Upload
Login or register
x

Bruh

File: (4 KB, 220x55)
l_ l Anonym DUE Em ssd) . " (IO N o. 321 166568 . 33321155513 33321155343 ::c/ :: :: 33321153519 33321159104 :: -: } EOE -:
l" / " 33321123123 33321123323 33321123223
Why is this allowed?
223211555151? -[C} F' 1
if he didnt recommend it he wouldnt put 300 ******* hours in it
unless he' s stupid as **** and plays the titles that make him hate himself
Li Anonymous ( yesd) - 33321 167253 :: 33321 167579 :: 33321 1132233 33321 167990 322321153094 33321 11331213 33321153255 333211133233 33321 1133343 33321 1133443
322321153513 33321 113333? 33321 1313334 33321 11331321 33321 113. 333? 333211133224 333211133243 333211133233 333211133333 3.; -32111333132 33321133334 33321133323 33321133331 3: - 33321 1133133 33321 169283
We put it years in my life and I wouldn' t recommend it
...
+1239
Views: 36967
Favorited: 50
Submitted: 12/23/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to FuckOffNow Subscribe to feels

Comments(108):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
[ 108 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
88 comments displayed.
#1 - poshblobfish (12/23/2015) [-]
I take negative Steam reviews much more seriously the more hours on the game said reviewer has spent. If someone spent only 10 minutes playing before deciding they hate it and posting a negative review, it just shows that they didn't put in the time to actually know the full game. Whereas if someone has at least 10 hours on a game, they should be knowledgeable enough to make an accurate review.
#89 to #1 - comradewinter (12/24/2015) [-]
But then again, if it was good enough that you happily wasted dozens of hours into it, you're most likely a raging idiot if you're gonna retroactively say it's bad. There are some exceptions, some games make drastic changes that ultimately make them unenjoyable, but you occasionally see negative reviews with people who still play the hell out of them. Fallout 4 had people a few days after release who had played it for 40 hours and such. When you spend every single waking moment on the game, why even go ranting about it?
User avatar #104 to #1 - magicalfruitbasket (12/24/2015) [-]
Still, there's a point where it comes full circle.
User avatar #77 to #1 - kyubii (12/24/2015) [-]
Case by case basis, Not everyone who logged hundreds of hours is an expert and not everyone who couldn't get past the start menu should be written off.
#78 to #77 - BloodyTurds (12/24/2015) [-]
Everyone who cant get past the start menu should be written off. Unless the reason is something technical like the game wont install/run
User avatar #82 to #78 - kyubii (12/24/2015) [-]
I'm not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing.

You start out by disagreeing and say everyone in that situation should be written off, but then you agree and claim an exception. Which is exactly what I just said, "not everyone who couldn't get past the start menu should be written off.".
#85 to #82 - BloodyTurds (12/24/2015) [-]
Any game that has been greenlit, has atleast basic level of play ability, and to be playable, there has to be a way to get past the start screen... This I have faith in, and unless most of the reviews parrot this same issue, then its one I would ignore. Though If the overall rating for a game is bad, (which if it truely wouldnt start, is almost guaranteed) I wouldn't consider the game

The most obvious reasoning for not getting past the start menu (aside from technical failure) is something unconventional (like you have to press enter to start) and its likely the reviewer simply didn't look into it, after trying to click with the mouse, and it failing to work.
#3 to #1 - drewjitsu (12/23/2015) [-]
Also, what scene is that from?
User avatar #7 to #3 - letmetouchyourboob (12/23/2015) [-]
rings of akhaten Rings of Akhaten Speech - Doctor Who - The Rings of Akhaten - Series 7 - BBC
#23 to #7 - virtualsloth (12/23/2015) [-]
Man, doctor who has the best speeches of any show i've ever seen
I. AM. TALKING! - The Pandorica Speech - Doctor Who - The Pandorica Opens - BBC
User avatar #57 to #23 - thelurkers (12/24/2015) [-]
Always did. Did you watch Heaven Sent? Best acting in DW for me.
#100 to #57 - virtualsloth (12/24/2015) [-]
Yeah I watched it. Capaldi is an excellent actor though I didn't personally find Heaven Sent to be that special.
User avatar #59 to #57 - RageguyFuckyea (12/24/2015) [-]
Which one was the speech in that?
#10 to #7 - drewjitsu (12/23/2015) [-]
That's what I thought, I love that episode. I love the music. I've got a lot of Netflix binging to get through 8 seasons though. TO THE BAT CAVE!
#94 to #7 - anon (12/24/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll 1, 1-99*"**
**anonymous rolls 74**

