| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
#300 to #294
-
mrmahn (01/20/2013) [-]
Actually, it is. The 2nd Amendment is pretty absolute with "shall not be infringed." Technically, waiting periods and the banning of fully automatic weapons and the such are unconstitutional as well, it's just that not enough people care about them to fight back.
Also, there's no such thing as an "assault weapon." What you are referring to are just semi-automatic firearms that look scary. On the inside they are the same as most hunting rifles.
Also, there's no such thing as an "assault weapon." What you are referring to are just semi-automatic firearms that look scary. On the inside they are the same as most hunting rifles.
#310 to #300
-
astafarianp (01/20/2013) [-]
Actually you're wrong. In the District of Columbia Vs. Heller the Supreme Court ruled that the 2nd amendment is not unlimited, they said "It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose". Also you'll notice that the 2nd amendment has the phrase "well-REGULATED" in it. That would mean that the government has the right to make regulations on guns.
Also full auto weapons aren't technically banned, you can still obtain one if you have a class 3 weapons permit.
Also full auto weapons aren't technically banned, you can still obtain one if you have a class 3 weapons permit.