| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
-
Famous author - It all makes sense
- Women need to know
- Flower Mail
- it all makes sense
- Holocaust in a nuts-
- 9000
- The ABC's of EA
- #Twerk4Fr-
- Party hard
- DBZ Time Logic
- only letters, numbe-
- Tumblr
- Of all the shit I'v-
- Fierce cat attack
- Pokemon Fusion Comp.
- Title
- This repost is wort-
- Nicklace sparx
- Code Lyoko
#1013 to #1011
-
noblexfenrir ONLINE (08/12/2012) [-] Do you believe in a god? I'm not asking if you are saying "I don't know", if you do not believe, you are an atheist. It's very simple.
And we don't know exactly how the universe runs, RELIGION claims that, science says "We don't know, let's find out". The reason we refute the existence of a god is because it is a claim by theists, which they cannot prove.
And we don't know exactly how the universe runs, RELIGION claims that, science says "We don't know, let's find out". The reason we refute the existence of a god is because it is a claim by theists, which they cannot prove.
#1014 to #1013
-
jewfrosdsd (08/12/2012) [-]
I think of this question as a box. if there is an item inside the box that you cannot see in, then god exists. But if there is no object then god doesn't exist. That box will NEVER open and for people saying that god exists or doesn't exist are fucking retards yelling at the box saying HERP DERP THERES A COIN IN DER. NOPE HERP DERP THERE IS NO COIN IN THER.
#1016 to #1014
-
noblexfenrir ONLINE (08/12/2012) [-] Actually I've gone over this many times with other people, you are using the Schrodinger's cat experiment to say there is a possibility of god which is very very flawed.
In Schrodinger's cat, both options (alive or dead) are equally plausible within the probability of the space provided.
However, a god is impossible to have a possibility through probability because he is given the wonderful attribute of creating the defined space. This means, that the only way for god to exist is if he exists, which means absolute evidence IS ABSOLUTELY REQUIRED to determine existence.
In Schrodinger's cat, both options (alive or dead) are equally plausible within the probability of the space provided.
However, a god is impossible to have a possibility through probability because he is given the wonderful attribute of creating the defined space. This means, that the only way for god to exist is if he exists, which means absolute evidence IS ABSOLUTELY REQUIRED to determine existence.
#1031 to #1029
-
noblexfenrir ONLINE (08/13/2012) [-] Like I said though, agnostic isn't a thing. There is theist and atheist. If you do not believe in god then you are an atheist. That doesn't mean you believe in anything science says, it just means: I refute the existence of god with the evidence given to me, if new evidence is given my opinion can change.
#1068 to #1066
-
noblexfenrir ONLINE (08/14/2012) [-] ..................THAT MEANS YOU'RE AN ATHEIST.
You don't believe in god because there isn't strong enough evidence, which means you are an atheist. Atheism isn't making a claim thus it doesn't require evidence. Please don't tell me you're one of those retards who thinks "You need to show me evidence god DOESN'T exist." because that is fucking retarded.
You don't believe in god because there isn't strong enough evidence, which means you are an atheist. Atheism isn't making a claim thus it doesn't require evidence. Please don't tell me you're one of those retards who thinks "You need to show me evidence god DOESN'T exist." because that is fucking retarded.
