| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
#33 - gregiss **User deleted account** (06/09/2012) [-]
its not bad as a stand alone, honestly. a little... uh... unrefined, and silly looking, but if there was no TV series, i doubt people would think its that terrible.
#39 to #33 - zelorazz (06/09/2012) [-]
and has shit acting, shit diologe shit action, everything in slow motion, horrible pacing terrible actors, anti-climatic end some parts made no sense like when the earth benders were in jail and didt fight even thou they were SURROUNDED BY EARTH.
cgi was meh
so if there was no avatar the last airbender cartoon the movie was still bad
#41 to #39 - gregiss **User deleted account** (06/09/2012) [-]
eehhhh... i guess. bad, but not as terrible as we make it out to be. it was a bad movie, but not quite as bad as the cancer we describe it to be.
User avatar #36 to #33 - Turmoil (06/09/2012) [-]
Yes okay but the problem is that there was a TV series, Nick gave them a map and they went the other direction with it.
#38 to #36 - gregiss **User deleted account** (06/09/2012) [-]
aaand made it shit. i agree. but its still a good movie for the population of earth that have not seen avatar. well... not good, but not terrible.
 Friends (0)