Fallout 4 DLC
Fad:
Original Game -
Filecloud 4 Without mo
Too accurate to not rel: -Eng again.
Original Game -
Filecloud 4 Without mo
Too accurate to not rel: -Eng again.
...
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
179 comments displayed.
#5
-
ifightdragons (11/05/2015) [-] i think its so weird to judge a games quality and quanity of content before its even out
#269 to #5
-
twentyseconds (11/06/2015) [-] i like how this comment has more thumbs then the content. I was thinking the same thing
#70 to #69
-
ifightdragons (11/06/2015) [-] oh boy lemme base my entire opinion of the game on some leaked footage
#72 to #71
-
ifightdragons (11/06/2015) [-] i dont like to be a fanboy clearly you have no issue with this . i enjoyed the other games and i will probably like this one as well, but that doesnt mean its some flawless godsend either.
#115 to #72
-
EdwardNigma 
ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-] I don't think it'll be flawless, Bethesda games always have their problems.
But like Fallout 3, New Vegas, Skyrim, Oblivion and Morrowind, I will almost guaranteed sink countless hours into that **** for years because the strengths so heavily outweigh the flaws.
But y'know. Opinions.
But like Fallout 3, New Vegas, Skyrim, Oblivion and Morrowind, I will almost guaranteed sink countless hours into that **** for years because the strengths so heavily outweigh the flaws.
But y'know. Opinions.
#246 to #194
-
assdoreponyfucker (11/06/2015) [-] thats like george lucas invented the foreman grill, correllation =/= compensation ; ;
#266 to #246
-
EdwardNigma ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-] But its still near enough to 3 that its worth including.
#220 to #151
-
anon (11/06/2015) [-]
Halo 4 set a record in sales for the franchise, and received universal acclaim from critics. It's a great game, regardless of whether it "feels like Halo" or not. Most of the people who bitched about that were people who had no interest in the extended lore anyways, and I was sick of MC having as much characterization as a potato. Each member of Noble Team had more characterization than Chief did in the first three games.
#268 to #220
-
doctorcamden (11/06/2015) [-] Aint ever seen so much wrong in ma whole gon-dum life boiyo.
#165 to #106
-
quicksilveralicorn (11/06/2015) [-] Watch(underscore)dogs was announced WAAAAY too early in development, thus created ass tons of hype it wasn't able to live up to, fallout 4 was announced when the game was basically finished, so it was able to hype with actual gameplay and such, though Fallout 4 won't be perfect, it is still far from being on the **** level of Watch_Dogs
#267 to #69
-
doctorcamden (11/06/2015) [-] I could rail off a list of games that looked amazing but were unfinished or **** . Fallout 4 doesn't look amazing, the game play looks clunky, the animations awful, the graphics average at best. but hey, its still marginally better than New Vegas
#90 to #5
-
tankdempseyy (11/06/2015) [-]
youre right, even the leaked footage didnt look that impressive, i mean what they added to the gameplay is pretty cool and all, but i expected more graphically, the face animation when npc talk to you is horrific, would completely break the immersion for me.
basically im not hyped anymore for the game, ill get it, but ill wait fro some good mods to be out before
imreadyforyourrage.jpg
basically im not hyped anymore for the game, ill get it, but ill wait fro some good mods to be out before
imreadyforyourrage.jpg
#162 to #5
-
anangrytaco (11/06/2015) [-] You're right. You shouldn't judge a game before it's out. But it's okay to expect some type of quality judging by the previous releases of the developers. Oblivion was great, too good for its time, Fallout 3 was almost perfect, New Vegas was good but too buggy, Skyrim will always be around, although i hate how modders butcher it, we can expect F4 to be good as well.
#153 to #5
-
centraldogma (11/06/2015) [-] Exactly
It was stupid of the doomsayers to constantly be banging on about how they magically knew the game was going to be **** months before it got released. Even with the gameplay trailers, it's equally stupid of anyone to do the opposite and act as if they know the game's going to be good before it's been released.
