Full protection ^_^
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
145 comments displayed.
#145 to #126
-
captaindeath (12/04/2015) [-]
Side question, what the hell is happening in this gif??
#127 to #126
-
ihateeverybodytoo (12/04/2015) [-] just face the fact that Fallout 4 is just Fallout 3 again.
#136 to #134
-
ihateeverybodytoo (12/04/2015) [-] it really is the same game. the difference from Fallout 1 and 2 compared to Fallout 3 is huge. the difference from Fallout 3 and New Vegas compared to Fallout 4 is very little.
#137 to #136
-
mochabearwelch (12/04/2015) [-]
I feel this review sums it up nicely. Good game, just not a good fallout game.
kotaku.com/fallout-4-is-not-the-fallout-fans-fell-in-love-with-1745651992
kotaku.com/fallout-4-is-not-the-fallout-fans-fell-in-love-with-1745651992
#138 to #137
-
ihateeverybodytoo (12/04/2015) [-] I like the ending though. I mean I wish the game wasn't so buggy and half-assed. Did you set up a supply line, hope you like where it is because it's unnecessarily hard as **** to change.
#140 to #138
-
mochabearwelch (12/04/2015) [-]
yeah. I set it up before getting most of the settlements.. I just wanted a nice circle. It's not a nice circle, now.
#151 to #150
-
ihateeverybodytoo (12/04/2015) [-] probably because there is even less of a difference between Fallout 3 and New Vegas than there is between Fallout 3 and 4.
#22 to #20
-
anon (12/04/2015) [-]
I think you would be surprised, but that's not important. I gave simple solution to simple problem with mechanics that is already there. If this ***** all over the place with 47694 new additional bugs then code is **** . Nothing more to it. I get that developing a game is a pain beyond imagination. But dealing with this problem is really not that hard. The code would have to be beyond **** to prevent from dealing with it.
#24 to #22
-
anon (12/04/2015) [-]
True, many problems are not that hard to figure out. The problem in finding all 50000000 ways people can make problems with it, then finding ways to fix it that doesnt break somthing else. Then after launch you get to find out there were 99999999999 possible ways for **** to break.
#25 to #24
-
anon (12/04/2015) [-]
Again I get that and I'm not saying that developing a game is a wak in the park. It has a lot more to do with tears that sunshine (actually it has nothing to do with sunshine). But this particular problem was present in Skyrim so they had a lot of time to deal with it. And it would be relatively easy (i think at least) to deal with with simple collision detection of object on body. Yes, that would generate some additional problems like triggering responses in cases when player does not try to put the object on the head of an npc like for example some triggers when npc gets hit with the object from explosion or sth. But that would be a far smaller bug to leave in and waaay harder to trigger. I think they just noticed people have fun with it and mostly don't mind it and left it as is.
#41 to #1
-
Javapenguin (12/04/2015) [-] How could it be?
Trashcans are metal and lifeless.
Bugs are tiny and scary.
Trashcans are metal and lifeless.
Bugs are tiny and scary.
#122 to #41
-
reinbowxdash ONLINE (12/04/2015) [-] **reinbowxdash used "*roll picture*"**
**reinbowxdash rolled image**what if you put the trashcan on the bug?
**reinbowxdash rolled image**what if you put the trashcan on the bug?
#54 to #1
-
ChuckNorrisVsMRT ONLINE (12/04/2015) [-] I'm not racist, but it says right in the description that it's not a bug, it's a feature.
#63 to #56
-
ChuckNorrisVsMRT ONLINE (12/04/2015) [-] I said I'm not racist, can you not read? Typical ****** .
#75 to #56
-
itsapirateslife (12/04/2015) [-] Probably because everyone is offended my everything these days. So just to be safe. Also, it's a joke
#109 to #52
-
WTFROFLOL (12/04/2015) [-]
I love Nick because he always has something interesting to say. Combat wise, he uses a revolver pistol which is still okay if it wasn't for the fact that companions has extremely poor accuracy. So for combat, i love me some Danse with his power armor and laser rifle.
#141 to #52
-
thegamepixel (12/04/2015) [-] No one on Fj has said my top 3 Piper, MacCready, and Deacon
I guess if I had to, I'd pick Deacon.
I guess if I had to, I'd pick Deacon.
#143 to #52
-
redbannerman (12/04/2015) [-] Lone Wanderer perk. Because **** having a tagalong that gets me caught and judges me for doing things.
The percent damage reduction is best companion.
The percent damage reduction is best companion.