Check 'em
#96 to #94 - elijie (12/24/2015) [-]
Click to show spoiler
User avatar #4 to #3 - poshblobfish (12/23/2015) [-]
idk, it's just in my reaction pics folder. I know it's Doctor Who, and it's the 11th doctor, but that's as much as I know.
#5 to #4 - drewjitsu (12/23/2015) [-]
Fine! I'll find it myself (this is NOT an excuse to Netflix binge on Doctor Who over the Holiday).
#2 to #1 - drewjitsu (12/23/2015) [-]
Yeah, but 300 hours? He's a ******* liar.

Also, if they really hate the game, they wont play long enough to know the full game. This can happen because of poor mechanics/voice acting/graphics and those reviews will suffice for similarly minded people who would ditch a game based on either of those criteria.

Holy **** I wouldn't recommend reading my post, I've bored myself near to sleep typing the ******* thing.
#27 to #2 - actionhirvi (12/24/2015) [-]
A lot of people changed their review of Payday 2 to negative even after playing more than 300 hours because Overkill (devs) introduced a micro transaction system in the game.

Point is that they might have liked the game first and then something vent wrong and they changed their review to negative.
#39 to #27 - drewjitsu (12/24/2015) [-]
Oh yeah...didn't factor in changes. well now i feel dumb
User avatar #9 to #2 - theruinedsage (12/23/2015) [-]
if it takes a long time to really get into a game, and the endgame is **** , why the **** wouldn't you be allowed to give it a negative review?
#11 to #9 - drewjitsu (12/23/2015) [-]
You'd have to be a bit more in depth than to just say "I don't recommend it." Only an idiot or someone getting paid to play would put 300 hours into something with no entertainment value". Could be like "gameplay is fun but story blows ass."
#17 to #11 - anon (12/23/2015) [-]
Their comment was cut out. I'm sure there was a paragraph attached to that review. I can think of two games that I spent a decent amount of time on I wish I hadn't
#76 to #2 - reaperriley ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-]
I have about 800 hours on a game called Fallen Earth. Its a game with plenty of issues and a dev that makes EA's practices look good. The game runs like crap, looks like crap, has terrible mechanics and much more. But the community when I played was great. Only reason I tried it was because of my ****** computer and lack of money.

Would I recommend this game? no, its pretty **** . Just because I have alot of hours doenst mean the game I would tell a friend to go play it. Recommendations are not "is this game good or not" its "Would you encourage a friend to play this game?"


Also there are plenty of games where at first the game is great and people play the **** out of them. Then the dev keeps making it worse and worse till they stop, meaning the state the player left it in is no longer a recommendable state.

Making the arguement that the longer you play the better you know the game is valid, but arguing they are just salty is stupid. Most game I have hundreds of hours in I WISH I could go back to the game and have whatever dragged me into it redrag me, but that will never happen.
User avatar #53 to #2 - ryalag (12/24/2015) [-]
i've played WoW since BC. I Dont recommend it, you can play for a long time and not recommend it.
User avatar #42 to #1 - kameken (12/24/2015) [-]
To a certain point, yeah.

300+ hours.

This guy's spent almost a baker's dozen of days playing this **** .
#65 to #42 - anon (12/24/2015) [-]
-Major game updates, such as the addition of microtransactions, major balance patches, etc.

-Long MMO's that take ages to reach endgame

-Niche games that a hardcore fan will play and enjoy, yet even the hardcore fan knows when the game fails to appeal to a greater audience.
#31 to #1 - ciacheczko (12/24/2015) [-]
Well, to be honest, it's a stick that has two ends. The 10 minutes review is unreliable because the person played too short. Then again the 350 hours review is questionable, because the game has been played for too long for being so bad - which is what the content said already.

