Messenger
Tags: Fallout
A q crs
...
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
75 comments displayed.
#15
-
tacolishous (01/05/2016) [-] 
I ******* love New Vegas. It's my favorite Fallout game and might be my favorite game of all time. But I've played it way too much. I've probably put close to 700 hours into the game on 360 and PC. Whenever I try to play now I get really bored because I've done and memorized nearly everything. I wish I could forget it and do everything all over again.
#35 to #29
-
tacolishous (01/05/2016) [-] I have modded it. And unmodded it and modded it again. Then I did a fresh install and modded it all over again. Who would ever play a Bethesda game on PC and never mod it?
#89 to #35
-
wertologist (01/05/2016) [-] Try "roleplaying". Pick what kind of character you are and stick to it. Don't fast travel. What mods do you use and what kind of mods are you looking for? I know a bunch of great mods you can use to change it up.
#97 to #15
-
thejusticar (01/05/2016) [-] delete the game for about a month. and just don't think about it for a month. then reinstall the game after the month is over. thats what i do once games start to get boring.
#4
-
prestongarvey (01/04/2016) [-] Speaking of message. I got word that some Raiders are attacking a nearby settlement. I'll mark it on your map.
#58 to #4
-
zetsuboukamina ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-] How? I consoled in hundreds of mines and te can't take a step without blowing up?
#70 to #63
-
ghettograndpa (01/05/2016) [-] There's a guy in Fallout 4 who's basically the good guy Sheriff. You can have him accompany you and if you do make him your companion, he'll notify you of your friends being attacked in the whole world map, so pretty often he'll tell you, that a nearby settlement is under attack.
#26 to #19
-
daredevizz (01/05/2016) [-] I think i'd be more afraid of Slaneesh and his weird fetishes then Khorne.....
#98 to #59
-
themarineelite (01/05/2016) [-] Considering Khornates make it quick, and slaaneshis would torture the **** outta you. I'd rather face Khornates.
#2 to #1
-
topperharly (01/04/2016) [-] **topperharly used "*roll picture*"**
**topperharly rolled image** ...that....kinda is true...unless i have an evil playthrough where i help them. filthy ncr
**topperharly rolled image** ...that....kinda is true...unless i have an evil playthrough where i help them. filthy ncr
#5 to #3
-
topperharly (01/04/2016) [-] **topperharly used "*roll picture*"**
**topperharly rolled image** yeah....well i remember when i first met them and that one guy was like " i wone the lottery!!!" i shot him.....and
**topperharly rolled image** yeah....well i remember when i first met them and that one guy was like " i wone the lottery!!!" i shot him.....and
#11 to #3
-
greenjacketcs (01/05/2016) [-] I went evil on my first playthrough. I put a lot into my stealth, so I stole everything of value.
#27
-
mycathascancer (01/05/2016) [-] you hear that antler? human says he will help nightkin get stealthboys!
#16 to #13
-
anon (01/05/2016) [-]
I agree, I bought Fallout 4 during the Steam sale. Played it for 1 hour and 56 minutes before I refunded it. So many of the new design choices either bored me or pissed me off. (Like the way they went back to the ******* fail of a persuasion system they had in Fallout 3)
It's like they learned absolutely nothing from New Vegas.
It's like they learned absolutely nothing from New Vegas.
#40 to #16
-
graboidzero ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-] falloutexplain : haven't plaid 3 or NV in a while. What was the difference with the persuasion fail again?
#44 to #40
-
theguythatisnotyou (01/05/2016) [-] In NV persuasion was a level you need to get your speech up to. If it was on or pass the level you needed you would always pass the checks.
In 3 and 4, you merely have a chance to pass or fail, so you could have 10 Charisma and 100 speech and still fail the easiest check in the game.
In 3 and 4, you merely have a chance to pass or fail, so you could have 10 Charisma and 100 speech and still fail the easiest check in the game.
#60 to #44
-
corrosionx (01/05/2016) [-] Really? I don't remember anything like that happening to me on F3 and I played through it twice.
#46 to #44
-
ashendashin (01/05/2016) [-]
Wait I never failed with 10 charisma. You sure about that?
#47 to #46
-
theguythatisnotyou (01/05/2016) [-] Due to the programming of the game it should be possible it just ins't likely. Like the Masterball in Pokemon can fail you just need to be the most unlucky son of the bitch in the universe.
#51 to #50
-
theguythatisnotyou (01/05/2016) [-] Due to Pokemon's catch formula which is a whole bunch of math. The Masterball doesn't give you a 100% catch rate. It gives your likelihood of catching a pokemon an insane multiplier. The masterball failing is about 8 times less likely than you finding a shiny pokemon.
#91 to #40
-
wertologist (01/05/2016) [-] One of the big differences between 3 and NV was the skill checks. In 3, if you had let's say 66 on small guns and a dialogue option for small guns came up and you chose it, you would have like a 66% chance of success. In NV, if you had 66 on guns and a dialogue option came up, then it would always succeed if you had above the required amount.