It was stupid of the doomsayers to constantly be banging on about how they magically knew the game was going to be **** months before it got released. Even with the gameplay trailers, it's equally stupid of anyone to do the opposite and act as if they know the game's going to be good before it's been released.
#273 to #201
-
filming (11/06/2015) [-] True enough, but there's a difference between saying:
"It's fun"
and
"It's pretty big and plays well".
Also, the primary reason I've seen games given out like this is because people want gameplay footage day 1 and full reviews day 1, so IGN would for example likely keep getting games regardless of what they say, where as Achievement Hunter may be under that situation you bring up.
"It's fun"
and
"It's pretty big and plays well".
Also, the primary reason I've seen games given out like this is because people want gameplay footage day 1 and full reviews day 1, so IGN would for example likely keep getting games regardless of what they say, where as Achievement Hunter may be under that situation you bring up.
#65 to #48
-
ifightdragons (11/06/2015) [-] i am in no way saying it will be bad or even just okay, i believe it will be good. but a picture like this is just praising a game for not only being filled with content but overflowing with it, and there is no real way of knowing right now if thats the case, and even if the burger is big that doesnt mean it wont taste like **** .
#6 to #5
-
ohemgeezus (11/05/2015) [-] We've already seen a lot of leaks from people that had review copies for FO4, so it's not blind praise, although the people saying it's going to be the best game ever clearly haven't seen the leaks.
#19 to #18
-
ohemgeezus (11/06/2015) [-] oh hey it's that guy from that *********** board with a couple video game posts
#21 to #20
-
ohemgeezus (11/06/2015) [-] I never really played a fallout game. I played through fallout 3 once, played a couple hours of NV so this'll be the first game I actually play. Although I'm pretty sure I know the story of FO4, I'll wait a week or two before getting it cause it's prob gonna be buggy as ****
#77 to #21
-
anon (11/06/2015) [-]
I'm agreeing here. I'm not necessarily a fan of Bethesda games, every time I get one I play a few hours and it feels like I've already done and seen everything the game has to offer so I take another couple of hours to do the main story and call it quits by the end (Felt this way for FO3, NV, Skyrim, and Oblivion). FO4 might change my mind, but it's gonna start as a rental, and even then only a good while after its come out.
Bethesda games are notorious for their insane numbers of glitches, progression stoppers, and the like; which, for some reason I see fans defending it as part of the experience and what makes these games so good when Watch Dogs and Assassin's Creed games are crucified for having half as much.
So I'll wait for Bethesda to fix all the egregious bugs in the first month or two like they always do. Then I'll watch them leave an insane number of bugs and never touch them so that modders make mods to fix the problems, like what always seems to happen. Then I'll wait for modders to make mods that fix a bunch of the game's design problems that just aren't that great like what always happens.
Bethesda games are notorious for their insane numbers of glitches, progression stoppers, and the like; which, for some reason I see fans defending it as part of the experience and what makes these games so good when Watch Dogs and Assassin's Creed games are crucified for having half as much.
So I'll wait for Bethesda to fix all the egregious bugs in the first month or two like they always do. Then I'll watch them leave an insane number of bugs and never touch them so that modders make mods to fix the problems, like what always seems to happen. Then I'll wait for modders to make mods that fix a bunch of the game's design problems that just aren't that great like what always happens.
#111 to #4
-
electronicbacon ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-] Is it bad that whenever I go to MacD's I usually just get a cheeseburger with no onion and no pickle? I like how bun, cheese, meat and ketchup tastes.
#45
-
lumpymandude (11/06/2015) [-] Yeah this is soooooooooooooooooo accurate. The ******* game isn't even out yet
#25
-
pocketstooheavy (11/06/2015) [-] Please stop pretending the game is incredible when you guys have only seen a few screenshots and videos.
Your fanboy is showing.