It also depends on the type of the game. You can tell a good shooter from a bad one after only a few hours of gameplay, because you get presented with enough information to quickly form a stable opinion. Adventure and rpg games, on the other hand, require investing much more time due to things like lenghty introduction to the system, character development, plot, and you usually can only truly judge it after you see the ending.

And maybe, just maybe, chances are that this is a positive review that was jokingly made not recommended. You know, it's that "Wasted my whole life on it, don't recommend, run while you still can" kind of reviews, that everyone knows are sarcastic. But since it's a cut image without context, we will never know.
#40 to #31 - anon (12/24/2015) [-]
It's all a joke and the punchline is that the review don't matter because just about everyone has no idea on how to properly review something.

Just because you didn't like something doesn't mean that it was bad and the other way around too, you have to take these things into consideration, but people are simple minded fools.

I have games I have played for more than 300 hours that I wouldn't recommend because I know it's a niche appeal that doesn't apply to most people.

This is how mediocre games like Undertale gets blown out of proportion as the "best game of all time" for no good reason.

User avatar #19 - sinonyx ONLINE (12/23/2015) [-]
250 hours played
positive review: "this game is dope as **** yo, get it"

310 hours played
negative review: "The developers of this game have recently implemented a store and the game is now a pay to win **** fest."
#54 to #19 - motherfuckingkenji (12/24/2015) [-]
I have 2k+ hours in Destiny.
The Taken King expansion completely ruined everything and if anyone were to ask me to recommend the game, I would tell them to **** off and take their money elsewhere.
That and the ******** of ******* microtransactions they added to the game.


What the **** and a half, Bungie? You used to be cool.
#92 to #54 - anon (12/24/2015) [-]
Holy **** , you think Destiny was better BEFORE TTK?

I'd rather have mostly cosmetic microtransations than go back to the ******** that was vanilla Destiny and I had 1000 hours put into it at that time.
#101 to #92 - anon (12/24/2015) [-]
Etheric Light > Light infusion system.
#86 to #54 - runesman (12/24/2015) [-]
I only recently started playing Destiny, what did the Taken King expansion change that made the game worse? I'm having a lot of fun playing through all the story missions.
#107 to #86 - motherfuckingkenji (12/24/2015) [-]
If you started playing after TTK was released and you know nothing about the game before that, then I can't really say you're doing anything wrong. From a fresh perspective, I could imagine it still being a pretty amazing game.
However, my main issue with situations like yours is that there is absolutely ZERO reason for you to do the vanilla **** . That includes the Vault of Glass raid. Also none of the "raid weapons" from TTK's raid against Oryx are worth it; unlike pretty much all raid weapons before them, they have ****** or average stats, they have no rare/unique and amazing abilities that mean anything outside the raid you got them in, and the primary weapons don't even have elemental damage types.
Example: the Fatebringer handcannon from the VoG was the ONLY non-sniper rifle/scout rifle to have the perk "Firefly" (headshot kills cause explosions) and it did Arc damage, both of which were totally unique to it. Now, you can get a ****** Vanguard or Crucible Legendary handcannon with Firefly, just without the elemental damage.
Hell, every VoG weapon was the best damn non-Exotic gun you could ever get for any PvE situation (except Praedyth's Timepiece; that Arc pulse rifle had the speed of an auto rifle, it was incredibly stable, but it had the damage of a rubber band gun). The shotgun, Found Verdict, was ridiculously overpowered in PvP; it was full-auto and had almost as much range as the Universal Remote Exotic primary shotgun. You could one-shot a player from like 10 meters away.
Then the Crota's End raid came out and that thing's weapons were more or less as good as the VoG weapons.


Okay, I've been going way into raid weapons.

They ****** up the Exotics by making all the ones you owned worthless, the new Light levelling system is exactly like World of Warcraft's ****** system ("Oh you're max level? Well since your max level gear isn't very good, you may as well be level ******* 5"), they completely removed the perfect Etheric Light system from House of Wolves (Fatebringer is "level 30" but the level cap is now 34? Slap on an Etheric Light you get from raids and Nightfall strikes and it gets upgraded to "level 34". All your old Crucible or VoG gear is now top-of-the-line yet again, letting you wear and use any Legendary instead of being limited to only the "best" gear), ******* , I don't know, I'm too tired to think of more specifics.



