FJ is now mobile friendly. Try it out on your mobile browser!
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - remsaman (01/15/2013) [-]
"it offered zero proof for any of its wild claims"
This woman needs to take a long hard look at herself.
#7 to #1 - anonexplains (01/15/2013) [-]
I mean, evolution hasn't been proved, a good theory though. I swear people are just gonna go by what they believe in regardless of what it is, science or religion. Stop acting better than the others, neither of your sides got proof of **** . One side theory's and the other side hears whispers from the sky. **** you all.
#39 to #7 - anonexplains (01/23/2013) [-]
have you heard of MRSA? or ever wondered why the flu shot every year treats a different strain? or why our use of antibacterial handwash is creating stronger bacteria? evolution at work.
User avatar #12 to #7 - thyregod (01/15/2013) [-]
It’s not about acting better than others, it’s about how ignorant some people choose to be, weather they believe in something or not. And that is what the post is about.
User avatar #9 to #7 - remsaman (01/15/2013) [-]
its still a 'theory' because its impossible to go back in time to prove it.
#37 to #9 - destismad (01/21/2013) [-]
It's not a "theory", it's a "scientific theory".

A theory is basically just a synynom for a hypothesis or idea, whilst a scientific theory is an idea which has been repeatedly tested and anaylzed by many scientists in relating fields. Until a great amount of evidence has been compiled for it, it remains a theory of a scientist, and after many scientists of relating fields confirm there findings, it becomes a scientific theory.

Scientific theorys never become or "get upgraded" to facts, they continue to be called scientific theorys, and facts are explained by scientific theorys.
fact ------->scientific theory
Life evolved through natural selection--->Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection
#16 to #9 - dalegendaryjake (01/15/2013) [-]
One thing you forgot my friend.
One thing you forgot my friend.
#25 to #16 - temporalguardian (01/15/2013) [-]
time race?
time race?
User avatar #8 to #7 - remsaman (01/15/2013) [-]
theres more evidence for evolution then creationism.
dont believe me? look it up.
#20 to #8 - anonexplains (01/15/2013) [-]
creationism -the belief that a nomad wise man knew how the world came to be
Evolution - the belief that we can see patterns between all living organisms and see heridetiary traits passed from one generation to another trough genetics
- that evolution must be complete bollocks

I've alays been baffled by one thing though - why don't creationsists rage on the existence of genetics? isn't that also contradictory to the bible?
User avatar #21 to #20 - remsaman (01/15/2013) [-]
because its something they cant deny, because its not a theory.
if it has 'theory' in the name, someones not going to believe it and try to enforce their non-belief.

the bible is full of contradictions. but when people point these out, lots of christians just say 'it was meant as a metaphor'. or some other silly excuse.
User avatar #11 to #8 - VincentKing ONLINE (01/15/2013) [-]
anons acting crazy. How about god created the universe, we evolved. A point and appear thing seems a bit strange
#10 to #8 - anonexplains (01/15/2013) [-]
First and foremost. there is a 2000 character limit so you didn't need to post twice. Second, even if you did go back in time how on earth are you gonna measure evolution? Watching the generations of cave men evolving? Third, yes I've been through high school, evidence isn't evidence as it is more speculation aka a ******* theory. Us as humans who have only been on this planet for a mere spec of the history of the universe and you're gonna go and say this is the answer and we're right, we just don't have time travel to prove it. Get bent faggot.
User avatar #3 to #1 - mrhazzy ONLINE (01/15/2013) [-]
And you assume this person is a woman because...
User avatar #4 to #3 - remsaman (01/15/2013) [-]
because ive been on this site too long and every time i see a post that shows someone complaining about evolution, its usually female(as seen by avatars, name, use of words, etc.)

so im just making a general assumption.

that being said, my point still stands that he or she is a hypocrite. regardless of gender.
User avatar #5 to #4 - mrhazzy ONLINE (01/15/2013) [-]
Agreed, why go to a place of fact and call it fiction, kind of anti-productive,
User avatar #6 to #5 - remsaman (01/15/2013) [-]
creationists. who understands them.
 Friends (0)