Login or register
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
#95 - dorberg
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(01/20/2013) [-]
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED,remember that you left wing pansy"s
#294 to #95 - anon id: d3bcc2f0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/20/2013) [-]
Banning Assault Weapons, as the "left wing" wants to do, is not infringing on the right to bear arms. You still have the right so every other type of gun, no one is gonna take those away.
#300 to #294 - mrmahn
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/20/2013) [-]
Actually, it is. The 2nd Amendment is pretty absolute with "shall not be infringed." Technically, waiting periods and the banning of fully automatic weapons and the such are unconstitutional as well, it's just that not enough people care about them to fight back.

Also, there's no such thing as an "assault weapon." What you are referring to are just semi-automatic firearms that look scary. On the inside they are the same as most hunting rifles.
#310 to #300 - astafarianp
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(01/20/2013) [-]
Actually you're wrong. In the District of Columbia Vs. Heller the Supreme Court ruled that the 2nd amendment is not unlimited, they said "It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose". Also you'll notice that the 2nd amendment has the phrase "well-REGULATED" in it. That would mean that the government has the right to make regulations on guns.

Also full auto weapons aren't technically banned, you can still obtain one if you have a class 3 weapons permit.
#121 to #95 - lordhaha
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(01/20/2013) [-]
Dude its the internet, they have no jobs and spend their lives on here, prepare for red thumbs. I for one stand by you.
#152 to #121 - offspring
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/20/2013) [-]
I will stand also to face the red-thumb sea. It's been an honor serving with you gentlemen.