>TFW you'll never know the amazing feeling shown in this picture of getting some of the best possible rewards from something in the entire game because everything from the super difficult but very rewarding VoG is completely obsolete even for low-level players.
>TFW you'll never get six people together to open the front door guarded by Praetorians, defend the Confluxes, prevent the Oracles from erasing your existence, fighting the massive Templar using the Aegis created by Kabr himself, falling off that 3-kilometer cliff to make your way through the Gorgon's Labyrinth without being erased from time, jumping across a chasm of vanishing platforms, fighting the Gatekeepers and the cool as **** Precursor/Descendant Vex, then defeating Atheon the Guardian of Time himself.
>TFW you'll never be able to do all that from the beginning in no more than 30 minutes because your raid group is amazing and knows exactly who does what and goes where and when.
>TFW you'll never experience the awesome might of Gjallarhorn because now it's nerfed, underpowered and useless.
>TFW you'll never be berated by Peter Dinklage because his monotone voice was 100% replaced by Nolan North as your Ghost.
>TFW you'll never have a reason to grind every day with your ********* of great friends you've made in-game.
>TFW vanilla Destiny was one of the most fun anyone could possibly have in a shooter even if 90% of it once you maxed out was grinding for even more loot that you can never have enough of.
>TFW getting grimoire cards actually meant something and also showed how MLG you were.
>TFW no more balanced PvP.
#84 to #54 - anon (12/24/2015) [-]
I don't really play the game too much, aside from raids, but the microtransactions were implemented/are being implemented to make future DLC's free. If they make enough money from the microtransactions they'll implement dlc for free so the community isn't split and everybody can play together.

Pretty cool imo to be honest, raids are my **** .
#90 to #84 - anon (12/24/2015) [-]
The microtransactions fund the Sandbox Team which are the guys that make the free public events like the Halloween event and currently the Sparrow Racing League. None of it goes to "free DLC", that was a hoax spread by IGN
User avatar #26 to #19 - goobyman (12/24/2015) [-]
sounds like payday 2 to me!
#29 to #26 - Kingsly (12/24/2015) [-]
Click to show spoiler
The ride never ends.
#97 to #26 - anon (12/24/2015) [-]
TFW ur an AI and these guys are owning you with pay to win guns. Hey, here is a solution, don't buy the ******* pay to win gun and there isn't a problem.
User avatar #15 - EdwardNigma ONLINE (12/23/2015) [-]
I put a fair amount of time into Destiny and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone.
User avatar #16 to #15 - dehnoobshow (12/23/2015) [-]
I would say it's risky.
Like sitting around doing difficult things with assholes multiple times to get better gear to do the same hard thing but on hard mode to get the best gear? Then come on buy it.
If not then leave now.
#49 to #16 - blueblaugh (12/24/2015) [-]
That skinner box is too strong
#60 to #15 - aerosol (12/24/2015) [-]
I was saying that from the beginning. Every time new dlc came out, it always had better gear and the level cap got raised but no one seemed to think it was ******** .

The Crucible is still fun, but other than that I wouldn't recommend it.
User avatar #62 to #60 - EdwardNigma ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-]
I'm not a fan of competitive multiplayer really. Like it was alright, but, I found it to be a bit of a pain in the ass as well.
Half of that though is due to the absolute nonsensical ******* rewards. It didn't matter how well or how **** you did, it was completely random. I'd seen the worst on teams get purples and oranges and the best get squat **** .

**** me up the wall.
#63 to #62 - aerosol (12/24/2015) [-]
I could give a **** about the rewards. I've come out on top, using this gun the whole ******* match, more than once.
#6 - freeb (12/23/2015) [-]
Having hours of playtime in a game does not make it good, let alone recomendable.
I'm sure you all had that one time killer that you regret every hour that's was wasted on it.

