So whats the general consensus on BloodBorne? I personally don't like it, i think its one step forward and 2 steps back for fromsoft and the souls style games. Don't give me that "its not a souls game" BS because its the same genre and company using the same basic controls and mechanics. I feel that the guns are more often then not underwhelming and more of a complex hassle then needed, I mean parrying in DS1 and 2 was ******* too easy and needed adjustment but i feel moving to guns was a wrong idea. I also don't like that you are pretty much locked into a dex style build, yeah there is strong slow weapons but they are not complimented well by other things to make them more usable, its like they decided to remove strength build options entirely. The enemies are also weirder in the sense that more often then not i've seen them just randomly decide that the hit that should stun them usually had no stun effect. Story wise i think its alright, wish they focused a bit more on the beasts and less on the Eldritch side, because it feels like the beast are under implemented lore wise and were made more as just place holder **** until you reached the crazy Lovecraft stuff. I honestly think they should have chosen one or the other. I do like some things they did and want them in DS3, like the chalice dungeon system i think its a neat way to get extra **** going. The summoning and PVP revamps are nice and i think spiced up a bit in the good way. As i said earlier i think its a case of one step forward two steps back