| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
User avatar #24 - legaleliminator (08/11/2012) [-]
ermmmm, i just could be a coincidence. cause, you know, the movie is made from the book. sooooo yeah, this is the dumbest post i've seen yet
User avatar #27 to #24 - gasster (08/11/2012) [-]
yeah i hate it when people try to be funny on a humour site! i want to see more people with their face blown off!
#25 to #24 - bronybox (08/11/2012) [-]
Yeah, but they just HAD TO cast David Tennant.
In this world there are no coincidences, only the inevitable.
User avatar #26 to #25 - legaleliminator (08/11/2012) [-]
well they could have cast him for the part because he is a good actor. david tennant doesn't act anything like the doctor in that movie
#28 to #26 - bronybox (08/11/2012) [-]
It doesn't change the fact that David Tennant is himself and the tent is bigger on the inside. Yes, they cast him because he was a good actor, but it does not change the inevitability of the matter, and should understand that it was not inevitable for the same reasons we think it was.

Just go watch xXxHolic. What I'm saying will make so much more sense.
It's an amazing anime, so you probably won't regret it.
User avatar #47 to #28 - legaleliminator (08/12/2012) [-]
david tennant doesn't even use the tent. there could be some sort of inspiration like JK took the 'bigger on the inside' for the tent from dr. who but i really doubt that they would make the whole movie one big reference to the show.
User avatar #48 to #47 - bronybox (08/12/2012) [-]
Listen, I already got off topic a while ago in my own head, only you are still thinking about the same thing in this argument.
User avatar #49 to #48 - legaleliminator (08/12/2012) [-]
yes and because i live in australia, i went to sleep while that was happening. i just saw my inbox now and decided to tie up loose ends that's all
User avatar #41 to #28 - spener (08/11/2012) [-]
i got the reference. great show
 Friends (0)