Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#12 - devout feminist (08/20/2013) [-]
I said it once and i'll fucking say it again... poor people shouldn't have children. If you can't take care of yourself then how the fuck can you take care of another human? If you revive welfare or any other form of government payment then you should not have a child. In order to receive a welfare check you should be forced onto some form of birth control.
User avatar #70 to #12 - unicornmangina (09/11/2013) [-]
oh yeah poor people don't deserve any sort of happiness at all because they're poor and it'll affect their parenting skills (!) fucking asshole
User avatar #67 to #12 - racheecat (09/03/2013) [-]
Poor people should have at least one child, and sometimes, they live up to achieve their goals. Sometimes, parents are so caring to a child, they save up money so that they can get an education. The child will live on from there, and become a successful adult with their children, but will always remember that their parents were there for them...
#55 to #12 - doubledisme (08/20/2013) [-]
log in and say it or post on everyone's profile
I might say opinions that get the red flag but I still stick by my word like a man
#18 to #12 - acetrainerewan (08/20/2013) [-]
in most developing countries children are a source of income, this is true in some NIC's too, the more kids you have, the more there are to work on the farm/in the local factory. besides, with such undeveloped health care they have to have a lot of kids to guarantee that some of their offspring will grow old and not die young
in most developing countries children are a source of income, this is true in some NIC's too, the more kids you have, the more there are to work on the farm/in the local factory. besides, with such undeveloped health care they have to have a lot of kids to guarantee that some of their offspring will grow old and not die young
#20 to #18 - devout feminist (08/20/2013) [-]
But i'm only talking about here in the USA. Fuck those other countries.
#22 to #20 - acetrainerewan (08/20/2013) [-]
fucking coward posting as anonymous and faverouting to keep checking back, log in and say it like a man
fucking coward posting as anonymous and faverouting to keep checking back, log in and say it like a man
#24 to #22 - devout feminist (08/20/2013) [-]
or maybe all anons are the same person.
User avatar #13 to #12 - adu (08/20/2013) [-]
So you're just making the assumption that two hobos decided to conceive a child? What if they were a happy family once that just fell upon hard times? What then? Give their child up for adoption because they can't afford an Xbox?
#25 to #13 - devout feminist (08/20/2013) [-]
If they were able to maintain a position in which they could provide for a kid and then became homeless implies they were in a position to have a kid when they did. If not then they should not have and the counter argument is supported. Nice try Mr. Feels.
#17 to #13 - devout feminist (08/20/2013) [-]
I'm talking about having a NEW kid once they have fallen on hard times. An existing kid is fine.
0
#15 to #13 - wholegrainhunter has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #14 to #13 - themastertroller (08/20/2013) [-]
amen to you sir
 Friends (0)