to #277 - DamnWalmartBullets
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
no but really if any of those things happen its probably just the persons fault you got to be a certain kind of stupid, but hey you cant fix stupid
User avatar #289 to #277 - trystanvierra
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Weed never caused anyone to die due to overdose, whereas thousands, if not millions, of people a year die from alcohol poisoning ALONE... Alcohol also fits every category you presented except for the one about being grown in bad soil.

But you're probably a troll, so it doesn't really matter. You already knew this ****.
User avatar #293 to #289 - Crusader
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Well, second response and it's already a strawman.

I wasn't comparing it to alcohol, I was simply saying that weed is not this perfect, harmless substance that everyone seems to act as if it is.
User avatar #295 to #293 - buya
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
i understand ya man. i have heard of cases of people too high to remember that they have a
peanut allergy or something and then they die.
User avatar #297 to #295 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Not even that, but like getting high and then going "I want bacon" start frying it, go into the other room for something forget about it, the grease catches fire and boom, there now a kitchen fire and someone not situated to handle it.
User avatar #467 to #293 - killasmasha
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
They are sold in 'coffee shops' here in the Netherlands.. and no, they rarely get robbed due to there being at least 20 more profitable targets in a two block radius
User avatar #298 to #293 - trystanvierra
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Oh, you're totally right. I don't use it because it makes you totally okay with doing nothing with your life. People should at least have the right to choose whether or not they want to use it without being arrested and such. People are going to get it anyway, but if it's legalized, government could put some sort of regulation on companies that rise from the legalization of it. Which solves the problem of it being laced or grown in bad soil. And if the alcohol consumption laws (i.e. you can't get drunk in the middle of a kids' park), and apply the same DUI consequences, then people will begin to use it responsibly. Just as most people use alcohol responsibly.
User avatar #299 to #298 - Crusader
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Dude, I never said you shouldn't legalize it or use it.

I just said it isn't perfect.

Calm down, you're the kind of person that makes other pot supporters look like tools.
User avatar #305 to #299 - trystanvierra
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Most of them are. They hide behind their "facts" on how weed is completely amazing and risk-free instead of admitting that they just wanna get high. There are a few exceptions to this stereotype, but it's THOSE pot supporters that make them look like dickheads.
User avatar #313 to #289 - wellimnotsure
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
You do realize prolonged use of marijuana turns your brain into Swiss cheese right?
User avatar #318 to #313 - trystanvierra
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
You can pretty much replace the word "Marijuana" with anything somewhat controversial and the word "brain" with the appropriate body part people will believe it's true (i.e. alcohol, video games, loud music, red meat, soda, plastic, fast food, etc, etc, etc).
User avatar #308 to #277 - demigodofmadness
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
I like to say it's a fair minimum of people killed due to weed. I think it's fair to say cocunuts falling on people's heads kills more people a year than weed. And if it's laced with something harmful, that wasn't really weed killing someone, was it?

And as for the DUI, if you're hit by a stoner who's driving you maybe got a scratch on your car, because no way was he going faster than 7 mph.
User avatar #309 to #308 - Crusader
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Guy hits the gas, goes to change the radio station, bam he's doing more than 7, especially if he's trying not to look high
User avatar #310 to #309 - demigodofmadness
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Woah woah woah, when a stoner goes behind the wheel of the car he doesn't change the radio station, ******* at 10 and 2 both eyes on the road. He sits there in silence, sweating hoping a cop doesn't pull him over.
User avatar #347 to #277 - drosenblum
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
While the driving one is very true, stoned driving is safer than drunk driving. But my main point is, one of the many attributes to legalization is the idea that it would reduce marijuana related violence and reduce cartel violence. Not saying I think it should be legalized, just saying.
User avatar #357 to #347 - Crusader
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Again, my comment was not comparing it to alcohol, why do people assume that?