Your fanboy is showing.
#46 to #31
-
lumpymandude (11/06/2015) [-] The fact that the game isn't even out and you people are loosing your minds with, not how good its going to be, but how good it is as if it is out already and it is an agreed upon opinion that the game is amazing
#32 to #25
-
tenaciouslee (11/06/2015) [-] Got it pre-ordered, the game looks fantastic, and I know I'm gonna love it.
#87 to #32
-
hongkonglongdong (11/06/2015) [-]
I knew I was going to love Rome 2 when it came out. It's a Total War game; how could I not?
That was the first and last time I pre-ordered anything.
That was the first and last time I pre-ordered anything.
#252 to #199
-
assdoreponyfucker (11/06/2015) [-] pre ordered MGSV and was not dissapointed
pre ordered Dark Souls 2 and was not dissapointed
Friend pre order gifted me Fallout 4 so if it turns out **** you can't blame me
pre ordered Dark Souls 2 and was not dissapointed
Friend pre order gifted me Fallout 4 so if it turns out **** you can't blame me
#180 to #25
-
lvlonemeepo (11/06/2015) [-] I never said it was going to be the best game ever. I've played every single fallout, and I don't give a flying **** if it isn't the most A-1 game. Fallouts in general were never the best games ever to come out. Its simply the best game to me, every single one has never disappointed me, and the fact im getting another fallout is good for me. I'll play the **** out of it no matter, I am a blind fanboy of fallout.
#28
-
rupok (11/06/2015) [-]
I feel like f4 like everything else this year is gonna be a huge disappointment. Thats why i am not preordering and will wait until it ******* COMES OUT.
Honestly the little snippets and videos didn't look that impressive. It looked ok.
Honestly the little snippets and videos didn't look that impressive. It looked ok.
#92 to #28
-
dagreatmax (11/06/2015) [-] I justhope I can play it for more than 30 minutes, the other fallout games made me nauseous and they were just plain boring, I especially hated when my camera would zoom in and it would show like percentage damage to X body part.
#237 to #92
-
OsamaBinLadenz (11/06/2015) [-] You say that last part as if it happened by accident and wasn't because you pressed the V.A.T.S. button. And even if it were on accident, even on console the game has fully customizable keybinds
#272 to #237
-
dagreatmax (11/06/2015) [-] in games, I don't customize my settings until I feel that it's unbearable to play with default.
#274 to #272
-
OsamaBinLadenz (11/06/2015) [-] To be honest, that kind of goes on you, then, man. It takes less than a minute to change. Kind of pointless to hate a feature that you can play the entire game without using if you wish
#275 to #274
-
dagreatmax (11/06/2015) [-] Well I'm sure you can play without it and beat the game, but that wasn't fully the issue. I also had no intentions of using the VATS mode in the first place.
#277 to #275
-
OsamaBinLadenz (11/06/2015) [-] So just exit out of it, it's only a minor inconvenience, and if you keybind it so you can't accidentally press it, then no more inconveniences in the first place
As long as you know it's not Bethesda's issue to deal with, I can understand disliking the feature.
As long as you know it's not Bethesda's issue to deal with, I can understand disliking the feature.
#278 to #277
-
dagreatmax (11/06/2015) [-] M8, I was nauseous playing the game. Heck I don't even think I played it for 30 minutes, I got like 2 quests in and got really tired of playing it. I had this same feeling when I tried to play Starcraft 1 like a year ago, I got nauseous and stopped.
#280 to #278
-
OsamaBinLadenz (11/06/2015) [-] Fair enough, I wouldn't really care to figure out features for a game I feel nauseous when playing.
#281 to #280
-
russianexplain (11/07/2015) [-] Well generally I prefer to explore the game with default options, unless it's a game that resembles a lot Counter strike, in which case I HAVE to change jump key to mouse wheel up.