Persuasion in 3 came down to chance and you'd have a better chance if your skill was higher. Persuasion in NV came down to if you had enough skill. If the requirement was 40 speech it wouldn't matter how much you had as long as it was over 40. A level 50 speech would do the same as a level 100 speech.
Persuasion in 3 came down to chance and you'd have a better chance if your skill was higher. Persuasion in NV came down to if you had enough skill. If the requirement was 40 speech it wouldn't matter how much you had as long as it was over 40. A level 50 speech would do the same as a level 100 speech.
#84 to #24
-
ludislavonac (01/05/2016) [-] Something I learned with armors in NV - don't take power armor into DLC areas, it'll get turned to mush sooner or later. Use combat armor mk2 or riot gear and get the jury rigging perk.
#96 to #84
-
brobyddark (01/05/2016) [-] It was combat ranger armor, taken straight from Honest Hearts.
#30 to #24
-
metalheadtildeath (01/05/2016) [-] that one...bored the living **** out of me. all of the dlc did
#28 to #24
-
sexyhimself ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-] The thing about the ten minute talk at the beginning though, it's ******* hilarious.
#22 to #9
-
nazkan (01/05/2016) [-]
Obsidian would have gotten a monetary bonus if Metacritic rated the game 85 or higher.
Metacritic gave it an 84 because of minor bugs that were unique to the Gamebryo engine and existed in Fallout 3, which Obsidian was forced to use. They were also given 16 months to make the game, which is short, but by no means impossible when you reuse Fallout 3's assets.
Metacritic gave it an 84 because of minor bugs that were unique to the Gamebryo engine and existed in Fallout 3, which Obsidian was forced to use. They were also given 16 months to make the game, which is short, but by no means impossible when you reuse Fallout 3's assets.
#57 to #22
-
karenoniks (01/05/2016) [-] C'mon now!
Why would Bethesda do that? Now that's just jewish...
Why would Bethesda do that? Now that's just jewish...
#49 to #41
-
nazkan (01/05/2016) [-]
And Fallout 3 got 91, what's your point?
I'm just saying, the bugs that existed in Fallout: New Vegas also existed in Fallout 3, yet Fallout 3 received a higher score despite them while NV was lowered because of them. I personally think that's ******** , but I don't see how Fallout 4 factors into this at all; especially considering it's on an entirely 'new' engine and has a myriad of unique bugs itself.
If anything, it's a good thing that it has the same score. It means reviewers aren't looking the other way towards **** like this.
I'm just saying, the bugs that existed in Fallout: New Vegas also existed in Fallout 3, yet Fallout 3 received a higher score despite them while NV was lowered because of them. I personally think that's ******** , but I don't see how Fallout 4 factors into this at all; especially considering it's on an entirely 'new' engine and has a myriad of unique bugs itself.
If anything, it's a good thing that it has the same score. It means reviewers aren't looking the other way towards **** like this.
#36
-
sergeantpopeye (01/05/2016) [-] Fallout NV was ******* excellent. Characters and setting were brilliant, Fallout 4 just doesn't do it for me
#31
-
asasqw (01/05/2016) [-] 800 hours and counting. Can't wait for the G.E.C.K. so fallout 4 can gain some depth
#71
-
ghostninjaguy (01/05/2016) [-] The Mojave can go **** itself, everyone was using me for their gains
#52
-
deroderpderp (01/05/2016) [-] I had a soft spot for Mr. New Vegas. Ive done several playthroughs with hundreds of hours into each of them, and I've sided with everyone besides Yes Man, but NCR will always be my favorite faction to side with. I just wish you could get mods on the console version. I just wish the Enclave played a bigger role and let you side with them,
Besides the occasional crash or fall-through-floor, the game was ******* great.
Besides the occasional crash or fall-through-floor, the game was ******* great.
#103 to #23
-
HAVEMUNCHEES (01/05/2016) [-]
THEEEEEREEE WAS NEVER A MAAAAAAAN
LIKE MY JOOOOOOHHNNYYY
LIKE MY JOOOOOOHHNNYYY
#102
-
HAVEMUNCHEES (01/05/2016) [-]
I just started playing new vegas. All I've ever really played before were sports games and call of dooty.
I ******* love New Vegas
I ******* love New Vegas
#93
-
shoryuken (01/05/2016) [-] I liked in New Vegas that there was the option to be independent and run the whole damn place yourself.
#72
-
inuares (01/05/2016) [-] I liked NV more than Fallout 3 simply due to the ability to aim down the sights. This seems like a petty complaint n all, but I felt like fallout 3 relied a bit too much on VATS. They're both great games though.
#55
-
anon (01/05/2016) [-]
Replayed a bit in the last couple months. Never realized how much Johnny goddamn Guitar plays.