I am comparing it to a theoretical world without the substance.
#286 to #277 - mrsadsap **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #317 to #277 - mkgt
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Dealers killing buyers. Bad product. Neither would happen if it were legal, and grown/distributed by professionals
User avatar #336 to #317 - Crusader
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Yes, because pharmacies, corner stores, drug stores, etc NEVER get robbed.
#48 - wheresthefudge
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
I'm just gonna point out that literally everything has an LD50. So about that "you can't overdose on it" thing... yeah, you can. I mean, ****, you can overdose on water.   
Granted, it's ridiculously high (pun entirely intended), but it exists so stop saying it doesn't exist.
I'm just gonna point out that literally everything has an LD50. So about that "you can't overdose on it" thing... yeah, you can. I mean, ****, you can overdose on water.
Granted, it's ridiculously high (pun entirely intended), but it exists so stop saying it doesn't exist.
#68 to #48 - terminalinfinity
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
Yeah but its physically possible to overdose on water (some radio station contestant did it in a town near me trying to win a Wii when it first came out)

It would take 600 joints consumed in 5 minutes to OD on THC. I challenge anyone to try and make it halfway
#72 to #68 - wheresthefudge
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
Never said it was practical, just possible.
Never said it was practical, just possible.
#91 to #68 - coryxyzagain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Man, I believe in what you are saying. I'm sure someone would be thrown into a coughing fit before they finished however much pot and wouldn't OD.

But I just ******* hate that unit of measure, joints. Are we talking 600 pinners or 600 ****** doobs? It's just some bogus measurement you usually hear in government propaganda. "600 joints of Colombian Strength." It's ********.
User avatar #71 to #48 - doctorgolgo [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
I like that gif, mate.
#129 to #48 - anonyanille
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
I'd use the "false" image, but it's already been posted as you can see. It is truly impossible to overdose on marijuana if it is in fact pure marijuana. The only way you could possibly die from it would be to smoke over 800 joints and you would die from the smoke that the papers would give off. (Carbon something-oxide overdose.)
User avatar #329 to #129 - tomsellick
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Carbon Monoxide overdose, that's what you're looking for.
#345 to #129 - wheresthefudge
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Nothing is impossible.   
That's the main point I'm making here. If you say something is 100% non-harmful, you're lying.   
Seriously. You're upwards of 80% water (by mass), and yet you can still die from drinking too much at once.
Nothing is impossible.
That's the main point I'm making here. If you say something is 100% non-harmful, you're lying.
Seriously. You're upwards of 80% water (by mass), and yet you can still die from drinking too much at once.
#146 to #48 - herptyderpies
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Im sorry but scientists have yet to find an actual LD50 for Marijuana. What they have come to is it would take 20,000 to 40,000 times what is in a joint. A joint is typically .5 of a gram of pot so were looking at 10,000 to 20,000 grams of pot in one sitting. You would green out after you consumed a max of 10 grams to yourself.
Im sorry but scientists have yet to find an actual LD50 for Marijuana. What they have come to is it would take 20,000 to 40,000 times what is in a joint. A joint is typically .5 of a gram of pot so were looking at 10,000 to 20,000 grams of pot in one sitting. You would green out after you consumed a max of 10 grams to yourself.
#343 to #146 - wheresthefudge
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Not having found it yet doesn't mean it doesn't exist.   
There is some amount (however impractically large [as I've noted in previous comments]) that is lethal.
Not having found it yet doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
There is some amount (however impractically large [as I've noted in previous comments]) that is lethal.
#369 to #146 - fractalius
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
It's possible with hash oil. 97% of THC, and as much as roughly 4 grams condensed to half a gram. You could technically hit 2-4 grams in one hit, and if you chain hit it you can die from it
#346 - justsomechickyo
Reply -10 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
I can't believe how many people on this site dis on weed so much........damit guys just chill the **** out... maybe smoke a joint?
I can't believe how many people on this site dis on weed so much........damit guys just chill the **** out... maybe smoke a joint?
User avatar #475 to #346 - animedudej
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
havent tried it... but my sister and mother have, and according to them it's not all it's cracked up to be
#358 to #346 - alexandervascus
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Alright then pal, I don't exactly need a mind altering drug to have a fulfilling life thank you very much. So instead of acting like weed is the holy grove of the virgin Mary (no pun intended)  I'm quite "chill", which is funny because I don't smoke at all.  I find this concept funny, in a fire you'd cover your mouth to prevent from inhaling smoke, yet people smoke as a past-time. The only difference here is that THC disrupts brain function and normal fires will probably just make you cough a lot. Oh believe me, I don't care if you smoke, just don't breathe your carcinogens in my face.
Alright then pal, I don't exactly need a mind altering drug to have a fulfilling life thank you very much. So instead of acting like weed is the holy grove of the virgin Mary (no pun intended) I'm quite "chill", which is funny because I don't smoke at all. I find this concept funny, in a fire you'd cover your mouth to prevent from inhaling smoke, yet people smoke as a past-time. The only difference here is that THC disrupts brain function and normal fires will probably just make you cough a lot. Oh believe me, I don't care if you smoke, just don't breathe your carcinogens in my face.
#468 to #358 - cplkoeksuster
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
The content kinda irritates me. They say weed never kills, but it's still smoking and apparently that isn't too good for you. I may just be ignorant as I don't think there's tar in joints, but I have a suspicion that there is some common ground between the two.
#356 to #346 - yellowjack
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
lol it's either smoke weed or get a good job. since I'm not 15, living with my mom, have a rebellious attitude towards anyone who has authority, and hang out with punks, I tend to not need a substance that ***** up my chance to get a well paying job.
User avatar #361 to #356 - ThatFuckingGuy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Just read a comment on youtube on some carcass song or something that read:

"Just got out of doing 45 days in jail for being caught with weed, glad to be back and listening to this new **** and taking bong rips **** the police"
Though not nearly as well worded as I made it, but that's the gist of it.
:|
User avatar #348 to #346 - roliga
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Maybe stop being 12 and stop acting like weed is the best thing to ever be discovered.
User avatar #351 to #348 - kiratheunholy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Thumbed you up... but be prepared when the weed-smokers find this it'll be a sea of red thumbs.
User avatar #380 to #348 - hideyowives
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
its not the best, and i dont care if someone smokes or not, i do personaly but the people that talk about nothing but or try to get people who dont want to , to smoke are asses
#359 to #348 - jeremybenden
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
its not the best thing ever discovered, but its certainly not the worst. im not 12 but the dude above u is correct. ppl hate on it too much, the fact of the matter is that it is better for u that cigs or alcohol yet its illegal. if it was legal we'd have a better alternative to drinking, we'd be able to fight cancer and even help with pain problems alot better. on top of that, we could make so much stuff with hemp alot cheaper than with paper to the point where it might actually improve the economy. but hey thats just my "opinion", and im ready for the red thumbs
User avatar #46 - Logicaltightrope
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(09/27/2013) [-]
Marijuana may not kill, but it does prevent some mental development. I'm personally fine with it being legal, but I think the legal age should be around 21, like alcohol.

Or make it fully legal and let people do what they want and deal with their own decisions. You know, instead of the gov't trying to be everyone's mom.
User avatar #189 to #46 - xdeathspawnx
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
I think that tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana should all be legal at 18, or maybe 19. I can understand that they don't want highschool students doing these things, but once they have moved out everyone is doing all of these things anyway. If you made them legal then we would have a lot less people in jail or kicked out of college for drinking under 21. Also, you can drink at 18 in pretty much every other country in the world except for the US, and things seem to work out there fine.
User avatar #201 to #189 - Logicaltightrope
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
Idk about alcohol, but marijuana does prevent some mental growth, as I said, and the brain is nowhere near done developing at 18 (or 21, for that matter), so I say the older the better, to a point.

I don't know how effective the law would be, but I'm relatively confident fewer underage people would use it than with no law in place, and that would be the goal.
User avatar #302 to #46 - demigodofmadness
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/28/2013) [-]
I think living in America prevents mental development. I talk to some people and I just feel my brain cells dying off.