| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
#610 to #562
-
comanderspy ONLINE (02/03/2013) [-]
well, you are getting red thumbed because of the way you worded your comment, if it were worded differently, emphasizing more on OP, it would have been successful, but as of now your comment look like shitty whining...
#640 to #569
-
freepaint (06/07/2012) [-]
I never denied there were other minority held theories.I just contend that these other theories are not the prevailing and dominating ideology with WIDELY held scientific circles embracing them.In one of the articles you have a man who supports the belief that human races are distinct and categorized as Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid.
However not only is this concept of race discredited for quite some time now, it is an archaic pseudo intellectual remnant of colonial era imperialist discrimination.The man isn't even a legitimate anthropologist, and his theory holds many deficiencies.Ill entertain the idea that there are alternate locations where humans MAY have evolved of course, it would be too presumptuous for me to embrace any other theory then the Out Of Africa theory since it has maintained a de facto consistency in its evidence for a longer period of time.
In the daily mail link it says that the Out of Africa theory is challenged but I don't think its really discredited.Just because Homo Erectus which is asserted to have came from Africa may have disappeared long before more modern forms of humans were already in Asia doesn't mean that those modern humans weren't descended from other isolated groups of homo Erectus that came from Africa.Where taking about 10s of thousands of years where so much could happen.There are actually fossils of homo erectus that have been found in India,Africa,Spain,Georgia,China etc.And they are OLDER than Homo Sapiens our ancestors.
That other link regarding halo groups and how Africans are the most isolated compared to Europeans and Asians is perfectly understandable.Africans in Africa are known to have the most diverse genes compared to other populations because they stayed in Africa.Europeans and Asians differ more because they adapted, and acclimated themselves to the climate and environment.But this doesn't mean they cant be traced to older haplogroups that essentially came from Africa.Check out the Genographic project.
However not only is this concept of race discredited for quite some time now, it is an archaic pseudo intellectual remnant of colonial era imperialist discrimination.The man isn't even a legitimate anthropologist, and his theory holds many deficiencies.Ill entertain the idea that there are alternate locations where humans MAY have evolved of course, it would be too presumptuous for me to embrace any other theory then the Out Of Africa theory since it has maintained a de facto consistency in its evidence for a longer period of time.
In the daily mail link it says that the Out of Africa theory is challenged but I don't think its really discredited.Just because Homo Erectus which is asserted to have came from Africa may have disappeared long before more modern forms of humans were already in Asia doesn't mean that those modern humans weren't descended from other isolated groups of homo Erectus that came from Africa.Where taking about 10s of thousands of years where so much could happen.There are actually fossils of homo erectus that have been found in India,Africa,Spain,Georgia,China etc.And they are OLDER than Homo Sapiens our ancestors.
That other link regarding halo groups and how Africans are the most isolated compared to Europeans and Asians is perfectly understandable.Africans in Africa are known to have the most diverse genes compared to other populations because they stayed in Africa.Europeans and Asians differ more because they adapted, and acclimated themselves to the climate and environment.But this doesn't mean they cant be traced to older haplogroups that essentially came from Africa.Check out the Genographic project.
Well, okay then. You are pretty smart for that, I'll agree. But it's the same level of job that roughly 70% of sub-Saharan Africans have. Most live in suburbs and are usually in slums due to corrupt super-socialist governments that rape them of any decent living.