Good games aren't necessarily played hour upon hours either, such as Portal or Undertale
User avatar #12 to #6 - timmity (12/23/2015) [-]
I put in 8 hours to Undertale in a week, a record only broken by Twilight Princess and Spirit Tracks.
#18 to #12 - anon (12/23/2015) [-]
>Finally get the ability to unsubscribe from undertale
>Continue to hear about undertale
User avatar #24 to #18 - gibusernamepls (12/23/2015) [-]
I get that people are annyoed by the Memetale spam I do myself and I'm currently playing it but you don't have to whine when someone merely mentions it
User avatar #98 to #24 - rarityrarityrarity (12/24/2015) [-]
People usually whine when other talk about cancer such as furries and bronies.
User avatar #108 to #12 - timmity (12/25/2015) [-]
Make that 11, but Bayonetta 2 and TP still have it beaten by a.... long... long shot.
#41 to #12 - rongdisk (12/24/2015) [-]
I bought Reign of kings yesterday for $5.49
I have 14 hours played. I have lots of free time
Its pretty cool. Not a smuch KOS as Rust and all that, but when people want in your **** .. They try hard.
User avatar #33 to #6 - feelythefeel (12/24/2015) [-]
Ninja Saga, man.
User avatar #20 to #6 - sinonyx ONLINE (12/23/2015) [-]
witcher 1
37 hours played

the combat is just... atrocious and seriously on that one reason i would never recommend the game.. but the story.. is pretty ******* boring as well
User avatar #35 to #20 - Monopolus (12/24/2015) [-]
dude my friend recommended the witcher series after i watched him play 3 for a while; i thought it looked interesting and wanted to start from the beginning.

holy **** the combat is bad. just switching stances and then pressing the attack button based on what enemy you're fighting. it makes it so hard for me to enjoy the rest of the game.
User avatar #103 to #35 - broswagonist (12/24/2015) [-]
The combat in witcher 1 is atrocious. It gets better though, so all we can say is commit to it if you can
User avatar #37 to #35 - sinonyx ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-]
it's ******* rock, paper, scissors...
#45 - notmadguy (12/24/2015) [-]
As someone with 8237 hours played in WoW since October 2005, I wouldn't even recommend it.
#58 to #45 - anon (12/24/2015) [-]
Why not
#61 to #58 - anon (12/24/2015) [-]
****** design no doubt
#51 to #45 - sacrilegious (12/24/2015) [-]
That's almost 2.5 hours every single day
User avatar #68 to #45 - rplix (12/24/2015) [-]
Last time I checked I had just passed 1 year of playtime across all of my characters in WoW.

Played since May 2005.
User avatar #47 to #45 - saxong (12/24/2015) [-]
As someone with 110 days on one character I wholeheartedly agree.
#46 to #45 - turbanmasher (12/24/2015) [-]
That's 343 days. Thats like 10% of the last 10 years.
User avatar #91 to #46 - Mesmus ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-]
I'm certain half of that time is spent afking and/or waiting for queues.
User avatar #93 to #91 - thrifty (12/24/2015) [-]
While a large chunk is often AFK, you'd be surprised how quick it adds up. I put one year into a character over the course of one expansion (WoTLK). I played basically 8 hours a day every day, for 3-4 years when I was off work ill.


I would definitely not recommend that.
#13 - anon (12/23/2015) [-]
Jesus Christ y'all are dumb. I'm sure there are people who have put thousands of hours into Payday 2 and yet would no longer recommend it, because -get this- nowadays, games can change. It's a fantastic thing that, when done properly, allows games to evolve and therefore have a lifespan far beyond that of many old, pre-internet era games. However, on rare occasions this can backfire. With Payday 2 it backfired, because the devs decided to introduce pay2win microtransactions even though they once claimed "Payday 2 will never have microtransactions".