#66 to #36
-
ifightdragons (11/06/2015) [-] mgs5 has been the biggest disappointment of the year for me i honestly dont understand how long time fans are okay with it at all. the gameplay was amazing though
#183 to #66
-
lvlonemeepo (11/06/2015) [-] It wasn't a metal gear in my opinion as a metal gear fan. Metal gear 4 and 3 reign supreme to me, metal gear has always been about the story and the depth, there was like 30 seconds of cut scenes in the entire game. I hated that so much.
#260 to #183
-
assdoreponyfucker (11/06/2015) [-] because ******** complained about those long cutscenes so guess what kojima made this game revolve around gameplay
#219 to #66
-
yellowcardraiden (11/06/2015) [-] Long time fans are the ones who are the most dissapointed at metal gear solid v, especially me.
#116 to #36
-
randombro (11/06/2015) [-] I sunk about 90 hours into that game, and as much as I love the gameplay, I feel like the game sort of died 60% of the way through. I haven't even finished the game because I just don't care anymore. The Side Ops quickly became a boring grind, and having to travel across the map to go to each one was ******* annoying. There was only 1 or 2 "subsistence" side ops where they drop you in with nothing but a knife and you have to procure everything you use on site. THAT was ******* cool, but there's like only 2 that I've seen so far which is a ******* bummer. The story is interesting enough but it's just not amazing, or at least not anymore. Maybe the upcoming multiplayer will revive it for me.
#187 to #36
-
lvlonemeepo (11/06/2015) [-] And believe me, Im a metal gear fanboy, just not a hypeboy that only played it for the hype. It almost felt like an arcade game with no campaign at all.
#181 to #36
-
lvlonemeepo (11/06/2015) [-] MGS5 was horrible for me. Gameplay great yeah. It felt quite possibly the farthest from original sequel, any game franchise has ever had.
#37 to #36
-
garymuthafuknoak (11/06/2015) [-] I'm playing MGS3 right now, because I bought MGS5 without ever playing Metal Gear before and it feels pointless with all these good characters and not knowing back story. I already got myself Peace Walker too, just so that I can play all of Naked Snakes story. Idk about the other Metal Gears and their story, but I'm just playing this **** in chronilogical order.
meow
meow
#40 to #38
-
garymuthafuknoak (11/06/2015) [-] I would be doing that right now, but sadly it's not on the PS vita store, just MGS2. I'm playing MGS3D right now though. The collection isn't available at my local vidya game store, but I usually never bother buying games online. Would it be a good idea to watch a MGS1 walk through on youtube?
#186 to #37
-
lvlonemeepo (11/06/2015) [-] MGS3 is better than MGS5 story wise, MGS4 is better than Mgs5 by stretches. Mgs5 was all gameplay and no story, it felt like a portable ops, it should not have been a metal gear solid #.
#62 to #28
-
angryninja (11/06/2015) [-] I am very satisfied with Witcher 3. GTAV on pc is not bad either.
#177 to #175
-
angryninja (11/06/2015) [-]
It is right now IMO. We will find out soon if F4 can claim that title.
#68
-
purdon (11/06/2015) [-] Except Bethesda are doing what every other dickhead publisher are doing, and releasing a season pass.
#101 to #68
-
noonelikesdan (11/06/2015) [-]
Bethesda were one of the first to utilize the season pass and it works for them. You know they're going to make DLC's/Expansions, so why not just buy the season pass and get them all for a reduced price, when theyre released.
#110 to #109
-
noonelikesdan (11/06/2015) [-]
There's only been two DLC's that I didn't think were that great, but I still enjoyed them, Dead Money and Mothership Zeta were easily the worst ones for each game.
#232 to #110
-
thatoneiranianguy (11/06/2015) [-] Story wise I felt that Dead Money was very poignant, then again it did rip off a movie of the same title.
#245 to #232
-
noonelikesdan (11/06/2015) [-]
Story wise it was ok, gameplay and level design wise was highly disappointing.
