Evolution According to Fallout

Yes, a very friendly one.

Evolving in broccoli.

Are you implying evolution is not caused by mutation?

mutation is caused by jesus dude.

No, I'm talking about unnatural (And it's clearly shown that the cause is unnatural) and sudden genetic rewrites as mutation

I think he means mutation as in natural evoluationary mutation.

oh hey, It could be a joke!

But Jokes are funny

"I did not find this funny. It must not be funny to anybody!"

Besides the fact that I said nothing like that, it wasn't

it was just The Evolution Of Man, a Mushroom cloud, and 3 seconds of fucking around in Paint

You didn't find it funny. That doesn't somehow mean this wasn't created for humorous purposes.

And to anyone wondering, Fallout 1/2 explained alot about that, there were even mines at the edge of the map at the 2nd Fallout that were bum-fucked with mutants and Enclave corpses had data disks on them, explaining that the F.E.V experiment was being to get out of hand there.

Wasn't there something similar in a few vaults in 3?

Or am I making that up?

I'm sure there was something like that in fallout 3

there was, vault 87 I think

I loved the tales of Herbert 'Daring' Dashwood and his faithful ghoul man servant Argyle!

Too bad argyles DEAD

I beg to differ old chap

Ripping the black widow's heart out.

WHat irked me was that they ended in Rockopolis. I wanted to hear if Herbert climbed that ledge damnit!

Actually in the first fallout ghouls were also the result of F.E.V. Hench why for the most part the large majority were found in necropolis, due to the F.E.V. testing done in that vault.

The Necropolis didn't test F.E.V., the vault doors just never closed on purpose. That was that Vaults' purpose.

Wasn't there F.E.V. involved? I remember a dialogue about how there was some kind of green mist or something like that occasionally being released in the vault before the bombs dropped, I may be wrong though but it just seems so familiar.

I'm not sure. I'm not a big know-it-all about the first few. I know a few facts, but Fallout 3 is where I am strong.

yeah they were test subjects of the enclave

The Enclave didn't exist pre-Fallout. All of the vaults were test subjects of the American government at the time. The Enclave came along after the bombs fell, and therefore after the vaults were set-up.

The Enclave were a shadow organisation during the Old-World era. They were also the ones responsible for the Vault-Tec Vault Experiments as well.

Some of them were from the Enclave at Mariposa (I think), some of them were from F.E.V tests in Pre-War vaults, and the smarter first gen, stupid second gen and the nightkin were all from the Master.

You are not the only one... gl shooting shit!

New Vegas

Because it shows you the product of your actions in 1 and 2, and actually has conflict

Honestly, I wish I could say I liked New Vegas more than I did. But, I honestly didn't find at as good as 1 or 2. Or even 3. Now, of the numbered part of the series, I like 3 the most. But, 1 and 2 aren't far behind.

I really enjoy New Vegas the most, dark, gritty, and I played it first. But I like all of them so much it's hard to decide

FALLOUT 2 IS BEST FALLOUT

Once I started looking at the story,Fallout 3s was a turd. So many plotholes..New Vegas was uch better in terms of the story,most of the way. There needed to be a lot more expansion on some characters(Like Ulysses and Joshua Graham and some of the companions) There was so much room. But the Devs I feel rushed new Vegas to beat the baby of Skyrim.

BOth are amazingly good games(even more so on PC with mods) but they have their highs and lows. Enviroment? Fallout 3 wins by a huge margin. Gameplay? new Vegas. DLCs? A bit of both. I loved the Sierra Madre and Old World Blues.

I honestly hope that they learned and make Fallout 4 the best of both. Strong gameplay and a strong storyline. Something easily done if Obisidan sticks to storyline and Bethseda sticks to the codework.

I've only played 3 and New Vegas. Story-wise, I'd pick 3. I liked it because it was simple, and yet it managed to keep you going as you ventured forth on your quest on finding your father, and ultimately, deciding the fate of Capital Wasteland. However, New Vegas had better weapons in large quantities, more perks and traits to choose from, more levels the more DLC's you have, with the possibility of having a max level cap of 50, while in F3 the max level cap was only 30, and the ability to choose from either siding with House, the NCR, Caesar's Legion, or with none of the aforementioned, and just dominating everything by yourself gave you more choices and more possible endings. It's hard to pick between the two, to be honest.

Oh, and New Vegas has some pretty fucking good DLC's. Old World Blues is my favorite, with Honest Hearts being the least favorite.

3 because i loved every single moment of the game and new vegas was kinda too easy and i never felt for any of the characters

2 because it had the best dialogue and the most memorable characters.

I only played third and new vegas and i liked the third one becauce the map was i think bigger but new vegas had better guns

New Vegas' map was much bigger than 3's.

the invisible walls changed that

It didn't feel big to me :/ had more locations yes but i think one part of the map was cout out by the mountains and other by big ass cazadors