No wait, I think I see it. I get the feeling someone's gonna call out "Y is dis on teh athesism channel?" That would be because if you really understa
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

No wait, I think I see it

I get the feeling someone's gonna call out "Y is dis on teh athesism channel?"
That would be because if you really understand this natural phenomenon, and the timeline, it all logically links to abiogenesis, and every deity imagined until the Age of Enlightenment was invented in part to explain creation, life and earth, therefore deserves to be in the channel, also considering the appeal.
If you compare possibilities, the special pleading apologetics for divine explanation versus the natural explanation, and think they're equal in chance, please discuss below.

Tags: Not | Pokemon
Going left to right can you point to the exact place that the color
stops being blue and becomes red?
This is how it is with evolution. You can' t point to one generation
where a mother gives birth to a child of a different species.
For most species it is a gradual change over thousands of years.
All species are transitional.
There is no "Missing Link", only points on a continuum.
This image is public domain. Free to copy 3: distribute. Lama ttet M society
Views: 13216
Favorited: 22
Submitted: 10/22/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to robinwilliamson Subscribe to atheism E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend



Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #24 - youarejustsocute (10/22/2013) [-]
> Be me
>see this post
>think, "I don't get it, the whole background is like a dark gray."
>remember that I am colorblind
>cry internally
User avatar #12 - whereistherumgone (10/22/2013) [+] (15 replies)
This is a ****** example; blue isn't next to red.
User avatar #14 to #12 - robinwilliamson (10/22/2013) [-]
It's just a color shift between primary colors.
#8 - cotterj (10/22/2013) [-]
Blue never becomes red because there's purple in the middle. WHERE'S THE PURPLE SCIENCE? WHERE'S THE PURPLE?   
Gif unrelated with love
Blue never becomes red because there's purple in the middle. WHERE'S THE PURPLE SCIENCE? WHERE'S THE PURPLE?
Gif unrelated with love
#3 - ubbashnubba (10/22/2013) [+] (12 replies)
Sounds good, the problem is that Evolution cannot be proven for this very reason. While there is a large amount of fossil evidence, this evidence is puny compared to what there should be, or compared to what would be necessary to prove Evolution beyond a reasonable doubt.
User avatar #4 to #3 - billybong (10/22/2013) [-]
"not as many fossils as what I think/was told should be there, therefore it's reasonable to doubt"

Did I miss something, or did you basically state the above?

There couldn't be ANY ancient fossils, if the theory evolution wasn't correct
#52 - demandsgayversion (10/23/2013) [-]
This graph was taken very much out of context. Here is the original version, very scientific graph on evolution, published in many journals.
User avatar #42 - addictakilla (10/23/2013) [+] (2 replies)
>stops being blue and becomes red
>goes from blue to purple to red
**** you
#41 - xsist (10/23/2013) [+] (1 reply)
#51 - thebigcountry (10/23/2013) [+] (2 replies)
>Be me
>Be Catholic
>Don't care if others are religious
>opinions and **** . People can have them
>see this post
>dont have a clue what it means
>go to kitchen
>make hot chocolate
>pour it into mug
>return to post
>it's talking about colors
>make greentext comment
>MFW I'm colorblind
User avatar #64 - bladeguy (11/30/2013) [+] (1 reply)
hmm i dont know? maybe the last ******* bar on the right is red and the only red? blue becomes indigo then purple then pink then red orange then red at the end. every different seperation is a different color so **** your **** .
User avatar #65 to #64 - robinwilliamson (12/02/2013) [-]
You really missed the point hoss. Looking at it way wrong, it's a damn metaphor. When someone says "Wow, it was hell out there!", you don't say "No it's not, only bad people are in hell and there's good people out there.", because that's not the point.
Point A changes and changes and changes and goes through a mixing stage and reaches what is called point B.
User avatar #49 - patrickmiller (10/23/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Dude it goes purple first , there are three colors there and I can point here it goes from Blue to Purple to Red but there simply is no transition from blue to red. You have to stop asking impossible questions to prove point to people who already agree ith you.
User avatar #21 - mayormilkman (10/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Preach it to the choir, man!
User avatar #1 - dunsparcee (10/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
i can def see it
User avatar #67 - KINGOFTHESTARS (01/20/2014) [+] (1 reply)
b-b-but havent they found missing links to other stuff? or am i wrong on that?
#37 - kanedam (10/23/2013) [+] (1 reply)
isn't exactly that the problem... that there are way too many nuances in between missing to say there is a gradual change...?

(just asking, not want to start a science vs religion discussion. the question is meant purely scientific)
User avatar #35 - ihaveakeyboard (10/23/2013) [-]
I actually feel like it changes in two or three spots
#34 - themonkeyfrompluto (10/23/2013) [-]
I like cookies.
Yea... discussing this **** never works out so I better say something different.
User avatar #32 - theguyinthemask (10/23/2013) [-]
So if I point out that spot a little bit to the left of the middle of the picture you won't get angry at me.
#30 - Womens Study Major (10/23/2013) [-]
technically atheism means the lack in belief of god so technically Buddhists are atheists
User avatar #7 - missraven (10/22/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Okay, I'm pretty sure I'm wrong, but wouldn't it generally be directly in the center of the picture?
I know, I'm dumb, somebody please tell me why I'm wrong. (No sarcasm ps.)
#5 - schnizel (10/22/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)