#261 to #245
-
thatoneiranianguy (11/06/2015) [-] Agreed, it was overtly and unnecessarily tedious, it was so bad that it was one of the few times I actually cheated to speed through most of the running around section.
#235 to #232
-
thatoneiranianguy (11/06/2015) [-] Excuse me, not of the same title, not sure what I was thinking, the movie was The Treasure of the Sierra Madre
#58
-
dennymyman (11/06/2015) [-] This overhyping is getting ridiculous. The game isn't even out yet.
And from the leaks I've seen so far, it looks fine, but it's not going to be anything revolutionary. There will still be bugs, awkward animations, and the dialogue seems pretty bad. Not to mention the retarded AI.
It will probably be fun, but this is going way overboard.
And from the leaks I've seen so far, it looks fine, but it's not going to be anything revolutionary. There will still be bugs, awkward animations, and the dialogue seems pretty bad. Not to mention the retarded AI.
It will probably be fun, but this is going way overboard.
#119 to #58
-
ilikadodachacha ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-]
You are right there will be bugs and the hype is perhaps exaggerated but, the point of this post was game content. Even if there is nothing revolutionary, there will be plenty of exploration and role playing elements and that is what most Bethesda fans look forward to. The vast D.C. ruins, Mojave wastes, and all of Tamriel were full of exploration and I believe that is what makes these games special. That's what makes them worth playing for 100s of hours and what keeps players invested for years. Aside from the few bugs that are to be expected from games with this kind of scope. Bethesda has always treated their buyers well, its refreshing to see them continually push out complete games, with their DLC only adding to the already massive settings and not simply being a way to squeeze dollars out of the customer for content that should have been made available prior to release.
#182 to #125
-
ilikadodachacha ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-]
Yeah anon. I was worried when they introduced weapon crafting as I thought it would usurp the need for unique weapons and armors, but If I remember correctly they are still in the game and weapon crafting is optional. But that's neither here nor there, I don't care if the game isn't "revolutionary" or "ground breaking," or even if the graphics aren't on godly all I could hope for is a solid and fun game. Because all in all isn't that what most people have forgot? That games should be fun?
#100
-
tittylovin (11/06/2015) [-] Oh you poor delusions fools.
I can't wait to hear the collective disappointment you'll all finally be willing to admit a year-and-a-half later.
I can't wait to hear the collective disappointment you'll all finally be willing to admit a year-and-a-half later.
#233
-
Viceroy (11/06/2015) [-] Fallout 4 isn't even out yet and it's already too popular for FunnyJunk's hipsters.
That's just saddening.
That's just saddening.
#126
-
iexs (11/06/2015) [-] Well everyone else is doing it so I guess I better complain about the game.
its overhyped omg
its overhyped omg
#79
-
fiskars (11/06/2015) [-] actually happy about all this hype. maybe you faggots will finally learn your lesson this time. or you'll just eat this piece of **** game up and move on to the next like always. thanks for being the cancer killing the game industry.
#259 to #79
-
assdoreponyfucker (11/06/2015) [-] only two game i pre ordered were not dissapointments. Dark Souls 2 and MGSV:TPP
#264 to #79
-
assdoreponyfucker (11/06/2015) [-] let me rephrase. only two games i have ever pre ordered and neither were dissapointments
#159 to #107
-
kinginthenorth (11/06/2015) [-] That's exactly the point though. By pre-ordering you're practically buying an unfinished game.
#173
-
kolocktos (11/06/2015) [-] >inedible (unplayable) disgusting mess
>visually unappealing
Sounds about right On a serious note, stop hyping the **** out of this game, you'll only ruin it for yourself. Judge its content when you actually play it.
>visually unappealing
Sounds about right On a serious note, stop hyping the **** out of this game, you'll only ruin it for yourself. Judge its content when you actually play it.
#184 to #173
-
trollinggenius ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-] >stating its an unplayable disgusting mess.