#91 to #52
-
ascarecrow (12/04/2015) [-] Hancock because dirty ghoul dick :^)
But really, he's hella good in a fight and gives you drugs
But really, he's hella good in a fight and gives you drugs
#69 to #52
-
sptnfouroneseven (12/04/2015) [-] Curie. By far.
I might not like 99% of the synth population, but that French accent, along with naive attitude and personality is just... Shiiiiit. Reminds me of Lelliana from Dragon Age Origins.
I might not like 99% of the synth population, but that French accent, along with naive attitude and personality is just... Shiiiiit. Reminds me of Lelliana from Dragon Age Origins.
#94 to #53
-
walcorn ONLINE (12/04/2015) [-] But he opens every door he walks past, I hate it, it makes sneaking impossible since they can just ******* see me through the open door.
Not to mention the times he runs off and aggroes several enemies at a time.
Other than this, I love the little mutt, he doesn't judge me for carrying around 200lbs of junk, and he more than happily shares the load without complains.
Not to mention the times he runs off and aggroes several enemies at a time.
Other than this, I love the little mutt, he doesn't judge me for carrying around 200lbs of junk, and he more than happily shares the load without complains.
#34
-
teamrocketninja (12/04/2015) [-] I've playing for just shy of 7 days in game and I honestly haven't seen too many bugs besides some goofy ragdolls, radroaches, and rarely a texture or two that take some time to get to higher resolution. I dont know what everyone's talking about with bugs.
#165 to #34
-
GoldenLotus (12/04/2015) [-] **GoldenLotus used "*roll picture*"**
**GoldenLotus rolled image**There was one time I fell off of a highway and died. When I loaded back up, I was only about halfway across the highway back to where I fell off only to see the entire highway in front of me in a lower resolution and when I tried crossing to that side I just fell through and died. Only had to spend a few minutes backtracking to walk below the highway, so wasn't too bad though.
**GoldenLotus rolled image**There was one time I fell off of a highway and died. When I loaded back up, I was only about halfway across the highway back to where I fell off only to see the entire highway in front of me in a lower resolution and when I tried crossing to that side I just fell through and died. Only had to spend a few minutes backtracking to walk below the highway, so wasn't too bad though.
#83 to #34
-
empithree ONLINE (12/04/2015) [-] those "bugs" are just amusing, not frustrating. I'm okay with this.
/channel/fallout/Fallout+4+breakdancing+boxes+glitch/rDgfLeQ/
/channel/fallout/Fallout+4+breakdancing+boxes+glitch/rDgfLeQ/
#89 to #34
-
anon (12/04/2015) [-]
Same here, I only ran into a bad texture on a highway where the "don't feed the bears" signs were with some Gunner thugs.
The worst bug I got was my Power Armor messing up but, had fun with that.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=dEwDEJkkMXU
I feel like I'm promoting a mix tape...
The worst bug I got was my Power Armor messing up but, had fun with that.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=dEwDEJkkMXU
I feel like I'm promoting a mix tape...
#101 to #34
-
mudkipfucker (12/04/2015) [-] the only major 'glitch' i have is that codsworth disappeared when i dismissed him for another companion
#147 to #101
-
arsenalthegunners (12/04/2015) [-] yoooo when you dismiss him I dont think he disappears, check everything n sanctuary hills, then pay a visit to general atomics galleria. I have found him there a couple of times.
Also there is this "bug" (god forbid if I call it something else, cuase hurr durr bugz) where dismissing a companion like dogmeat or codsworth might make them "disappear", you have to either load a few times, or just keep on exploring until you find him somewhere (he might be in other settlements which sucks ass
Also there is this "bug" (god forbid if I call it something else, cuase hurr durr bugz) where dismissing a companion like dogmeat or codsworth might make them "disappear", you have to either load a few times, or just keep on exploring until you find him somewhere (he might be in other settlements which sucks ass
#84 to #34
-
Thunderrr (12/04/2015) [-] I've experienced a glitch(a dozen or so times), where after exiting a terminal, I couldn't do anything else besides looking around.
I'm 99% sure that happens because I disabled the frame limiter, so not really Bethesda's fault.
Oh, and the game crashed once, but I'm inclined to believe it was because of the mods I had installed.
I'm 99% sure that happens because I disabled the frame limiter, so not really Bethesda's fault.
Oh, and the game crashed once, but I'm inclined to believe it was because of the mods I had installed.
#12
-
anon (12/04/2015) [-] "Fallout 4 was totally finished when they shipped it. Bugs are funny! Hurrr" - Every Bethesdrone on this site.
Anon'd because you kids would just red-thumb me into oblivion.
