Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#15 - johnnygat (06/11/2014) [-]
Fallout 4 wasn't at E3.....
Fallout 4 wasn't at E3.....
#69 to #15 - tomjay (06/12/2014) [-]
I guess I already knew it wouldn't be, but I still feel ****** for it
User avatar #33 to #15 - hourlyb ONLINE (06/12/2014) [-]
If the info of it being set in Boston pans out, I hope they are going to reveal it a PAX East.
#18 to #15 - nicoquitemad (06/12/2014) [-]
Well they've barely finished The Elder Scrolls Online. 2016 my friend, we wait.
#86 to #18 - theonewhoisnigz (06/12/2014) [-]
I bought an Xbone solely for Fallout 4. and halo and GOW
User avatar #46 to #18 - misfitxcreepx (06/12/2014) [-]
Bethesda didn't create ESO.
User avatar #55 to #46 - nicoquitemad (06/12/2014) [-]
I contacted Bethesda via their general info email about something Fallout related a month ago, and I got replies from the Elder Scrolls Online team.
User avatar #60 to #55 - misfitxcreepx (06/12/2014) [-]
While that is odd. Bethesda Game Studios didn't make ESO.
My understanding, which is likely totally wrong, is that Zenimax Media owns Bethesda Game Studios (developer of TES, fallout 3, etc.), Zenimax Online Studios (the ****** who made ESO), and Bethesda Softworks (the publishing company).
So from what I understand, Zenimax Media created Zenimax Online Studios to develop ESO, which was published by Bethesda Softworks. Bethesda Game Studios had nothing to do with it, leaving them free to work on Fallout 4 or whatever.
Again, this might be a bit wrong, but I do know that BGS did not develop ESO. Maybe that has something to do with why they replied? idk

There have been other games, like Rage and Brink have been developed by other companies but published by Bethesda Softworks. Makes for a lot of confusing and misplaced "Bethesda sucked at making this game" and "Bethesda did great at making this game" haha
#17 to #15 - archael (06/11/2014) [-]
Is Fallout 4 being made by Bethesda or that ************** Block Rock?

Also, do you think they'll try as hard now that they already have a fanbase and don't have to give a **** to live up to the original?
#22 to #17 - fefe (06/12/2014) [-]
probobly ruin the lore of fallout more unless its obsidian that makes it.
but if bethesda makes it, it would still be good but would give a **** about the original lore and go its own direction.
User avatar #39 to #22 - amata (06/12/2014) [-]
How exactly did Bethesda ruin the lore, exactly? I love all of the games a great deal and am genuinely curious.
#162 to #39 - fefe (06/15/2014) [-]
mothershp zeta just implies that aliens were behind the great war. which kind of ruins the war never changes thing thats all. it has some rehashed plot points and just feels like a reboot to the series but at least a good reboot.
#159 to #39 - fefe (06/14/2014) [-]
dont get me wrong it wasnt bad but it did just have a few things wrong. plus the main quest objectives were just rehashed from fallout 1 and 2. the computer president just a copy of the computer emperor in fallout 2 San Francisco. still a good game
#157 to #39 - fefe (06/14/2014) [-]
well it wasnt ruined they just shouldnt have done a few things the way they did. good game but it has its bad. this pc covers it if ya can see it.
User avatar #160 to #157 - amata (06/14/2014) [-]
Jesus, I don't know what's sadder, the fact that the guy who made this decided to make an entire rant because Fallout 3 wasn't 100% perfect and exactly how he wanted it, or the fact that he actually devoted the time to making this picture. I mean **** , guys like these are the same sort of angry losers who throw hissy fits because video games are becoming more popular.
Not to mention the fact that very few of the points he touched on had anything to do with the lore, and the **** he did mention was bass-ackwards and idiotic. The BoS thing, for example. It says in the game that they decided to change their mission, and that the Outcasts left because of that decision. The guy is getting mad over a fully explained plot point.

In my opinion, Fallout 3 was not a perfect game, by any means. However, despite all the bugs, I found it to be very enjoyable and I don't see how the lore was supposedly bent over and assraped.
#161 to #160 - fefe (06/14/2014) [-]
like i said game is good just a few things i dont totally agree with what he said but yeah . he does make a few good points though. he just a bit upset cause of the different direction taken i guess.
 Friends (0)