>guys dont judge before you play.
>guys dont judge before you play.
#93 to #89
-
kiaserzerg (11/06/2015) [-] yep. but, then agaon, mods. so bethesda lets the community handle it.
#224 to #221
-
holycrapimacupcake (11/06/2015) [-] Yes, but there's enough content in vanilla to justify it.
#283 to #257
-
McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
Fallout 3 had meh density as well. Based on your way of evaluating F4 this should have **** density as well, since F3 did so as well. If that's the wrong way to look at it, why the **** are people hyping up F4.
Dragon Age 2 was **** , even though origins was great. Just because F3 was good doesn't mean F4 will be.
Dragon Age 2 was **** , even though origins was great. Just because F3 was good doesn't mean F4 will be.
#284 to #283
-
holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-] I'm evaluating it based on what I've seen. Densely populated areas, it's a more urban environment. So less mountains to climb around, don't say a game is shut before the game I even a thing.
#287 to #284
-
McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
You've seen jack **** , you've only seen what they wanted you to see. Don't say a game is good until there are actual reviews or videos on it, is what I think. I understand why you'd expect it to be good, but that doesn't mean it will, having a bit of skepticism can help you a lot. Thinking it will be awesome will only make it that much ******** if it happens to not live up to your expectations. F3's saving graces were the mods, the game itself wasn't that good, it was average, and I dont expect F4 to be different.
#289 to #287
-
holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-] You're a glass half empty kind of guy aren't you?
#290 to #289
-
McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
I'll enjoy the game a lot more if I don't expect anything when going in. And I just hate fanboyism, you literally have no evidence pointing to a good game, and yet you act as if It's game of the year already. So far, the info we have on the game points to a mediocre game. To be fair we have little information on it, but people act as if the trailer and the footage was a positive thing. The amount of negatives you can find in them is enormous, but fanboys act like its all good.
I ESPECIALLY hate the ******* who always have the pcmasterrace attitude and then say, "oh, the graphics don't matter, it's fallout" kindly **** off, graphics always matter, it 's your ******* medium of interaction.
And yes, I'd rather be skeptical than to be stupidly and baselessly optimistic.
I ESPECIALLY hate the ******* who always have the pcmasterrace attitude and then say, "oh, the graphics don't matter, it's fallout" kindly **** off, graphics always matter, it 's your ******* medium of interaction.
And yes, I'd rather be skeptical than to be stupidly and baselessly optimistic.
#292 to #290
-
holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-] Also I think the graphics look fine. Could be a tad better, but then again Bethesda likes to focus more on game play than making sure you can see your pores.
#291 to #290
-
holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-] I just have high hopes and so far it's looking good. I mean yeah I am a little worried about a few things, like the story since we have no clue about anything. I mean with Skyrim we knew almost everything when it came out.
#293 to #291
-
McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
Skyrim had a ****** 'story' though.
And compare graphics to ANY new release game and you'll see what I'm talking about.The only hope I have is that they upped the textures at least somewhat from the footage we had before.
The fact they're using the same engine is a BIIIIIIIIIG red flag for me as well. If you can't even put enough resources into your brand game to up your engine, I can't expect anything substantial from other aspects of the game either.
And compare graphics to ANY new release game and you'll see what I'm talking about.The only hope I have is that they upped the textures at least somewhat from the footage we had before.
The fact they're using the same engine is a BIIIIIIIIIG red flag for me as well. If you can't even put enough resources into your brand game to up your engine, I can't expect anything substantial from other aspects of the game either.
#294 to #293
-
holycrapimacupcake (11/08/2015) [-] Buddy, the graphics are fine for me. You may want to see pores, but frankly as long as everything looks nice, I'm fine.
#236 to #231
-
holycrapimacupcake (11/06/2015) [-] Based Howard man, Based Howard. Also mods on console version next year, I'm fins with a Season Pass form Bethesda.