Anon'd because you kids would just red-thumb me into oblivion.
#170 to #12
-
gromitsparkles (12/04/2015) [-] am i the only one who likes a series and thinks "i want more of this" instead of "i want something radically different so it doesn't resemble the previous game too much, otherwise why would i buy it?"
also.. it's a bethesda game... there were bugs in the trailers, idk what you were expecting but that really should have clued you in :¬P
pic related maybe, idk probably not
also.. it's a bethesda game... there were bugs in the trailers, idk what you were expecting but that really should have clued you in :¬P
pic related maybe, idk probably not
#13 to #12
-
danmegaflakes (12/04/2015) [-] You're actually right
As in for you faggots. You critisize every other game NOT made by bethesda
You guys are just as bad or worse than the fags that play cod
As in for you faggots. You critisize every other game NOT made by bethesda
You guys are just as bad or worse than the fags that play cod
#21 to #13
-
blueblaugh (12/04/2015) [-]
In my opinion not a single person should be shocked by what Fallout 4 is. It is literally Bethesda going:
"Psst guys so since everyone will buy our game anyway no matter what, so lets make it basically the same but add a building mechanic that is terrible and boring so that we can make a mobile game to make extra money."
To me there is no significant difference between Fallout 3 and 4 and should get hate as such BUT if that's what you want then do you, I'm just disappointed in it.
"Psst guys so since everyone will buy our game anyway no matter what, so lets make it basically the same but add a building mechanic that is terrible and boring so that we can make a mobile game to make extra money."
To me there is no significant difference between Fallout 3 and 4 and should get hate as such BUT if that's what you want then do you, I'm just disappointed in it.
#97 to #21
-
astatine (12/04/2015) [-]
Mate it's a largely story-driven game, it doesn't need to completely change its mechanics every time a sequel comes out. It gets more praise than it's due by the fans and it's not the best game I've played all year, but it's still a pretty damn good game. The significant difference between Fallout 3 and Fallout 4 is that it's in a different setting with different characters and different quests.
You know, I'm just throwing this out there but faggots like you are the reason Banjo Threeie got cancelled in favour of Banjo Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts. You cry about there being no difference but the moment they make any significant changes you'll complain that they ruined the series
You know, I'm just throwing this out there but faggots like you are the reason Banjo Threeie got cancelled in favour of Banjo Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts. You cry about there being no difference but the moment they make any significant changes you'll complain that they ruined the series
#164 to #97
-
blueblaugh (12/04/2015) [-]
Not at all, I've never played a single Banjo game so i have no idea what you're talking about. The best example i have is the Borderlands and Borderlands 2. Games should get better and feel different with each iteration. Fallout isn't different or better. It's exactly the same
#171 to #164
-
astatine (12/04/2015) [-]
Wait Borderlands is the best example of a game changing and updating or the best example of a game that's gotten stale and needs to be changed? Because they're both great games but I'm pretty sure FO3/4 changes more between games than BL1/2.
I think maybe you're judging it a little too harshly and looking at what's the same more than what's new because of all the fanboys, I know I've done that before. Fallout 4 changes and adds plenty, just because they've kept features from previous games doesn't mean it's suddenly a clone.
Banjo Kazooie was one of the best games on the N64, along with games like Zelda and Super Mario 64. It's one of those timelss games that you can always go back to and think "wow, this is a really ******* good game" without worrying about how it's dated.
After Banjo Kazooie came Banjo Tooie. Slightly improved graphics and some cool new moves, but otherwise the same core mechanics. It was a perfect sequel; everything from the previous game but slightly better with a new story.
Then after Banjo Tooie, Rare (the developers) hinted at Banjo Threeie, which was majorly anticipated by fans. After Rare got bought out by Microsoft they hinted at it even more and fed us teasers; after years and years it was finally being made, and fans were ecstatic.
Then Threeie got trashed Banjo Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts came out. To call it a failure would be like calling M. Night Shyamalan's biggest, wateriest turd "a bit smelly." Jontron reviewed it and depicted the disc as an evil demon that needed to be destroyed.
It wasn't too awful a game in its own right, but unfortunately Microsoft did its research. Badly. See, Banjo Kazooie was all about collectibles. Musical notes, little rainboy-coloured friendly monsters called Jinjos, jigsaw pieces, the purpose of each world was to collect all the items. Well in recent years people had gotten sick of collectables, so Microsoft in their infinite wisdom decided to completely change how the game was played. On top of that though they also poked fun at the previous games and made them out to be endless fetch quests that modern gamers weren't interested in, collecting a trillion pointless items (they really weren't, each item you picked up felt significant in its own way and the whole thing was beautifully done.)