Seriously, welcome to the 21st century, people.
User avatar #14 to #13 - masteroffj (12/23/2015) [-]
Hi john oliver.
User avatar #74 to #14 - aidnyan (12/24/2015) [-]
usually you would have a point, but the usage of the phrase in this sense makes sense, as before the 21st century(and even for the first several years of the 21st century) games couldn't be changed at all once you got them, but now since everything is online nowadays it's actually pretty easy to update a game after launch.
User avatar #28 - rokkarokkaali (12/24/2015) [-]
I have over 1000 hours on league of legends and I wouldn't recommend it
#30 - tropenthatshtup (12/24/2015) [-]
Click to show spoiler
It was this game I know, someone else in the comments already said it.
#48 - notenoughtortillas (12/24/2015) [-]
At least it isn't one of those retarded steam reviews where they try to be random and hilarious by copy pasting a recipe into it.
#109 to #48 - lmrml (12/26/2015) [-]
Hey **** you man that chicken taco was great
#64 - teedoubler (12/24/2015) [-]
Three options for why you could play 300+ hours and still post a legit negative review:

-It is an MMO or other such game where you have to put a lot of time in before reaching endgame, and the unsatisfying endgame is what turned him off from the game as a whole

-The game received a change or update that the reviewer does not like. Balance patches, the addition of micro-transactions, change of profit model, etc.

-The reviewer is a hardcore fan of a niche genre, but is aware that that game in particular failed to appeal to a greater audience. For example, while I have played multiple playthroughs of nearly ever game in the Tales series, there are several that I would NOT recommend for most people, as they are not on par with the other games in the series. I am a hardcore fan of the series, but I can acknowledge when a game would not be fun for anybody but other hardcore fans. So I would not give them a positive review, but I would include that reasoning in the written review, which we can't actually see here.
User avatar #70 to #64 - dharkmoswen (12/24/2015) [-]
RWBY: Grimm Eclipse. As a hardcore RWBY fan, I absolutely love the game. It's one of my favorite. At this point, at least, I wouldn't recommend it to anyone but the most hardcore fans and people who want to help the game to grow.
User avatar #8 - theruinedsage (12/23/2015) [-]
I played sim city 5 a lot, and I still wouldn't recommend it.

Sure it was fun, but every time you would get far enough into the game to really get anything out of your cities, the bigs and ****** design would ruin it. I would start over and over again because it had such a great premise, but in the end, all I'm left with is ****** memories of how frustrated i felt afterwards.
User avatar #83 - ariakon (12/24/2015) [-]
I've spent 1600 hours on league of legends and I wish it were on steam so I could not recommend it to people.
User avatar #73 - subaqueousreach (12/24/2015) [-]
You can change your review though. Maybe it started good, but eventually there were some updates that soured the game for him.
#44 - chaoticlaw (12/24/2015) [-]
I ******* hated the story for Ground Zeroes and The Phantom Pain ******* great gameplay, tho ,but I still finished that **** completely, because only the most ********* of faggots complains about something without finishing it.


That **** is beyond ******* stupid.
User avatar #81 to #44 - brokentrucker ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-]
It was so ******* fun.


Really wish the ******* demon snake thing wasn't a thing. I want to run around being a ******* cringey fag and roleplay this PMC with my avatar. But noooooo. Kill to many people and you're covered in blood permanently.
#25 - akkere (12/24/2015) [-]
If I pay for something, I'm going to try to spend as much time with it and get my money's worth before I decide enough is enough and can it. That applies a lot for gaming, especially when you have a complex situation where a game has a certain theme or feature that you're interested in, but everything else is giving you a sour taste for the rest of the trip.

Not every hour spent in a game is filled with "HAHA WOW, THIS IS GREAT, I'M ENJOOOOOYING MYSELF" moments. Some mutliplayer gaming genres (like MMOs) have you spend hours and hours building yourself up before you can even get to those sweet moments. Someone putting a review after spending hundreds of hours is usually the result of;
A. They genuinely tried to find the fun in the game and simply couldn't get it.
B. The game updated itself to something completely undesirable.
User avatar #22 - ifreakinglovepizza (12/23/2015) [-]
too real bro
#32 - anon (12/24/2015) [-]
This **** was on /v/ earlier today, the reason it has so many replies is samefagging by people from sites like these who do le wacky 4chon comp XD. **** you.
User avatar #106 - strangesir (12/24/2015) [-]
... Why is this in the feels channel?
User avatar #99 - frutus ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-]
I bet I have 2000+ hours on CoD MW2 on PC and maybe 1000 on Xbox. Would I recommend it? No, it ******* sucks really.
But I liked it when it came.
[ 108 comments ]
Leave a comment

Top Content in 24 Hours

No entries found.
 Friends (0)