Anyway the point is if it isn't broken, you don't always have to fix it. Innovation is fine and good but you don't have to totally change how a game is played just because your old games have been done. <------ Big Banjo Kazooie rant, spoilering because I got a little off track.
I think maybe you're judging it a little too harshly and looking at what's the same more than what's new because of all the fanboys, I know I've done that before. Fallout 4 changes and adds plenty, just because they've kept features from previous games doesn't mean it's suddenly a clone.
Banjo Kazooie was one of the best games on the N64, along with games like Zelda and Super Mario 64. It's one of those timelss games that you can always go back to and think "wow, this is a really ******* good game" without worrying about how it's dated.
After Banjo Kazooie came Banjo Tooie. Slightly improved graphics and some cool new moves, but otherwise the same core mechanics. It was a perfect sequel; everything from the previous game but slightly better with a new story.
Then after Banjo Tooie, Rare (the developers) hinted at Banjo Threeie, which was majorly anticipated by fans. After Rare got bought out by Microsoft they hinted at it even more and fed us teasers; after years and years it was finally being made, and fans were ecstatic.
Then Threeie got trashed Banjo Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts came out. To call it a failure would be like calling M. Night Shyamalan's biggest, wateriest turd "a bit smelly." Jontron reviewed it and depicted the disc as an evil demon that needed to be destroyed.
It wasn't too awful a game in its own right, but unfortunately Microsoft did its research. Badly. See, Banjo Kazooie was all about collectibles. Musical notes, little rainboy-coloured friendly monsters called Jinjos, jigsaw pieces, the purpose of each world was to collect all the items. Well in recent years people had gotten sick of collectables, so Microsoft in their infinite wisdom decided to completely change how the game was played. On top of that though they also poked fun at the previous games and made them out to be endless fetch quests that modern gamers weren't interested in, collecting a trillion pointless items (they really weren't, each item you picked up felt significant in its own way and the whole thing was beautifully done.)
Anyway the point is if it isn't broken, you don't always have to fix it. Innovation is fine and good but you don't have to totally change how a game is played just because your old games have been done. <------ Big Banjo Kazooie rant, spoilering because I got a little off track.
#90 to #12
-
jizzmeista (12/04/2015) [-] I genuinely couldn't name you another game made by Bethesda off the top of my head other than the rest of the fallout series (I assume). I don't really buy games based on the companies who have made them. I usually watch trailers and play betas, then decide if I want them based on those experiences. As for the bugs, I've heard about one or two annoying bugs, but haven't encountered them myself. Also the game has added so much more to the Fallout series. From the much improved graphics, to the added backstory which has always been missing from the games. Overall great game and my decision has nothing to do with who made it.
#14 to #12
-
daredevizz (12/04/2015) [-] lol calls eveyone else a kid but isn't man enough to voice his opinions with a real identity.
Classic Loser Anon
Classic Loser Anon
#6
-
worldatarms ONLINE (12/03/2015) [-] >Need to protect town
>Starts shooting in bin
>Bullet ricochet within bin
>Horrible death
>Starts shooting in bin
>Bullet ricochet within bin
>Horrible death
#154 to #130
-
dehnoobshow ONLINE (12/04/2015) [-] How do people even do it, when I try to put a bucket on their head, the bucket slides off an invisible barrier.
#161 to #154
-
fuzzyballs (12/04/2015) [-] that's a basket
not a bucket
and it JUST works
seriously though, I only tried it once, and it worked fine
not a bucket
and it JUST works
seriously though, I only tried it once, and it worked fine
#28
-
tenaciouslee ONLINE (12/04/2015) [-] Ahh, putting Cait where she belongs.
It's probably just me, but I think Cait is annoying as **** , every time I go back to the Red Rocket, she's like, "NOOTHIN'S BETTER THAN GETTIN' DRUNK OR IN A FIGHT, AM I RIGHT?", and I want to kill her because ******* no, there's a whole lot of better **** that "GETTIN' PISSED OR FOIGHTIN'.", if it wasn't for her ability to pick Master locks, I'd've left her in the Combat Zone.
Pick related, best girl.
It's probably just me, but I think Cait is annoying as **** , every time I go back to the Red Rocket, she's like, "NOOTHIN'S BETTER THAN GETTIN' DRUNK OR IN A FIGHT, AM I RIGHT?", and I want to kill her because ******* no, there's a whole lot of better **** that "GETTIN' PISSED OR FOIGHTIN'.", if it wasn't for her ability to pick Master locks, I'd've left her in the Combat Zone.
Pick related, best girl.
#45 to #42
-
tenaciouslee ONLINE (12/04/2015) [-] The Silver Shroud outfit is great on Curie.
Not the hat/outfit combo, just the Silver Shroud outfit.
But, I got the Minutemen General's uniform and gave her it, it looks good on her with the hat, too.
Not the hat/outfit combo, just the Silver Shroud outfit.
But, I got the Minutemen General's uniform and gave her it, it looks good on her with the hat, too.
#102 to #45
-
traaaaains (12/04/2015) [-] wait wait wait, this is curie the HANDYROBOT RIGHT? i thought they cant use anything except for wahatever they have installed?
#117 to #102
-
tenaciouslee ONLINE (12/04/2015) [-] Well, after you give Curie her synth body, you can.
#38 to #28
-
mikhailovych (12/04/2015) [-] Curie is Bae
I put her in a lab coat and made her a maxed out institute rifle because it looks all sciency
got really sad when I found you couldn't winterize X-01 power armour so I couldn't make her a sciency-looking set of personal power armour
I put her in a lab coat and made her a maxed out institute rifle because it looks all sciency
got really sad when I found you couldn't winterize X-01 power armour so I couldn't make her a sciency-looking set of personal power armour
#48 to #47
-
tenaciouslee ONLINE (12/04/2015) [-] >She's Irish
Yeah, but the worst kind of Irish accent.
>She's redhead.
That I'll give you.
>Tough
No, she's ******* worthless in a shootout, Nick or Danse are best for fights.
>And drunk.
Yeah, that's the only part of her personality, if you don't recruit her, she whines about "THIS GODDAMN HEAT", and then says, "There's nothin' better than gettin' drunk or in a fight, am I right?" 98 times.
I just do not like Cait.
Yeah, but the worst kind of Irish accent.
>She's redhead.
That I'll give you.
>Tough
No, she's ******* worthless in a shootout, Nick or Danse are best for fights.
>And drunk.
Yeah, that's the only part of her personality, if you don't recruit her, she whines about "THIS GODDAMN HEAT", and then says, "There's nothin' better than gettin' drunk or in a fight, am I right?" 98 times.
I just do not like Cait.
#133 to #48
-
anon (12/04/2015) [-]
Does nobody realize you can put your followers (Except Dogmeat, Codsworth, and Strong) INTO POWERARMOR
They take no Cores to power it and you can hand them whatever weapon you want to tell them to use it.
So Honestly, ANY companion is as good as ANY other for me, cause I have Master Lockpicking and Master Terminal hacking I don't need them for anything other than Carrying my **** and being a second target for enemies WHICH THEY DO WELL
They take no Cores to power it and you can hand them whatever weapon you want to tell them to use it.
So Honestly, ANY companion is as good as ANY other for me, cause I have Master Lockpicking and Master Terminal hacking I don't need them for anything other than Carrying my **** and being a second target for enemies WHICH THEY DO WELL
#111
-
mintea ONLINE (12/04/2015) [-] I've only seen 1 bug in FO4 so far inb4 radroaches , but it is so ******* annoying, because it happens fairly often.
I switch my weapon out, but my hands are empty but in a pose as though the weapon is in them. I cannot shoot at all until I finally manage to get the gun to appear.
This happens midcombat. Switch gun out, suddenly I can't shoot at all and I just get mulched.
Is this a feature?
I switch my weapon out, but my hands are empty but in a pose as though the weapon is in them. I cannot shoot at all until I finally manage to get the gun to appear.
This happens midcombat. Switch gun out, suddenly I can't shoot at all and I just get mulched.
Is this a feature?
#162 to #111
-
fuzzyballs (12/04/2015) [-] that's not really a bug
that's just your gun taking it's time to load
I hate the one where your gun just goes invisible when you were just using it
or the one where the vertibird minigun disappears in first person, and then it's gone in third person, and if you try shooting or reloading the game crashes
and I don't know if it's Win 10 or Fallout 4, but the crashes suck because the game won't minimize and I have to log off my account and back in
that's just your gun taking it's time to load
I hate the one where your gun just goes invisible when you were just using it
or the one where the vertibird minigun disappears in first person, and then it's gone in third person, and if you try shooting or reloading the game crashes
and I don't know if it's Win 10 or Fallout 4, but the crashes suck because the game won't minimize and I have to log off my account and back in
#168
-
joefrazer (12/04/2015) [-] I think your all faggots for saying the game is bad just because it didnt meet YOUR specific expectations
